Clinical Roles in the Medical Communications Centre: A Rapid Scoping Review.

In recent years, 911 call volumes have increased, and emergency medical services (EMS) are routinely stretched beyond capacity. To better match resources with patient needs, some EMS systems have integrated clinician roles into the emergency medical communications centre (MCC). Our objective was to explore the nature and scope of clinical roles in emergency MCCs. Using a rapid scoping review methodology, we searched PubMed for studies related to any clinical role employed within an emergency MCC. We accepted reviews, experimental and observational designs, as well as expert opinions. Studies reporting on dispatcher recognition and pre-arrival instructions were excluded. Title and abstract screening were conducted by a single reviewer, included studies were verified by two reviewers, and data extraction was completed in duplicate, all using Covidence review software. The level of evidence was assessed using the prehospital evidence-based practice (PEP) scale. The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/NX4T8).  Our search yielded 1071 titles, and four were added from other sources; 44 studies were reviewed at the full-text stage and 31 were included. The included studies were published from 2002 to 2022 and represent 17 countries. Studies meeting inclusion criteria consisted of level I (n=4, 11%), II (n=13, 37%), and III (N=6, 17%) methodologies, as well as 12 other studies (34%) with qualitative or other designs. Most of the included studies reported systems that employ nurses in the MCC (n=29, 83%). Twelve (34%) studies reported on the inclusion of paramedics in the MCC, and five (14%) reported physician involvement. The roles of these clinicians chiefly consisted of triage (n=25, 71%), advice (n=20, 57%), referral to non-emergency care (n=14, 40%), and peer-to-peer consulting (n=2, 4%). Alternative dispositions (as opposed to emergency ambulance transport) for low acuity callers included self-care, as well as referral to a general practitioner, pharmacist, or other outreach programs. There is a wide range of literature reporting on clinical roles integrated within MCCs. Our findings revealed that MCC nurses, physicians, and paramedics assist substantively with triage, advice, and referrals to better match resources to patient needs, with or without the requirement for ambulance dispatch.

Predictors of Urgent Dialysis Following Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department in Patients Treated With Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Background: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis frequently require ambulance transport to the emergency department (ambulance-ED transport). Identifying predictors of outcomes after ambulance-ED transport, especially the need for timely dialysis, is important to health care providers. Objective: The purpose of this study was to derive a risk-prediction model for urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED transport. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting and Patients: All ambulance-ED transports among incident and prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis affiliated with a regional dialysis program (catchment area of approximately 750 000 individuals) from 2014 to 2018. Measurements: Patients' vital signs (systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and heart rate) at the time of paramedic transport and time since last dialysis were utilized as predictors for the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was urgent dialysis (defined as dialysis in a monitored setting within 24 hours of ED arrival or dialysis within 24 hours with the first ED patient blood potassium level >6.5 mmol/L) for an unscheduled indication. Secondary outcomes included, hospitalization, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Methods: A logistic regression model to predict outcomes of urgent dialysis. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using the C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Among 878 ED visits, 63 (7.2%) required urgent dialysis. Hypoxemia (odds ratio [OR]: 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.75-9.33) and time from last dialysis of 24 to 48 hours (OR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.05-11.9) and >48 hours (OR: 9.22, 95% CI: 3.37-25.23) were strongly associated with urgent dialysis. A risk-prediction model incorporating patients' vital signs and time from last dialysis had good discrimination (C-statistic 0.8217) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit P value .8899). Urgent dialysis patients were more likely to be hospitalized (63% vs 34%), but there were no differences in inpatient mortality or length of stay. Limitations: Missing data, requires external validation. Conclusion: We derived a risk-prediction model for urgent dialysis that may better guide appropriate transport and care for patients requiring ambulance-ED transport.

Contexte: Les patients sous hémodialyse chronique doivent souvent être transportés au service des urgences par ambulance (transport ambulance-SU). Il est important pour les prestataires de soins de santé que l'on détermine les facteurs prédictifs des résultats après un transport ambulance-SU, en particulier le besoin de dialyze d'urgence. Objectifs: Cette étude visait à établir un modèle de prédiction du risque pour une dialyze d'urgence après un transport ambulance-SU. Type d'étude: Étude de cohorte observationnelle. Participants et cadre de l'étude: Tous les transports ambulance-SU de patients incidents et prévalents recevant une hémodialyse chronique affiliée à un program régional de dialyze (zone desservant environ 750 000 personnes) entre 2014 et 2018. Prédicteurs: Les signes vitaux du patient (pression artérielle systolique, saturation en oxygène, fréquence respiratoire et fréquence cardiaque) au moment du transport par ambulance et le temps écoulé depuis la dernière dialyze. Résultats: La dialyze d'urgence (définie comme une dialyze en environnement monitoré dans les 24 heures suivant l'arrivée aux urgences ou une dialyze dans les 24 heures avec une première mesure du taux de potassium sanguin aux urgences supérieure à 6,5 mmol/L) pour une indication non programmée. Résultats secondaires: hospitalization, durée du séjour à l'hôpital et mortalité à l'hôpital. Méthodologie: Un modèle de régression logistique a servi à prédire le résultat de dialyze d'urgence. La discrimination et la calibration ont été évalués à l'aide de la statistique C et du test Hosmer-Lemeshow. Résultats: Parmi les 878 visites aux urgences, 63 (7,2 %) ont nécessité une dialyze d'urgence. L'hypoxémie (rapport de cote [RC]: 4,04; IC à 95 %: 1,75-9,33) et des périodes de 24 à 48 heures (RC: 3,43; IC à 95 %: 1,05-11,9) et de plus de 48 heures (RC: 9,22; IC à 95 %: 3,37-25,23) depuis la dernière dialyze sont les facteurs qui ont été les plus fortement associés à une dialyze d'urgence. Un modèle de prédiction du risque intégrant les signes vitaux du patient et le temps depuis la dernière dialyze a présenté une bonne discrimination (statistique C: 0,8217) et une bonne calibration (qualité de l'ajustement selon Hosmer-Lemeshow: P =,8899). Les patients qui avaient reçu une dialyze d'urgence étaient plus susceptibles d'être hospitalisés (63% contre 34%), mais aucune différence n'a été observée pour le taux de mortalité ou la durée du séjour en milieu hospitalier. Limites: Données manquantes, validation externe requise. Conclusion: Nous avons dérivé un modèle de prédiction du risque de dialyze d'urgence susceptible de mieux guider le transport et les soins appropriés pour les patients nécessitant un transport ambulance-SU.

Potential Candidates for Emergency Department Initiated Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) in a Canadian Institution.

Introduction Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients experience poor survival. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a form of heart-lung bypass, in the setting of cardiac arrest, termed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has promise in improving survival with good neurologic outcomes. The study objective was to determine the number of potential annual ECPR candidates among the OHCA population in a health region within the Atlantic Canadian province of Nova Scotia. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted over a five-year period: January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2016. Consecutive non-traumatic OHCA and emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests occurring in a pre-determined catchment area (20-minute transport to ECMO center) defined by a geographic bounding box were identified. Criteria for ECPR were developed to identify candidates for activation of a "Code ECPR": (1) age 16-70, (2) witnessed arrest, (3) no flow duration (time to CPR, including bystander) <10 minutes, (4) resuscitation >10 minutes without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), (5) emergency medical service (EMS) transport to hospital <20 minutes, (6) no patient factors precluding ongoing resuscitation (do not resuscitate status (DNR), palliative care involvement, or metastatic cancer), and (7) initial rhythm not asystole. Candidates were stratified by initial rhythm. Candidates were considered ultimately ED ECPR eligible if they failed conventional treatment, defined by death or resuscitation >30 minutes. Clinical data related to candidacy was extracted by an electronic query from prehospital and ED electronic records and manual chart review by three researchers. Results Our search yielded 561 cases of EMS-treated OHCA or in-ED arrests. Of those 204/561 (36%; 95% CI 33-40%) met the criteria for activation of a "Code ECPR". Ultimately 79/204 (34%; 95% CI 28-41%) of those who met activation criteria were considered ED ECPR eligible; which is 14% (95% CI 11-17%) of the total number of arrests-of the total number of arrests, the initial rhythms were pulseless electrical activity (PEA) 33/79 (42%; 95% CI 32-53%) and shockable 46/79 (58%; 95% CI 47-69%). Conclusion Of all cardiac arrests in the area surrounding our ECMO center, approximately 41 per year met the criteria for a Code ECPR activation, with 16 per year ultimately being eligible for ED ECPR. This annual estimate varies based on the inclusion of initial rhythm. This provides insight into both prehospital and hospital implications of an ED ECPR program and will help guide the establishment of a program within our Nova Scotian health region. This study also provides a framework for similar investigation at other institutions contemplating ED ECPR program implementation.

Predictors of Hyperkalemia among Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis Transported to the Emergency Department by Ambulance.

Background: Hyperkalemia is common among patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with mortality. We hypothesized that clinical characteristics available at time of paramedic assessment before emergency department (ED) ambulance transport (ambulance-ED) would associate with severe hyperkalemia (K≥6 mmol/L). Rapid identification of patients who are at risk for hyperkalemia and thereby hyperkalemia-associated complications may allow paramedics to intervene in a timely fashion, including directing emergency transport to dialysis-capable facilities. Methods: Patients on maintenance HD from a single paramedic provider region, who had at least one ambulance-ED and subsequent ED potassium from 2014 to 2018, were examined using multivariable logistic regression to create risk prediction models inclusive of prehospital vital signs, days from last dialysis, and the presence of prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG) features of hyperkalemia. We used bootstrapping with replacement to validate each model internally, and performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. Results: Among 704 ambulance-ED visits, severe hyperkalemia occurred in 75 (11%); 26 patients with ED hyperkalemia did not have a prehospital ECG. Younger age at transport, longer HD vintage, more days from last hemodialysis session (OR=49.84; 95% CI, 7.72 to 321.77 for ≥3 days versus HD the same day [before] ED transport), and prehospital ECG changes (OR=6.64; 95% CI, 2.31 to 19.12) were independently associated with severe ED hyperkalemia. A model incorporating these factors had good discrimination (c-statistic 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.89) and, using a cutoff of 25% probability, correctly classified patients 89% of the time. Conclusions: Characteristics available at the time of ambulance-ED were associated with severe ED hyperkalemia. An awareness of these associations may allow health care providers to define novel care pathways to ensure timely diagnosis and management of hyperkalemia.

Dextrose 50% versus Dextrose 10% or Dextrose Titration for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Hypoglycemia: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Paramedics commonly administer intravenous (IV) dextrose to severely hypoglycemic patients. Typically, the treatment provided is a 25g ampule of 50% dextrose (D50). This dose of D50 is meant to ensure a return to consciousness. However, this dose may cause harm and lead to difficulties regulating blood glucose levels (BGLs) post-treatment. It is hypothesized that a lower concentration, such as 10% dextrose (D10), may improve symptoms while minimizing harm. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched on September 15, 2020. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. GRADE and risk of bias were applied to determine the certainty of the evidence. Primary literature investigating the use of IV dextrose in hypoglycemic diabetic patients presenting to paramedics or the emergency department was included. Outcomes of interest included safety, efficacy (symptom resolution), and BGL. RESULTS: Of 680 abstracts screened, 51 full-text articles were reviewed, with eleven studies included. Data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight observational studies were analyzed. A single RCT comparing D10 to D50 was identified. The primary significant finding of the study was an increased post-treatment glycemic profile by 3.2mmol/L in the D50 group; no other outcomes had significant differences between groups. When comparing pooled data from all the included studies, there was greater symptom resolution in the D10 group (95.9%) compared to the D50 group (88.8%). However, the mean time to resolution was approximately four minutes longer in the D10 group (4.1 minutes [D50] versus 8.0 minutes [D10]). There was a greater need for subsequent doses with the use of D10 (19.5%) compared to D50 (8.1%). The post-treatment glycemic profile was lower in the D10 group at 6.2mmol/L versus 8.5mmol/L in the D50 group. Both treatments had nearly complete resolution of hypoglycemia: 98.7% (D50) and 99.2% (D10). No adverse events were observed in the D10 group (0/1057) compared to 13/310 adverse events in the D50 group. CONCLUSION: Studies show D10 may be as effective as D50 at resolving symptoms and correcting hypoglycemia. Although the desired effect can take several minutes longer, there appear to be fewer adverse events. The post-D10-treatment BGL may result in fewer untoward hyperglycemic episodes.

Control of Severe, Life-Threatening External Bleeding in the Out-of-Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Trauma, with resultant bleeding, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world; however, the best possible method of bleeding control by immediate responders is unknown. We performed a systematic review of the effectiveness of treatment modalities for severe, life-threatening external bleeding in the out-of-hospital first aid setting. Methods: We followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions methodology and report results according to PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparative studies and case series investigating adults and children with severe, life-threatening external bleeding who were treated with therapies potentially suitable for first aid providers. We assessed the certainty of the evidence and risk of bias. Outcomes were prioritized by first aid specialists based on importance for patients and decision-makers and included mortality due to bleeding, all-cause mortality, cessation of bleeding, time to cessation of bleeding, a decrease in bleeding, and complications/adverse effects. Results were reported in Evidence Profiles. Results: Of the 1,051 full-text articles screened, 107 were included for analysis including 22,798 patients. The primary methods of bleeding control were tourniquets (n = 49), hemostatic dressings (n = 34), hemostatic devices (n = 14), pressure dressings/bandages/devices (n = 8), pressure points (n = 4), including 2 studies that reported multiple hemorrhage control methods. Overall, certainty of evidence was very low and often relied on indirect evidence and poorly controlled studies. Tourniquets were associated with a decrease in mortality when compared with direct manual pressure. Hemostatic dressings resulted in a shorter time to hemostasis than direct manual pressure using standard dressings. Direct manual compression resulted in a shorter time to hemostasis than pressure dressings/devices. Conclusion: Overall, data regarding the control of life-threatening bleeding is of very low certainty, making it difficult to draw robust conclusions for treatment by immediate responders. While more robust data is needed on first aid treatments of life-threatening bleeding, this systematic review aggregates the most comprehensive to date to help guide recommendations. Key words: bleeding; hemorrhage; tourniquet; hemostatic dressing; direct pressure.

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations.

This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's 2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the topics of first aid methods of glucose administration for hypoglycemia; techniques for cooling of exertional hyperthermia and heatstroke; recognition of acute stroke; the use of supplementary oxygen in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life- threatening bleeding through the use of tourniquets, haemostatic dressings, direct pressure, or pressure devices; the use of a compression wrap for closed extremity joint injuries; and temporary storage of an avulsed tooth. Additional summaries of scoping reviews are presented for the use of a recovery position, recognition of a concussion, and 6 other first aid topics. The First Aid Task Force has assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of evidence on the basis of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and present their consensus treatment recommendations with evidence-to-decision highlights and identified priority knowledge gaps for future research. The 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) is the fourth in a series of annual summary publications from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This 2020 CoSTR for first aid includes new topics addressed by systematic reviews performed within the past 12 months. It also includes updates of the first aid treatment recommendations published from 2010 through 2019 that are based on additional evidence evaluations and updates. As a result, this 2020 CoSTR for first aid represents the most comprehensive update since 2010.

2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations.

This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's 2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the topics of first aid methods of glucose administration for hypoglycemia; techniques for cooling of exertional hyperthermia and heatstroke; recognition of acute stroke; the use of supplementary oxygen in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life-threatening bleeding through the use of tourniquets, hemostatic dressings, direct pressure, or pressure devices; the use of a compression wrap for closed extremity joint injuries; and temporary storage of an avulsed tooth. Additional summaries of scoping reviews are presented for the use of a recovery position, recognition of a concussion, and 6 other first aid topics. The First Aid Task Force has assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of evidence on the basis of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and present their consensus treatment recommendations with evidence-to-decision highlights and identified priority knowledge gaps for future research.

Outcomes of a Provincial Myocardial Infarction Reperfusion Strategy: A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinolysis is an acceptable treatment for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cannot be performed within 120 minutes. The American Heart Association has recommended Emergency Medical Services (EMS) interventions such as prehospital fibrinolysis (PHF), prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG), and hospital bypass direct to PCI center. Nova Scotia, Canada has incorporated these interventions into a unique province-wide approach to STEMI care. A retrospective cohort analysis comparing the primary outcome of 30-day mortality for patients receiving either prehospital or emergency department (ED) fibrinolysis (EDF) to patients transported directly by EMS from community or regional ED for primary PCI was conducted. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included all STEMI patients in Nova Scotia who survived to hospital admission from July 2011 through July 2013. Three provincial databases were used to collect demographic, 30-day mortality, hospital readmission, and rescue PCI data. The results were grouped and compared according to reperfusion strategy received: PHF, EDF, patients brought by ambulance via EMS direct to PCI (EMS to PCI), and ED to PCI (ED to PCI). RESULTS: There were 1,071 STEMI patients included with 145 PHF, 606 EDF, 98 EMS to PCI, and 222 ED to PCI. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality across groups (n, %): PHF 5(3); EDF 36(6); EHS to PCI <5(2); and ED to PCI 10(4); P = .28. There was no significant difference in patients receiving fibrinolysis who underwent rescue PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital fibrinolysis incorporated into a province-wide approach to STEMI treatment is feasible with no observed difference in patient 30-day mortality outcomes observed.

Early or First Aid Administration Versus Late or In-hospital Administration of Aspirin for Non-traumatic Adult Chest Pain: A Systematic Review.

Chest pain is a common symptom of acute coronary syndrome, including myocardial infarction (MI). Treatment with antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin, improves survival, although the ideal dose is uncertain. It is unknown if outcomes can be improved by giving aspirin early in the course of MI as part of the first-aid management as opposed to late or in-hospital administration. We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases and used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for determining the certainty of evidence. We included studies in adults with non-traumatic chest pain, where aspirin was administered early (within two hours) following the onset of chest pain as part of first-aid management as compared with late or in-hospital administration (The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CDR153316). From 1470 references, we included three studies (one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and two non-RCTs). Early administration (median 1.6 hours or pre-hospital) was associated with increased survival as compared with late administration (median 3.5 hours or in-hospital) at seven days; risk ratio (RR) 1.04 (95% CI 1.03-1.06), 30 days RR 1.05 (95% 1.02-1.07), and one-year RR 1.06 (95% CI1.03-1.10). The evidence is of very low certainty due to limitations in study design and the imprecision of the evidence. This systematic review would suggest that the early or first-aid administration of aspirin to adults with non-traumatic chest pain improves survival as compared with late or in-hospital administration.

2019 American Heart Association and American Red Cross Focused Update for First Aid: Presyncope: An Update to the American Heart Association and American Red Cross Guidelines for First Aid.

This 2019 focused update to the American Heart Association and American Red Cross first aid guidelines follows the completion of a systematic review of treatments for presyncope of vasovagal or orthostatic origin. This review was commissioned by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and resulted in the development of an international summary statement of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation First Aid Task Force Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations. This focused update highlights the evidence supporting specific interventions for presyncope of orthostatic or vasovagal origin and recommends the use of physical counterpressure maneuvers. These maneuvers include the contraction of muscles of the body such as the legs, arms, abdomen, or neck, with the goal of elevating blood pressure and alleviating symptoms. Although lower-body counterpressure maneuvers are favored over upper-body counterpressure maneuvers, multiple methods can be beneficial, depending on the situation.

Optimizing Ambulance Transport of Hemodialysis Patients to the Emergency Department: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis patients who require ambulance transport to the emergency department ("ambulance-ED") may subsequently require timely dialysis in a monitored setting ("urgent dialysis"). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop and internally validate a risk prediction model for urgent dialysis based on patient characteristics at the time of paramedic assessment before ambulance-ED. DESIGN: Cohort Study. SETTING: Region of Nova Scotia, Canada, covered by a single emergency medical services provider. PATIENTS: Thrice-weekly hemodialysis patients who initiated dialysis between 2009 and 2013 (follow-up to 2015) and experienced one or more ambulance-ED events. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome ("urgent dialysis") was defined as dialysis within 24 hours of an ambulance-ED in a monitored setting or dialysis within 24 hours of an ambulance-ED with an initial ED potassium of >6.5 mmol/L. Predictors of urgent dialysis based on paramedic assessment before ambulance-ED included presenting complaint, vital signs and time from last dialysis to ambulance dispatch. METHODS: Associations with urgent dialysis were analyzed using logistic regression from which a risk prediction model was created. The model was internally validated using bootstrapping and model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Among 197 patients, there were 624 ambulance-ED events and 87 episodes of urgent dialysis. Weakness as a presenting complaint (odds ratio [OR]: 4.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-17.29), >24 hours since last dialysis (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.15-3.81), and vital signs, including heart rate <60 beats/minute (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.09-8.61), oxygen saturation <90% (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.55-5.94), elevated respiratory rate (≥20 breaths/min), and systolic blood pressure>160 mmHg, were associated with urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED. A risk prediction model incorporating these variables had very good discrimination (C-statistic: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.86). The negative predictive value was 93.6% using the optimal cut point. Of patients who were predicted to need urgent dialysis but were transported to a facility incapable of providing it, 31% were re-transported for urgent dialysis. LIMITATIONS: Findings of our study may not be generalizable to other centers where the practice of ambulance transfer and availability of monitored dialysis may differ, and data were lacking for potential missed dialysis sessions or changes in routine dialysis scheduling. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics at the time of paramedic assessment are associated with urgent dialysis after ambulance-ED. This risk prediction model has the potential to guide dialysis patient transport to dialysis-capable facilities when needed.

CONTEXTE: Les patients dialysés transportés à l'urgence en ambulance (« transports en ambulance ¼) pourraient par la suite nécessiter une dialyse urgente dans un environnement monitoré (« dialyse d'urgence ¼). OBJECTIFS: On visait à élaborer et à valider à l'interne un modèle de prédiction du risque pour une dialyse d'urgence basé sur les caractéristiques des patients recueillies par les ambulanciers pendant le transport. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte. CADRE: Une région de la Nouvelle-Écosse (Canada) desservie par un seul établissement fournissant des soins médicaux d'urgence. SUJETS: Des patients hémodialysés trois fois par semaine ayant amorcé leur traitement entre 2009 et 2013 (suivi jusqu'en 2015) et ayant été transportés au moins une fois à l'urgence en ambulance. MESURES: Le critère de jugement principal (« dialyse d'urgence ¼) a été défini par une dialyse amorcée dans un environnement monitoré dans les 24 heures suivant l'arrivée en ambulance, ou par une dialyse amorcée dans les 24 heures suivant l'arrivée en ambulance et en présence d'un taux de potassium supérieur à 6,5 mmol/L. Les plaintes formulées par le patient, les signes vitaux et le temps entre la dernière dialyse et l'envoi de l'ambulance ont constitué les facteurs prédictifs d'une dialyse d'urgence s'appuyant sur l'évaluation des ambulanciers. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La régression logistique a été utilisée pour analyser les associations avec une dialyse urgente et cette analyse a servi à la création d'un modèle de prédiction du risque. Ce dernier a été validé à l'interne par la méthode du bootstrapping, et sa performance a été confirmée par discrimination et calibration. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 197 patients recrutés, 624 transports en ambulance et 87 épisodes de dialyse urgente ont été répertoriés. Une dialyse urgente après un transport en ambulance a été justifiée par les facteurs suivants: des plaintes de faiblesse générale (RC: 4,62; IC 95 %: 1,23-17,29), une période de plus de 24 heures depuis la dernière dialyse (RC: 2,09; IC 95 %: 1,15-3,81) et les signes vitaux (notamment une fréquence cardiaque <60 battements/minute [RC: 3,06; IC 95 %: 1,09-8,61], une saturation en oxygène <90 % [RC: 3,04; IC 95 %: 1,55 − 5,94], une fréquence respiratoire élevée [≥20 respirations/min] et une pression artérielle systolique >160 mmHg). Un modèle de prédiction du risque incorporant ces variables a montré une bonne discrimination (statistique c: 0,81; IC 95 %: 0,76-0,86). Le coefficient de prévision d'un test négatif s'est établi à 93,6 % en utilisant un seuil optimal. Parmi les patients pour qui on avait prévu qu'ils nécessiteraient une dialyse urgente, mais qui avaient été transportés dans un établissement n'étant pas en mesure de la fournir, 31 % ont dû être transportés à nouveau pour une dialyse urgente. LIMITES: Ces résultats pourraient ne pas être généralisables aux établissements où diffèrent les pratiques de transfert par ambulance et la disponibilité de la dialyse urgente en environnement monitoré. De plus, des données quant aux séances de dialyse manquées ou aux changements apportés dans la routine de la dialyse étaient non disponibles. CONCLUSION: Certaines caractéristiques des patients, recueillies par les ambulanciers pendant le transport à l'hôpital, ont été associées au besoin de procéder à une dialyse urgente après un transport en ambulance. Ce modèle de prédiction du risque pourrait, lorsque nécessaire, guider le transport en ambulance des patients dialysés vers des établissements en mesure de les prendre en charge.

State of the Evidence for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Care: The Evolution and Current Methodology of the Prehospital Evidence-Based Practice (PEP) Program.

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) leaders and clinicians need to incorporate evidence into safe and effective clinical practice. Access to high-quality evidence, and the time to synthesize it, can be barriers to evidence-based practice. The Prehospital Evidence-Based Practice (PEP) program is an online, freely accessible, repository of critically appraised evidence specific to EMS. This paper describes the evolution and current methodology of the PEP program. Methods|design: The purpose of PEP is to identify, catalog and critically appraise relevant studies. Following regular systematic searches, two trained appraisers critically appraise included studies and assign a score on three-point level of evidence (LOE) and direction of evidence (DOE) scales. Each clinical intervention is plotted on a 3 × 3 (LOE × DOE) evidence matrix, which provides a summary recommendation. Discussion: The PEP program is a unique knowledge translation tool, specific to EMS. End-users can easily identify which clinical interventions are, or are not, supported by evidence.

Burden of Emergency Medical Services Usage by Dialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving chronic dialysis often require emergent and inpatient care; however, only a minimal amount is known about their out-of-hospital/inter-hospital use of Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The purpose of this study was to describe the utilization of EMS in a cohort of dialysis patients. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of adult (≥18 years) chronic dialysis patients within the Nova Scotia Health Authority Central Zone Renal Program who initiated chronic dialysis between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2013 (last follow up July 1, 2015). Dialysis patient data was linked to regional EMS data. Requests for EMS, including encounter type, day of the week, and patient characteristics were described. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 468 patients of whom 79% (N = 361) had an EMS encounter. There were a total of 8,774 EMS encounters for the entire cohort. Patients who had an EMS encounter tended to be older (64 ± 14 years), compared to those without an encounter (55 ± 16 years, P < 0.001) and also had a higher burden of comorbidity. Transfers (including those between facilities) accounted for 89% of all encounters (N = 7,826), followed by emergency department (ED) transports (N = 749, 9%). Overall, 79% of all non-transfers underwent transport to the ED. For patients receiving thrice weekly in-center hemodialysis, the highest EMS utilization for ED transport occurred on the first hemodialysis day after the long dialysis break (22%, P < 0.01). The lowest proportion of ED transports occurred on the day after hemodialysis day 3. CONCLUSION: Utilization of EMS services by dialysis patients is considerable, particularly for transfers. This highlights a potential area to be targeted for reducing resource utilization. Calls requiring transport to the ED occurred most often on Mondays and Tuesdays, the day after the long-dialysis break, and may represent a time of heightened risk for in-center hemodialysis patients.