Impact of Frailty on Outcome of Older Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Frailty status is linked with a poorer clinical outcome, and patients with frailty are often less revascularized, even with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore sought to assess the impact of frailty on the clinical outcome of older patients with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent PCI. We prospectively enrolled 141 consecutive older patients (>75 years) admitted for NSTEMI; 104 patients underwent PCI (35 with frailty, 69 without frailty), and 37 were not revascularized (22 with frailty, 15 without). Patients with frailty were older, less frequently male, more affected by dementia and severe left ventricular dysfunction, and less treated with PCI; patients treated with PCI were younger and less affected by dementia. Thirty-day mortality rates were proportionally higher, from 3% in patients without frailty treated with PCI, to 7% in patients without frailty not treated with PCI, 17% in patients with frailty treated with PCI, and 48% in patients with frailty not treated with PCI (p <0.05). Similarly, 6-month mortality rates were proportionally higher (12%, 29%, 37%, and 71%). At multivariable analysis, frail status was associated to a sixfold increased risk of mortality at 30 days; at 6 months, frail status was associated to a 3.4-fold risk of death (p <0.01), but PCI was also associated to a lower risk of mortality (odds ratio 0.2, p <0.01). In an observational study in older patients with NSTEMI, frail status is associated to a poorer outcome, whereas PCI is associated to a better long-term outcome. A careful selection of patient suitable for revascularization by PCI may be useful in improving outcomes of older patients with frailty with NSTEMI.

Meta-regression analysis on the impact of medical therapy on long-term outcome in spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively rare condition affecting predominantly young adults, with a prevalence of female sex. The best management of SCAD is still unclear and not adequately evidence-based both in the acute phase but especially over the long-term. We therefore aimed to evaluate the impact of medical therapy usually adopted for coronary artery disease on long-term outcome in SCAD patients. Methods: We performed a meta-regression analysis including all the studies evaluating the long-term outcome of patients affected by SCAD. We used long-term mortality, recurrent SCAD, admission for angina and major adverse cardio-vascular events (MACE) as dependent variables and the rates of discharge drug rates (beta-blockers, statins, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)) as independent variables. Results: Fourteen observational studies were included with a long-term follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.7 years. No statistically significant correlations between drug therapy (beta-blockers, statins, calcium channel blockers, nitrates, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors) and mortality, MACE, admission for angina, and SCAD recurrence were found. Higher aspirin use rates were significantly correlated with lower admission rates for angina (p < 0.05); DAPT, however, showed a borderline correlation with higher rates of SCAD recurrence (p = 0.068). Conclusions: In a meta-regression analysis including observational studies aspirin use rates correlated with lower long-term rates of admission for angina, while a borderline correlation between DAPT and rates of SCAD recurrence was found. Other drugs usually used for the treatment of coronary artery disease do not seem to impact long-term outcome of SCAD patients.

Improvement in Left and Right Ventricular Function after Introduction of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure Outpatients with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) are among the main therapeutic options for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of SGLT2i on the echocardiographic parameters of left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular function among outpatients with a long history of HFrEF, in optimized therapy. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients affected by HFrEF in whom the SGLT2i therapy was prescribed. Following a baseline evaluation (T0), in which SGLT2i was prescribed, patients were re-evaluated at 3 (T3), 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months. RESULTS: We considered 60 patients for the analysis with a median history of HFrEF of more than seven years in optimal medical and electrical therapy. After SGLT2i therapy, LV ejection fraction and LV global longitudinal strain improved from baseline at T3, T6, and T12. Analogously, RV global and free wall longitudinal strain improved at T3 and T6. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the addition of SGLT2i to the optimized therapy for HFrEF was associated with a significant improvement in both LV and RV function, thus highlighting a possible mechanism responsible for the benefit obtained with this class of drugs.

Introduction of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Variations in Other Disease-Modifying Drugs in Heart Failure Patients: A Single-Centre Real-World Experience.

BACKGROUND: The sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have emerged as a crucial therapeutic option for patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a real-world population from a single centre, the feasibility of introducing SGLT2i and their interaction with other recommended drug classes. METHODS: Consecutive patients affected by chronic heart failure (CHF) were evaluated beginning in January 2022. At the baseline clinical visit, both the patient's current medication and the prescribed treatments were recorded. Over a 6- to 12-month follow-up, changes in concomitant therapy were analysed. RESULTS: At baseline, among 350 patients evaluated, only 17 (5%) were already taking SGLT2i: 13 with HFrEF, five with mildly reduced (HFmrEF), preserved (HFpEF) or improved (HFimpEF) ejection fraction. After the baseline assessment, SGLT2i were prescribed to 224 (64%) of the patients, including 179 (84%) with HFrEF, 27 (42%) with HFmrEF/HFimpEF, and 18 (22%) with HFpEF/HFimpEF. After follow-up, SGLT2i therapy was well tolerated and was associated with a significant increase in sacubitril/valsartan prescriptions and a decrease in diuretic use. Finally, a significant improvement in functional status and left ventricular systolic function after SGLT2i therapy was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre, real-world study, SGLT2i were primarily prescribed to HFrEF patients who were already on other recommended drug classes for their treatment. Additionally, there was a noticeable enhancement in the prescribed therapy during a short-term follow-up. These findings further bolster the inclusion of this therapeutic approach in regular clinical practice.

Renal resistance index independently predicts worsening of renal function after coronary angiography.

The renal resistance index (RRI) has been demonstrated to be a useful parameter that can detect patients at a high risk of worsening of renal function (WRF). This study was designed to evaluate the role of the RRI in predicting WRF mediated by the intravascular administration of contrast media. We enrolled patients who were referred for coronary angiography. Renal arterial echo-color Doppler was performed to calculate the RRI. WRF was defined as an increase of > 0.3 mg/dL and at least 25% of the baseline value in creatinine concentration 24-48 h after coronary angiography. Among the 148 patients enrolled in this study, 18 (12%) had WRF. In the multivariate logistic analysis, the RRI was independently associated with WRF (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.36; p = 0.001). After angiography, the RRI significantly increased in both patients with and without WRF. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for WRF, the RRI at baseline and after angiography showed similar accuracy, and the best cutoff value for predicting WRF was 70%. In patients undergoing coronary angiography, the RRI is independently associated with WRF, probably because it provides more accurate information about cardiorenal pathophysiological factors and reflects kidney hemodynamic status and flow reserve.