Antimicrobial prescribing and infections in long-term care facilities (LTCF): a multilevel analysis of the HALT 2016 study, Ireland, 2017.

BackgroundThe 2016 point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antimicrobial use (AMU) in Irish long-term care facilities (LTCF) (HALT) showed a 9.8% AMU and 4.4% HAI prevalence, based on aggregated data analysis.AimOur aim was to identify institutional and resident risk factors of AMU and HAI.MethodsHALT 2016 gathered information using institutional and resident questionnaires, for residents who met the surveillance definition of active HAI and/or AMU, limiting analysis to the aggregated institutional level. In January 2017, we requested additional data on age, sex, urinary catheter use and disorientation of current residents from HALT 2016 LTCF and matched to 2016 HALT data.ResultsOf 224 HALT 2016 LTCF, 80 provided additional information on 3,816 residents; prevalence of AMU was 10.6% and HAI was 4.7%. Presence of a coordinating physician (Odds ratio (OR): 0.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-0.6), antimicrobial stewardship committee (OR: 0.2; 95%; CI: 0.1-0.6), healthcare assistants (OR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.9-1.0), antimicrobial consumption feedback (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6) and medical care by personal general practitioner (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.7-1.0) were associated with less AMU and feedback on surveillance of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices (OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3-1.0) with less HAI. AMU and HAI varied significantly between LTCF.ConclusionsMultilevel modelling identified significant inter-facility variation, as well as institutional factors associated with AMU and HAI. An antimicrobial stewardship committee linked with feedback on IPC and prescribing was associated with reduced AMU and HAI.

Distal pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation in chronic pancreatitis patients: First case series from India.

Pancreatectomy and autologous islet transplantation (AIT) are performed in highly specialized centers to alleviate abdominal pain and preserve endocrine function in patients with chronic pancreatitis. We aimed at initiating AIT studies in India for the first time in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) to prevent development of diabetes. Four out of 14 chronic pancreatitis patients screened underwent DP with AIT. Pancreatectomy specimen preserved in Wisconsin solution was subjected to islet isolation employing standard protocol using collagenase V. Isolated islets were infused into the liver through portal vein after quality assessment and the four patients were followed for 1 year. During the study period, blood glucose, fasting insulin, and C-peptide were analyzed and glucose tolerance was assessed. Three patients could be infused with islets (4363 Islet equivalents, IEQ/kg, 3860 IEQ/kg, 3600 IEQ/kg) into liver without any infusion-related complications. Two of these patients maintained glucose tolerance and glycemic control (HbA1c: 6.0%) and one became diabetic at the end of 1 year (HbA1c: 7.5%). Circulating fasting insulin increased (2.7-24.4 µU/mL and 4.0-21.2 µU/mL) and C-peptide levels increased (2.2 to 3.6, 3.4-5.6 ng/mL) in these two patients. Circulating insulin was 2.7 µU/mL and C-peptide was 2.4 ng/mL in the patient who became diabetic at the end of 1 year, while insulin was 2.3 µU/mL and C-peptide was 1.2 ng/mL in the patient who could not be infused with islets after DP. Safety and feasibility of autologous islet transplantation is established in India for the first time.

Adverse events of fluoroquinolones vs. other antimicrobials prescribed in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are second-line antimicrobial agents. Once the decision to prescribe an antimicrobial is made, the choice of antimicrobial should be based on both the benefits and adverse effects. This systematic review quantifies the occurrence of common adverse events (AEs) related to FQs in relation to any other antimicrobial for any indication in primary care. METHODS: We searched randomized controlled trials from Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and CINHAL. FQs had to be administered orally, for any indication, to adults and in primary care. Data were extracted independently in standard forms in "Covidence". Pooled estimates of the intervention effects for AEs were determined by the Peto odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in Revman. RESULTS: In the 39 studies selected, the most commonly reported AEs were nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, and rash. A meta-analysis of 28 studies reporting AEs showed central nervous system (CNS)-related AEs (OR 1.40 (1.12-1.75) P = 0.003, heterogeneity (I2) = 0%) and gastrointestinal (GI)-related AEs (OR 1.20 (1.06-1.36) P = 0.005, I2 = 80%) were significantly associated with FQs compared with other antimicrobials. Compared with FQs, co-amoxiclav showed significantly more total AEs (OR 0.70 (0.54-0.90) P = 0.006, I2 = 78%) and GI-related AEs (OR 0.69 (0.52-0.91) P = 0.008, I2 = 94%). Withdrawal or discontinuation due to drug-related AEs was higher for FQs (OR 1.19 (1.00-1.42) P = 0.05, I2 = 5%). Sensitivity analyses did not change these results. CONCLUSION: FQs are associated with more CNS- and GI-related AEs compared with other types of antimicrobial. This information is relevant to support decision making in relation to antimicrobial prescribing.

Clinical trial: a randomized trial comparing fluoroscopy guided percutaneous technique vs. endoscopic ultrasound guided technique of coeliac plexus block for treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Coeliac plexus block (CPB) is a management option for pain control in chronic pancreatitis. CPB is conventionally performed by percutaneous technique with fluoroscopic guidance (PCFG). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is increasingly used for CPB as it offers a better visualization of the plexus. There are limited data comparing the two modalities. AIM: To compare the pain relief in chronic pancreatitis among patients undergoing CPB either by PCFG technique or by EUS guided technique. METHODS: Chronic pancreatitis patients with abdominal pain requiring daily analgesics for more than 4 weeks were included. Fifty six consecutive patients (41 males, 15 females) participated in the study. EUSG-CPB was performed in 27 and PCFG-CPB in 29 patients. In both the groups, 10 mL of Bupivacaine (0.25%) and 3 mL of Triamcinolone (40 mg) were given on both sides of the coeliac artery through separate punctures. RESULTS: Pre and post procedure pain scores were obtained using a 0-10 visual analogue scale. Improvement in pain scores was seen in 70% of subjects undergoing EUS-CPB and 30% in Percutaneous- block group (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided coeliac block appears to be better than PCFG-CPB for controlling abdominal pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis.