Administration of Cimetidine for Calcific Tendinitis of the Rectus Femoris: Five Cases.

Calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris is rare. This clinical report presents five cases of management of calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris. Between July 2018 and March 2023, five patients visited our institution, where they were treated for calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris. All patients presented with severe acute hip pain. Radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and an ultrasound examination of the hip showed calcification outside the joint, suggesting calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris. All patients were orally administered 200 mg cimetidine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs twice daily. A pain-free status was achieved in 2 weeks on average. Calcium deposits disappeared in three patients and decreased in two. Symptoms did not recur. Furthermore, no recurrence or enlargements in calcium deposits were observed. It appears to be an effective treatment for calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris; however, the underlying mechanisms of action of cimetidine on calcific tendinitis have not yet been elucidated in detail.

Measurement accuracy of the acetabular cup position using an inertial portable hip navigation system with patients in the lateral decubitus position.

Accurate cup placement is critical to ensure satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative guidance tools that achieve accurate cup placement in the supine position; however, accuracy in the lateral decubitus position is under debate. A new inertial portable navigation system has recently become available. The present study investigated the accuracy of measurements of the cup position in 54 patients in the lateral decubitus position using this system and compared it with that by a goniometer. After cup placement, cup abduction and anteversion were measured using the system and by the goniometer, and were then compared with postoperatively measured angles. Absolute measurement errors with the system were 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction and 3.9° ± 2.9° for anteversion. The system achieved 98 and 96% measurement accuracies within 10° for cup abduction and anteversion, respectively. The system was more accurate than the goniometer for cup anteversion (p < 0.001), but not for abduction (p = 0.537). The system uses a new registration method of the pelvic reference plane and corrects intraoperative pelvic motion errors, which may affect measurement accuracy. In the present study, reliable and reproducible intraoperative measurements of the cup position were obtained using the inertial portable navigation system.

Does a Commercially Available Augmented Reality-based Portable Hip Navigation System Improve Cup Positioning During THA Compared With the Conventional Technique? A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Portable hip navigation systems have been developed to combine the accuracy of cup positioning by large console navigation systems with the ease of use and convenience of conventional surgical techniques. Although a novel augmented reality-based portable hip navigation system using a smartphone (AR navigation) has become available recently, no studies, to our knowledge, have compared commercially available AR navigation with the conventional technique. Additionally, no studies, except for those from designer-surgeon series, have demonstrated the results of AR navigation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does intraoperative use of commercially available AR navigation improve cup positioning compared with the conventional technique? (2) Are operative factors, clinical scores, and postoperative course different between the two groups? METHODS: In this randomized trial, 72 patients undergoing THA were randomly assigned to undergo either commercially available AR navigation or a conventional technique for cup placement. All patients received the same cementless acetabular cups through a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome of the present study was cup positioning, including the absolute differences between the intended target and angle achieved, as well as the number of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone. Our target cup position was 40° abduction and 20° anteversion. Secondary outcomes were operative factors, between-group difference in improvement in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the postoperative course, including the operative time (between the start of the surgical approach and skin closure), procedure time (between the first incision and skin closure, including the time to insert pins, registration, and transfer and redrape patients in the navigation group), time taken to insert pins and complete registration in the navigation group, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reoperations. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months, because data regarding the primary outcome-cup positioning-were collected within 1 week after surgery. The between-group difference in improvement in HOOS, which was the secondary outcome, was much lower than the minimum clinically important difference for the HOOS. No patients in either group were lost to follow-up, and there was no crossover (the randomized treatment was performed in all patients, so there was no difference between an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis). RESULTS: The use of the commercially available AR navigation slightly improved cup positioning compared with the conventional technique in terms of the absolute difference between the desired and achieved amounts of cup abduction and anteversion (which we defined as "absolute differences"; median 1° [IQR 0° to 4.0°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.0° to 7.5°], difference of medians 4°; p < 0.001 and median 2° [IQR 1.9° to 3.7°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.2° to 9.7°], difference of medians 2°; p = 0.001). A higher proportion of cups were placed inside the Lewinnek safe zone in the navigation group than in the control group (94% [34 of 36] compared with 64% [23 of 36]; p < 0.001). Median operative times were not different between the two groups (58 minutes [IQR 49 to 72 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 1 minute; p = 0.99). The median procedure time was longer in the navigation group (95 minutes [IQR 84 to 109 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 38 minutes; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in improvement in HOOS (27 ± 17 versus 28 ± 19, mean difference -1 [95% CI -9.5 to 7.4]; p = 0.81). In the navigation group, no complications occurred in the pin sites; however, one anterior dislocation occurred. In the conventional group, one hip underwent reoperation because of a deep infection. CONCLUSION: Although the use of commercially available AR navigation improved cup positioning in THA, the improvement in clinical scores and postoperative complication rates were not different between the two groups, and the overall magnitude of the difference in accuracy was small. Future studies will need to determine whether the improvement in the percentage of hips inside the Lewinnek safe zone results in differences in late dislocation or polyethylene wear, and whether such benefits-if any-justify the added costs and surgical time. Until or unless more compelling evidence in favor of the new system emerges, we recommend against widespread use of the system in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level Ⅱ, therapeutic study.

Soft-tissue tension during total hip arthroplasty measured in four patients and predicted using a musculoskeletal model.

PURPOSE: Soft-tissue tension around the hip joint is related to the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA), but it remains difficult to quantify the soft-tissue tension during surgery. In this study, a three-dimensional force sensor-instrumented modular femoral head was developed and used to quantify soft-tissue tension during THA. The forces at the hip joint were also calculated using a three-dimensional musculoskeletal computer model to validate the measured forces. METHODS: Soft-tissue tension was investigated by measuring the hip joint forces and directions during intraoperative trialing in four patients through passive range of motion (ROM) from 0° extension to 90° flexion. A musculoskeletal model with THA, which was scaled to one of four patients, was developed. The hip joint forces were calculated under the same motion. RESULTS: Through the passive ROM, the magnitude of soft-tissue tension was greatest when the hip was extended, decreased with flexion to 34°, and progressively increased to flexion at 90°. The mediolateral force component was relatively constant, but the supero-inferior and anterior-posterior force components changed significantly. Within-individual variations were small during three repeated cycles of measurement, but magnitudes varied significantly among patients. Similar force patterns and magnitudes were calculated by the musculoskeletal model. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it is possible to quantify soft-tissue tension and direction during THA with an instrumented head. There was general agreement between the calculated and measured forces in both pattern and magnitude. Including additional subject-specific details would further enhance agreement between the model and measured hip forces.

The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Dislocation continues to be a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although previous studies of computed simulation analysis investigated the range of motion (ROM), it is unclear whether the ROM before impingement simulated using computed tomography-based 3-dimensional simulation analysis (simulated ROM) is related to dislocation after THA. It is also unclear what angles are required in computed simulation analyses for stable hips after THA. In this study, we compared the simulated ROM in patients with and without dislocation. METHODS: 16 patients with posterior dislocation were compared with 48 matched patients without dislocation. Risk factors including preoperative bone morphology of the hip, implant position, change of femoral offset, change of leg length, anterior aspect of the greater trochanter (GTa) length, and anterior inferior iliac spine length were also compared. RESULTS: The mean flexion angle, internal-rotation at 90° flexion (IR) angle, cup anteversion based on the anterior pelvic plane (APP), tilt-adjusted cup anteversion and GTa length were significantly different between patients with dislocation and patients without dislocation (p = 0.033, 0.002, 0.010, 0.047, 0.046). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested cutoff points for flexion angle, IR angle, cup anteversion based on the APP, tilt-adjusted cup anteversion and GTa length, of 114.5°, 45.5°, 19.5°, 12.0° and 15.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that preoperative planning to achieve a larger simulated ROM, flexion angle and IR angle, may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation. This study also suggests that fine-tuning of cup anteversion and/or trimming of the overhanging GTa during preoperative planning may reduce the risk of posterior dislocation.

Accuracy of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system for cup placement and intraoperative leg length measurement in total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are frequently the consequence of malpositioned components or leg length discrepancy after surgery. Recently, a new version of a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (New HipAlign) was made available with a change in the method of measuring cup abduction and the addition of a leg length measurement function. The purposes of this study were to investigate cup positioning and to examine the accuracy of leg length measurement with New HipAlign. METHODS: Cups were implanted and intraoperative leg length change was measured using New HipAlign in 60 THAs through a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. The cup position and radiographic leg length change were determined postoperatively on pelvic radiograph and computed tomography scans. We previously compared cup positioning with a previous version of a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (Previous HipAlign) and conventional surgical techniques. Cup positioning in this study was compared with the results of out previous study using Previous HipAlign. RESULTS: The mean cup abduction of 40.3° ± 4.9° (range, 26° to 53°) and the mean cup anteversion of 15.8° ± 5.6° (range, 6.7° to 29.5°) were found. The deviation of the postoperative measured angles from the target cup position was 3.7° ± 3.3° for cup abduction and 5.9° ± 3.6° for cup anteversion. 56/60 of the cups were inside the Lewinnek safe zone. Compared with our previous study using Previous HipAlign, there were no significant differences with regard to cup abduction, cup anteversion, the deviation from the target cup position for cup abduction, the value of deviation for cup anteversion, and the number of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone (P = 0.218, 0.334, 0.651, 0.797, 0.592). The mean difference between the intraoperative and radiographic leg length changes was + 0.8 ± 3.4 mm. There was significant correlation between the intraoperative and radiographic leg length changes (r = 0.804, P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Use of New HipAlign allowed for accurate cup placement and reliable leg length measurement during THA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial is defined as 'any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcome' by the World Health Organization (WHO). Because this study is not a clinical trial, trial registration is not needed.

A simple angle-measuring instrument for measuring cemented stem anteversion during total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: During total hip arthroplasty (THA), the accurate placement of the femoral components is an important determinant of the success of the procedure. This study assessed the accuracy of cemented stem placement using a new angle-measuring instrument. The primary objective was to investigate the accuracy of the intraoperative measurements of cemented stem anteversion obtained using the angle-measuring instrument. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the accuracy of stem positioning performed using the angle-measuring instrument. METHODS: We compared the intraoperative stem anteversion measurements obtained using the angle-measuring instrument with postoperative stem anteversion measurements obtained using computed tomography in 149 hips (measurement accuracy). We also compared the target angle and postoperative stem anteversion in 105 hips (implantation accuracy). RESULTS: The mean amount of intraoperative stem anteversion was 37.9° ± 10.1°, and the mean amount of postoperative stem anteversion was 37.0° ± 10.4°. The mean measurement accuracy was 0.9° ± 6.1°, and the absolute measurement accuracy was 4.9° ± 3.7°. The correlation coefficient for the relationship between the intraoperative and postoperative stem anteversion measurements was 0.824 (p = 0.000). The mean amount of target angle was 37.4° ± 7.6°, and the mean amount of postoperative stem anteversion was 35.9° ± 9.1°. The mean implantation accuracy was 1.4° ± 5.6°, and the mean absolute implantation accuracy was 4.3° ± 3.6°. The correlation coefficient for the relationship between the target angle and postoperative stem anteversion was 0.795 (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The angle-measuring instrument measured intraoperative stem anteversion accurately, and cemented stem was implanted accurately during THA with the angle-measuring instrument.

Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Cup Placement of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Malposition of the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with increased risk of dislocation, reduced range of motion, and accelerated wear. The purpose of this study is to compare cup positioning with a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system and conventional surgical technique. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, clinical study, cups were implanted with a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (navigation group; n = 55) or conventional technique (conventional group; n = 55). THA was conducted in the lateral position and through posterior approach. The cup position was determined postoperatively on pelvic radiograph and computed tomography scans. RESULTS: An average cup abduction of 39.2° ± 4.6° (range, 27° to 50°) and an average cup anteversion of 14.6° ± 6.1° (range, 1° to 27.5°) were found in the navigation group, and an average cup abduction of 42.9° ± 8.0° (range, 23° to 73°) and an average cup anteversion of 11.6° ± 7.7° (range, -12.1° to 25°) in the conventional group. A smaller variation in the navigation group was indicated for cup abduction (P = .001). The deviations from the target cup position were significantly lower in the navigation group (P = .001, .016). While only 37 of 55 cups in the conventional group were inside the Lewinnek safe zone, 51 of 55 cups in the navigation group were placed inside this safe zone (P = .006). The navigation procedure took a mean of 10 minutes longer than the conventional technique. CONCLUSION: Use of the portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system can improve cup positioning in THA.

Hip stability after total hip arthroplasty predicted by intraoperative stability test and range of motion: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Dislocation continues to be a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A larger intraoperative range of motion (ROM) is believed to minimize dislocation risk, and intraoperative stability tests have been used to assess the ROM. However, it is not clear whether or not intraoperative stability tests can predict hip stability after THA. It is also unclear which angles are required in intraoperative stability tests. We investigated the usefulness of intraoperative stability tests, and other risk factors to predict hip stability after THA. METHODS: Patients operated by single surgeon at one hospital from June 2009 to December 2013 were evaluated. This study included 185 hips with 32 mm metal femoral head. The range of internal rotation with 90° hip flexion (IR angle) was measured as an intraoperative stability test. The variables studied as risk factors included age, height, weight, gender, cerebral dysfunction, preoperative diagnosis, history of previous hip surgery, and IR angle. RESULTS: Mean IR angle was statistically different between patients with dislocation and patients without dislocation (59.5° vs 69.6°: p = 0.006). Cerebral dysfunction and a history of previous hip surgery were statistically related with prevalence of dislocation (p = 0.021, and p = 0.011). The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that the cutoff points for IR angle were 51° and 67°. Dislocation rate in larger IR angle group was significantly lower than the rate in smaller IR angle group when patients were divided by 51° (p = 0.002). Logistic regression analyses showed that significant risk factors were cerebral dysfunction (OR: 5.3 (95%CI 1.1-25.9); p = 0.037), history of previous hip surgery (OR: 8.6 (95%CI 1.2-63.0); p = 0.035), and IR angle (OR: 10.4 (95%CI 1.9-57.1); p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that intraoperative stability test, especially the IR angle, was a useful method to predict hip stability after THA, and a larger intraoperative ROM reduced the likelihood of dislocation. 51° and 67° were indicated as cutoff points for IR angle. Cerebral dysfunction and a history of previous hip surgery are also risk factors for the incidence of dislocation after THA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This is a retrospective study, not a clinical trial defined by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Dynamic femoral head translations in dysplastic hips.

BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is an important disease leading to osteoarthritis. Recently, researchers have focused on hip instability as a potentially important dynamic factor for osteoarthritis, but the detailed kinematics of dysplastic hips during weight-bearing gait have not been reported. The purpose of this research is to contrast femoral translation in contralateral healthy hips and dysplastic hips during weight-bearing stepping. METHODS: Twelve dysplastic hips and eight healthy hips were investigated. Hip joint kinematics were analyzed using 3D-2D model-image registration with dynamic fluoroscopic images of each hip during a stepping-in-place activity. Femoral translation relative to the acetabular center was quantified as instability. FINDINGS: Total femoral head translations were significantly different between dysplastic and contralateral healthy hips. Mean translation was 1.0mm in dysplastic hips and 0.4mm in contralateral healthy hips during swing-phase, and consisted of inferior translation during early swing phase with a complementary superior translation just before foot strike. Total femoral translation was significantly correlated to several radiographic indices of hip dysplasia. INTERPRETATION: Superior translations of the femur during the end of swing phase may result in altered articular contact mechanics, abnormal stresses on the labrum and lost lubricant sealing. All of these factors may contribute to joint degeneration and osteoarthritis in dysplastic hips.

Three-dimensional shape optimization of a cemented hip stem and experimental validations.

This study proposes novel optimized stem geometry with low stress values in the cement using a finite element (FE) analysis combined with an optimization procedure and experimental measurements of cement stress in vitro. We first optimized an existing stem geometry using a three-dimensional FE analysis combined with a shape optimization technique. One of the most important factors in the cemented stem design is to reduce stress in the cement. Hence, in the optimization study, we minimized the largest tensile principal stress in the cement mantle under a physiological loading condition by changing the stem geometry. As the next step, the optimized stem and the existing stem were manufactured to validate the usefulness of the numerical models and the results of the optimization in vitro. In the experimental study, strain gauges were embedded in the cement mantle to measure the strain in the cement mantle adjacent to the stems. The overall trend of the experimental study was in good agreement with the results of the numerical study, and we were able to reduce the largest stress by more than 50% in both shape optimization and strain gauge measurements. Thus, we could validate the usefulness of the numerical models and the results of the optimization using the experimental models. The optimization employed in this study is a useful approach for developing new stem designs.

Early weight-bearing after periacetabular osteotomy leads to a high incidence of postoperative pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: It has not been shown whether accelerated rehabilitation following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is effective for early recovery. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare complication rates in patients with standard and accelerated rehabilitation protocols who underwent PAO. METHODS: Between January 2002 and August 2011, patients with a lateral center-edge (CE) angle of < 20°, showing good joint congruency with the hip in abduction, pre- or early stage of osteoarthritis, and age younger than 60 years were included in this study. We evaluated 156 hips in 138 patients, with a mean age at the time of surgery of 30 years. Full weight-bearing with two crutches started 2 months postoperatively in 73 patients (80 hips) with the standard rehabilitation protocol. In 65 patients (76 hips) with the accelerated rehabilitation protocol, postoperative strengthening of the hip, thigh and core musculature was begun on the day of surgery as tolerated. The exercise program included active hip range of motion, and gentle isometric hamstring and quadriceps muscle sets; these exercises were performed for 30 minutes in the morning and 30 minutes in the afternoon with a physical therapist every weekday for 6 weeks. Full weight-bearing with two axillary crutches started on the day of surgery as tolerated. Complications were evaluated for 2 years. RESULTS: The clinical results at the time of follow-up were similar in the two groups. The average periods between the osteotomy and full-weight-bearing walking without support were 4.2 months and 6.9 months in patients with the accelerated and standard rehabilitation protocols (P < 0.001), indicating that the accelerated rehabilitation protocol could achieve earlier recovery of patients. However, postoperative fractures of the ischial ramus and posterior column of the pelvis were more frequently found in patients with the accelerated rehabilitation protocol (8/76) than in those with the standard rehabilitation protocol (1/80) (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The accelerated rehabilitation protocol seems to have advantages for early muscle recovery in patients undergoing PAO; however, postoperative pelvic fracture rates were unacceptably high in patients with this protocol.

Intermediate- to long-term results after hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

There have been few reports describing intermediate- to long-term results after hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We followed up 52 hips in 44 patients aged 5 men and 39 women, with a mean of 11.5 years (range, 5-23.5 years). Revisions had been performed in 6 hips in 6 patients: 1 both acetabular and femoral components for infection, 1 acetabular component for aseptic loosening, 3 acetabular components for recurrent dislocation, and 1 acetabular component for dislodgement of the polyethylene liner from the metal shell. None of other acetabular or femoral components were revised or found to be loose at the final follow-up. Although postoperative dislocation remains a concern, hybrid total hip arthroplasty had an acceptable result in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Intermediate to long-term results of periacetabular osteotomy in patients younger and older than forty years of age.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of middle-aged patients with periacetabular osteotomy remains controversial. The goal of the present retrospective study was to analyze the intermediate to long-term functional and radiographic results of periacetabular osteotomy in patients below and above the age of forty years. METHODS: Between February 1990 and December 2004, 166 periacetabular osteotomies were performed in 146 patients. We evaluated 158 hips in 139 patients who had a mean age of thirty-two years at the time of surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was eleven years (range, five to twenty years). We compared thirty-six patients (forty-one hips) who were forty years of age or older with 103 patients (117 hips) who were younger than forty years of age at the time of surgery. RESULTS: The average Harris hip score increased from 70 points preoperatively to 90 points postoperatively. The mean Harris hip scores at the time of the five-year follow-up were similar in the older and younger groups (p = 0.57), although the latest follow-up scores were significantly higher in the younger group than in the older group (91 compared with 88 points; p = 0.02). The average modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score (with 0 representing the worst score and 100 representing the best score) was higher for the younger group than for the older group (92 compared with 90 points; p = 0.03). Kaplan-Meier analysis with progression of the Tönnis grade of osteoarthritis as the end point showed a ten-year survival rate of 90.8% (95% confidence interval, 88.3% to 93.3%) and a fifteen-year survival rate of 83.0% (95% confidence interval, 78.5% to 87.5%); the ten-year survival rates in the younger and older groups were 94.4% and 81.3%, respectively, and the fifteen-year survival rates were 86.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Periacetabular osteotomy yielded similar results for the two groups at the time of the five-year follow-up, although the results for the older group deteriorated thereafter. Decrease in physical function due to aging and increased susceptibility to the progression of osteoarthritis may be responsible for the poorer results over time in the older group.

Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.

Quantifying soft-tissue tension around the hip joint during total hip arthroplasty remains difficult. In this study, a three-dimensional computer-aided design model was developed to clarify how component position in total hip arthroplasty contributes to the primary cause of posterior dislocation in cases of flexion, adduction and internal rotation. To better understand the influences of anteversion angle of the acetabular component, its effects on the primary causes of dislocations and the range of motion were investigated. Three different primary dislocation mechanisms were noted: impingement of the prosthetic femoral neck on the cup liner; impingement of the osseous femur on the osseous pelvis; and spontaneous dislocation caused by soft-tissue traction without impingement. Spontaneous dislocation could be detected by calculating hip forces at any thigh position using the computer-aided design model developed. In computer analysis, a transition from prosthetic impingement rate to osseous impingement rate occurred with increasing anteversion angle of the acetabular component. Spontaneous dislocation was detected at angles > 10° of anteversion of the acetabular component when flexion occurred with extreme adduction and internal rotation. This study demonstrated the possibility of spontaneous dislocation that results not from prosthetic or bony impingement but from muscle traction with increased range of motion.