Comparison of four D-dimer assays in the context of venous thromboembolism in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: This observational study conducted across seven emergency care units compares the efficacy of four D-dimer detection methods, namely HemosIL D-dimer HS (HS), HemosIL D-dimer HS-500 (HS-500), VIDAS D-dimer (VIDAS), and HemosIL AcuStar D-dimer (ACUSTAR). The primary focus is on patients with a clinical suspicion of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: A total of 149 samples were collected from patients with suspected DVT or PE. The confirmation of DVT/PE was based on calf ultrasound or computed tomography-Angiography. Direct comparisons were made between the different detection methods, considering both their analytical performance and clinical utility. Additionally, the impact of an age-adjusted cut-off on the diagnostic accuracy of each method was assessed. RESULTS: The results revealed comparable negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity across the methods, with a notable exception of increased specificity for HS compared with HS-500 (50.8% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.03). Further analysis incorporating an age-adjusted cut-off demonstrated a significant improvement in specificity for HS. When using the age-adjusted cut-off, HS exhibited a substantial increase in specificity compared with HS-500 (63.1% vs. 49.2%, p = 0.004) and demonstrated significantly higher specificity compared with VIDAS (63.1% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes the nonuniversal effect of an age-adjusted cut-off and discusses the potential necessity for different cut-off values, particularly in the case of HS-500. These findings contribute to the understanding of D-dimer detection methods in the context of DVT and PE, providing insights into their relative performances and the potential optimization through age-adjusted cut-offs.

Medication Error When Switching from Warfarin to Rivaroxaban Leading to Spontaneous Large Ecchymosis of the Abdominal and Chest Wall.

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy may be inappropriate if prescription was incorrect, the patient's physiological parameters change, or interacting concomitant medications are erroneously added. The aim of this report was to illustrate inappropriate NOAC prescription in a 78-year-old woman with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and borderline renal dysfunction who was switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban and subsequently developed bruising with hemorrhagic shock and acute on chronic renal failure. Administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate effectively reversed coagulopathy and stopped bleeding. Retrospective determination of circulating plasma levels of rivaroxaban and warfarin confirmed that excessive anticoagulation was likely due to warfarin that the patient probably continued to take although rivaroxaban was initiated. Pharmacodynamic interaction between rivaroxaban and warfarin may not only be additive but synergistic. In patients at high risk of complications, judicious prescribing and dosing of NOACs, and regular monitoring of concomitant medications and renal function are highly recommended.