Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(7): 102619, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723794

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in various subgroups of patients with acute cardiogenic shock, providing insights for personalized clinical decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across major databases to identify studies that reported on the use of temporary MCS devices like TandemHeart, Impella, and VA-ECMO in acute cardiogenic shock. Special attention was given to subgroup analyses based on etiologies of shock, patient demographics, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that while devices like TandemHeart and Impella offer significant hemodynamic support, their effectiveness and safety profiles vary across different patient subgroups. VA-ECMO demonstrated the highest flow rates and potential for mortality benefits but requires careful management due to associated risks. The lack of randomized controlled trials in specific patient subgroups highlights a gap in the current literature, underscoring the need for targeted research. CONCLUSION: The review underscores the necessity of a personalized approach in selecting temporary MCS devices for patients with acute cardiogenic shock, guided by specific patient characteristics and clinical scenarios. Future research should focus on addressing the identified evidence gaps through well-designed studies that provide robust subgroup-specific data, enabling clinicians to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes in this critical care context.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Coração Auxiliar , Choque Cardiogênico , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Aguda , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia
2.
Vaccine ; 41(20): 3233-3246, 2023 05 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37085458

RESUMO

The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is controlled but not halted by public health measures and mass vaccination strategies which have exclusively relied on intramuscular vaccines. Intranasal vaccines can prime or recruit to the respiratory epithelium mucosal immune cells capable of preventing infection. Here we report a comprehensive series of studies on this concept using various mouse models, including HLA class II-humanized transgenic strains. We found that a single intranasal (i.n.) dose of serotype-5 adenoviral vectors expressing either the receptor binding domain (Ad5-RBD) or the complete ectodomain (Ad5-S) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was effective in inducing i) serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) anti-spike IgA and IgG, ii) robust SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing activity in the serum and BAL, iii) rigorous spike-directed T helper 1 cell/cytotoxic T cell immunity, and iv) protection of mice from a challenge with the SARS-CoV-2 beta variant. Intramuscular (i.m.) Ad5-RBD or Ad5-S administration did not induce serum or BAL IgA, and resulted in lower neutralizing titers in the serum. Moreover, prior immunity induced by an intramuscular mRNA vaccine could be potently enhanced and modulated towards a mucosal IgA response by an i.n. Ad5-S booster. Notably, Ad5 DNA was found in the liver or spleen after i.m. but not i.n. administration, indicating a lack of systemic spread of the vaccine vector, which has been associated with a risk of thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Unlike in otherwise genetically identical HLA-DQ6 mice, in HLA-DQ8 mice Ad5-RBD vaccine was inferior to Ad5-S, suggesting that the RBD fragment does not contain a sufficient collection of helper-T cell epitopes to constitute an optimal vaccine antigen. Our data add to previous promising preclinical results on intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and support the potential of this approach to elicit mucosal immunity for preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Humanos , Animais , Camundongos , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genética , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Administração Intranasal , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Imunoglobulina A
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...