Brain-targeting autoantibodies in patients with dementia.

Autoantibodies against proteins in the brain are increasingly considered as a potential cause of cognitive decline, not only in subacute autoimmune encephalopathies but also in slowly progressing impairment of memory in patients with classical neurodegenerative dementias. In this retrospective cohort study of 161 well-characterized patients with different forms of dementia and 34 controls, we determined the prevalence of immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA autoantibodies to brain proteins using unbiased immunofluorescence staining of unfixed murine brain sections. Autoantibodies were detected in 21.1% of dementia patients and in 2.9% of gender-matched controls, with higher frequencies in vascular dementia (42%), Alzheimer's disease (30%), dementia of unknown cause (25%), and subjective cognitive impairment (16.7%). Underlying antigens involved glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), glycine receptor, and Rho GTPase activating protein 26 (ARHGAP26), but also a range of yet undetermined epitopes on neurons, myelinated fiber tracts, choroid plexus, glial cells, and blood vessels. Antibody-positive patients were younger than antibody-negative patients but did not differ in the extent of cognitive impairment, epidemiological and clinical factors, or comorbidities. Further research is needed to understand the potential contribution to disease progression and symptomatology, and to determine the antigenic targets of dementia-associated autoantibodies.

Identification of DAGLA as an autoantibody target in cerebellar ataxia.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the clinical, imaging and fluid biomarker characteristics in patients with antidiacylglycerol lipase alpha (DAGLA)-autoantibody-associated cerebellitis. METHODS: Serum and cerebrospinal fliud (CSF) samples from four index patients were subjected to comprehensive autoantibody screening by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA). Immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry and recombinant protein assays were used to identify the autoantigen. Sera from 101 patients with various neurological symptoms and a similar tissue staining pattern as the index patient samples, and 102 healthy donors were analysed in recombinant cell-based IIFA (RC-IIFA) with the identified protein. Epitope characterisation of all positive samples was performed via ELISA, immunoblot, immunoprecipitation and RC-IIFA using different DAGLA fragments. RESULTS: All index patients were relatively young (age: 18-34) and suffered from pronounced gait ataxia, dysarthria and visual impairments. Paraclinical hallmarks in early-stage disease were inflammatory CSF changes and cerebellar cortex hyperintensity in MRI. Severe cerebellar atrophy developed in three of four patients within 6 months. All patient samples showed the same unclassified IgG reactivity with the cerebellar molecular layer. DAGLA was identified as the target antigen and confirmed by competitive inhibition experiments and DAGLA-specific RC-IIFA. In RC-IIFA, serum reactivity against DAGLA was also found in 17/101 disease controls, including patients with different clinical phenotypes than the one of the index patients, and in 1/102 healthy donors. Epitope characterisation revealed that 17/18 anti-DAGLA-positive control sera reacted with a C-terminal intracellular DAGLA 583-1042 fragment, while the CSF samples of the index patients targeted a conformational epitope between amino acid 1 and 157. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that anti-DAGLA autoantibodies detected in CSF, with a characteristic tissue IIFA pattern, represent novel biomarkers for rapidly progressive cerebellitis.

KCNA2 IgG autoimmunity in neuropsychiatric diseases.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies against the potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 2 (KCNA2) have been described in a few cases of neuropsychiatric disorders, but their diagnostic and pathophysiological role is currently unknown, imposing challenges to medical practice. DESIGN / METHODS: We retrospectively collected comprehensive clinical and paraclinical data of 35 patients with KCNA2 IgG autoantibodies detected in cell-based and tissue-based assays. Patients' sera and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were used for characterization of the antigen, clinical-serological correlations, and determination of IgG subclasses. RESULTS: KCNA2 autoantibody-positive patients (n = 35, median age at disease onset of 65 years, range of 16-83 years, 74 % male) mostly presented with cognitive impairment and/or epileptic seizures but also ataxia, gait disorder and personality changes. Serum autoantibodies belonged to IgG3 and IgG1 subclasses and titers ranged from 1:32 to 1:10,000. KCNA2 IgG was found in the CSF of 8/21 (38 %) patients and in the serum of 4/96 (4.2 %) healthy blood donors. KCNA2 autoantibodies bound to characteristic anatomical areas in the cerebellum and hippocampus of mammalian brain and juxtaparanodal regions of peripheral nerves but reacted exclusively with intracellular epitopes. A subset of four KCNA2 autoantibody-positive patients responded markedly to immunotherapy alongside with conversion to seronegativity, in particular those presenting an autoimmune encephalitis phenotype and receiving early immunotherapy. An available brain biopsy showed strong immune cell invasion. KCNA2 autoantibodies occurred in less than 10 % in association with an underlying tumor. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that KCNA2 autoimmunity is clinically heterogeneous. Future studies should determine whether KCNA2 autoantibodies are directly pathogenic or develop secondarily. Early immunotherapy should be considered, in particular if autoantibodies occur in CSF or if clinical or diagnostic findings suggest ongoing inflammation. Suspicious clinical phenotypes include autoimmune encephalitis, atypical dementia, new-onset epilepsy and unexplained epileptic seizures.

Preserved visuoconstruction in patients with Alzheimer's pathology and anti-neural autoantibodies: A case control study.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is seldom reported to be associated with neural autoantibodies apart from those involved in axonal neurodegeneration and amyloidopathy in prior studies. Nevertheless, this is an under-investigated aspect of AD. As we do not know whether additional screening for autoantibodies in AD patients has additional diagnostic and therapeutic value, this study aims to shed light on whether visuoconstructive or figural memory capacities might distinguish these patient populations. Methods: In this pilot case series, we investigated eight patients suffering from cognitive impairment associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based Alzheimer pathology (AP) and with verified anti-neural autoantibodies (AP Aab+) compared to eight AD patients presenting no autoantibodies (Aab-) (AD Aab-). Patients files were reviewed retrospectively regarding their neuropsychological profile assessed via the CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) test battery and psychopathology measured by the AMDP (Manual for the Assessment and Documentation of Psychopathology in Psychiatry) system. We also relied on diagnostic parameters as in the CSF and magnetic resonance images. Results: All patients shared the same pattern of dysfunctional word-list learning and word-list recall resembling a hippocampus-dependent memory dysfunction. Furthermore, both patient groups revealed a CSF profile concurring with Alzheimer's disease. However, visuoconstructive capacity, but not figure recall was preserved in AP Aab+ patients, but not in AD Ab-patients with the shared hippocampus-based memory dysfunction. We observed no relevant differences between the AP Aab+ and AD Aab- groups in CSF cell-counts or intrathecal IgG synthesis. The relative frequency of hippocampal and focal atrophy did not differ either between AP Aab+ and AD Aab- groups. Discussion: Our pilot findings are encouraging us to conduct large-scale studies to replicate our discovery of preserved visuoconstruction in AP Aab+ patients with hippocampus-based memory dysfunction. The role of anti-neural autoantibodies is still not fully understood. The detection of these autoantibodies might imply another disease pathology that could be either neuroprotective or be affecting other brain regions, i.e., less pronounced disease activity in the right temporo-parietal regions mainly involved in visuoconstruction.