Mechanical left ventricular unloading in cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if mechanical left ventricular unloading could reduce mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies published until December 20, 2023. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up. We used a Mantel-Haenszel random effects meta-analysis and reported the pooled results with a risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic review (CRD42024498665). RESULTS: We identified two randomized controlled trials and eleven propensity score-matched studies, totaling 9858 patients. Mechanical left ventricular unloading was significantly associated with reduced mortality at the longest follow-up (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P = 0.0001; moderate certainty of evidence), which was confirmed in studies using intraaortic ballon pump (IABP). Benefits of mechanical unloading were also observed in terms of successful VA-ECMO weaning (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29; P = 0.02; low certainty of evidence) and favorable neurological outcome (two studies; RR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.62-3.69; P < 0.0001; low certainty of evidence), although we observed an increased incidence of major bleeding (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59; P = 0.03; low certainty of evidence) and hemolysis (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.02; P = 0.01; moderate certainty of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Among adult patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO, mechanical left ventricular unloading was associated with reduced mortality, which was confirmed in studies using IABP as an unloading device.

Ketamine versus etomidate as an induction agent for tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation is a high-risk intervention commonly performed in critically ill patients. Due to its favorable cardiovascular profile, ketamine is considered less likely to compromise clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether ketamine, compared with other agents, reduces mortality in critically ill patients undergoing intubation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception until April 27, 2023, for randomized controlled trials and matched observational studies comparing ketamine with any control in critically ill patients as an induction agent. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available, and the secondary outcomes included Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, ventilator-free days at day 28, vasopressor-free days at day 28, post-induction mean arterial pressure, and successful intubation on the first attempt. For the primary outcome, we used a Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis on the risk ratio (RR) scale with a weakly informative neutral prior corresponding to a mean estimate of no difference with 95% probability; the estimated effect size will fall between a relative risk of 0.25 and 4. The RR and 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to estimate the probability of mortality reduction (RR < 1). The secondary outcomes were assessed with a frequentist random-effects model. We registered this study in Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/2vf79/ ). RESULTS: We included seven randomized trials and one propensity-matched study totaling 2978 patients. Etomidate was the comparator in all the identified studies. The probability that ketamine reduced mortality was 83.2% (376/1475 [25%] vs. 411/1503 [27%]; RR, 0.93; 95% CrI, 0.79-1.08), which was confirmed by a subgroup analysis excluding studies with a high risk of bias. No significant difference was observed in any secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: All of the included studies evaluated ketamine versus etomidate among critically ill adults requiring tracheal intubation. This meta-analysis showed a moderate probability that induction with ketamine is associated with a reduced risk of mortality.

Hospital-onset sepsis and community-onset sepsis in critical care units in Japan: a retrospective cohort study based on a Japanese administrative claims database.

BACKGROUND: Hospital- and community-onset sepsis are significant sepsis subgroups. Japanese data comparing these subgroups are limited. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of hospital- and community-onset sepsis in critical care units in Japan. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis and Procedure Combination database. Adult patients admitted to critical care units with sepsis from April 2010 to March 2020 were included. Sepsis cases were identified based on ICD-10 codes for infectious diseases, procedure codes for blood culture tests, and medication codes for antimicrobials. Patients' characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and resource utilization were assessed. The in-hospital mortality between groups was compared using the Poisson regression generalized linear mixed-effect model. RESULTS: Of 516,124 patients, 52,183 (10.1%) had hospital-onset sepsis and 463,940 (89.9%) had community-onset sepsis. Hospital-onset sepsis was characterized by younger age, infrequent emergency hospitalization, frequent surgery under general anesthesia, and frequent organ support upon critical care unit admission compared to community-onset sepsis. In-hospital mortality was higher for hospital-onset than for community-onset sepsis (35.5% versus 19.2%; unadjusted mean difference, 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9-16.7]; adjusted mean difference, 15.6% [95% CI 14.9-16.2]). Mean hospital length of stay was longer for hospital-onset than for community-onset sepsis (47 days versus 30 days; unadjusted mean difference, 17 days [95% CI 16-17]; adjusted mean difference, 13 days [95% CI 12-14]). CONCLUSION: Patients with hospital-onset sepsis admitted to critical care units in Japan had a poorer prognosis and more resource utilization including organ support rate, number of days with critical care unit surcharge codes, and hospital length of stay than those with community-onset sepsis.