Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 152(2): 256-261, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32967036

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze all the variables in women who received fibrinogen for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using hierarchical cluster analysis, to provide greater insight into the risk variables involved in these women. METHODS: This retrospective study of women with at least 500 mL of bleeding at birth or during the postpartum period and treated with fibrinogen was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atatürk University School of Medicine from January 2013 to January 2018. Data on the women were obtained from medical records and various risk variables were recorded and analyzed using hierarchical cluster analysis. RESULTS: A total of 114 women with PPH were included in the study. Based on a dendrogram, three main clusters of similar quality variables were created: 1) gravida, parity, age, cervical/vaginal hematoma, laparotomy, hypogastric artery ligation, uterine artery embolization, uterine artery ligation, uterine atony, distance from outer center, lowest hemoglobin, preoperative platelets, endometritis, preoperative white blood cells; 2) lowest fibrinogen, highest fibrinogen, type of birth, placenta invasion anomaly, Bakri balloon tamponade, postpartum hysterectomy, preoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), preoperative international normalized ratio (INR), placental abruption, in-utero ex fetus; 3) postoperative APTT, postoperative INR, maternal mortality, erythrocyte transfusion, plasma transfusion, hospital stay time, disseminated intravascular coagulation/HELLP syndrome, highest hemoglobin, blood group, postoperative platelets, platelet transfusion, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, fibrinogen extract. CONCLUSION: According to the cluster analysis, we should keep fibrinogen extract in the foreground especially in the treatment of hemorrhage in patients with variable conditions. As a result, we can determine whether fibrinogen extract, which has a high economic cost, should be kept at each center. We can also direct which patient will be referred in accordance with the referral steps.


Assuntos
Fibrinogênio/administração & dosagem , Hemostáticos/administração & dosagem , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Descolamento Prematuro da Placenta/epidemiologia , Adulto , Transfusão de Componentes Sanguíneos , Análise por Conglomerados , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ligadura , Doenças Placentárias/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Artéria Uterina , Embolização da Artéria Uterina , Inércia Uterina/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 33(4): 657-663, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29996688

RESUMO

Objective: We compared the extraperitoneal cesarean section to transperitoneal cesarean on fetal delivery time.Material and methods: This randomized study included 210 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section for elective reasons, repeat cesarean (< four), or dystocia. Patients who required an urgent cesarean section, who were at high risk for obstetric or maternal bleeding, who had a uterine or adnexal mass, or who requested tubal ligation were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of the study was the skin incision-to-delivery time. The sample size was set to detect of 1-minute difference in fetal delivery time between groups (two-tailed hypothesis, α = 0.05, ß = 0.10). Secondary outcome measures were total operation time, intraoperative nausea, gag reflex, vomiting, pain and anxiety for those receiving regional anesthesia, postoperative pain, change in hemoglobin, postoperative analgesic requirements, nausea, vomiting and shoulder pain, urogenital distress, time until gas passage, and neonatal outcome.Results: No significant difference occurred between the two groups for skin incision-to- delivery time (extraperitoneal cesarean 3.9 minutes [2.1-7.3] versus transperitoneal cesarean 4.2 minutes [1.9-8.2], p = .065). Significant differences regarding intraoperative pain, total operation time, postoperative pain at the surgical site and shoulder pain, analgesic requirements, time until gas passage, and oral tolerability favored the extraperitoneal group. No significant differences between groups occurred regarding other seconder outcome parameters.Conclusions: There is no clinically significant difference between extraperitoneal cesarean section and transperitoneal cesarean on fetal delivery time. Extraperitoneal cesarean reduces postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and improves oral tolerability.


Assuntos
Cesárea/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Peritônio/cirurgia , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...