Learning single-cell chromatin accessibility profiles using meta-analytic marker genes.

MOTIVATION: Single-cell assay for transposase accessible chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) is a valuable resource to learn cis-regulatory elements such as cell-type specific enhancers and transcription factor binding sites. However, cell-type identification of scATAC-seq data is known to be challenging due to the heterogeneity derived from different protocols and the high dropout rate. RESULTS: In this study, we perform a systematic comparison of seven scATAC-seq datasets of mouse brain to benchmark the efficacy of neuronal cell-type annotation from gene sets. We find that redundant marker genes give a dramatic improvement for a sparse scATAC-seq annotation across the data collected from different studies. Interestingly, simple aggregation of such marker genes achieves performance comparable or higher than that of machine-learning classifiers, suggesting its potential for downstream applications. Based on our results, we reannotated all scATAC-seq data for detailed cell types using robust marker genes. Their meta scATAC-seq profiles are publicly available at https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC. Furthermore, we trained a deep neural network to predict chromatin accessibility from only DNA sequence and identified key motifs enriched for each neuronal subtype. Those predicted profiles are visualized together in our database as a valuable resource to explore cell-type specific epigenetic regulation in a sequence-dependent and -independent manner.

Selecting deep neural networks that yield consistent attribution-based interpretations for genomics.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have advanced our ability to take DNA primary sequence as input and predict a myriad of molecular activities measured via high-throughput functional genomic assays. Post hoc attribution analysis has been employed to provide insights into the importance of features learned by DNNs, often revealing patterns such as sequence motifs. However, attribution maps typically harbor spurious importance scores to an extent that varies from model to model, even for DNNs whose predictions generalize well. Thus, the standard approach for model selection, which relies on performance of a held-out validation set, does not guarantee that a high-performing DNN will provide reliable explanations. Here we introduce two approaches that quantify the consistency of important features across a population of attribution maps; consistency reflects a qualitative property of human interpretable attribution maps. We employ the consistency metrics as part of a multivariate model selection framework to identify models that yield high generalization performance and interpretable attribution analysis. We demonstrate the efficacy of this approach across various DNNs quantitatively with synthetic data and qualitatively with chromatin accessibility data.