Diet in secondary prevention: the effect of dietary patterns on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Improving dietary habits is a first-line recommendation for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is unclear which dietary pattern most effectively lowers cardiovascular risk factors and what the short- and long-term effects are. Therefore, this network meta-analysis compared the effects of popular dietary patterns on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with established CVD. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, SCOPUS and Web of Science was conducted up to 1 April 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of popular dietary patterns (Mediterranean, moderate carbohydrate, low glycemic index, low-fat and minimal dietary intervention) on cardiovascular risk factors (body weight, systolic blood pressure, lipids) in CVD populations were selected. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs comprising 6,331 participants were included. The moderate carbohydrate diet had the most beneficial effect on body weight (-4.6 kg, 95%CrI -25.1; 15.8) and systolic blood pressure (-7.0 mmHg 95%CrI -16.8; 2.7) compared to minimal intervention. None of the included dietary patterns had a favorable effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. After 12 months, the effects were attenuated compared to those at < 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this network meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials, potentially clinically relevant effects of dietary interventions on CV risk factors were observed, but there was considerable uncertainty due to study heterogeneity, low adherence, or actual diminished effects in the medically treated CVD population. It was not possible to select optimal dietary patterns for secondary CVD prevention. Given recent clinical trials demonstrating the potential of dietary patterns to significantly reduce cardiovascular event risk, it is likely that these effects are effectuated through alternative physiological pathways.

LDL cholesterol targets rarely achieved in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: A sex and gender-specific analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reaching LDL-C targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remains challenging. Our aim was to determine attainment of LDL-C target levels and reasons for not reaching these in female and male FH patients. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of heterozygous FH patients in five hospitals in the Netherlands and Norway. Clinical characteristics and information about LLT, lipid levels and reasons for not being on LDL-C treatment target were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: We studied 3178 FH patients (53.9% women), median age 48.0 (IQR 34.0-59.9) years. Median LDL-C before treatment and on-treatment was higher in women compared to men (6.2 (IQR 5.1-7.3) and 6.0 (IQR 4.9-7.2) mmol/l (p=0.005) and 3.0 (IQR 2.4-3.8) and 2.8 (IQR 2.3-3.5) mmol/L (p<0.001)), respectively. A minority of women (26.9%) and men (28.9%) reached LDL-C target. In patients with CVD, 17.2% of women and 25.8% of men reached LDL-C target. Women received less often high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Most common reported reasons for not achieving the LDL-C target were insufficient effect of maximum LLT (women 17.3%, men 24.3%) and side effects (women 15.2%, men 8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In routine practice, only a minority of women and men with FH achieved their LDL-C treatment target. Extra efforts have to be made to provide FH patients with reliable information on the safety of statins and their long-term effects on CVD risk reduction. If statin treatment is insufficient, alternative lipid lowering therapies such as ezetimibe or PCSK9-inhibitors should be considered.

Effect of dietary patterns on cardiovascular risk factors in people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIMS: To identify the most effective dietary pattern for improving cardiovascular risk factors in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, SCOPUS and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of dietary patterns on body weight, blood pressure, HbA1c and lipids after 6 and 12 months. Treatment effects were synthesized using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Six-month changes in HbA1c, SBP and LDL-C were used to estimate relative risk reductions (RRR) for cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Seventy-three RCTs on eight different dietary patterns were included. All reduced body weight and HbA1c after 6 months, with the largest effects from the low carbohydrate (body weight -4.8 kg, 95 %credibility interval (95 %CrI) -6.5;-3.2 kg) and Mediterranean diet (HbA1c -1.0 %, 95 %CrI -15;-0.4 % vs usual diet). There were no significant 6-month blood pressure or lipid effects. Dietary patterns had non-statistically significant 12-months effects. The Mediterranean diet resulted in the largest expected RRR for cardiovascular events: -16 % (95 %CI -31;3.0) vs usual diet. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, all dietary patterns outperformed usual diet in improving body weight and HbA1c after 6 months and clinically relevant cardiovascular risk reduction could be achieved. There was insufficient evidence to select one optimal dietary pattern.

Residual cardiovascular risk reduction guided by lifetime benefit estimation in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

AIMS: To determine the (cost)-effectiveness of blood pressure lowering, lipid-lowering, and antithrombotic therapy guided by predicted lifetime benefit compared to risk factor levels in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: For all patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in the UCC-SMART cohort (1996-2018; n = 7697) two treatment strategies were compared. The lifetime benefit-guided strategy was based on individual estimation of gain in cardiovascular disease (CVD)-free life with the SMART-REACH model. In the risk factor-based strategy, all patients were treated the following: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) < 1.8 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg, and antithrombotic medication. Outcomes were evaluated for the total cohort using a microsimulation model. Effectiveness was evaluated as total gain in CVD-free life and events avoided, cost-effectiveness as incremental cost-effectivity ratio (ICER). In comparison to baseline treatment, treatment according to lifetime benefit would lead to an increase of 24 243 CVD-free life years [95% confidence interval (CI) 19 980-29 909] and would avoid 940 (95% CI 742-1140) events in the next 10 years. For risk-factor based treatment, this would be an increase of 18 564 CVD-free life years (95% CI 14 225-20 456) and decrease of 857 (95% CI 661-1057) events. The ICER of lifetime benefit-based treatment with a treatment threshold of ≥1 year additional CVD-free life per therapy was €15 092/QALY gained and of risk factor-based treatment €9933/QALY gained. In a direct comparison, lifetime benefit-based treatment compared to risk factor-based treatment results in 1871 additional QALYs for the price of €36 538/QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Residual risk reduction guided by lifetime benefit estimation results in more CVD-free life years and more CVD events avoided compared to the conventional risk factor-based strategy. Lifetime benefit-based treatment is an effective and potentially cost-effective strategy for reducing residual CVD risk in patients with clinical manifest vascular disease.

The challenge of choosing in cardiovascular risk management.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. For many years guidelines have listed optimal preventive therapy. More recently, novel therapeutic options have broadened the options for state-of-the-art CV risk management (CVRM). In the majority of patients with CVD, risk lowering can be achieved by utilising standard preventive medication combined with lifestyle modifications. In a minority of patients, add-on therapies should be considered to further reduce the large residual CV risk. However, the choice of which drug combination to prescribe and in which patients has become increasingly complicated, and is dependent on both the absolute CV risk and the reason for the high risk. In this review, we discuss therapeutic decisions in CVRM, focusing on (1) the absolute CV risk of the patient and (2) the pros and cons of novel treatment options.

Detection of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with lower-extremity arterial disease: development and external validations of a risk score.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for screening patients with lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are conflicting. Prediction models might identify patients at high risk of ACS, possibly allowing targeted screening to improve preventive therapy and compliance. METHODS: A systematic search for prediction models for at least 50 per cent ACS in patients with LEAD was conducted. A prediction model in screened patients from the USA with an ankle : brachial pressure index of 0.9 or less was subsequently developed, and assessed for discrimination and calibration. External validation was performed in two independent cohorts, from the UK and the Netherlands. RESULTS: After screening 4907 studies, no previously published prediction models were found. For development of a new model, data for 112 117 patients were used, of whom 6354 (5.7 per cent) had at least 50 per cent ACS and 2801 (2.5 per cent) had at least 70 per cent ACS. Age, sex, smoking status, history of hypercholesterolaemia, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, coronary heart disease and measured systolic BP were predictors of ACS. The model discrimination had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.71 (95 per cent c.i. 0.71 to 0.72) for at least 50 per cent ACS and 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) for at least 70 per cent ACS. Screening the 20 per cent of patients at greatest risk detected 12.4 per cent with at least 50 per cent ACS (number needed to screen (NNS) 8] and 5.8 per cent with at least 70 per cent ACS (NNS 17). This yielded 44.2 and 46.9 per cent of patients with at least 50 and 70 per cent ACS respectively. External validation showed reliable discrimination and adequate calibration. CONCLUSION: The present risk score can predict significant ACS in patients with LEAD. This approach may inform targeted screening of high-risk individuals to enhance the detection of ACS.

Predicting 10-year risk of recurrent cardiovascular events andcardiovascular interventions in patients with established cardiovascular disease: results from UCC-SMART and REACH.

BACKGROUND: Existing cardiovascular risk scores for patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) estimate residual risk of recurrent major cardiovascular events (MACE). The aim of the current study is to develop and externally validate a prediction model to estimate the 10-year combined risk of recurrent MACE and cardiovascular interventions (MACE+) in patients with established CVD. METHODS: Data of patients with established CVD from the UCC-SMART cohort (N = 8421) were used for model development, and patient data from REACH Western Europe (N = 14,528) and REACH North America (N = 19,495) for model validation. Predictors were selected based on the existing SMART risk score. A Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted 10-year risk model was developed for the combined outcome MACE+. The model was validated in all patients and in strata of coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), peripheral artery disease (PAD). RESULTS: External calibration for 2-year risk in REACH Western Europe and REACH North America was good, c-statistics were moderate: 0.60 and 0.58, respectively. In strata of CVD at baseline good external calibration was observed in patients with CHD and CeVD, however, poor calibration was seen in patients with PAD. C-statistics for patients with CHD were 0.60 and 0.57, for patients with CeVD 0.62 and 0.61, and for patients with PAD 0.53 and 0.54 in REACH Western Europe and REACH North America, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year combined risk of recurrent MACE and cardiovascular interventions can be estimated in patients with established CHD or CeVD. However, cardiovascular interventions in patients with PAD could not be predicted reliably.

[A fasting lipid profile is not a necessity in majority of cases]. / Nuchtere lipidenbepaling is vrijwel niet meer nodig.

For decades, a fasting lipid profile was required to predict the cardiovascular risk of patients. This was due to the assumption that if low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is calculated with the Friedewald Formula, LDL-C is dependent on the triglycerides concentration, which can vary after fat consumption. However, several prospective studies show minimal differences of lipid values in fasting and non-fasting lipid profiles. There is also evidence that a non-fasting lipid profile is equally accurate in the prediction of cardiovascular risk. Only in select cases, such as non-fasting triglycerides > 8 mmol/l (708 mg/dl), it is advised to obtain a fasting lipid profile. In conclusion, it is not a necessity to obtain a fasting lipid profile for determining cardiovascular risk. This has many advantages for patients, laboratories and physicians.

The relation between healthy lifestyle changes and decrease in systemic inflammation in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pharmacological lowering of inflammation has proven effective in reducing recurrent cardiovascular event rates. Aim of the current study is to evaluate lifestyle changes (smoking cessation, weight loss, physical activity level increase, alcohol moderation, and a summary lifestyle improvement score) in relation to change in plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration in patients with established cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In total, 1794 patients from the UCC-SMART cohort with stable cardiovascular disease and CRP levels ≤10 mg/L, who returned for a follow-up study visit after median 9.9 years (IQR 5.4-10.8), were included. The relation between changes in smoking status, weight, physical activity, alcohol consumption, a summary lifestyle improvement score and change in plasma CRP concentration was evaluated with linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Smoking cessation was related to a 0.40 mg/L decline in CRP concentration (ß-coefficient -0.40; 95%CI -0.73,-0.07). Weight loss (per 1SD = 6.4 kg) and increase in physical activity (per 1 SD = 48 MET hours per week) were related to a decrease in CRP concentration (ß-coefficients -0.25; 95%CI -0.33,-0.16 and -0.09; 95%CI -0.17,-0.01 per SD). Change in alcohol consumption was not related to CRP difference. Every point higher in the summary lifestyle improvement score was related to a decrease in CRP concentration of 0.17 mg/L (ß-coefficient -0.17; 95%CI -0.26,-0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking cessation, increase in physical activity, and weight loss are related to a decrease in CRP concentration in patients with stable cardiovascular disease. Patients with the highest summary lifestyle improvement score have the most decrease in CRP concentration. These results may indicate that healthy lifestyle changes contribute to lowering systemic inflammation, potentially leading to a lower cardiovascular risk in patients with established cardiovascular disease.

Mortality after hospital admission for heart failure: improvement over time, equally strong in women as in men.

BACKGROUND: To assess the trend in age- and sex-stratified mortality after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in the Netherlands. METHODS: Two nationwide cohorts of patients, hospitalized for new onset heart failure between 01.01.2000-31.12.2002 and between 01.01.2008-31.12.2010, were constructed by linkage of the Dutch Hospital Discharge Registry and the National Cause of Death registry. 30-day, 1-year and 5 -year overall and cause-specific mortality rates stratified by age and sex were assessed and compared over time. RESULTS: We identified 40,230 men and 41,582 women. In both cohorts, men were on average younger than women (74-75 and 78-79 years, respectively) and more often had comorbid conditions (37 and 30%, respectively). In the 2008-10 cohort, mortality rates for men were 13, 32 and 64% for respectively 30-day, 1-year and 5-year mortality and 14, 33 and 66% for women. Mortality rates increased considerably with age similarly in men and women (e.g. from 10.5% in women aged 25-54 to 46.1% in those aged 85 and older after 1 year). Between the two time periods, mortality rates dropped across all ages, equally strong in women as in men. The 1-year absolute risk of death declined by 4.0% (from 36.1 to 32.1%) in men and 3.2% (from 36.2 to 33.0%) in women. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after hospitalization for new onset HF remains high, however, both short-term and long-term survival is improving over time. This improvement was similar across all ages and equally strong in women as in men.

A computerised decision support system for cardiovascular risk management 'live' in the electronic health record environment: development, validation and implementation-the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort Initiative.

PURPOSE: We set out to develop a real-time computerised decision support system (CDSS) embedded in the electronic health record (EHR) with information on risk factors, estimated risk, and guideline-based advice on treatment strategy in order to improve adherence to cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) guidelines with the ultimate aim of improving patient healthcare. METHODS: We defined a project plan including the scope and requirements, infrastructure and interface, data quality and study population, validation and evaluation of the CDSS. RESULTS: In collaboration with clinicians, data scientists, epidemiologists, ICT architects, and user experience and interface designers we developed a CDSS that provides 'live' information on CVRM within the environment of the EHR. The CDSS provides information on cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, medical and family history, smoking, blood pressure, lipids, kidney function, and glucose intolerance measurements), estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk, guideline-compliant suggestions for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment to optimise risk factors, and an estimate on the change in 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease if treatment goals are adhered to. Our pilot study identified a number of issues that needed to be addressed, such as missing data, rules and regulations, privacy, and patient participation. CONCLUSION: Development of a CDSS is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. We identified opportunities and challenges in our project developing a CDSS aimed at improving adherence to CVRM guidelines. The regulatory environment, including guidance on scientific evaluation, legislation, and privacy issues needs to evolve within this emerging field of eHealth.

Observational study of the medical management of patients with peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are not offered adequate risk factor modification, despite their high cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to assess the cardiovascular profiles of patients with PAD and quantify the survival benefits of target-based risk factor modification. METHODS: The Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN) prospectively collected cardiovascular profiles of patients with PAD from ten UK vascular centres (April to June 2018) to assess practice against UK and European goal-directed best medical therapy guidelines. Risk and benefits of risk factor control were estimated using the SMART-REACH model, a validated cardiovascular prediction tool for patients with PAD. RESULTS: Some 440 patients (mean(s.d.) age 70(11) years, 24·8 per cent women) were included in the study. Mean(s.d.) cholesterol (4·3(1·2) mmol/l) and LDL-cholesterol (2·7(1·1) mmol/l) levels were above recommended targets; 319 patients (72·5 per cent) were hypertensive and 343 (78·0 per cent) were active smokers. Only 11·1 per cent of patients were prescribed high-dose statin therapy and 39·1 per cent an antithrombotic agent. The median calculated risk of a major cardiovascular event over 10 years was 53 (i.q.r. 44-62) per cent. Controlling all modifiable cardiovascular risk factors based on UK and European guidance targets (LDL-cholesterol less than 2 mmol/l, systolic BP under 140 mmHg, smoking cessation, antiplatelet therapy) would lead to an absolute risk reduction of the median 10-year cardiovascular risk by 29 (20-38) per cent with 6·3 (4·0-9·3) cardiovascular disease-free years gained. CONCLUSION: The medical management of patients with PAD in this secondary care cohort was suboptimal. Controlling modifiable risk factors to guideline-based targets would confer significant patient benefit.

Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in people with Type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To quantify the risk of different non-invasive arterial stiffness measurements with macrovascular disease and all-cause mortality in high-risk people with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1910 people with Type 2 diabetes included in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study. Arterial stiffness was assessed by brachial artery pulse pressure, normal range (≥0.9) ankle-brachial index and carotid artery distension. Cox regression was used to evaluate the effects of arterial stiffness on risk of cardiovascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular mortality) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 380 new cardiovascular events and 436 deaths occurred during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 7.5 (4.1-11.0) years. A 10-mmHg higher brachial pulse pressure was related to higher hazard of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16). A 0.1-point lower ankle-brachial index within the normal range was related to a higher hazard of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.27) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.31). A one-unit (10-3 ×kPa-1 ) lower carotid artery distensibility coefficient was related to a higher hazard of vascular mortality (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.07). CONCLUSION: Increased arterial stiffness, as measured by either increased pulse pressure, normal-range ankle-brachial index or carotid artery distensibility coefficient, is related to increased hazard of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in people with Type 2 diabetes.

Limited benefit of haemoglobin glycation index as risk factor for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: The haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) has been proposed as a marker of interindividual differences in haemoglobin glycosylation. Previous studies have shown a relationship between high HGI and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with diabetes. However, no studies have investigated the role of previous CVD in this association. METHODS: The study cohort comprised patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; n=1910) included in the Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART) study. The relationship between either HGI or HbA1c and a composite of cardiovascular events as the primary outcome, and mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke as secondary outcomes, was investigated using Cox proportional-hazards models. Similar analyses were performed after stratification according to previous CVD. RESULTS: A 1-unit higher HGI was associated with a 29% greater risk of a composite of cardiovascular events (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06-1.57) in patients without previous CVD, whereas no such relationship was seen in patients with previous CVD (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86-1.08). The direction and magnitude of the hazard ratios (HRs) of HGI and HbA1c in relation to outcomes were similar. Additional adjustment for HbA1c in the association between HGI and outcomes lowered the HRs. CONCLUSION: Similar to HbA1c, higher HGI is related to higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM without CVD. As HbA1c has proved to be a comparable risk factor, and obtaining and interpreting the HGI is complicated, any additional benefit of applying the HGI in clinical settings is likely to be limited.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels in the normal range and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels within the normal range and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a cohort of patients at high cardiovascular risk, and to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies. METHODS: We included 5542 patients without T2DM from the prospective Secondary Manifestations of ARTerial disease study with TSH levels between 0.35 and 5.0 mIU/L without anti-thyroid medication or thyroid-hormone replacement therapy. Cox regression was used to investigate the relationship between baseline plasma TSH levels and incident T2DM. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched for prospective cohorts assessing TSH and incident T2DM. Hazard ratios (HR) from included prospective cohort studies were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: In patients at high cardiovascular risk, higher plasma TSH levels in the normal range were not associated [HR 1.07 per mIU/L increase in TSH (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.95-1.22)] with an increased risk of T2DM, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, total and HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. In the meta-analysis involving three prospective cohort studies, including the present study, including 29,791 participants with 1930 incident events, there was no relation between plasma TSH levels in the normal range and incident T2DM [pooled HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.99-1.14)]. CONCLUSION: There is no apparent relation between plasma TSH levels in the normal range and incident T2DM in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Association between bone metabolism regulators and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Osteopontin (OPN), osteonectin (ON) and osteocalcin (OC) play an important role in the development of vascular calcifications, but it is unclear whether these bone metabolism regulators contribute to the development of arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes patients. We therefore aim to determine the relationship between plasma concentrations of OPN, ON, OC and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 1003 type 2 diabetes patients included in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART)-cohort. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the relation between plasma levels of OPN, ON and OC and arterial stiffness as measured by pulse pressure (PP), ankle-brachial index (ABI) (≥0.9), carotid artery distension and an arterial stiffness summary score. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, kidney function, diabetes duration and diastolic blood pressure. Higher OPN plasma levels were significantly related to a lower ABI (ß-0.013; 95%CI -0.024 to -0.002) and a higher arterial stiffness summary score (OR1.24; 95%CI 1.03-1.49). OPN levels were not related to PP (ß 0.59; 95%CI -0.63-1.81) or absolute carotid artery distention (ß -7.03; 95%CI -20.00-5.93). ON and OC plasma levels were not related to any of the arterial stiffness measures. CONCLUSION: Only elevated plasma levels of OPN are associated with increased arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes as measured by the ankle-brachial index and arterial stiffness summary score. These findings indicate that OPN may be involved in the pathophysiology of arterial stiffness and call for further clinical investigation.

Relation between adiposity and vascular events, malignancy and mortality in patients with stable cerebrovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal adiposity is associated with various risk factors including hypertension, and is therefore particularly relevant in patients with stable cerebrovascular disease (CeVD). A U-shaped relation between body mass index (BMI, kg m-2) and cardiovascular events is often described. Whether this U-shape persists for abdominal adiposity, and consequently which reference values should guide clinical practice, is unclear. We described the relation between multiple adiposity measurements and risk of vascular events, vascular mortality, malignancy and all-cause mortality in patients with clinically stable CeVD. METHODS: During a median follow-up time of 6.8 years, 1767 patients were prospectively followed. Relations were assessed using multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Adiposity was assessed with BMI, waist circumference (stratified by gender) and the contribution of visceral fat to total abdominal fat (VAT%) measured using ultrasound. Relations were nonlinear if the χ2-statistic of the nonlinear term was significant (P-value<0.05). Nadirs were reported for nonlinear and hazard ratios (HRs) for linear relations. RESULTS: The relations between BMI and outcomes were nonlinear with nadirs ranging between 27.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.9-29.3) kg m2 for vascular mortality and 28.1 (95% CI, 19.0-38.2)) kg m-2 for malignancy. The relation between waist circumference and all-cause mortality was nonlinear with a nadir of 84.0 (95% CI, 18.7-134.8) cm for females and 94.8 (95% CI, 80.3-100.1) cm for males. No nonlinearity was detected for VAT%. A 1-s.d. (9.8%) increase in VAT% was related to both vascular (HR, 1.23, 95% CI 1.00-1.51) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CeVD, a BMI around 27-28 kg m-2 relates to the lowest risk of vascular events, vascular mortality, malignancy and all-cause mortality. However, increasing abdominal adiposity confers a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Thus, whereas traditional BMI cutoffs may be re-evaluated in this population, striving for low abdominal obesity should remain a goal.

[Syncope; suspect pulmonary embolism, especially in the elderly]. / Syncope: wees bedacht op een longembolie, vooral bij ouderen.

Syncope can be caused by a pulmonary embolism. This applies in particular to elderly patients admitted with syncope; in the general population, however, syncope is far more frequently caused by a vasovagal response or orthostatic hypotension. Syncope can be the symptom of a pulmonary embolism, even in the absence of any clinical manifestations of this diagnosis; it is, therefore, important to exclude pulmonary embolism in any syncope patient in the accident and emergency department by applying the Wells clinical decision rule. GPs should also be alert to syncope as a possible symptom of pulmonary embolism, and be alert to breathing rate and signs of venous thrombosis.

Individualized prediction of the effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

AIMS: To predict individualized treatment effects of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on cardiovascular and renal complications in order to help clinicians and patients assess the benefit of treatment (or adherence) and estimate remaining disease risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In patients with diabetic nephropathy, the 3-year treatment effect of ARBs was predicted in terms of absolute risk reduction (ARR) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD; i.e. myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure) and all-cause mortality. Competing-risk-adjusted proportional hazard models were developed based on the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and externally validated in the Reduction of Endpoints NIDDM with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial. RESULTS: Predictors included in the model were age, sex, smoking sex, systolic blood pressure, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, albumin and phosphorus. The median predicted 3-year risk without treatment was 6.0% for ESRD and 28.0% for CVD and mortality. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] predicted 3-year ARR was 1.2 (0.4-3.1)% for ESRD and 2.2 (1.8-2.6)% for CVD and mortality, resulting in a combined ARR of 3.4 (2.4-5.5)%. The remaining disease risk was 4.7 (IQR 1.7-12.8)% for ESRD and 25.8% (IQR 20.3-31.9)% for CVD and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The combined effects of ARBs on ESRD and CVD and mortality in patients with diabetic nephropathy vary considerably between patients. A substantial proportion of patients remain at high risk for both outcomes despite ARB treatment.

Association between vascular health and ovarian ageing in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

STUDY QUESTION: Is vascular health associated with ovarian reserve status using type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM-1) as a model for vascular compromise? SUMMARY ANSWER: No conclusive evidence for an association between vascular health and ovarian ageing was found in women with DM-1. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The mechanism behind advanced ovarian ageing has not yet been elucidated. We hypothesize that vascular impairment precedes ovarian ageing. DM-1 is hallmarked by premature vascular complications that may consequently play a role in the rate of primordial follicle decline. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional, patient-control study was performed in 150 premenopausal, regular cycling women with DM-1, as well as a reference population of 177 healthy, fertile women. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In a single-study visit, an inventory of both ovarian reserve and vascular status was carried out in the DM-1 group. A transvaginal ultrasound to calculate the antral follicle count (AFC) and blood sampling for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), lipids, C-reactive protein and HbA1c measurements were performed. Furthermore, vascular screening including measurements of blood pressure, flow-mediated dilation, peripheral arterial tonometry, pulse wave velocity, pulse wave analysis and intima-media thickness was carried out. The relative decrease in serum AMH levels in women with DM-1 compared with healthy references was investigated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Systolic blood pressure was negatively correlated with both serum AMH (P= 0.006) and AFC (P= 0.004) in the DM-1 group. A non-linear relationship between HDL-cholesterol and serum AMH was found (P= 0.0001). No associations were detected between other vascular risk factors or vascular function tests and serum AMH or AFC in women with DM-1. With regard to the comparison of AMH levels between women with and without DM-1, mean AMH levels were 2.5 ± 1.9 ng/ml and 3.0 ± 2.8 ng/ml, respectively. After adjustment for confounders the difference in AMH levels between both groups appeared non-significant (fold change: 0.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-1.23). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The use of different AMH assays and the cross-sectional design may limit the interpretation of this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The lack of evident association between vascular health and ovarian ageing may be the result of an insufficient vascular compromise in the relatively young, DM-1 group. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was received for conducting or publishing this study. F.Y., W.S., A.F., F.L.J.V., M.J.C.E. and H.W.d.V. have nothing to disclose. F.J.M.B. has received fees and grant support from the following companies: Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Merck Serono, Medical Specialties Distributors and Roche. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.