Independence of Lipoprotein(a) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Mediated Cardiovascular Risk: A Participant-Level Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels are independently associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the relationship between Lp(a) level, LDL-C level, and ASCVD risk at different thresholds is not well defined. METHODS: A participant-level meta-analysis of 27 658 participants enrolled in 6 placebo-controlled statin trials was performed to assess the association of LDL-C and Lp(a) levels with risk of fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease events, stroke, or any coronary or carotid revascularization (ASCVD). The multivariable-adjusted association between baseline Lp(a) level and ASCVD risk was modeled continuously using generalized additive models, and the association between baseline LDL-C level and ASCVD risk by baseline Lp(a) level by Cox proportional hazards models with random effects. The joint association between Lp(a) level and statin-achieved LDL-C level with ASCVD risk was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared with an Lp(a) level of 5 mg/dL, increasing levels of Lp(a) were log-linearly associated with ASCVD risk in statin- and placebo-treated patients. Among statin-treated individuals, those with Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL (≈125 nmol/L) had increased risk across all quartiles of achieved LDL-C level and absolute change in LDL-C level. Even among those with the lowest quartile of achieved LDL-C level (3.1-77.0 mg/dL), those with Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL had greater ASCVD risk (hazard ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.06-1.79]) than those with Lp(a) level ≤50 mg/dL. The greatest risk was observed with both Lp(a) level >50 mg/dL and LDL-C level in the fourth quartile (hazard ratio, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.46-2.48]). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the independent and additive nature of Lp(a) and LDL-C levels for ASCVD risk, and that LDL-C lowering does not fully offset Lp(a)-mediated risk.

Long-Term Effects of Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, had positive cardiorenal effects in patients with chronic kidney disease who were at risk for disease progression. Post-trial follow-up was designed to assess how the effects of empagliflozin would evolve after the discontinuation of the trial drug. METHODS: In the active trial, patients with chronic kidney disease were randomly assigned to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo and were followed for a median of 2 years. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 20 but less than 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area or an eGFR of at least 45 but less than 90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of at least 200. Subsequently, surviving patients who consented were observed for 2 additional years. No trial empagliflozin or placebo was administered during the post-trial period, but local practitioners could prescribe open-label SGLT2 inhibitors, including open-label empagliflozin. The primary composite outcome was kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death as assessed from the start of the active-trial period to the end of the post-trial period. RESULTS: Of the 6609 patients who had undergone randomization in the active trial, 4891 (74%) were enrolled in the post-trial period. During this period, the use of open-label SGLT2 inhibitors was similar in the two groups (43% in the empagliflozin group and 40% in the placebo group). During the combined active- and post-trial periods, a primary-outcome event occurred in 865 of 3304 patients (26.2%) in the empagliflozin group and in 1001 of 3305 patients (30.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.87). During the post-trial period only, the hazard ratio for a primary-outcome event was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99). During the combined periods, the risk of kidney disease progression was 23.5% in the empagliflozin group and 27.1% in the placebo group; the risk of the composite of death or end-stage kidney disease was 16.9% and 19.6%, respectively; and the risk of cardiovascular death was 3.8% and 4.9%, respectively. There was no effect of empagliflozin on death from noncardiovascular causes (5.3% in both groups). CONCLUSIONS: In a broad range of patients with chronic kidney disease at risk for progression, empagliflozin continued to have additional cardiorenal benefits for up to 12 months after it was discontinued. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and others; EMPA-KIDNEY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03594110; EuDRACT number, 2017-002971-24.).

Proceedings of a membrane update symposium: advancements, scientific insights, and future trends for dialysis membranes for enhanced clinical outcomes in end stage kidney disease patients.

Purpose of symposium: From September 6 - 8 2022, the Life/2022 Membrane Symposium was held in Frankfurt, Germany, and transmitted live to a worldwide internet audience. The event was part of the Life/Nephrology Campus initiative, a continuous educational platform for the nephrology community to expand knowledge and share expertise on contemporary topics in chronic kidney disease. We describe recent questions and advances in the field, and we underline challenges in the care of dialysis patients and opportunities for integration of new findings into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes in end stage kidney disease patients. Topics: Most patients with kidney failure are on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). The scientific program of the symposium was developed around topics about the role, functional determinants, technical aspects, limitations, and clinical implications of membranes presently in use. International experts with clinical or technical expertise as well as scientific recognition within the nephrology community were asked to prepare their presentations based on their own experiences, perceptions, opinions, and sources of information. The symposium devoted a major portion to discussing novel approaches for improving membranes and treatment quality, including updates on innovative concepts that may could potentially transform the landscape of kidney replacement therapy for chronic kidney disease patients in the future. Implications: The intent was to provide insights into current attention points for healthcare professionals new to the field of MHD, and to test a unique forum for continuing medical education integrating physician and patient experiences to promote changes in clinical practice. Furthermore, the symposium premiered a specifically developed mixed reality holographic 3D model to demonstrate recent dialyzer innovation diminishing protein fouling on membrane surfaces. As a continuous online educational platform for scientific exchange, this Life/2022 event provided online learning opportunities with on-demand content, with all symposium lectures freely available on nephrologycampus.com.

Semaglutide in patients with overweight or obesity and chronic kidney disease without diabetes: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Semaglutide reduces albuminuria and the risk of kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 and <3,500 mg g-1) and body mass index ≥27 kg m-2. Participants were randomized to semaglutide 2.4 mg per week or placebo. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in UACR at week 24. Safety was monitored throughout. Overall, 125 participants were screened, of whom 101 were randomized to semaglutide (n = 51) or placebo (n = 50). Mean age was 55.8 (s.d. 12) years; 40 participants (39.6%) were female; median UACR was 251 mg g-1 (interquartile range 100, 584); mean eGFR was 65.0 (s.d. 25) ml min-1 1.73 m-2; and mean body mass index was 36.2 (s.d. 5.6) kg m-2. Chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 25) and hypertensive CKD (n = 27) were the most common CKD etiologies. Treatment for 24 weeks with semaglutide compared to placebo reduced UACR by -52.1% (95% confidence interval -65.5, -33.4; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more often reported with semaglutide (n = 30) than with placebo (n = 15). Semaglutide treatment for 24 weeks resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction in albuminuria in patients with overweight/obesity and non-diabetic CKD. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04889183 .

Adverse Impacts of PEGylated Protein Therapeutics: A Targeted Literature Review.

The beneficial effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated therapeutics, such as increased half-life, solubility, stability, and decreased immunogenicity, have been well described. There have been concerns, however, about adverse outcomes with their use, but understanding of those adverse outcomes is still relatively limited. The present study aimed to characterize adverse outcomes associated with PEGylation of protein-based therapeutics on immunogenicity, pharmacologic properties, and safety. A targeted review of English language articles published from 1990 to September 29, 2023, was conducted. Of the 29 studies included in this review, 18 reported adverse safety outcomes such as hematologic complications, hepatic toxicity, injection site reactions, arthralgia, nausea, infections, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), and AE-related discontinuations and dose modifications. Fifteen studies reported immunogenicity-related outcomes, such as the prevalence of pre-existing antibodies to PEG, treatment-emergent antibody response, and hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated drugs. Seven studies reported pharmacological outcomes such as increased clearance and reduced activity in response to PEGylated drugs. This review aims to contribute to a balanced view of PEGylated therapies by summarizing the adverse outcomes or lack of benefit associated with PEGylated therapeutics reported in the literature. We identified several studies characterizing adverse outcomes, pharmacological effects, and immunogenicity associated with the use of PEGylated therapeutics. Our findings suggest that using PEGylated therapeutics may require careful monitoring for adverse safety outcomes, including screening and monitoring for pre-existing antibodies and those induced in response to PEGylated therapy, as well as monitoring and adjusting the dosing of PEGylated therapeutics.

First interim results from FINE-REAL: a prospective, non-interventional, phase 4 study providing insights into the use and safety of finerenone in a routine clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone, a selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improves kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The FINE-REAL study (NCT05348733) aims to evaluate the characteristics and treatment patterns of participants treated with finerenone in clinical practice. METHODS: FINE-REAL is a prospective, single-arm, non-interventional study of patients initiated on finerenone as part of their routine care in accordance with country-approved labels. The study, initiated in June 2022, is expected to be completed by January 2028. The cutoff for this pre-specified interim analysis was June 13, 2023. RESULTS: Participants were recruited across nephrology, endocrinology, cardiology, and primary care settings. Of 556 participants enrolled in the study by the cut-off date, 504 were included in this analysis (median follow-up duration of 7 months [finerenone treatment initiation to last recorded observation]). At baseline, 76.1% of participants were in the high or very high (KDIGO) CKD risk categories. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were prescribed to 71.8% and 46.6% of participants, respectively. Based on prescribing information, 87.9% and 12.1% of participants initiated finerenone at doses of 10 and 20 mg, respectively. Finerenone treatment was uninterrupted in 92.3% of participants after 7 months' median follow-up. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 110 (21.8%) participants. Hyperkalemia occurred in 25 (5.0%) participants, with no cases leading to death, dialysis, or hospitalization. CONCLUSION: At this interim analysis, finerenone was initiated in patients with CKD and T2D across various clinical practices participating in the study. Treatment discontinuation and hyperkalemia occurred infrequently.

Frequent hemodialysis versus standard hemodialysis for people with kidney failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Frequent hemodialysis provided more than three times per week may lower mortality and improve health-related quality of life. Yet, the evidence is inconclusive. We evaluated the benefits and harms of frequent hemodialysis in people with kidney failure compared with standard hemodialysis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials including adults on hemodialysis with highly sensitive searching in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar on 3 January 2024. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. We adjudicated evidence certainty using GRADE. RESULTS: From 11,142 unique citations, only seven studies involving 518 participants proved eligible. The effects of frequent hemodialysis on physical and mental health were imprecise due to few data. Frequent hemodialysis probably had uncertain effect on death from all cause compared with standard hemodialysis (relative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.33-1.91, low certainty evidence). Data were not reported for death from cardiovascular causes, major cardiovascular events, fatigue or vascular access. CONCLUSION: The evidentiary basis for frequent hemodialysis is incomplete due to clinical trials with few or no events reported for mortality and cardiovascular outcome measures and few participants in which patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life and symptoms were reported.

Empagliflozin lowers serum uric acid in chronic kidney disease: exploratory analyses from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Hyperuricaemia and gout are common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to assess the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition on uric acid (urate) and gout in patients with CKD. METHODS: The EMPA-KIDNEY trial randomised 6609 patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥20 and <90 mL/min/1.73m2) to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg daily or matching placebo over a median of two years follow-up. Serum uric acid was measured at randomisation then 2 and 18 months of follow-up and the effects of empagliflozin were analysed using a pre-specified mixed model repeated measures approach. Participant-reported gout events were analysed in Cox regression models (first events) with the Andersen-Gill extension (total events). A post-hoc composite outcome included new initiation of uric acid lowering therapy or colchicine. EMPA-KIDNEY primary and kidney disease progression outcomes were also assessed in subgroups of baseline serum uric acid. RESULTS: Baseline mean ± SD serum uric acid concentration was 431±114 µmol/L. Allocation to empagliflozin resulted in a study-average between-group difference in serum uric acid of -25.6 (95%CI -30.3,-21.0) µmol/L with larger effects in those with higher eGFR (trend P < 0.001) and without diabetes (heterogeneity P < 0.001). Compared to placebo, empagliflozin did not significantly reduce first or total gout events (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.74-1.02 for the 595 first events, and 0.86, 0.72-1.03 for the 869 total events) with similar hazard ratios for the post-hoc composite and across subgroups, including by diabetes and eGFR. The effect of empagliflozin on the primary outcome and kidney disease progression outcomes were similar irrespective of baseline level of uric acid. CONCLUSION: SGLT2 inhibition reduces serum uric acid in patients with CKD with larger effects at higher eGFR and in the absence of diabetes. However, the effect on uric acid is modest and did not translate into reduced risk of gout in EMPA-KIDNEY.

Reduction in kidney function decline and risk of severe clinical events in agalsidase beta-treated Fabry disease patients: a matched analysis from the Fabry Registry.

Background: Patients with Fabry disease (FD, α-galactosidase A deficiency or absence) accumulate glycosphingolipids, leading to progressive dysfunction of kidneys, heart and nervous system. Generalizable real-world outcomes following agalsidase beta treatment initiation outside trials are limited. We investigated the associations of long-term agalsidase beta treatment with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes over time and the risk of developing a composite clinical event in a matched analysis of treated and untreated patients with FD. Methods: Agalsidase beta-treated adult patients (aged ≥16 years) from the Fabry Registry and adult untreated patients from a natural history cohort were matched 1:1 and X:X (with one occurrence and multiple occurrences of each untreated patient, respectively) by sex, phenotype, age and (for eGFR slope analysis) baseline eGFR. Outcomes included eGFR slope over 5 years and composite clinical event risk (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or renal event, or death) over 10+ years. As a surrogate indicator of therapeutic response in paediatric patients, the percentage experiencing normalization in plasma globotriaosylceramide (GL-3) from treatment initiation was assessed in patients aged 2 to <16 years. Results: Overall, eGFR slopes for 1:1-matched untreated and treated adult patients [122 pairs (72.1% male)] were -3.19 and -1.47 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively (reduction in rate of decline = 53.9%, P = .007), and for X:X-matched [122 untreated/950 treated (59.4% male)] were -3.29 and -1.56 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively (reduction in rate of decline = 52.6%, P < .001). Agalsidase beta treatment was associated with lower risk of clinical events, with hazard ratios of 0.41 (P = .003) and 0.67 (P = .008) for 1:1-matched and X:X-matched analyses, respectively. Plasma GL-3 declined markedly in paediatric patients and normalized in most within 6 months of treatment initiation. Conclusion: Agalsidase beta treatment preserves kidney function and delays progression to severe clinical events among adult patients with FD. Plasma GL-3 levels analysed in paediatric patients showed normalization of elevated pre-treatment levels in most patients.

Anaemia and quality of life in chronic kidney disease: a consensus document from the European Anaemia of CKD Alliance.

Anaemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and has a significant impact on quality of life (QoL), work productivity and outcomes. Current management includes oral or intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), to which hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have been recently added, increasing the available therapeutic options. In randomised controlled trials, only intravenous iron improved cardiovascular outcome, while some ESAs were associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events. Despite therapeutic advances, several challenges and unmet needs remain in the current management of anaemia of CKD. In particular, clinical practice does not include an assessment of QoL, which prompted a group of European nephrologists and representatives of patient advocacy groups to revisit the current approach. In this consensus document, the authors propose a move towards a more holistic, personalised and long-term approach, based on existing evidence. The focus of treatment should be on improving QoL without increasing the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, and tailoring management strategies to the needs of the individual. In addition, the authors discuss the suitability of a currently available anaemia of CKD-specific health-related QoL measure for inclusion in the routine clinical management of anaemia of CKD. The authors also outline the logistics and challenges of incorporating such a measure into electronic health records and how it may be used to improve QoL for people with anaemia of CKD.

Clinical trial designs to assess treatment effects on glomerular filtration rate decline.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline is used as surrogate endpoint for kidney failure. Interventions that reduce chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression often exert acute GFR reductions which differ from their long-term benefits and complicate the estimation of long-term benefit. Here, we assessed the utility of two alternative trial designs (wash-out design and active run-in randomized withdrawal design) that attempt to exclude the impact of acute effects. Post-hoc analyses of two clinical trials that characterized the effect of an intervention with acute reductions in GFR were conducted. The two trials included a wash-out period (EMPA-REG Outcome testing empagliflozin vs placebo) or an active run-in period with a randomized withdrawal (SONAR testing atrasentan vs placebo). We compared the drug effect on GFR decline calculated from the first on-treatment visit to the end of treatment (chronic slope in a standard randomized trial design) with GFR change calculated from randomization to end of wash out, or GFR change from treatment-specific baseline GFR values (GFR at start-of-run-in for placebo and end-of-run-in for atrasentan) until end-of-treatment. The effect of empagliflozin versus placebo on chronic GFR slope was 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.49-1.94) mL/min/1.73 m2/year, similar to total GFR decline from baseline to the end of wash-out period using a linear mixed model 1.64 (1.44-1.85) mL/min/1.73 m2/year). The effect of atrasentan versus placebo on chronic GFR slope was 0.72 (0.32-1.11) mL/min/1.73 m2/year, similar to total slope from a single slope model when estimated from treatment specific baseline GFR values 0.77 (0.39-1.14) mL/min/1.73 m2/year). Statistical power of the two designs outperformed the standard randomized design. Thus, wash-out and active-run-in randomized-withdrawal trial designs are appropriate models to compute treatment effects on GFR decline.

Heart failure events in randomized controlled trials for adults receiving maintenance dialysis: a meta-epidemiologic study.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Heart failure is characterized as cardiac dysfunction resulting in elevated cardiac filling pressures with symptoms and signs of congestion. Distinguishing heart failure from other causes of similar presentations in patients with kidney failure is challenging but necessary, and is needed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to accurately estimate treatment effects. The objective of this study was to review heart failure events, their diagnostic criteria and adjudication in RCTs of patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis. We hypothesized that heart failure events, diagnostic criteria and adjudication were infrequently reported in RCTs in dialysis. METHODS: We conducted a meta-epidemiologic systematic review of RCTs from high impact medical, nephrology and cardiology journals from 2000 to 2020. RCTs were eligible if they enrolled adults receiving maintenance dialysis for kidney failure and evaluated any intervention. Results. Of 561 RCTs in patients receiving dialysis, 36 (6.4%) reported heart failure events as primary (10, 27.8%) or secondary (31, 86.1%) outcomes. 10 of the 36 (27.8%) RCTs provided heart failure event diagnostic criteria and 5 of these 10 (50%) adjudicated heart failure events. These 10 RCTs included event diagnostic criteria for heart failure or heart failure hospitalizations, and their criteria included dyspnea (5/10), edema (2/10), rales/crackles (4/10), chest x-ray pulmonary edema or vascular redistribution (4/10), treatment in an acute setting (6/10) and ultrafiltration or dialysis (4/10). No study explicitly distinguished heart failure from volume overload secondary to non-adherence or underdialysis. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that heart failure events are infrequently reported in RCTs in dialysis and are heterogeneously defined. Further research is required to develop standardized diagnostic criteria that are practical and meaningful to patients and clinicians.

Effect of empagliflozin on total myocardial infarction events by type and additional coronary outcomes: insights from the randomized EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose-co-transporter-2 inhibitor, on risk for myocardial infarction has not been fully characterized. METHODS: This study comprised prespecified and post-hoc analyses of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial in which 7020 people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease [mostly atherosclerotic (ASCVD)] were randomized to empagliflozin or placebo and followed for a median 3.1 years. We assessed the effect of empagliflozin on total (first plus recurrent) events of centrally adjudicated fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) using a negative binomial model with robust confidence intervals (CI) that preserves randomization and accounts for the within-patient correlation of multiple events. Post hoc, we analyzed types of MI: type 1 (related to plaque-rupture/thrombus), type 2 (myocardial supply-demand imbalance), type 3 (sudden-death related, i.e. fatal MI), type 4 (percutaneous coronary intervention-related), and type 5 (coronary artery bypass graft-related). MIs could be assigned to > 1 type. RESULTS: There were 421 total MIs (including recurrent); 299, 86, 26, 19, and 1 were classified as type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 events, respectively. Overall, empagliflozin reduced the risk of total MI events by 21% [rate ratio for empagliflozin vs. placebo, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.620-0.998), P = 0.0486], largely driven by its effect on type 1 [rate ratio, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61-1.04)] and type 2 MIs [rate ratio, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.41-1.10)]. CONCLUSIONS: In T2D patients with ASCVD, empagliflozin reduced the risk of MIs, with consistent effects across the two most common etiologies, i.e. type 1 and 2. TRAIL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01131676.

Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors with and without glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: a SMART-C collaborative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists both improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. We sought to evaluate whether the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are consistent in patients receiving and not receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists. METHODS: We conducted a collaborative meta-analysis of trials included in the SGLT2 Inhibitor Meta-Analysis Cardio-Renal Trialists' Consortium, restricted to participants with diabetes. Treatment effects from individual trials were obtained from Cox regression models and pooled using inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. The two main cardiovascular outcomes assessed included major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death), and hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death. The main kidney outcomes assessed were chronic kidney disease progression (≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], kidney failure [eGFR <15 mL/min/1·73 m2, chronic dialysis, or kidney transplantation], or death due to kidney failure), and the rate of change in eGFR over time. Safety outcomes were also assessed. FINDINGS: Across 12 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, 3065 (4·2%) of 73 238 participants with diabetes were using GLP-1 receptor agonists at baseline. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in participants both receiving and not receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists (hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·63-1·03 vs 0·90, 0·86-0·94; p-heterogeneity=0·31). Effects on hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death (0·76, 0·57-1·01 vs 0·78, 0·74-0·82; p-heterogeneity=0·90) and chronic kidney disease progression (0·65, 0·46-0·94 vs 0·67, 0·62-0·72; p-heterogeneity=0·81) were also consistent regardless of GLP-1 receptor agonist use, as was the effect on the chronic rate of change in eGFR over time (heterogeneity=0·92). Fewer serious adverse events occurred with SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo, irrespective of GLP-1 receptor agonist use (relative risk 0·87, 95% CI 0·79-0·96 vs 0·91, 0·89-0·93; p-heterogeneity=0·41). INTERPRETATION: The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes are consistent regardless of the background use of GLP-1 receptor agonists. These findings suggest independent effects of these evidence-based therapies and support clinical practice guidelines recommending the use of these agents in combination to improve cardiovascular and kidney metabolic outcomes. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Ramaciotti Foundation.

Effect of Qualifying Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis Proximity on Cardiovascular Risk and Benefit of Empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial.

Background: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a history of an ischemic event is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Whether patients with T2DM and a recent atherothrombotic diagnosis benefit from early intervention with a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor is unknown. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of the Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients-Removing Excess Glucose (EMPA-REG OUTCOME), which compared empagliflozin to placebo in adults with T2DM and atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). Participants were categorized based on the time since their last qualifying ASCVD diagnosis (≤ 1 year vs > 1 year). Qualifying ASCVD diagnoses included ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, and peripheral artery disease. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Results: A total of 6796 participants (n = 4547 empagliflozin, n = 2249 placebo) were included. Median time since the last qualifying ASCVD diagnosis was 3.8 years (quartile 1-quartile 3: 1.5-7.6), and most qualifying diagnoses occurred > 1 year before randomization (≤ 1 year, n = 1214; > 1 year, n = 5582). Empagliflozin reduced the incidence of the primary outcome irrespective of the time since the last qualifying ASCVD diagnosis (≤ 1 year: hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.57-1.16; vs > 1 year: hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.00; P for interaction = 0.84). Results were similar for the composite of CV death or hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: Empagliflozin improved CV outcomes in participants with T2DM, irrespective of the time since the last qualifying ASCVD diagnosis at randomization. Prospective trials are necessary to investigate the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors at the time of an acute ASCVD event. Trial Registration: EMPA-REG OUTCOME (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01131676).

Contexte: Chez les patients atteints de diabète de type 2 (DT2), des antécédents d'accidents ischémiques sont associés à un risque accru de maladie cardiovasculaire (CV). On ignore si une intervention précoce par un inhibiteur du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2 pourrait être bénéfique pour les patients atteints de DT2 ayant récemment reçu un diagnostic d'athérothrombose. Méthodologie: Cette étude est une analyse secondaire de l'essai EMPA-REG OUTCOME ( Empa gliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients­ R emoving E xcess G lucose), qui visait à comparer l'empagliflozine à un placebo chez des adultes atteints de DT2 et d'une maladie CV athéroscléreuse. Les participants ont été répartis selon le temps écoulé depuis leur plus récent diagnostic de maladie CV athéroscléreuse admissible (≤ 1 an vs > 1 an). Les diagnostics de maladies CV athéroscléreuses admissibles comprenaient un accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique ou hémorragique, un infarctus du myocarde, une coronaropathie et une artériopathie périphérique. Le critère d'évaluation principal était composé des décès d'origine CV, des infarctus du myocarde non mortels et des accident vasculaire cérébral non mortels. Résultats: Au total, 6796 participants (n = 4547 pour l'empagliflozine, n = 2249 pour le placebo) ont été inclus. Le temps écoulé médian depuis le diagnostic le plus récent de maladie CV athéroscléreuse admissible était de 3,8 ans (quartile 1-quartile 3 : 1,5-7,6). La plupart des diagnostics admissibles avaient été posés plus de 1 an avant la répartition aléatoire (≤ 1 an, n = 1214; > 1 an, n = 5582). L'empagliflozine a réduit la fréquence des événements constituant le critère d'évaluation principal, sans égard au temps écoulé depuis le plus récent diagnostic de maladie CV athéroscléreuse admissible (≤ 1 an : rapport des risques instantanés 0,82, intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 0,57-1,16; vs > 1 an : rapport des risques instantanés 0,85, intervalle de confiance à 95 % : 0,72-1,00; p pour l'interaction = 0,84). Les résultats étaient comparables à ceux observés pour le critère composé des décès d'origine CV et des hospitalisations pour insuffisance cardiaque. Conclusions: L'empagliflozine a amélioré les issues CV chez les patients atteints de DT2 sans égard au temps écoulé depuis le plus récent diagnostic de maladie CV admissible au moment de la répartition aléatoire. Des essais prospectifs sont nécessaires pour étudier l'utilisation des inhibiteurs du cotransporteur sodium-glucose de type 2 lorsqu'une manifestation de maladie CV athéroscléreuse aiguë survient. Inscription de l'essai: EMPA-REG OUTCOME (numéro d'identification dans clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01131676).

Frailty, multimorbidity and polypharmacy: exploratory analyses of the effects of empagliflozin from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are recommended treatment for adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but uncertainty exists regarding their use in patients with frailty and/or multimorbidity, among whom polypharmacy is common. We derived a multivariable logistic regression model to predict hospitalization (reflecting frailty) and assessed empagliflozin's risk-benefit profile in a post-hoc analysis of the double-blind, placebo-controlled EMPA-KIDNEY trial. METHODS: The EMPA-KIDNEY trial randomized 6609 patients with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥20<45 mL/min/1.73m2, or ≥45<90 mL/min/1.73m2 with urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥200 mg/g) to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg daily or matching placebo and followed for two years (median). Additional characteristics analysed in subgroups were multimorbidity, polypharmacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline. Cox regression analyses were performed with subgroups defined by approximate thirds of each variable. RESULTS: The strongest predictors of hospitalization were N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, poor mobility and diabetes; then eGFR and other comorbidities. Empagliflozin was generally well-tolerated independent of predicted risk of hospitalization. In relative terms, allocation to empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death by 28% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.82); and all-cause hospitalization by 14% (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95); with broadly consistent effects across subgroups of predicted risk of hospitalization, multimorbidity, polypharmacy or HRQoL. In absolute terms, the estimated benefits of empagliflozin were greater in those at highest predicted risk of hospitalization (reflecting frailty) and outweighed potential serious harms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD, irrespective of frailty, multimorbidity or polypharmacy.

Loss of Y Chromosome and Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease represents one of the strongest risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, and particularly for heart failure. Despite improved pharmaceutical treatments, mortality remains high. Recently, experimental studies demonstrated that mosaic loss of Y chromosome (LOY) associates with cardiac fibrosis in male mice. Since diffuse cardiac fibrosis is the common denominator for progression of all forms of heart failure, we determined the association of LOY on mortality and cardiovascular disease outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: LOY was quantified in men with stable chronic kidney disease (CARE for HOMe study, n=279) and dialysis patients (4D study, n=544). The association between LOY and mortality, combined cardiovascular and heart failure-specific end points, and echocardiographic measures was assessed. RESULTS: In CARE for HOMe, the frequency of LOY increased with age. LOY >17% was associated with increased mortality (heart rate, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.33-5.03]) and risk for cardiac decompensation or death (heart rate, 2.30 [95% CI, 1.23-4.27]). Patients with LOY >17% showed a significant decline of ejection fraction and an increase of E/E' within 5 years. Consistently, in the 4D study, LOY >17% was significantly associated with increased mortality (heart rate, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.83-4.16]), higher risk of death due to heart failure and sudden cardiac death (heart rate, 4.11 [95% CI, 2.09-8.08]), but not atherosclerotic events. Patients with LOY >17% showed significantly higher plasma levels of soluble interleukin 1 receptor-like 1, a biomarker for myocardial fibrosis. Mechanistically, intermediate monocytes from patients with LOY >17% showed significantly higher C-C chemokine receptor type 2 expression and higher plasma levels of the C-C chemokine receptor type 2 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2, which may have contributed to increased heart failure events. CONCLUSIONS: LOY identifies male patients with chronic kidney disease at high risk for mortality and heart failure events.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials for implications of acute treatment effects on glomerular filtration rate for long-term kidney protection.

Pharmacologic interventions to slow chronic kidney disease progression, such as ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, often produce acute treatment effects on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that differ from their long-term chronic treatment effects. Observational studies assessing the implications of acute effects cannot distinguish acute effects from GFR changes unrelated to the treatment. Here, we performed meta-regression analysis of multiple trials to isolate acute effects to determine their long-term implications. In 64 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), enrolling 154,045 participants, we estimated acute effects as the mean between-group difference in GFR slope from baseline to three months, effects on chronic GFR slope (starting at three months after randomization), and effects on three composite kidney endpoints defined by kidney failure (GFR 15 ml/min/1.73m2 or less, chronic dialysis, or kidney transplantation) or sustained GFR declines of 30%, 40% or 57% decline, respectively. We used Bayesian meta-regression to relate acute effects with treatment effects on chronic slope and the composite kidney endpoints. Overall, acute effects were not associated with treatment effects on chronic slope. Acute effects were associated with the treatment effects on composite kidney outcomes such that larger negative acute effects were associated with lesser beneficial effects on the composite kidney endpoints. Associations were stronger when the kidney composite endpoints were defined by smaller thresholds of GFR decline (30% or 40%). Results were similar in a subgroup of interventions with supposedly hemodynamic effects that acutely reduce GFR. For studies with GFR 60 mL/min/1.73m2 or under, negative acute effects were associated with larger beneficial effects on chronic GFR slope. Thus, our data from a large and diverse set of RCTs suggests that acute effects of interventions may influence the treatment effect on clinical kidney outcomes.