RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) occurs in 5-10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the condition is associated with a 30-day mortality rate of up to 50%. Most of the AMI patients are in SCAI SHOCK stage B upon hospital arrival, but some of these patients will progression through the stages to overt shock (SCAI C-E). Around one third of patients who develop CS are not in shock at the time of hospital admission. Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (proband) is a biomarker closely related to CS development. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential for preventing progression of hemodynamic instability by early inotropic support with low-dose dobutamine infusion administrated after revascularization in AMI patients with intermediate to high risk of in-hospital CS development. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center, clinical trial will include 100 AMI patients (≥ 18 years) without CS at hospital admission and at intermediate-high risk of in-hospital CS development (ORBI risk score ≥ 10). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a 24 h intravenous (IV) infusion of dobutamine (5 µg/kg/min) or placebo (NaCl) administrated after acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (< 24 h from symptom onset). Blood samples are drawn at time points from study inclusion (before infusion, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h). The primary outcome is peak plasma proBNP within 48 h after infusion as a surrogate-measure for the hemodynamic status. Hemodynamic function will be assessed pulse rate, blood pressure, and lactate within 48 h after infusion and by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed after 24-48 h and at follow-up after 3 months. Markers of cardiac injury (troponin T and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB)) will be assessed. DISCUSSION: Early inotropic support with low-dose dobutamine infusion in patients with AMI, treated with acute PCI, and at intermediate-high risk of in-hospital CS may serve as an intervention promoting hemodynamic stability and facilitating patient recovery. The effect will be assessed using proBNP as a surrogate marker of CS development, hemodynamic measurements, and TTE within the initial 48 h and repeated at a 3-month follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Regional Ethics Committee : H-21045751. EudraCT: 2021-002028-19. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT05350592, Registration date: 2022-03-08. WHO Universal Trial Number: U1111-1277-8523.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Dobutamina , Hemodinâmica , Infarto do Miocárdio , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Choque Cardiogênico , Humanos , Dobutamina/administração & dosagem , Dobutamina/efeitos adversos , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Resultado do Tratamento , Cardiotônicos/administração & dosagem , Cardiotônicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Infusões Intravenosas , Fatores de Risco , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is characterized by a series of pathological events, including inflammation. In the randomized "STERoid for OHCA" (STEROHCA) trial, prehospital high-dose glucocorticoid decreased interleukin (IL) 6 and C-reactive protein levels following resuscitated OHCA. The aim of this predefined sub-study was to assess the inflammatory response the first three days of admission. METHODS: The STEROHCA trial enrolled 137 OHCA patients randomized to either a single prehospital injection of methylprednisolone 250 mg or placebo. Inflammatory markers, including pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, were analyzed in plasma samples, from 0-, 24-, 48-, and 72 h post-admission. Mixed-model analyses were applied using log-transformed data to assess group differences. RESULTS: The 137 patients included in this sub-study had a median age of 67 years (57 to 74), and the 180-day survival rates were 75% (n = 51/68) and 64% (n = 44/69) in the glucocorticoid and placebo group, respectively. A total of 130 (95%) patients had at least one plasma sample available. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was increased at hospital admission in the glucocorticoid group (ratio 2.74 (1.49-5.05), p = 0.006), but the intervention showed the strongest effect after 24 h, decreasing pro-inflammatory levels of IL-6 (ratio 0.06 (0.03-0.10), p < 0.001), IL-8 (ratio 0.53 (0.38-0.75), p < 0.001), macrophage chemokine protein-1 (MCP-1, ratio 0.02 (0.13-0.31), p < 0.001), macrophage inflammatory protein-1-beta (MIP-1b, ratio 0.28 (0.18-0.45), p < 0.001), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, ratio 0.6 (0.4-0.8), p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Administering high-dose glucocorticoid treatment promptly after resuscitation from OHCA influenced the inflammatory response with a reduction in several systemic proinflammatory cytokines after 24 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2020-000855-11; submitted March 30, 2020. URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04624776.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Glucocorticoides , Metilprednisolona , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/sangue , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Inflamação/sangue , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Citocinas/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Biomarcadores/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Interleucina-6/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Trauma guidelines on spinal motion restriction (SMR) have changed drastically in recent years. An international group of experts explored whether consensus could be reached and if guidelines on SMR performed by trained lifeguards and prehospital EMS following in-water traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) should also be changed. METHODS: An international three-round Delphi process was conducted from October 2022 to November 2023. In Delphi round one, brainstorming resulted in an exhaustive list of recommendations for handling patients with suspected in-water TSCI. The list was also used to construct a preliminary flowchart for in-water SMR. In Delphi round two, three levels of agreement for each recommendation and the flowchart were established. Recommendations with strong consensus (≥ 85% agreement) underwent minor revisions and entered round three; recommendations with moderate consensus (75-85% agreement) underwent major revisions in two consecutive phases; and recommendations with weak consensus (< 75% agreement) were excluded. In Delphi round 3, the level of consensus for each of the final recommendations and each of the routes in the flowchart was tested using the same procedure as in Delphi round 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four experts participated in Delphi round one. The response rates for Delphi rounds two and three were 92% and 88%, respectively. The study resulted in 25 recommendations and one flowchart with four flowchart paths; 24 recommendations received strong consensus (≥ 85%), and one recommendation received moderate consensus (81%). Each of the four paths in the flowchart received strong consensus (90-95%). The integral flowchart received strong consensus (93%). CONCLUSIONS: This study produced expert consensus on 25 recommendations and a flowchart on handling patients with suspected in-water TSCI by trained lifeguards and prehospital EMS. These results provide clear and simple guidelines on SMR, which can standardise training and guidelines on SMR performed by trained lifeguards or prehospital EMS.
Assuntos
Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapia , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoAssuntos
Assistência Perioperatória , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Europa (Continente) , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The management of blood pressure targets during intensive care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a topic of debate. The blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets After OHCA (BOX) trial explored the efficacy of two different blood pressure targets in 789 patients during intensive care after OHCA. In the primary frequentist analysis, no statistically significant differences were found for neurological outcome after 90 days. METHODS: This protocol outlines secondary Bayesian analyses of 365-day all-cause mortality and two secondary outcomes: neurological outcome after 365 days, and plasma neuron-specific enolase, a biomarker of brain injury, after 48 h. We will employ adjusted Bayesian logistic and linear regressions, presenting results as relative and absolute differences with 95% confidence intervals. We will use weakly informative priors for the primary analyses, and skeptical and evidence-based priors (where available) in sensitivity analyses. Exact probabilities for any benefit/harm will be presented for all outcomes, along with probabilities of clinically important benefit/harm (risk differences larger than 2%-points absolute) and no clinically important differences for the binary outcomes. We will assess whether heterogeneity of treatment effects on mortality is present according to lactate at admission, time to return of spontaneous circulation, primary shockable rhythm, age, hypertension, and presence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. DISCUSSION: This secondary analysis of the BOX trial aim to complement the primary frequentist analysis by quantifying the probabilities of beneficial or harmful effects of different blood pressure targets. This approach seeks to provide clearer insights for researchers and clinicians into the effectiveness of these blood pressure management strategies in acute medical conditions, particularly focusing on mortality, neurological outcomes, and neuron-specific enolase.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Hipertensão , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Pressão Sanguínea , Teorema de Bayes , Coma/terapia , Hipertensão/complicações , Fosfopiruvato Hidratase , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for selected refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is increasingly used. Detailed knowledge of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and long-term cognitive function is limited. HRQoL and cognitive function were assessed in ECPR-survivors and OHCA-survivors with prehospital return of spontaneous circulation after standard advanced cardiac life support (sACLS). METHODS: Fifteen ECPR-survivors and 22 age-matched sACLS-survivors agreed to participate in this follow-up study. Participants were examined with echocardiography, 6-minute walk test, and neuropsychological testing, and answered HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L and Short Form 36 (SF-36)), and mental health questionnaires. RESULTS: Most patients were male (73 % and 82 %) and median age at follow-up was similar between groups (55 years and 60 years). Low flow time was significantly longer for ECPR-survivors (86 min vs. 15 min) and lactate levels were significantly higher (14.1 mmol/l vs. 3.9 mmol/l). No between-group difference was found in physical function nor in cognitive function with scores corresponding to the 23rd worst percentile of the general population. SACLS-survivors had HRQoL on level with the Danish general population while ECPR-survivors scored lower in both EQ-5D-5L (index score 0.73 vs. 0.86, p = 0.03, visual analog scale: 70 vs. 84, p = 0.04) and in multiple SF-36 health domains (role physical, bodily pain, general health, and mental health). CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantially longer low flow times with thrice as high lactate levels, ECPR-survivors were similar in cognitive and physical function compared to sACLS-survivors. Nonetheless, ECPR-survivors reported lower HRQoL overall and related to mental health, pain management, and the perception of limitations in physical role.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Seguimentos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cognição , LactatosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), inflammatory markers are significantly elevated and associated with hemodynamic instability and organ dysfunction. Vasopressor support is recommended to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 65 mmHg. Glucocorticoids have anti-inflammatory effects and may lower the need for vasopressors. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of prehospital high-dose glucocorticoid treatment in resuscitated comatose OHCA patients. METHODS: The STEROHCA trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial comparing one prehospital injection of methylprednisolone 250 mg with placebo immediately after resuscitated OHCA. In this sub-study, we included patients who remained comatose at admission and survived until intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was cumulated norepinephrine use from ICU admission until 48 h reported as mcg/kg/min. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic status characterized by MAP, heart rate, vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), and the VIS/MAP-ratio as well as cardiac function assessed by pulmonary artery catheter measurements. Linear mixed-model analyses were performed to evaluate mean differences between treatment groups at all follow-up times. RESULTS: A total of 114 comatose OHCA patients were included (glucocorticoid: n = 56, placebo: n = 58) in the sub-study. There were no differences in outcomes at ICU admission. From the time of ICU admission up to 48 h post-admission, patients in the glucocorticoid group cumulated a lower norepinephrine use (mean difference - 0.04 mcg/kg/min, 95% CI - 0.07 to - 0.01, p = 0.02). Moreover, after 12-24 h post-admission, the glucocorticoid group demonstrated a higher MAP with mean differences ranging from 6 to 7 mmHg (95% CIs from 1 to 12), a lower VIS (mean differences from - 4.2 to - 3.8, 95% CIs from - 8.1 to 0.3), and a lower VIS/MAP ratio (mean differences from - 0.10 to - 0.07, 95% CIs from - 0.16 to - 0.01), while there were no major differences in heart rate (mean differences from - 4 to - 3, 95% CIs from - 11 to 3). These treatment differences between groups were also present 30-48 h post-admission but to a smaller extent and with increased statistical uncertainty. No differences were found in pulmonary artery catheter measurements between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital treatment with high-dose glucocorticoid was associated with reduced norepinephrine use in resuscitated OHCA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2020-000855-11; submitted March 30, 2020. URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT04624776.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Glucocorticoides/farmacologia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Coma/tratamento farmacológico , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Hemodinâmica , Norepinefrina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate the advanced hemodynamic effects of the two MAP-targets during intensive care on systemic hemodynamics in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary vasopressor used was per protocol norepinephrine. Hemodynamic monitoring was done with pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) and measurements were made on predefined time points. The primary endpoint of this substudy was the difference in cardiac index within 48 h from a repeated measurements-mixed model. Secondary endpoints included systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), heart rate, and stroke volume index. PATIENTS: Comatose survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: The "Blood pressure and oxygenations targets after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (BOX)"-trial was a randomized, controlled, double-blinded, multicenter-study comparing targeted mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 63 mmHg (MAP63) vs 77 mmHg (MAP77). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 789 randomized patients, 730 (93%) patients were included in the hemodynamic substudy. From PAC-insertion (median 1 hours after ICU-admission) and the next 48 hours, the MAP77-group received significantly higher doses of norepinephrine (mean difference 0.09 µg/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.11, pgroup < 0.0001). Cardiac index was significantly increased (0.20 L/min/m2 (CI 0.12-0.28), pgroup < 0.0001) as was SVRI with an overall difference of (43 dynes m2/s/cm5 (CI 7-79); pgroup = 0.02). Heart rate was increased in the MAP77-group (4 beats/minute; CI 2-6, pgroup < 0.003), but stroke volume index was not (pgroup = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted MAP at 77 mmHg compared to 63 mmHg resulted in a higher dose of norepinephrine, increased cardiac index and SVRI. Heart rate was also increased, but stroke volume index was not affected by a higher blood pressure target.
Assuntos
Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Pressão Sanguínea , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Coma , Hemodinâmica , Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Cuidados CríticosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients who are successfully resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are still at a high risk of neurological damage and death. Inflammation and brain injury are components of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome, and can be assessed by systemic interleukin 6 (IL-6) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Anti-inflammatory treatment with methylprednisolone may dampen inflammation, thereby improving outcome. This study aimed to determine if prehospital high-dose methylprednisolone could reduce IL-6 and NSE in comatose OHCA patients. METHODS: The STEROHCA trial was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, phase II prehospital trial performed at two cardiac arrest centers in Denmark. Resuscitated comatose patients with suspected cardiac etiology were randomly assigned 1:1 to a single intravenous injection of 250 mg methylprednisolone or placebo. The co-primary outcome was reduction of IL-6 and NSE-blood levels measured daily for 72 h from admission. The main secondary outcome was survival at 180 days follow-up. RESULTS: We randomized 137 patients to methylprednisolone (n = 68) or placebo (n = 69). We found reduced IL-6 levels (p < 0.0001) in the intervention group, with median (interquartile range, IQR) levels at 24 h of 2.1 pg/ml (1.0; 7.1) and 30.7 pg/ml (14.2; 59) in the placebo group. We observed no difference between groups in NSE levels (p = 0.22), with levels at 48 h of 18.8 ug/L (14.4; 24.6) and 14.8 ug/L (11.2; 19.4) in the intervention and placebo group, respectively. In the intervention group, 51 (75%) patients survived and 44 (64%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Prehospital treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone to resuscitated comatose OHCA patients, resulted in reduced IL-6 levels after 24 h, but did not reduce NSE levels.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Coma , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-6 , Inflamação/complicações , Biomarcadores , Fosfopiruvato HidrataseRESUMO
Aims: Hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a common complication and a major cause of death. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) are released after brain injury and elevated concentrations of both are associated with poor neurological outcome. We explored the influence of haemolysis on the prognostic performance of NSE and NfL. Methods and results: The study is based on post hoc analyses of a randomized, single-centre, double-blinded, controlled trial (IMICA), where comatose OHCA patients of presumed cardiac cause were included. Free-haemoglobin was measured at admission to quantify haemolysis. NSE and NfL were measured after 48â h to estimate the extent of brain injury. Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MoCA) was assessed to evaluate neurocognitive impairments. Seventy-three patients were included and divided into two groups by the median free-haemoglobin at admission. No group differences in mortality or poor neurological outcome were observed. The high-admission free-haemoglobin group had a significantly higher concentration of NSE compared to the low-admission free-haemoglobin group (27.4â µmol/L vs. 19.6â µmol/L, P = 0.03), but no differences in NfL. The performance of NSE and NfL in predicting poor neurological outcome were high for both, but NfL was numerically higher [area under the ROC (AUROC) 0.90 vs. 0.96, P = 0.09]. Furthermore, NfL, but not NSE, was inversely correlated with MoCA score, R2 = 0.21, P = 0.006. Conclusion: High free-haemoglobin at admission was associated with higher NSE concentration after 48â h, but, the performance of NSE and NfL in predicting poor neurological outcome among OHCA patients were good regardless of early haemolysis. Only elevated NfL concentrations were associated with cognitive impairments.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe trauma represents a major global public health burden and the management of post-traumatic bleeding continues to challenge healthcare systems around the world. Post-traumatic bleeding and associated traumatic coagulopathy remain leading causes of potentially preventable multiorgan failure and death if not diagnosed and managed in an appropriate and timely manner. This sixth edition of the European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following traumatic injury aims to advise clinicians who care for the bleeding trauma patient during the initial diagnostic and therapeutic phases of patient management. METHODS: The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma included representatives from six European professional societies and convened to assess and update the previous version of this guideline using a structured, evidence-based consensus approach. Structured literature searches covered the period since the last edition of the guideline, but considered evidence cited previously. The format of this edition has been adjusted to reflect the trend towards concise guideline documents that cite only the highest-quality studies and most relevant literature rather than attempting to provide a comprehensive literature review to accompany each recommendation. RESULTS: This guideline comprises 39 clinical practice recommendations that follow an approximate temporal path for management of the bleeding trauma patient, with recommendations grouped behind key decision points. While approximately one-third of patients who have experienced severe trauma arrive in hospital in a coagulopathic state, a systematic diagnostic and therapeutic approach has been shown to reduce the number of preventable deaths attributable to traumatic injury. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidelines are pillars of best practice in the management of severely injured trauma patients. Further improvement in outcomes will be achieved by optimising and standardising trauma care in line with the available evidence across Europe and beyond.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , Hemorragia , Humanos , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Consenso , Europa (Continente)RESUMO
AIM: To investigate how the inflammatory response after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is modulated by blocking IL-6-mediated signalling with tocilizumab, and to relate induced changes to clinical status, myocardial- and brain injury. METHODS: This is a preplanned substudy of the IMICA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03863015). Upon admission 80 comatose OHCA patients were randomized to infusion of tocilizumab or placebo. Inflammation was characterized by a cytokine assay, CRP, and leukocyte differential count; myocardial injury by TnT and NT-proBNP; brain injury by neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and Neurofilament Light chain (NFL), while sequential organ assessment (SOFA) score and Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) represented overall clinical status. RESULTS: Responses for IL-5, IL-6, IL-17, neutrophil as well as monocyte counts, and VIS were affected by tocilizumab treatment (all p < 0.05), while there was no effect on levels of NFL. IL-5 and IL-6 were substantially increased by tocilizumab, while IL-17 was lowered. Neutrophils and monocytes were lower at 24 and 48 hours, and VIS was lower at 24 hours, for the tocilizumab group compared to placebo. Multiple correlations were identified for markers of organ injury and clinical status versus inflammatory markers; this included correlations of neutrophils and monocytes with TnT, NSE, NFL, SOFA- and VIS score for the tocilizumab but not the placebo group. NT-proBNP, NFL and SOFA score correlated with CRP in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tocilizumab after OHCA modulated the inflammatory response with notable increases for IL-5, IL-6, and decreases for neutrophils and monocytes, as well as reduced vasopressor and inotropy requirements.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Interleucina-17 , Interleucina-6 , Interleucina-5 , Inflamação/etiologia , BiomarcadoresRESUMO
AIMS: Myocardial dysfunction is well described after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); however, the underlying mechanisms are not yet understood. We hypothesized that this dysfunction is associated to a global myocardial oedema. Using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), we assessed the presence of such oedema early after successful resuscitation from OHCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA and admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit were consecutively included and underwent CMR in general anaesthesia within 36 h after cardiac arrest with anaesthetic support. To assess global myocardial oedema, T1 and T2 segmented maps were generated from three representative short-axis slices, and values from each segment were then used to determine a mean global T1 and T2 time for each patient. Healthy subjects were used as controls. CMR was obtained in 16 patients and compared with nine controls. The OHCA patients were 60 ± 9 years old, and acute myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed in six cases. On admission, left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by transthoracic echocardiography was 35 ± 15%, and this improved significantly to 43 ± 14% during hospitalization (P < 0.05). Mean global T1 and T2 time was significantly higher in OHCA patients compared with the control group (1071 ms vs. 999 ms, P = 0.002, and 52 ms vs. 46 ms, P < 0.001, respectively), and this difference remained significant when segments involved in the MI were excluded. CONCLUSION: Assessed with CMR, we for the first time document an early global myocardial oedema in patients successfully resuscitated from OHCA.
Assuntos
Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Projetos Piloto , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Edema , Espectroscopia de Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend active fever prevention for 72 hours after cardiac arrest. Data from randomized clinical trials of this intervention have been lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned comatose patients who had been resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause to device-based temperature control targeting 36°C for 24 hours followed by targeting of 37°C for either 12 or 48 hours (for total intervention times of 36 and 72 hours, respectively) or until the patient regained consciousness. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category of 3 or 4 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability; a category of 3 or 4 indicates severe cerebral disability or coma) within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability) at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients were randomly assigned to temperature control for 36 hours, and 396 patients were assigned to temperature control for 72 hours. At 90 days after randomization, a primary end-point event had occurred in 127 of 393 patients (32.3%) in the 36-hour group and in 133 of 396 patients (33.6%) in the 72-hour group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.26; P = 0.70) and mortality was 29.5% in the 36-hour group and 30.3% in the 72-hour group. At 3 months, the median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26 (interquartile range, 24 to 29) and 27 (interquartile range, 24 to 28), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Active device-based fever prevention for 36 or 72 hours after cardiac arrest did not result in significantly different percentages of patients dying or having severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.).
Assuntos
Temperatura Corporal , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Coma , Febre , Hipotermia Induzida , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Coma/etiologia , Febre/etiologia , Febre/prevenção & controle , Hipotermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Hipotermia Induzida/instrumentação , Hipotermia Induzida/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estado de ConsciênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have a high morbidity and mortality risk and often develop post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) involving systemic inflammation. The severity of the inflammatory response is associated with adverse outcome, with anoxic irreversible brain injury as the leading cause of death following resuscitated OHCA. The study aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effect of pre-hospital administration of a high-dose glucocorticoid following OHCA. METHODS: The study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, multicenter, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Inclusion will continue until one hundred twenty unconscious OHCA patients surviving a minimum of 72 h are randomized. Intervention is a 1:1 randomization to an infusion of methylprednisolone 250 mg following a minimum of 5 min of sustained return of spontaneous circulation in the pre-hospital setting. Methylprednisolone will be given as a bolus infusion of 1 × 250 mg (1 × 4 mL) over a period of 5 min. Patients allocated to placebo will receive 4 mL of isotonic saline (NaCl 0.9%). Main eligibility criteria are OHCA of presumed cardiac cause, age ≥ 18 years, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8, and sustained ROSC for at least 5 min. Co-primary endpoint: Reduction of interleukin-6 and neuron-specific-enolase. Secondary endpoints: Markers of inflammation, brain, cardiac, kidney and liver damage, hemodynamic and hemostatic function, safety, neurological function at follow-up, and mortality. A research biobank is set up with blood samples taken daily during the first 72 h from hospitalization to evaluate primary and secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that early anti-inflammatory steroid treatment in the pre-hospital setting can mitigate the progression of PCAS following resuscitated OHCA. Primary endpoints will be assessed through analyses of biomarkers for inflammation and neurological damage taken during the first 72 h of admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2020-000855-11 ; submitted March 30, 2020 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04624776; submitted October 12, 2020, first posted November 10, 2020.
Assuntos
Fármacos Neuroprotetores , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Adolescente , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Inflamação , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Esteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic infection is one of the most severe complications following implant-based breast reconstruction affecting 5%-10% of the women. Currently, many surgeons apply antibiotics locally on the breast implant to reduce the risk of postoperative infection, but no randomised, placebo-controlled trials have tested the treatment's efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The BREAST-AB trial (BREAST-AntiBiotics) is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of local treatment with gentamicin, vancomycin and cefazolin on breast implants in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. The trial drug consists of 80 mg gentamicin, 1 g vancomycin and 1 g cefazolin dissolved in 500 mL of isotonic saline. The placebo solution consists of 500 mL isotonic saline. The trial drug is used to wash the dissected tissue pocket and the breast implant prior to insertion. The primary outcome is all-cause explantation of the breast implant within 180 days after the breast reconstruction surgery. This excludes cases where the implant is replaced with a new permanent implant, for example, for cosmetic reasons. Key long-term outcomes include capsular contracture and quality of life. The trial started on 26 January 2021 and is currently recruiting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of the Capital Region (H-20056592) on 1 January 2021 and the Danish Medicines Agency (2020070016) on 2 August 2020. The main paper will include the primary and secondary outcomes and will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04731025.
Assuntos
Implantes de Mama , Mamoplastia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vancomicina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence to support the choice of blood-pressure targets for the treatment of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who are receiving intensive care is limited. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we evaluated a mean arterial blood-pressure target of 63 mm Hg as compared with 77 mm Hg in comatose adults who had been resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause; patients were also assigned to one of two oxygen targets (reported separately). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) of 3 or 4 within 90 days (range, 0 to 5, with higher categories indicating more severe disability; a category of 3 or 4 indicates severe disability or coma). Secondary outcomes included neuron-specific enolase levels at 48 hours, death from any cause, scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability) and the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 3 months, and the CPC at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 789 patients were included in the analysis (393 in the high-target group and 396 in the low-target group). A primary-outcome event occurred in 133 patients (34%) in the high-target group and in 127 patients (32%) in the low-target group (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.37; P = 0.56). At 90 days, 122 patients (31%) in the high-target group and 114 patients (29%) in the low-target group had died (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.46). The median CPC was 1 (interquartile range, 1 to 5) in both the high-target group and the low-target group; the corresponding median modified Rankin scale scores were 1 (interquartile range, 0 to 6) and 1 (interquartile range, 0 to 6), and the corresponding median Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were 27 (interquartile range, 24 to 29) and 26 (interquartile range, 24 to 29). The median neuron-specific enolase level at 48 hours was also similar in the two groups. The percentages of patients with adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting a mean arterial blood pressure of 77 mm Hg or 63 mm Hg in patients who had been resuscitated from cardiac arrest did not result in significantly different percentages of patients dying or having severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.).
Assuntos
Pressão Arterial , Coma , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Adulto , Humanos , Pressão Arterial/fisiologia , Biomarcadores/análise , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Coma/diagnóstico , Coma/etiologia , Coma/mortalidade , Coma/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Oxigênio , Fosfopiruvato Hidratase/análise , Sobreviventes , Cuidados CríticosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The appropriate oxygenation target for mechanical ventilation in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned comatose adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a 1:1 ratio to either a restrictive oxygen target of a partial pressure of arterial oxygen (Pao2) of 9 to 10 kPa (68 to 75 mm Hg) or a liberal oxygen target of a Pao2 of 13 to 14 kPa (98 to 105 mm Hg); patients were also assigned to one of two blood-pressure targets (reported separately). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with severe disability or coma (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] of 3 or 4; categories range from 1 to 5, with higher values indicating more severe disability), whichever occurred first within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were neuron-specific enolase levels at 48 hours, death from any cause, the score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability), the score on the modified Rankin scale (ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability), and the CPC at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 789 patients underwent randomization. A primary-outcome event occurred in 126 of 394 patients (32.0%) in the restrictive-target group and in 134 of 395 patients (33.9%) in the liberal-target group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.21; P = 0.69). At 90 days, death had occurred in 113 patients (28.7%) in the restrictive-target group and in 123 (31.1%) in the liberal-target group. On the CPC, the median category was 1 in the two groups; on the modified Rankin scale, the median score was 2 in the restrictive-target group and 1 in the liberal-target group; and on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the median score was 27 in the two groups. At 48 hours, the median neuron-specific enolase level was 17 µg per liter in the restrictive-target group and 18 µg per liter in the liberal-target group. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting of a restrictive or liberal oxygenation strategy in comatose patients after resuscitation for cardiac arrest resulted in a similar incidence of death or severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.).
Assuntos
Coma , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Oxigênio , Respiração Artificial , Insuficiência Respiratória , Adulto , Humanos , Coma/etiologia , Coma/mortalidade , Coma/terapia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Oxigênio/administração & dosagem , Fosfopiruvato Hidratase/análise , Sobreviventes , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Biomarcadores/análiseRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Research in plastic surgery often includes bilateral procedures. This gives rise to issues with clustered data. Clustering is when individual data points within a data set are internally related. However, many authors do not account for clustering within their data, which can lead to incorrect statistical conclusions. METHODS: In February of 2020, the authors searched PubMed to investigate the prevalence of reporting issues with bilateral breast procedures in plastic surgery literature. The review focused on breast surgery, as it often involves bilateral procedures and, therefore, clustering. Based on the review, the authors developed guidelines for how to identify and address clustered data. The guidelines were modified by a multidisciplinary group consisting of a biostatistician with expertise in clustered data at the Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, and three doctors (M.D.s and Ph.D.s) with expertise in statistical analysis and scientific methodology from the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. RESULTS: A total of 113 studies were included in the review. Seventy-five studies (66 percent) contained clustered data, but only eight studies (11 percent) took clustering into account in the statistical analysis. These results were used to develop the Clustered Data, or CLUDA, reporting guidelines which consist of two sections: one to identify clustering and one for reporting and analyzing clustered data. CONCLUSIONS: Clustered data are abundant in plastic surgery literature. The authors propose using the Clustered Data reporting guidelines to identify and report clustered data and consulting with a biostatistician when designing a study.
Assuntos
Projetos de Pesquisa , Cirurgia Plástica , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains challenging. The inflammatory response after OHCA has been associated with increased mortality. This study investigates the associations and predictive value between inflammatory markers and outcome in resuscitated OHCA patients. DESIGN: The study is based on post hoc analyses of a double-blind controlled trial, where resuscitated OHCA patients were randomized to receive either exenatide or placebo. Blood was analyzed for levels of inflammatory markers the day following admission. Primary endpoint was time to death for up to 180 days. Secondary endpoints included 180-day mortality and poor neurological outcome after 180 days, defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) of 3 to 5. RESULTS: Among 110 included patients we found significant associations between higher leucocyte quartile and increasing mortality in univariable analysis (OR 2.6 (95%CI 1.6-4.2), p < .001), as well as in multivariable analysis (OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.1-4.0), p = .02). A significant association was found between higher neutrophil quartile and increasing mortality in univariable analysis (OR 3.0 (95%CI 1.8-5.0), p < .001) as well as multivariable analysis (OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.2-4.6), p = .01). Leucocyte and neutrophil levels were predictive of poor outcome after 180 days with area under the receiver operating characteristics curves of 0.79 and 0.81, respectively. We found no associations between CRP and lymphocyte levels versus outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Total leucocyte count and neutrophil levels measured the first day following OHCA were significantly associated with 180-day all-cause mortality and may potentially act as early predictors of outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT02442791.