Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(9): 1773-1778, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the initial clinical presentation of EDH, identify potential clinical markers and highlight diagnostic pitfalls. METHODS: Retrospective review of all pediatric patients admitted to a Level I Trauma Center diagnosed with blunt traumatic EDH from 2008 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 699 pediatric patients were identified with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI); 106 with EDH made up the study population. A skull fracture was present in 84%. Overall, the most common clinical finding was a scalp hematoma (86%), followed by loss of consciousness (66%), emesis (34%), headache (27%), amnesia (18%), and seizures (12%). Importantly, 40% of patients with EDH presented with GCS 15. Four children (4%) had GCS 15 and were completely asymptomatic on admission. In three children (3%) the only symptom was a scalp hematoma. 50% of all EDH required craniotomy, and this was not significantly different if GCS was 15 on presentation (45%, p = 0.192). Mortality was 2%. Fourteen patients (13%) were discharged with cognitive/motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric EDH frequently present with subtle clinical signs, including a normal GCS half the time. Irrespective of asymptomatic presentation, threshold for CT scan or an observation period should be low after head injuries in children. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II/III.


Assuntos
Hematoma Epidural Craniano , Criança , Hematoma , Hematoma Epidural Craniano/diagnóstico , Hematoma Epidural Craniano/epidemiologia , Hematoma Epidural Craniano/etiologia , Hematoma Epidural Craniano/fisiopatologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Couro Cabeludo/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas , Centros de Traumatologia , Inconsciência
2.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 79(2): 232-7;quiz 332-3, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26218691

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unlike in the military setting, where the use of tourniquets has been well established, in the civilian sector their use has been far less uniform. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes associated with the use of tourniquets for civilian extremity trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to our institution with an extremity injury requiring tourniquet application from January 2007 to June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome analyzed was limb loss. Secondary outcomes included death, hospital length of stay, and complications. RESULTS: There were 87 patients who met inclusion criteria. Average age was 35.3 years, 90.8% were male, and 66.7% had penetrating injuries, with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 6. Tourniquets were placed in the prehospital setting in 50.6%, in the emergency department in 39.1%, and in the operating room in 10.3% of patients. The windlass type Combat Application Tourniquet was the most commonly used type (67.8%), followed by a pneumatic system (24.1%) and self-made tourniquet (8.0%). The median duration of use was 75 minutes (interquartile range, 91) with no differences between groups (p = 0.547). Overall, 80.5% had a vascular injury (70.1% arterial), and a total of 99 limb operations were performed, including 15 amputations. Fourteen amputations (93.3%) occurred at the scene or were directly attributed to the extent of tissue damage with a median Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) of 7 (interquartile range, 2). In the remaining patient, the tourniquet was lifesaving but likely contributed to limb loss. Seven patients sustained 13 other complications; however, none was directly attributed to tourniquet use. CONCLUSION: Tourniquet use in the civilian sector is associated with a low rate of complications. With the low complication rate and high potential for benefit, aggressive use of this potentially lifesaving intervention is justified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Extremidades/irrigação sanguínea , Extremidades/lesões , Hemorragia/terapia , Torniquetes , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...