Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heliyon ; 10(15): e34878, 2024 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157358

RESUMO

Background: Liposarcoma is a malignant tumor that originates from adipose tissue and can occur in any part of the body. There is currently no clear conclusion on whether there are significant differences in prognosis between liposarcoma at different anatomical locations, especially retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) and non retroperitoneal liposarcoma (NRLPS). The aim of this study is to reveal whether there are differences in prognosis between these two locations of liposarcoma, and further explore the fundamental reasons behind these differences. Methods: We conducted an in-depth investigation into the factors affecting the prognosis of patients with liposarcoma by analyzing the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Then, we used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance these prognostic factors for comparative analysis of survival between RLPS and NRLPS. In addition, by analyzing transcriptome and whole exome data from TCGA and the Japan Genotypic Phenotype Archive (JGA), we identified genes with significant expression differences and explored changes in the immune microenvironment. Result: Through analysis of RLPS and NRLPS patients in the SEER database, we observed significant prognostic differences between the two groups, with RLPS exhibiting worse prognosis (p < 0.001). Even after adjusting for confounding factors through PSM, these survival rate differences remained significant, with RLPS still showing worse prognosis (p = 0.017). Furthermore, our analysis of transcriptomic data led to the identification of 467 differentially expressed genes. Additionally, we noted significant differences in the immune microenvironment and whole exome sequencing data between the two groups. Conclusion: There are significant differences between patients with RLPS and NRLPS. Therefore, from clinical research to treatment strategies, RLPS and NRLPS should be considered as two distinct types of tumors, necessitating differentiated approaches for their study and treatment.

2.
Front Surg ; 11: 1339170, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872723

RESUMO

Introduction: The proportion of retroperitoneal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (RMPNST) in retroperitoneal tumors is less than 5%, but the mortality rate is very high. However, there is no relevant research focused on RMPNST only. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the SEER database of patients with primary RMPNST from 2000 to 2019, by leveraging the advantages of the Seer database, we can explore the prognosis of such rare diseases. Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct the survival curve, and cox regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of patients. In addition, a model was developed to distinguish high-risk and low-risk patients. Results: This study included a total of 52 patients, with a median survival time of 39 months (95% CI 12.740-65.260) and a 5-year survival rate of 44.2% (95% CI 0.299-0.565). Radiotherapy (p = 0.004, OR: 1.475, 95% CI 0.718-3.033), metastasis disease (p = 0.002, OR: 5.596, 95% CI 2.449-47.079) and surgery (p = 0.003, OR: 5.003, 95% CI 0.011-0.409) were associated with overall survival (OS). The 5-year distant metastasis rate was 36% (95% CI 0.221-0.499). We used the above risk factors to separate patients into high and low groups and evaluate the results through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. This model is beneficial for guiding the selection of treatment strategies. Conclusion: The majority of RMPNST patients have a good prognosis after surgery, and the establishment of high-low group is helpful for clinical decision-making.

3.
Front Med ; 18(2): 375-393, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157196

RESUMO

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is the main subtype of retroperitoneal soft sarcoma (RSTS) and has a poor prognosis and few treatment options, except for surgery. The proteomic and metabolic profiles of RLPS have remained unclear. The aim of our study was to reveal the metabolic profile of RLPS. Here, we performed proteomic analysis (n = 10), metabolomic analysis (n = 51), and lipidomic analysis (n = 50) of retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma (RDDLPS) and retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma (RWDLPS) tissue and paired adjacent adipose tissue obtained during surgery. Data analysis mainly revealed that glycolysis, purine metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism and phospholipid formation were upregulated in both RDDLPS and RWDLPS tissue compared with the adjacent adipose tissue, whereas the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, lipid absorption and synthesis, fatty acid degradation and biosynthesis, as well as glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism were downregulated. Of particular importance, the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) inhibitor RRX-001 significantly promoted the antitumor effects of the MDM2 inhibitor RG7112 and CDK4 inhibitor abemaciclib. Our study not only describes the metabolic profiles of RDDLPS and RWDLPS, but also offers potential therapeutic targets and strategies for RLPS.


Assuntos
Lipossarcoma , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/metabolismo , Lipossarcoma/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Proteômica , Metabolômica , Idoso , Metaboloma , Adulto , Multiômica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...