RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although nutritional therapy may be able to enable intensive care unit (ICU) survivors to return home instead of being discharged to a rehabilitation facility, post-ICU discharge nutritional therapy lacks investigation. This study evaluated the impact of nutritional therapy after ICU on discharge destination in critically ill patients. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive adult patients who spent >72 h in the ICU from December 2020 to March 2023. The primary outcome was discharge destination. Energy and protein intake during the ICU stay and on days 7 and 14 after ICU discharge were evaluated. The target protein intake during the intensive treatment and general ward phases were 0.8 and 1.0 g/kg/day, respectively. Patients were categorized into home discharge (group A) and rehabilitation transfer (group B) groups. Factors affecting the discharge destination were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 183 patients included, 134 belonged to group A and 49 to group B. In group A, more patients reached the protein intake target than in group B. Logistic regression analysis identified achieving the protein intake target as an independent predictor of home discharge. CONCLUSION: Further studies are required to confirm the relationship between nutritional therapy during general ward and patient outcomes.
RESUMO
Acute glycemic control significantly affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. This updated network meta-analysis examines the benefits and harms of four target blood glucose levels (< 110, 110-144, 144-180, and > 180 mg/dL). Analyzing data of 27,541 patients from 37 trials, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve for mortality and hypoglycemia was highest at a target blood glucose level of 144-180 mg/dL, while for infection and acute kidney injury at 110-144 mg/dL. Further evidence is needed to determine whether 110-144 or 144-180 mg/dL is superior as an optimal glucose target, considering prioritized outcomes.
RESUMO
Background: Anaphylactic shock of diclofenac etalhyaluronate agent can be prolonged and recurrent. However, its reports are rare, and consequently, its method of management remains to be established. Case Presentation: A 65-year-old woman received an intra-articular injection of diclofenac and hyaluronate. After 20 min, systemic urticaria and severe hypotension developed after walking. After an intramuscular adrenaline injection, she was transferred to our hospital. Despite administration of continuous noradrenaline and adrenaline, hypotension persisted. Seven hours after the joint injection, 25 mL of knee joint fluid was aspirated under ultrasound guidance. Mobilization was performed 24 h after joint injection. However, urticaria rapidly spread after standing. At 45 and 46 h after joint injection, we confirmed that no symptoms, including urticaria, recurred after walking. Conclusion: Anaphylactic shock due to intra-articular injection of diclofenac etalhyaluronate is prolonged and requires extended observation. Aspiration of joint fluid may be one of the treatment options.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have suggested that low-dose steroids are effective in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Recent guidelines recommend the use of low-dose steroids instead of high-dose steroids. These systematic reviews were conducted based on the concept that the effect of steroids is constant regardless of their type. We discuss whether the type of steroid used influences the outcomes in patients with ARDS. MAIN BODY: From a pharmacological standpoint, methylprednisolone has little activity as a mineralocorticoid and may cause pulmonary hypertension. The results of the rank probability of our previous network meta-analysis revealed that low-dose methylprednisolone might be an optimal treatment compared to using other types of steroids or no steroids in terms of ventilator-free days. Similarly, an analysis of individual data from four randomized controlled trials suggested that low-dose methylprednisolone was associated with decreased mortality in patients with ARDS. Dexamethasone has attracted the attention of clinicians as a novel adjunct therapy for ARDS. CONCLUSION: Recent evidence has shown that low-dose methylprednisolone may be an effective treatment option for ARDS. The timing of initiation and duration of low-dose methylprednisolone therapy should be verified in future studies.
RESUMO
Pancreatic injury is considered an organ-related complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it is unclear whether COVID-19 status affects pancreatic injury. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether COVID-19 affects the occurrence of pancreatic injuries. Consecutive patients diagnosed with sepsis admitted to the ICU between March 2020 and September 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was a pancreatic injury, which was defined as amylase or lipase levels > 3 times the upper limit of the normal range. Among the 177 patients included in the analysis, 40 (23%) were COVID-19 patients, and 54 (31%) had pancreatic injuries. Of these three patients, acute pancreatitis was diagnosed based on computed tomography. The pancreatic injury was significantly more common among COVID-19 patients (75 vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that COVID-19 and steroid use were independent risk factors for pancreatic injury (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-15.5], p = 0.009; OR 4.02 [95% CI 1.42-11.4], p = 0.009). This study revealed that the proportion of pancreatic injury in septic patients with COVID-19 was significantly higher than in those without COVID-19. It may be difficult to diagnose pancreatitis based on amylase and lipase levels in COVID-19 patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pancreatite , Humanos , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Pancreatite/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Aguda , COVID-19/complicações , Amilases , LipaseRESUMO
The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, platelet count × neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio) is a novel parameter for systemic inflammation. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with systemic inflammatory responses. This retrospective study aimed to determine whether SII could predict postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery using CPB. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery using CPB between January 2020 and July 2021 were included. The primary outcome was POAF incidence within 7 days. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate SII ability in predicting POAF. Multivariable analysis was used to estimate the independent association between SII and POAF development. The study included 212 patients, and 90 (43%) developed POAF. The preoperative SII cutoff of 545 × 109/L predicted a poor outcome with 71% sensitivity and 81% specificity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.86). Multivariable analysis showed that SII ≥ 545 × 109/L was associated with the development of POAF (odds ratio 10.2; 95% CI 5.1-20.2, P < 0.001). SII predicted POAF with a curve of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.00) in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); the corresponding value in patients without CABG was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83). Preoperative SII may be a useful prognostic biomarker for POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB. Moreover, preoperative SII may play an important role in predicting POAF in patients undergoing CABG.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Inflamação/diagnóstico , Inflamação/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Objectives: Our aims were to clarify the actual situation regarding preoperative fasting and determine whether multidisciplinary interventions in a perioperative management center shorten the duration of preoperative fasting. Methods: The cohort of this before-and-after study comprised patients undergoing elective surgery aged 18 years or older who underwent general anesthesia at one of three stages: after starting a short preoperative fasting protocol (Group A), after the anesthesiologist started explaining the protocol (Group B), and after the start of the perioperative management center (Group C). Instructions on drinking clear fluids were given up to 2 h and 4 h before the start of elective surgery to the first patient on the list (on-time) and to the second and subsequent patients (on-call), respectively. Data were collected retrospectively in Groups A and B and prospectively in Group C. Results: The study cohort comprised 89 patients in Group A (50 on-time, 39 on-call), 108 in Group B (65 on-time, 43 on-call), and 284 in Group C (182 on-time, 102 on-call). The difference between the instructed and last drinking time was significantly shorter in Group C than Group A (30 [10, 140] vs. 30 [10, 60] vs. 20 [0, 50] min, p=0.003). The duration of fasting was significantly shorter in Group C than Group B (243 [150, 395] vs. 213 [151, 323] vs. 180 [146, 280] min, p=0.01). Conclusions: Multidisciplinary interventions at the perioperative management center tended to reduce the duration of fasting, suggesting that this approach may contribute to improved compliance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The joint committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Japanese Respiratory Society/Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine on ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline has created and released the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021. METHODS: The 2016 edition of the Clinical Practice Guideline covered clinical questions (CQs) that targeted only adults, but the present guideline includes 15 CQs for children in addition to 46 CQs for adults. As with the previous edition, we used a systematic review method with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system as well as a degree of recommendation determination method. We also conducted systematic reviews that used meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy and network meta-analyses as a new method. RESULTS: Recommendations for adult patients with ARDS are described: we suggest against using serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to identify bacterial pneumonia as the underlying disease (GRADE 2D); we recommend limiting tidal volume to 4-8 mL/kg for mechanical ventilation (GRADE 1D); we recommend against managements targeting an excessively low SpO2 (PaO2) (GRADE 2D); we suggest against using transpulmonary pressure as a routine basis in positive end-expiratory pressure settings (GRADE 2B); we suggest implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for those with severe ARDS (GRADE 2B); we suggest against using high-dose steroids (GRADE 2C); and we recommend using low-dose steroids (GRADE 1B). The recommendations for pediatric patients with ARDS are as follows: we suggest against using non-invasive respiratory support (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy) (GRADE 2D), we suggest placing pediatric patients with moderate ARDS in the prone position (GRADE 2D), we suggest against routinely implementing NO inhalation therapy (GRADE 2C), and we suggest against implementing daily sedation interruption for pediatric patients with respiratory failure (GRADE 2D). CONCLUSIONS: This article is a translated summary of the full version of the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 published in Japanese (URL: https://www.jsicm.org/publication/guideline.html ). The original text, which was written for Japanese healthcare professionals, may include different perspectives from healthcare professionals of other countries.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The joint committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Japanese Respiratory Society/Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine on ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline has created and released the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021. METHODS: The 2016 edition of the Clinical Practice Guideline covered clinical questions (CQs) that targeted only adults, but the present guideline includes 15 CQs for children in addition to 46 CQs for adults. As with the previous edition, we used a systematic review method with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system as well as a degree of recommendation determination method. We also conducted systematic reviews that used meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy and network meta-analyses as a new method. RESULTS: Recommendations for adult patients with ARDS are described: we suggest against using serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to identify bacterial pneumonia as the underlying disease (GRADE 2D); we recommend limiting tidal volume to 4-8 mL/kg for mechanical ventilation (GRADE 1D); we recommend against managements targeting an excessively low SpO2 (PaO2) (GRADE 2D); we suggest against using transpulmonary pressure as a routine basis in positive end-expiratory pressure settings (GRADE 2B); we suggest implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for those with severe ARDS (GRADE 2B); we suggest against using high-dose steroids (GRADE 2C); and we recommend using low-dose steroids (GRADE 1B). The recommendations for pediatric patients with ARDS are as follows: we suggest against using non-invasive respiratory support (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy) (GRADE 2D); we suggest placing pediatric patients with moderate ARDS in the prone position (GRADE 2D); we suggest against routinely implementing NO inhalation therapy (GRADE 2C); and we suggest against implementing daily sedation interruption for pediatric patients with respiratory failure (GRADE 2D). CONCLUSIONS: This article is a translated summary of the full version of the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 published in Japanese (URL: https://www.jrs.or.jp/publication/jrs_guidelines/). The original text, which was written for Japanese healthcare professionals, may include different perspectives from healthcare professionals of other countries.
Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Decúbito Ventral , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Volume de Ventilação PulmonarRESUMO
Prolonged neurological symptoms such as "brain fog" and cognitive impairment have occurred after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. In this report, we describe impaired consciousness caused by cefepime hydrochloride (CFPM) in a patient with cognitive sequalae of COVID-19. A 56-year-old male patient was diagnosed with penile abscess after COVID-19 infection, and a blood culture detected two drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Therefore, CFPM 2 g × twice/day was administered on day 71 after intensive care unit admission. Approximately 48 h after CFPM administration, the patient showed disturbances in consciousness. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and spinal fluid examination revealed no obvious abnormalities. Therefore, CFPM-induced neurotoxicity was suspected. CFPM was discontinued and ceftazidime 2 g × three times/day was initiated. The patient's consciousness improved 30 h after the final administration of CFPM. Serum CFPM concentrations were 14.2, 21.7, 21.7, and 11.9 µg/mL on days 1, 2, and 3 after the initiation of CFPM and on the day after CFPM was discontinued, respectively. In conclusion, intensivists should pay attention to new neurological symptoms such as CFPM-induced encephalopathy in patients with prolonged neurological symptoms after COVID-19 infection.
Assuntos
Encefalopatias , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Encefalopatias/induzido quimicamente , Encefalopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/complicações , Cefepima/efeitos adversos , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the evidence-to-decision tables differed between them. In addition, certain recommendations may differ between these guidelines for similar clinical questions because of differences in the "PICO" criteria. Other differences in recommendations between the two guidelines are due to unclear evidence, and these ambiguities may provide the basis for further sepsis research. We hope that these two guidelines will contribute to the creation of new clinical evidence in addition to supporting treatment of patients with sepsis.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Although the most recent systematic review and meta-analyses on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have shown that the use of steroids decreases mortality in adult patients, its benefits and risks may differ depending on the type and dosage of the steroid. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the differences in the efficacy among different doses and types of steroids. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ICHUSHI, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP databases from the earliest records to March 2021 for randomized control trials, which compared steroids with placebo or conventional therapy for ARDS. Using the random-effects model, we compared various categories of steroids (high-dose methylprednisolone, low-dose methylprednisolone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, and no steroid) concerning hospital mortality, incidence of infection, and ventilator-free days (VFD). RESULTS: We analyzed nine studies involving adult patients (n = 1212). Although there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the mortality and incidence of infection, the number of VFD were greater when using low-dose methylprednisolone than when not using any steroids (Mean difference: 6.06; 95% confidence intervals: [2.5, 10.5]). Moreover, the rank probability showed that low-dose methylprednisolone might be the optimal treatment, whereas using no steroid or high-dose methylprednisolone may be inferior to other treatments in terms of mortality, infection, and VFD. CONCLUSION: This NMA suggested that the effect of steroids on the outcome in patients with ARDS might depend on the type of the steroid drug administered. Moreover, further studies are needed to identify the optimal type and dosage.
Assuntos
Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório , Adulto , Glucocorticoides , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Metanálise em Rede , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Infection during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a common complication that leads to increased mortality. Thus, antimicrobial prophylaxis during ECMO is often performed to prevent of nosocomial infections. However, the current status of antimicrobial prophylaxis during ECMO in Japan is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a national survey of members of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) to clarify the current status of antimicrobial prophylaxis during ECMO in intensive care units. An 11-question survey was devised to assess antimicrobial prophylaxis and surveillance practices during ECMO. A total of 253 hospitals responded. Of these, 235 hospitals were the JSICM-certified hospitals, and the response rate was 64%. A total of 96 hospitals (39%) administered antimicrobial prophylaxis during ECMO, and 17% of hospitals had a standardized protocol for antimicrobial prophylaxis during ECMO. Of these 96 hospitals, 79% used single agents. First-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used (54%), followed by penicillins or penicillin-derived combinations (24%), second-generation cephalosporins (7%), and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents (6%). In conclusion, our survey revealed 39% of hospitals administered antimicrobial prophylaxis during ECMO in Japan. First-generation cephalosporins were the agents most commonly used.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Hyperchloremia is a potential risk factor for acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. However, the relationship between hyperchloremia and postoperative AKI in adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains unclear. The authors aimed to determine whether postoperative hyperchloremia was associated with postoperative AKI in these populations. OBJECTIVES: Retrospective, single-center study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients with and without postoperative hyperchloremia were matched (1:1). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative AKI diagnosed using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes consensus criteria. Postoperative hyperchloremia was defined as postoperative serum chloride levels of >110 mmol/L during the first 48 hours. An increase in serum chloride levels (Δ[Cl-]) was defined as the difference between the preoperative and maximum postoperative serum chloride levels during the first 48 hours ([Cl-]max). Propensity-score matching and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed. A total of 323 patients were included. Propensity-score matching selected 55 pairs for the final comparison. The incidence of postoperative AKI did not differ between the two groups (47% v 46%, p = 1.0). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, Δ[Cl-] was associated independently with the development of postoperative AKI (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.21; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to postoperative hyperchloremia was not associated with postoperative AKI in adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with CPB. However, an increase in the serum chloride level might be associated with postoperative AKI.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico , Injúria Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Adulto , Cloretos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.
RESUMO
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.
RESUMO
The usefulness and safety of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in adult patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been reported. Using CGM might reduce the exposure patients and healthcare workers to COVID-19 and limit the use of personal protective equipment during the pandemic. CGM devices measure glucose in the subcutaneous interstitial fluid, but the accuracy of this technique has not been established in critically ill patients. The artificial pancreas, STG-55 (Nikkiso, Tokyo), is a closed-loop device that conducts continuous blood glucose monitoring using a peripheral vein. We used the STG-55 for glucose control in a 60-year-old woman with severe COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit. Due to severe respiratory failure, the patient was intubated, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was introduced. Because she had hyperglycemia despite high-dose intravenous insulin therapy, we decided to use STG-55 for glucose control. The STG-55 safely titrated the insulin infusion and monitored glucose levels. Fifty-six hours after adopting the STG-55, it was removed because the blood sampling failed. No episodes of hypoglycemia were observed despite deep sedation during this period. In conclusion, this case demonstrates the potential utility of an artificial pancreas in patients with severe COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Pâncreas Artificial , Adulto , Glicemia , Automonitorização da Glicemia , Feminino , Humanos , Insulina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Blood purification has been widely performed for critically ill patients, even in cases without renal failure. Effective anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit is necessary to prevent circuit clotting. We hypothesized that administration of recombinant human-soluble thrombomodulin (rhsTM) to septic patients undergoing blood purification may prevent circuit clotting, because this agent regulates coagulation. We performed a retrospective, single-center, propensity-matched cohort study in the intensive care unit of Nishichita General Hospital. We included septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit from May 2015 to August 2020 who underwent blood purification. Patients who received rhsTM during intensive care unit admission to the end of the first blood purification (rhsTM group) were matched 1:1 with other patients (control group). The primary outcome was the occurrence of circuit clotting during the first blood purification. A total of 138 patients were included in the study [43 patients (31%) in the rhsTM group and 95 patients (69%) in the control group]. After propensity score matching, 42 pairs of patients were selected, and patients in the rhsTM group had a lower incidence of circuit clotting (21 vs. 55%, P = 0.003). One case of major bleeding occurred in the rhsTM group, but there was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding between groups (2 vs. 0%, P = 1.0). In conclusion, this propensity-matched cohort study indicated that the administration of rhsTM to septic patients undergoing blood purification may prevent extracorporeal circuit clotting.
Assuntos
Sepse , Trombose , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , TrombomodulinaRESUMO
The use of standardized internal hospital phone numbers for cardiac arrest is advocated in Europe. We evaluated the current status of variations in medical emergency call numbers for in-hospital patients in Japan and whether anesthesiologists would approve a standardized number. From June 2018 to August 2018, a questionnaire survey was mailed to anesthesiologists in 1373 Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA)-accredited hospitals. The basis for opinions on using a standardized cardiac arrest call number in all Japanese hospitals was evaluated. Of 1373 facilities (response rate, 58%, n = 800), 741/776 (96%) reported a response system for in-hospital cardiac arrest; 638/710 (90%) responded to cardiac arrest through loudspeaker broadcast, audible to both patients and staff; 346/777 (48%) used a number between one and five digits long, four-digit numbers being the most common. Across Japan, 370 different numbers were reported. Only 385/688 (56%) of respondents had the emergency number memorized. Finally, 423/776 (55%) respondents approved standardizing a hospital telephone number for summoning help. Multivariate analysis showed that facilities where the anesthesiologists already memorized the call number were the only reason identified for opposition to the standardization. Although 96% of JSA-accredited hospitals had a response system for in-hospital cardiac arrests, discussions for standardization of a unified number need to be encouraged for improved emergency response.