Knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of and willingness to consider taking oral contraceptive pills among a low-risk female population: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In addition to its widely-appreciated contraceptive applications, the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) conveys both oncological and non-oncological benefits. Oncological benefits include a decreased risk of endometrial, ovarian, and colorectal cancer. Non-oncological benefits include reducing androgenic effects and alleviating menstruation-related problems. This study aimed to ascertain knowledge levels of non-contraceptive benefits and risks of OCP use among participants without contraindications to OCPs. This study also assessed factors associated with participants being more likely to consider taking OCPs. METHODS: 263 women aged 21 to 40 years old with no contraindications for OCP usage participated in this study. An anonymous questionnaire collected sociodemographic information and assessed participants' knowledge of the non-contraceptive benefits and risks associated with OCP use. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess factors associated with knowledge levels. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with being more likely to consider taking OCPs among women who did not presently take them. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression revealed that participants who were more knowledgeable overall about the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs were more likely to consider taking OCPs (coefficient = 0.184, p-value = 0.00). Knowledge of both oncological and non-oncological benefits of OCP use was relatively poor, especially among older women. Current OCP users were found to be more knowledgeable about their benefits. CONCLUSIONS: As women with greater knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs are more likely to consider taking them, knowledge gaps regarding OCPs should be filled, so that more women may reap the non-contraceptive benefits of OCPs.

A sample of women with a low risk profile for oral contraceptive pills in Singapore demonstrated poor overall knowledge of their non-contraceptive benefits. Greater knowledge of the non-contraceptive benefits of oral contraceptive pills was associated with a greater willingness to consider taking oral contraceptive pills.

Development of a surgical competency assessment tool for sentinel lymph node dissection by minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node dissection is widely used in the staging of endometrial cancer. Variation in surgical techniques potentially impacts diagnostic accuracy and oncologic outcomes, and poses barriers to the comparison of outcomes across institutions or clinical trial sites. Standardization of surgical technique and surgical quality assessment tools are critical to the conduct of clinical trials. By identifying mandatory and prohibited steps of sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection in endometrial cancer, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a competency assessment tool for use in surgical quality assurance. METHODS: A Delphi methodology was applied, included 35 expert gynecological oncology surgeons from 16 countries. Interviews identified key steps and tasks which were rated mandatory, optional, or prohibited using questionnaires. Using the surgical steps for which consensus was achieved, a competency assessment tool was developed and subjected to assessments of validity and reliability. RESULTS: Seventy percent consensus agreement standardized the specific mandatory, optional, and prohibited steps of SLN dissection for endometrial cancer and informed the development of a competency assessment tool. Consensus agreement identified 21 mandatory and three prohibited steps to complete a SLN dissection. The competency assessment tool was used to rate surgical quality in three preselected videos, demonstrating clear separation in the rating of the skill level displayed with mean skills summary scores differing significantly between the three videos (F score=89.4; P<0.001). Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach α=0.88). CONCLUSION: Specific mandatory and prohibited steps of SLN dissection in endometrial cancer have been identified and validated based on consensus among a large number of international experts. A competency assessment tool is now available and can be used for surgeon selection in clinical trials and for ongoing, prospective quality assurance in routine clinical care.

Feasibility study of toxicity outcomes using GEC-ESTRO contouring guidelines on CT based instead of MRI-based planning in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To report late rectal and bladder toxicity outcomes of a CT-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) technique for treatment of cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2008 and 2014, 95 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA cervical carcinoma treated with definitive concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy and external beam radiation therapy 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions followed by planned prescription dose of 7 Gy × 4 fractions of high-dose-rate IGBT was retrospectively reviewed. At each implantation, all patients had a urinary catheter in situ and received bowel enema before undergoing planning CT simulation. A high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) as per GEC-ESTRO guidelines and the entire cervix, rectum, and bladder was contoured on the simulation CT according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Gynaecology Contouring Atlas. Reported doses to HRCTV and organs at risk were recorded. Toxicities were recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3. RESULTS: The median followup time was 29 months. The mean HRCTV equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of external beam radiation therapy combined with brachytherapy was 80 Gy (standard deviation [SD], 11), and the rectal doses to 2 cm3 (D2cc) EQD2 and bladder D2cc EQD2 were 74 Gy (SD, 6) and 79 Gy (SD, 15), respectively. Twenty-two patients (23%) had grade 2 proctitis and 10 patients (11%) had grade 3 proctitis. Four patients (4%) had grade 2 cystitis and two patients (2%) had grade 3 cystitis. No patients had ≥ grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite CT-based brachytherapy planning, reported organ at risk toxicity was still significant compared with reported MRI-based planning series. Coimplementation of interstitial IGBT using the European Study on MRI-guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (EMBRACE) protocol or using intensity-modulated radiation therapy during the external beam phase treatment might help to limit these late toxicities.

The effects of 15 Hz trans-spinal magnetic stimulation on locomotor control in mice with chronic contusive spinal cord injury.

The effects of repetitive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (rTSMS), combined with acrobatic exercise on functional locomotor recovery in chronic spinal-contused mice were tested. The exposure to magnetic stimulation was initiated 3 weeks after injury, when the animals entered chronic stage. The rTSMS was applied for a total of 4 weeks over a 9-week duration trial. Seventeen mice with the spinal cord contusion injured at level T13 were separated into two groups. While one group consisting of 10 animals was exposed to rTSMS (15 Hz), the other seven animals served as controls. Functional recovery measured with Basso mouse scale and horizontal ladder scale showed significantly better functional recovery in rTSMS-treated animals. The progress in recovery continued even after cessation of magnetic stimulation. In vitro experiments revealed that the release of glutamate analog, radioactive D-aspartate from the segments of the spinal cord exposed to rTSMS was significantly elevated. In conclusion, the exposure to rTSMS, applied to injured spinal cord during chronic post-surgery stage remarkably improves the functional recovery. This recovery may be correlated by magnetically induced elevation in the release of major excitatory neurotransmitter, glutamate from injured tissue.