Association Between Age-stratified Cohorts and Perioperative Complications and 30-day and 90-day Readmission in Patients Undergoing Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: To assess perioperative complication rates and readmission rates after ACDF in a patient population of advanced age. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Readmission rates after ACDF are important markers of surgical quality and, with recent shifts in reimbursement schedules, they are rapidly gaining weight in the determination of surgeon and hospital reimbursement. METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who underwent elective single-level ACDF were identified in the National Readmissions Database (NRD) and stratified into 4 cohorts: 18-39 ("young"), 40-64 ("middle"), 65-74 ("senior"), and 75+ ("elderly") years of age. For each cohort, the perioperative complications, frequency of those complications, and number of patients with at least 1 readmission within 30 and 90 days of discharge were analyzed. χ 2 tests were used to calculate likelihood of complications and readmissions. RESULTS: There were 1174 "elderly" patients in 2016, 1072 in 2017, and 1010 in 2018 who underwent ACDF. Their rate of any complication was 8.95%, 11.00%, and 13.47%, respectively ( P <0.0001), with dysphagia and acute posthemorrhagic anemia being the most common across all 3 years. They experienced complications at a greater frequency than their younger counterparts (15.80%, P <0.0001; 16.98%, P <0.0001; 21.68%, P <0.0001). They also required 30-day and 90-day readmission more frequently ( P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: It has been well-established that advanced patient age brings greater risk of perioperative complications in ACDF surgery. What remains unsettled is the characterization of this age-complication relationship within specific age cohorts and how these complications inform patient hospital course. Our study provides an updated analysis of age-specific complications and readmission rates in ACDF patients. Orthopedic surgeons may account for the rise in complication and readmission rates in this population with the corresponding reduction in length and stay and consider this relationship before discharging elderly ACDF patients.

Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients with Vocal Fold Paralysis after Ischemic and Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Propensity Matched 20-Year Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVE: Laryngeal manifestations of stroke have been sparsely described in the literature, specifically vocal fold paralysis (VFP). This study aimed to identify the prevalence, characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of patients presenting with VFP after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: A query of the 2000-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed for patients admitted with AIS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision 433, 43,401, 43,411, 43,491, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision I63) and ICH (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision 431, 432.9, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision I61, I62.9). Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were identified. Univariate analysis with t-tests or χ2 performed as appropriate. A 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matched cohort was generated. Variables with standardized mean differences > 0.1 used in multivariable regression to generate adjusted odds ratios (AOR)/ß-coefficients for VFP on outcomes. Significance was set at an alpha level of < 0.001. All analysis were performed in R version 4.1.3. RESULTS: A total of 10,415,286 patients with AIS were included; 11,328 (0.1%) had VFP. Of 2,000,868 patients with ICH 2132 (0.1%) had in-hospital VFP. Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with VFP after AIS were less likely to be discharged home (AOR 0.32; 95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.18-0.57; P < 0.001) and elevated total hospital charges (ß coefficient = 59,684.6; 95% CI = 18,365.12-101,004.07; P = 0.005). Patients with VFP after ICH were less likely to experience in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34-0.79; P = 0.002) with longer hospital stays (1.99 days; 95% CI: 1.78-2.21; P < 0.001) and elevated total hospital charges (ß coefficient = 53,905.35; 95% CI = 16,352.84-91,457.85; P = 0.005).. CONCLUSIONS: VFP in patients with ischemic stroke and ICH; although an infrequent complication is associated with functional impairment, longer hospital stay, and higher charges.

Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Cervical Spinal Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The "weekend effect" occurs when patients cared for during weekends versus weekdays experience worse outcomes. But reasons for this effect are unclear, especially amongst patients undergoing elective cervical spinal fusion (ECSF). Our aim was to analyze whether index weekend admission affects 30- and 90-day readmission rates post-ECSF. METHODS: All ECSF patients > 18 years were retrospectively identified from the 2016-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), using unique patient linkage codes and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate logistic regression analyzed primary outcomes of 30- and 90-day readmission rates in weekday or weekend groups. Multivariate regression determined the impact of complications on readmission rates. RESULTS: Compared to the weekday group (n = 125,590), the weekend group (n = 1,026) held a higher percentage of Medicare/Medicaid insurance, incurred higher costs, had longer length of stay, and fewer routine home discharge (all p < 0.001). There was no difference in comorbidity burden between weekend versus weekday admissions, as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p = 0.527). Weekend admissions had higher 30-day (4.30% vs. 7.60%, p < 0.001) and 90-day (7.80% vs. 16.10%, p < 0.001) readmission rates, even after adjusting for sex, age, insurance status, and comorbidities. All-cause complication rates were higher for weekend admissions (8.62% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), specifically deep vein thrombosis, infection, neurological conditions, and pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Index weekend admission increases 30- and 90-day readmission rates after ECSF. In patients undergoing ECSF on weekends, postoperative care for patients at risk for specific complications will allow for improved outcomes and health care utilization.

Interventions to reduce repetitive ordering of low-value inpatient laboratory tests: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Over-ordering of daily laboratory tests adversely affects patient care through hospital-acquired anaemia, patient discomfort, burden on front-line staff and unnecessary downstream testing. This remains a prevalent issue despite the 2013 Choosing Wisely recommendation to minimise unnecessary daily labs. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify interventions targeting unnecessary laboratory testing. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and SCOPUS databases to identify interventions focused on reducing daily complete blood count, complete metabolic panel and basic metabolic panel labs. We defined interventions as 'effective' if a statistically significant reduction was attained and 'highly effective' if a reduction of ≥25% was attained. RESULTS: The search yielded 5646 studies with 41 articles that met inclusion criteria. We grouped interventions into one or more categories: audit and feedback, cost display, education, electronic medical record (EMR) change, and policy change. Most interventions lasted less than a year and used a multipronged approach. All five strategies were effective in most studies with EMR change being the most commonly used independent strategy. EMR change and policy change were the strategies most frequently reported as effective. EMR change was the strategy most frequently reported as highly effective. CONCLUSION: Our analysis identified five categories of interventions targeting daily laboratory testing. All categories were effective in most studies, with EMR change being most frequently highly effective. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021254076.

Weekend Admission Increases Risk of Readmissions Following Elective Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the influence of weekend admission on patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion by investigating hospital readmission outcomes and analyzing differences in demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative factors. METHODS: The 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify adult patients who underwent elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion. The sample was divided into weekday and weekend admission patients. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, and discharge status data were compiled. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission. Univariate logistic regression analyzed the relationship between weekday or weekend admission and 30- or 90-day readmission, and multivariate regression determined the impact of covariates. RESULTS: 177,847 patients were identified in total, with 176,842 in the weekday cohort and 1005 in the weekend cohort. Multivariate regression analysis found that 30-day readmissions were significantly greater for the weekend cohort after adjusting for sex, age, Medicare or Medicaid status, and comorbidity status (OR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.60-2.48; P < .001), and 90-day readmissions were also greater for the weekend cohort after adjustment (OR 2.01, 95% CI: 1.68-2.40, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery who are initially admitted on weekends are more likely to experience hospital readmission. These patients have increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis, postoperative infection, and non-routine discharge status. These factors are potential areas of focus for reducing the impact of the "weekend effect" and improving outcomes for elective thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Comparison of Patient Preference, Understanding, and Sentiment for Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective questionnaire analysis. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to analyze patients' understanding and preferences for minimally invasive spine (MIS) versus open spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MIS surgery is increasing in prevalence. However, there is insufficient literature to evaluate how the availability of MIS surgery influences the patients' decision-making process and perceptions of spine procedures. METHODS: A survey was administered to patients who received a microdiscectomy or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2016 and 2020. All eligible patients were stratified into two cohorts based on the use of minimally invasive techniques. Each cohort was administered a survey that evaluated patient preferences, perceptions, and understanding of their surgery. RESULTS: One hundred fifty two patients completed surveys (MIS: 88, Open: 64). There was no difference in time from surgery to survey (MIS: 2.1 ±â€Š1.4 yrs, Open: 1.9 ±â€Š1.4 yrs; P = 0.36) or sex (MIS: 56.8% male, Open: 53.1% male; P = 0.65). The MIS group was younger (MIS: 53.0 ±â€Š16.9 yrs, Open: 58.2 ±â€Š14.6 yrs; P = 0.05). More MIS patients reported that their technique influenced their surgeon choice (MIS: 64.0%, Open: 37.5%; P  < 0.00001) and increased their preoperative confidence (MIS: 77.9%, Open: 38.1%; P  < 0.00001). There was a trend towards the MIS group being less informed about the intraoperative specifics of their technique (MIS: 35.2%, Open: 23.4%; P = 0.12). More of the MIS cohort reported perceived advantages to their surgical technique (MIS: 98.8%, Open: 69.4%; P < 0.00001) and less reported disadvantages (MIS: 12.9%, Open: 68.8%; P < 0.00001). 98.9% and 87.1% of the MIS and open surgery cohorts reported a preference for MIS surgery in the future. CONCLUSION: Patients who received a MIS approach more frequently sought out their surgeons, were more confident in their procedure, and reported less perceived disadvantages following their surgery compared with the open surgery cohort. Both cohorts would prefer MIS surgery in the future. Overall, patients have positive perceptions of MIS surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.

Abnormal Bone Morphology in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

BACKGROUND: Although long suspected, it has yet to be shown whether the foot and ankle deformities of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) are generally associated with abnormalities in osseous shape. Computed tomography (CT) was used to quantify morphologic differences of the calcaneus, talus, and navicular in CMT compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Weightbearing CT scans of 21 patients (27 feet) with CMT were compared to those of 20 healthy controls. Calcaneal measurements included radius of curvature, sagittal posterior tuberosity-posterior facet angle, and tuberosity coronal rotation. Talar measurements included axial and sagittal body-neck declination angle, and coronal talar head rotation. Surface-mesh model analysis of the hindfoot was performed comparing the average of the CMT cohort to the controls using a CT analysis software (Disior Bonelogic 2.0). Means were compared with a t test (P < .05). RESULTS: CMT patients had significantly less talar sagittal declination vs controls (17.8 vs 25.1 degrees; P < .05). Similarly, CMT patients had less talar head coronal rotation vs controls (30.8 vs 42.5 degrees; P < .001). The calcaneal radius of curvature in CMT patients was significantly smaller than controls (822.8 vs 2143.5 mm; P < .05). CMT sagittal posterior tuberosity-posterior facet angle was also significantly different from that of controls (60.3 vs 67.9 degrees respectively; P < .001).Surface-mesh model analysis demonstrated the largest differences in morphology at the navicular tuberosity, medial talar head, sustentaculum tali, and anterior process of the calcaneus. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to quantify the morphologic differences in hindfoot osteology seen in CMT patients. Patients identified with osseous changes of the calcaneus, especially a smaller axial radius of curvature, may benefit from a 3-dimensional osteotomy for correction.

Significance of Hospital Size in Outcomes of Single-Level Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate risk factors for 90-day readmission in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for small, medium, and large hospitals. To assess differences in length of stay, charges, and complication rates across hospitals of different size. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using elective, single-level ACDF data from 2016 to 2018 in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database. Elective single-level ACDF cases were stratified into 3 groups by hospital bed size (small, medium, and large). All-cause complication rates, mean charges, length of stay, and 90-day readmission rates were compared across hospital size. Frequencies of specific comorbidities were compared between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients for each hospital size. Comorbidities significant on univariate analysis were evaluated as independent risk factors for 90-day readmission for each hospital size using multivariate regression. RESULTS: The overall 90-day readmission rate was 6.43% in 36,794 patients, and the rates for small, medium, and large hospitals were 6.25%, 6.28%, and 6.56%, respectively (P = 0.537). Length of stay increased significantly with hospital size (P < 0.001), and small hospitals had the lowest charges (P < 0.001). Although different independent predictors of 90-day readmission were identified for each hospital size, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic pulmonary disease, neurologic disorders, and rheumatic disease were identified as risk factors for hospitals of all sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital size is a determining factor for charges and length of stay associated with elective single-level ACDF. Variation in risk factors for readmission exists across hospital size in context of similar 90-day readmission rates.

Reducing Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections via Cost-saving Diagnostic Stewardship.

We conducted a quality improvement project at our large, public, tertiary-care, academic hospital to reduce the standardized infection ratio (SIR) of hospital-acquired catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Our diagnostic stewardship program, based on education and audit and feedback, significantly reduced inpatient urine culture orders and CAUTI SIR.

Monoclonal Antibody Protects Against Acinetobacter baumannii Infection by Enhancing Bacterial Clearance and Evading Sepsis.

Background: Extremely drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the most commonly encountered, highly resistant pathogens requiring novel therapeutic interventions. Methods: We developed C8, a monoclonal antibody (mAb), by immunizing mice with sublethal inocula of a hypervirulent XDR clinical isolate. Results: C8 targets capsular carbohydrate on the bacterial surface, enhancing opsonophagocytosis. Treating with a single dose of C8 as low as 0.5 µg/mouse (0.0167 mg/kg) markedly improved survival in lethal bacteremic sepsis and aspiration pneumonia models of XDR A. baumannii infection. C8 was also synergistic with colistin, substantially improving survival compared to monotherapy. Treatment with C8 significantly reduced blood bacterial density, cytokine production (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin [IL] 6, IL-1ß, and IL-10), and sepsis biomarkers. Serial in vitro passaging of A. baumannii in the presence of C8 did not cause loss of mAb binding to the bacteria, but did result in emergence of less-virulent mutants that were more susceptible to macrophage uptake. Finally, we developed a highly humanized variant of C8 that retains opsonophagocytic activity in murine and human macrophages and rescued mice from lethal infection. Conclusions: We describe a promising and novel mAb as therapy for lethal, XDR A. baumannii infections, and demonstrate that it synergistically improves outcomes in combination with antibiotics.