Comparison of artificial intelligence-assisted informed consent obtained before coronary angiography with the conventional method: Medical competence and ethical assessment.

Objective: At the time of informed consent (IC) for coronary angiography (CAG), patients' knowledge of the process is inadequate. Time constraints and a lack of personalization of consent are the primary causes of inadequate information. This procedure can be enhanced by obtaining IC using a chatbot powered by artificial intelligence (AI). Methods: In the study, patients who will undergo CAG for the first time were randomly divided into two groups, and IC was given to one group using the conventional method and the other group using an AI-supported chatbot, chatGPT3. They were then evaluated with two distinct questionnaires measuring their satisfaction and capacity to understand CAG risks. Results: While the satisfaction questionnaire was equal between the two groups (p = 0.581), the correct understanding of CAG risk questionnaire was found to be significantly higher in the AI group (<0.001). Conclusions: AI can be trained to support clinicians in giving IC before CAG. In this way, the workload of healthcare professionals can be reduced while providing a better IC.

Investigation of cardiac adverse effects in COVID-19 ARDS patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVE: The popularity of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) secondary to COVID-19 infection is increasing day by day. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the possible cardiac effects in our CARDS patients treated with IVIG. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality, sequential electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, cardiac markers, and other laboratory parameters of CARDS patients who received IVIG treatment were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 68.7±13.6%, and 70.5% were female. The mean number of days of hospitalization in the intensive care unit was 18.2±9.7, and the mortality rate was recorded as 35.2%. No pathological rhythm or ischemic change was observed in sequential ECG follow-ups. However, in consecutive ECO follow-ups, the sPAP values at the treatment end were numerically lower, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that IVIG therapy may be used safely in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular side effects. However, due to the high risk of coagulopathy in these patients, the use of IVIG therapy in COVID-19 infection should be monitored with close monitoring, as it may increase the potential for cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, monitoring cardiac parameters are also essential as it may predict high cardiovascular risk in patients. For this reason, patients need lower infusion rates, steroid combination, adequate hydration, and effective anticoagulation therapy to avoid these side effects.

Door to Balloon Time of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction May be Reconsidered According to Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index.

Aim    Early diagnosis and treatment is very important in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Previous studies showed that not all non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients should be considered and treated in the same way. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), which is an easily accessible, rapidly computed, and cost-effective parameter, was evaluated in this study to determine the optimal intervention time for NSTEMI.Material and methods    469 patients diagnosed with ACS were included to the study. STEMI and NSTEMI patients were compared according to their SII. Univariate and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to determine which parameters have a significant effect on the discrimination of types of myocardial infarction.Results    The mean age of the patients was 61.43±11.52 yrs, and 348 (74.2 %) were male. NSTEMI patients with an SII value higher than 768×109 / l may be assumed to be STEMI (p<0.001). Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression showed that only SII and hypertension had statistically impact on differentiation of STEMI and NSTEMI. In addition, SII value of 1105×109 / l was the cut-off point for discrimination of cardiovascular survival (p<0.001, AUC =0.741). This study was performed to find out which NSTEMI patients should be treated percutaneously immediately after first medical contact according to SII. It was found that, SII value of higher than 768×109 / l is related with STEMI.Conclusion    In conclusion, NSTEMI patients with a SII value higher than 768×109 / l may be considered as STEMI and treated with in 120 min after first contact. In addition, SII was found to be a cardiovascular mortality predictor after myocardial infarction, and this may be used for identifying high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Investigation of mortality rates and the factors affecting survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

BACKGROUND: It is known that even if spontaneous circulation returns after cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR) in geriatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests(OHCA), the overall one-year survival rate of these patients is very low. In our study, we aimed to investigate the factors affecting survival in OHCA cases. METHODS: OHCA patients over 18 years of age were examined in two different groups as 18-64 years old and over 65 years old. Demographic data, comorbidities, cardiac arrest rhythms and minutes, and the number of days they were hospitalized in the intensive care unit were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age was 65.9 ± 15.8 years and 39.9% (n = 110) of the patients were female. The number of intensive care unit stays was significantly higher in the over-65 age group (p = 0.011). The mortality rate and one-year survival rate were significantly lower in the over-65 age group (p < 0.001). Median CPR time was 21 min (IQR:14-32) in the entire patient population. The duration of CPR was 22 min (IQR:14-35) in patients with in-hospital mortality, and 15 min (IQR:13-25) in patients discharged from the hospital. In this comparison, the difference is statistically significant (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In our study, it was determined that especially over 65 years of age, coronary artery disease, and post-arrest CPR duration were determinant and predictive factors in in-hospital and long-term survival.

Clinical usability of morning surge blood pressure for predicting future hypertension in a young population.

Objective    Early diagnosis of hypertension (HT) is a critical issue for physicians. This study was conducted to determine if morning surge blood pressure (MSBP) could be used to predict future HT. The study also examined which demographic data in a regression model might help to detect future HT without any invasive procedure.Material and methods    A young population between 18 and 40 yrs of age was included in the study. MSBP and demographic data were used to determine an optimal model for predicting future HT by using Bayesian information criteria and binary logistic regression.Results    1321 patients with 24 hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were included in this study. The odds ratio of 10 units of increase in diastolic MSBP was 1.173511 in the model, which indicates that a 10 mmHg increase in diastolic MSBP increases the odds of future HT in the patient by 17.4 %. The odds ratio of age was 1.096365, meaning that at each age above 18 yrs, the patients' odds of future HT rise by 9.6 %. The odds ratios for gender (male) and previous HT were 1.656986 and 3.336759, respectively. The odds of future HT in males were 65 % higher than for females, and a history of HT implies that the odds of future HT were higher by 230 %.Conclusion    Diastolic MSBP can be used to predict HT in young individuals. In addition, age, male gender, and previous HT add more predictive power to diastolic MSBP. This statistically significant, predictive model could be useful in lessening or preventing future HT.

Assessment of secondary prevention awareness among patients with coronary artery disease: A survey including patients from 3 centers.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the awareness of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) about secondary prevention and the channels through which they obtained information on this issue. METHODS: A standard questionnaire including 45 questions was given to the patients (n=912) who were admitted to the cardiology outpatient clinics to investigate their secondary prevention awareness and lifestyle. RESULTS: Of the participants, 508 (55.7%) stated that they knew the condition of their vessels after coronary angiography; 493 (54.1%) stated that they did not exercise; 299 stated that they did not follow any specific diet. Men were more frequently aware of all risk factors except diet, blood glucose, and blood pressure compared to women (p<0.001). Women were more frequently aware that blood glucose and blood pressure are risk factors for CAD compared to men (p<0.001). The high-income patient group was more aware of all the risk factors, except blood glucose compared to the low/medium income patient group (p<0.001). The frequency of awareness, except for blood glucose and antiplatelet drugs, increased as the education level increased (p<0.001). However, the frequency of awareness of blood glucose and antiplatelet drug use was higher in the literate/elementary school/secondary school group (p<0.001). In addition, it was concluded that patients' sexual life and psychological problems after being diagnosed with the disease were rarely questioned by cardiology specialists. CONCLUSION: Awareness of patients with CAD about secondary prevention was found to be very low.

Chest pain score: a novel and practical approach to angina pectoris. A diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: The chest pain classifications that are currently in use are based on studies that are several decades old. Various studies have indicated that these classifications are not sufficient for determining the origin of chest pain without additional diagnostic tests or tools. We describe a new chest pain scoring system that examines the relationship between chest pain and ischemic heart disease (IHD). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary-level university hospital and two public hospitals. METHODS: Chest pain scores were assigned to 484 patients. These patients then underwent a treadmill stress test, followed by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy if necessary. Coronary angiography was then carried out on the patients whose tests had been interpreted as positive for ischemia. Afterwards, the relationship between myocardial ischemia and the test score results was investigated. RESULTS: The median chest pain score was 2 (range: 0-7) among the patients without IHD and 6 (1-8) among those with IHD. The median score of patients with IHD was significantly higher than that of patients without IHD (P = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the score had sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 87.5% for detecting IHD. CONCLUSION: We developed a pre-test chest pain score that uses a digital scoring system to assess whether or not the pain was caused by IHD. This scoring system can be applied easily and swiftly by healthcare professionals and can prevent the confusion that is caused by other classification and scoring systems.

Chest pain score: a novel and practical approach to angina pectoris. A diagnostic accuracy study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The chest pain classifications that are currently in use are based on studies that are several decades old. Various studies have indicated that these classifications are not sufficient for determining the origin of chest pain without additional diagnostic tests or tools. We describe a new chest pain scoring system that examines the relationship between chest pain and ischemic heart disease (IHD). DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary-level university hospital and two public hospitals. METHODS: Chest pain scores were assigned to 484 patients. These patients then underwent a treadmill stress test, followed by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy if necessary. Coronary angiography was then carried out on the patients whose tests had been interpreted as positive for ischemia. Afterwards, the relationship between myocardial ischemia and the test score results was investigated. RESULTS: The median chest pain score was 2 (range: 0-7) among the patients without IHD and 6 (1-8) among those with IHD. The median score of patients with IHD was significantly higher than that of patients without IHD (P = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the score had sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 87.5% for detecting IHD. CONCLUSION: We developed a pre-test chest pain score that uses a digital scoring system to assess whether or not the pain was caused by IHD. This scoring system can be applied easily and swiftly by healthcare professionals and can prevent the confusion that is caused by other classification and scoring systems.