RESUMO
Background: Urethral calculi causing acute urinary retention is a highly uncommon condition in women, which poses distinctive difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. This report presents the case of a 52-year-old woman who experienced acute urinary retention caused by a urethral stone. It emphasizes the effective use of minimally invasive methods and underscores the importance of comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment. Case presentation: A 52-year-old woman patient arrived with acute urinary retention symptoms that lasted 6 hours. She complained of pain in the perineal and periurethral regions. She struggled with poorly managed type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and frequent cystitis. The examination showed the presence of a 2-cm stone in the urethra. The treatment utilised retrograde propulsion and laser fragmentation. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging results were normal, and follow-up care involved managing diabetes and adopting lifestyle changes to prevent the recurrence of cystitis and stones for 6 months. Conclusion: Urethral calculi exceptionally cause acute urinary retention in women. To achieve successful outcomes and prevent recurrence, it is crucial to prioritize prompt, minimally invasive treatment, and comprehensive management.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Genital self-mutilation presents significant surgical challenges, particularly when complicated by psychiatric disorders. This case highlights the critical role of surgical intervention in the management of self-inflicted severe penile injuries and underscores the need to integrate surgical and psychiatric care to optimise results. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old man, with progressive psychiatric issues, self-inflicted penile amputation. He arrived late in the emergency room with a poorly preserved amputated penis, complicating potential reimplantation. The surgeons extensively debrided and created a urethrostomy on the anterior scrotum wall, preparing for future phalloplasty. This planning ensured tissue viability and minimised postoperative complications. Early psychiatric evaluations revealed hebephrenic schizophrenia. Unfortunately, after psychiatric stabilisation, he was lost to follow-up and was not present for phalloplasty. DISCUSSION: Severe penile lesions require restoration of appearance, preservation of functions, and minimisation of complications. The surgical approach depends on the hospital capabilities, expertise, and patient condition, our patient's case required an anterior urethral anastomosis of the scrotum wall in consideration of phalloplasty. Pairing surgical intervention with immediate psychiatric care is crucial for optimal outcomes. However, the loss of follow-up postpsychiatric discharge in our patient highlights the need for improved monitoring to ensure adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the interaction between severe genital trauma, psychiatric instability, and surgical management in patients who engage in self-genital mutilation. It underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that involves both surgical and psychiatric. Enhanced strategies for psychiatric involvement and monitoring are crucial, especially for people scheduled for complex reconstructive surgeries such as phalloplasty.
