Cardiac Tamponade as a Life-Threatening Complication of Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery: The Real Incidence and 3D Anatomy of a Heart Injury by Helical Tacks.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac tamponade (CT) is a dreadful complication of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) with unknown incidence, and preventive measures are yet to be defined. Incidence during LARS with respect to usage/configuration of graft deployment is analyzed. Three-dimensional (3D) analysis of tack distribution provided anatomical insight to prevent cardiac injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data regarding the usage and configuration of graft deployment are retrieved from the prospective database. Grafting was "posterior" or "posterior + anterior." Incidence of CT in all hiatoplasties is calculated. Tomography is reconstructed in 3D, showing the spatial distribution of the tacks. Tacks are numbered in the surgical video. Corresponding numbering is applied to the tacks in any particular tomography slice, utilizing the 3D images as an interface. A numbering-blinded radiologist is asked to identify the offending and the nonoffending tacks as the cause of tamponade. Tack-to-pericardium distances are recorded. Tacks having no measurable distance from the pericardium are regarded as offensive. RESULTS: One CT occurred in 1302 consecutive LARS (0.076%). The incidence is 0% when "no" (379) or "posterior" (880) graft is used as opposed to 2.3% rate in "posterior + anterior" (43) grafting. The distribution of "offensive," "nonoffensive but nearest," and "safe" tacks followed a pattern. All offensive tacks belonged to the anterior graft fixation, which we referred as the critical zone. CONCLUSION: CT during LARS is rare, and associated with graft fixation anterior to the hiatal opening. Avoiding graft fixation to the critical zone may prevent cardiac injury.

Correlation between Doppler derived dP/dt and left ventricular asynchrony in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: A combined study using strain rate imaging and conventional Doppler echocardiography.

AIM: To evaluate the relationship between Doppler-derived left ventricular (LV) dP/dt and the degree of LV mechanical asynchrony measured by strain rate imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 69 patients with variable degree of LV dysfunction and mitral regurgitation (MR). Conventional echo variables and LV dP/dt were calculated from the MR Doppler spectrum by rate-pressure-rise method. Strain rate traces were obtained by 12-segment model and LV long axis images were analyzed off-line. The longest time intervals between the peak negative strain rate waves at isovolumic contraction period and peak systole from reciprocal segments were defined as asynchrony index AIc or AIs, respectively. The maximum differences in time-to-peak systolic velocities between opposing walls were also measured as asynchrony index by tissue Doppler (AItd). The dP/dt, mean QRS duration, AIc, AIs, and AItd were 836 +/- 266 mmHg/sec, 125 +/- 31, 38 +/- 28, 64 +/- 44, and 52 +/- 32 m, respectively. No significant correlation between the dP/dt and the LV dimension, ejection fraction or QRS duration was observed. However, dP/dt correlated negatively with AIc, or AIs (r:-0.78, -0.72, P < or = 0.0001) and AItd (r:-0.65, P < or = 0.001). A cutoff dP/dt value of under 700 mmHg/sec can discriminate patients over median AIs (55 ms) or patients with AIc over 30 ms with high sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler-derived LV dP/dt is related to the degree of LV dyssynchrony rather than the conventional systolic function indices such as EF% in patients with severe heart failure. Noninvasive dP/dt assessment in addition to advanced imaging techniques can be used to define patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Pacemaker related endocarditis: analysis of seven cases.

Vegetative electrode infection following permanent pacemaker implantation is a rare and serious complication. Among 1920 patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation in our institute between 1980 and 2000, 7 patients aged 65 to 78 years were diagnosed to have pacemaker related endocarditis. In this study, the clinical course and management strategies for these patients are reviewed. The most frequently encountered factors contributing to development of pacemaker infection were local complications such as postoperative hematoma and inflammation, and recurrent surgical interventions on the pacemaker system. In blood cultures S. aureus was the most common causative microorganism. Echocardiography could be performed in 5 patients. Three patients were referred to open-heart surgery for total removal of the pacemaker system, and one patient had his pacemaker system removed percutaneously. The remaining 3 patients did not agree to either surgical or percutaneous removal. These patients have been under antibiotic therapy for approximately 3 years and they still do not have any signs of a serious infection. Consequently, in patients with permanent pacemakers, infective endocarditis should be considered in the presence of fever and local symptoms. Blood cultures should be obtained and echocardiography should be performed. Complete removal of the pacemaker system with intensive antibiotic treatment is necessary for complete eradication of the infection. However, if percutaneous or surgical removal of the electrodes cannot be done because of high perioperative risk or the patient does not agree to undergo either method, medical treatment with long term antibiotic use may be considered as an alternative.