Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros












Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4): 785-787, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751279

RESUMO

This retrospective cohort study analysed the trends and complications of vaginal hysterectomy conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Demographics, indications, surgery duration, complications (haemorrhage, urological or rectal problems, infection), and hospital stay were recorded. Out of 819 hysterectomies performed for benign gynaecological conditions, 112 (13.68%) were vaginal hysterectomies. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) accounted for 33(29.46%) and uterine prolapse for 79(70.53%) of the cases. Mean age was 52.35±8.74 years, parity was 5.01±1.32, intraoperative haemorrhage was 796.87±450.1 ml, surgery duration was 48.61±12.28 minutes, and hospital stay was 2.58±0.41 days. Complications occurred in 19(16.97%) of the cases, while 93(83.03%) cases had no complications. Outcomes were comparable between NDVH and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse (p=0.552). This indicates that vaginal hysterectomy is a safe procedure with minimal complications and quick recovery for uterine prolapse and non-descent uterus. However, a declining trend was observed over the study period.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Prolapso Uterino , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Duração da Cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Paquistão , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia
2.
Pak J Med Sci ; 40(1Part-I): 78-83, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38196458

RESUMO

Objective: To compare the efficacy of letrozole vs Clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in PCOS women. Methods: This double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore, from January 2016 to December 2020. Total 220 patients, diagnosed with PCOS according to Rotterdam criteria were randomly assigned into two groups after taking informed consent. The women were followed for ovulation, pregnancy and live birth rates in the next five consecutive menstrual cycles with either clomiphene citrate or letrozole. Results: Letrozole had significantly better pregnancy rate (29.0% vs 15.4% p-value 0.015), monofollicular development (77.2% vs 52.7% p-value 0.000) and live birth rate (25.4% vs 10.9% p-value 0.005) as compared to clomiphene citrate. There was no difference between the two groups in ovulation rate (68.1% vs 63.6%, p-value 0.477), early pregnancy loss (3.6% vs 4.5% p-value 0.734), and twin pregnancy (0.0% vs 1.81% p-value 0.155). There was no ectopic pregnancy and no congenital anomalies in both groups. Hot flushes were higher in clomiphene group (31.8% vs 12.7% p-value 0.001) while fatigue (30.9% vs 8.1% p-value 0.000) and dizziness (21.8% vs 10.0% p-value 0.029) was higher with letrozole but these were well tolerated. Conclusion: Letrozole is better treatment choice than clomiphene citrate in PCOS women with infertility in terms of pregnancy and live birth rate.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05702957.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...