Enterococcus-related vascular graft infection: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the frequency, management, and burden of enterococcal-related vascular graft infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2021, data regarding all episodes of vascular graft infections initially managed or secondarily referred to our referral center were prospectively collected. We described the history and management of the infection, depending on the type of prosthesis used. RESULTS: The frequency of enterococcal-related vascular graft infections was 29/249 (12 %). Most of them were early infections (22/29, 76 %). Infections were polymicrobial (26/29, 90 %), mostly associated with Enterobacterales. Among patients with positive blood cultures, 7/8 (88 %) involved enterococci. Patients with enterococcal-related vascular graft infections were mainly (22/29, 76 %) treated with an association of antibiotics. Mortality and relapse occurred in 28 % and 7 % respectively of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Enterococcal-related vascular graft infections occurred in patients with comorbidities, during the early period following surgery and were more frequent in cases of intra-cavitary prosthesis. Their potential virulence needs to be considered, especially in polymicrobial infections.

Dalbavancin as suppressive therapy for implant-related infections: a case series with therapeutic drug monitoring and review of the literature.

Implant-related infections may need suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). We describe a SAT strategy using dalbavancin with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This is a retrospective bicentric study of patients with implant-related infection who received dalbavancin SAT between January 2021 and September 2023. Fifteen patients were included. Median number of injections was 4 (IQR: 2-7). Median time between two reinjections was 57 days (IQR 28-82). Dalbavancin plasma concentrations were above 4 mg/L for 97.9% of dosages (93/95) and above 8 mg/L for 85% (81/95). These results support the use of dalbavancin SAT for implant-related infections.

Burden of Candida-related vascular graft infection: a nested-case control study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess risk factors of candida-related Vascular Graft Infections (VGIs). METHODS: We did a case-control study (1:4) matched by age and year of infection, nested in a cohort of patient with a history of VGIs. Cases were defined by a positive culture for Candida spp. in biological samples and controls were defined by a positive culture for bacterial strains only in biological samples. Risk factors for Candida-related VGIs were investigated using multivariate logistic regression. Mortality were compared using survival analysis. RESULTS: 16 Candida-related VGIs were matched to 64 bacterial-related VGIs. The two groups were comparable regarding medical history and clinical presentation. Candida-related VGIs were associated with bacterial strains in 88% (14/16). Gas/fluid-containing collection on abdominal CT scan and the presence of an aortic endoprosthesis were risk factors for Candida spp.-related VGIs [RRa 10.43 [1.81-60.21] p = 0.009 RRa and 6.46 [1.17-35.73] p = 0.03, respectively]. Candida-related VGIs were associated with a higher mortality when compared to bacterial-related VGIs (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Candida-related VGIs are severe. Early markers of Candida spp. infection are needed to improve their outcome. The suspicion of aortic endoprosthesis infection may necessitate probabilistic treatment with antifungal agents.

Tolerability of High Doses of Daptomycin in the Treatment of Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: In treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infection (PVGI), appropriate antimicrobial treatment is crucial for controlling the septic process and preventing re-infection of the new graft. Glycopeptides are the mainstay of treatment for device-related infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, but with some limitations, especially concerning vancomycin-intermediate and glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus. We report our experience using a high dose of daptomycin (DAP) for treatment of PVGI. METHODS: We reviewed medical reports of 26 patients treated with high doses of DAP (>8 mg/kg) and beta-lactams/aminosides for PVGI, defined as positive bacterial culture of intraoperative specimens or blood samples and/or clinical, biological, and radiological signs of infection. Clinical success was defined by resolution of all clinical signs at the end of follow-up, without the need for additional antibiotic therapy, and/or negative culture in case of new surgery. RESULTS: Cultures of intraoperative samples were positive in 21 patients (80.8%). Blood and intraoperative cultures were concomitantly positive in 10 patients. The main microorganism identified in microbiological samples was S. aureus (n = 18). Surgery was performed in 23 patients (88.4%). The mean duration of the DAP regimen was 12.3 ± 11.9 days. DAP was discontinued in 26 patients [need to switch to microbiological results (n = 19), bacterial pneumonia (n = 2), and increased creatine phosphokinase levels (n = 4)]. One patient had myalgia, while 9 received concomitant statins. CONCLUSION: High-dose DAP therapy shows a satisfactory toxicity profile even in severely ill patients with multiple comorbidities, and may favorably compete with vancomycin, especially concerning the risk of induced nephrotoxicity.

Intra-abdominal aortic graft infection: prognostic factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: Mortality associated with aortic graft infection is considerable. The gold standard for surgical treatment remains explantation of the graft. However, prognostic factors associated with early mortality due to this surgical procedure are not well-known. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted in our center between January 2006 and October 2011 for aortic graft infection. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. A bivariate analysis of characteristics of patients associated with in-hospital outcome was performed. RESULTS: Twenty five evaluable patients were studied. All patients were male. Their mean age was 67 ± 8.4 years. Most of them (92%) had severe underlying diseases. An in situ prosthetic graft replacement, mainly using cryopreserved arterial allografts, was performed in all patients, excepted one who underwent extra-anatomic bypass. Causative organisms were identified in 23 patients (92%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 48%. Among pre-operative characteristics, age ≥ 70 years, creatinine ≥ 12 mg/L and C reactive protein ≥ 50 mg/L were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Hospital mortality rates increased with the number of risk factor present on ICU admission, and were 0%, 14.3%, 85.7% and 100% for 0, 1, 2 and 3 factors, respectively. The only intra-operative factor associated with prognosis was an associated intestinal procedure due to aorto-enteric fistula. SAPS II, SOFA score and occurrence of medical or surgical complications were postoperative characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical approach of aortic graft infections are considerable. Age and values of creatinine and C Reactive protein on hospital admission appear as the most important determinant of in hospital mortality. They could be taken into account for guiding the surgical strategy.

Comparison of short- and mid-term follow-up between standard and fenestrated endografts.

BACKGROUND: This study compared early and mid-term results of endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and pararenal aneurysms (PRAs). METHODS: Using data from a prospective database, patients treated with endografts for AAA and PRA between January 2007 and December 2009 were analyzed. In both groups, mortality, endoleak rates, evolution of renal function, reintervention rate at 30 days and at mid-term follow-up, and aneurysmal sac evolution at 1 year were compared. RESULTS: In total, 379 patients were included: 264 treated for AAA and 115 for PRA. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 12-46 months) in both groups. Risk factors and medical history were comparable in both groups, except for chronic renal failure (higher in the PRA group; P = 0.003). The mortality rates at 30 days were 1% and 3% in the AAA and APR groups, respectively (P = 0.10). During follow-up, the mortality rates were 11.1% and 12.8% in the AAA and PRA groups, respectively (P = 0.72). The reoperation rates at 30 days were 8% and 10% in the AAA and PRA groups, respectively (P = 0.72). During follow-up, the reoperation rates were 9.2% and 9.9% in the AAA and PRA groups, respectively (P = 0.85). At 1 year, retraction of the aneurysmal sac was diagnosed in 48% of the patients in the AAA group and in 56% of the patients in the PRA group (P = 0.41). The incidence rates of new postoperative cases of renal insufficiency were 19.3% and 8.1% in the AAA and PRA groups, respectively (P = 0.008). At 30 days, the endoleak rates were 27.5% and 12.7% in the AAA and PRA groups, respectively (P = 0.001). At 1 year, the endoleak rates were 19.4% and 7.3% in the AAA and PRA groups, respectively (P = 0.007). When type II endoleaks were excluded, the endoleak rates were comparable in both groups (P = 0.5). At 1 year, in both groups, a retraction of the aneurysmal sac was significantly correlated to the absence of endoleak (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early and mid-term results of AAA treatment with standard endografts and PRA treatment with fenestrated endografts are comparable.

Endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Development in endograft design has extended endovascular treatment to include thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). We report our experience using fenestrated and branched endografts in the management of TAAA. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of consecutive patients treated electively for TAAA using endovascular techniques between 2006 and 2011. All data were collected prospectively. The relationships between preoperative risk factors and clinical outcome were examined using univariate and multivariate statistical techniques. We also compared the outcomes between 33 previously published early cases (EC) with the last 56 later cases (LC). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (83 men) were treated. Median age was 69 years. All patients were deemed unfit for open surgery. The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 8.9% and 10%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed in-hospital mortality was associated with preoperative chronic renal failure and advanced age. Higher postoperative mean arterial blood pressure was a protective factor. Technical success rate was 96.6% (94% and 98% in the EC and LC groups, respectively; P = .14). The spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rate was 7.8% (15% and 3% in the EC and LC groups, respectively; P = .063) and was associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and procedure duration. Six patients (6.7%) required temporary filtration, but none required permanent renal support (associated with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and procedure duration). Median procedure duration decreased from 232 to 203 minutes (P = .01) in the EC and LC groups, respectively. Actuarial survival was 86.8% ± 3.7% at 1 year and 74.7% ± 6% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although we have treated a cohort at high operative risk, our midterm results compare favorably with the published series of conventional surgery. Accurate hemodynamic control represented by high-normal perioperative blood pressure seems to protect against severe postoperative complications.

Vascular graft infections.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides a focus on infections of prosthetic vascular grafts used to treat peripheral arterial diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of infections varies between 1 and 6%. Risk factors of infection are not well identified. Main causative pathogens are Gram-negative bacilli, Staphylococcus aureus, and coagulase-negative staphylococci, without clear differences according to location of graft and time of onset of infection. There is no consensual diagnostic criterion. The basic principles for management of graft infections have been known for many years. A surgical approach combining graft excision, complete debridement, and maintaining distal vascular flow is required. Antimicrobial therapy is always instituted to reduce sepsis and prevent secondary graft infection, but there are no evidence-based data to recommend any regimen. However, antibiotics should have bactericidal activity whatever the bacteria growth phase, reduce the microbial burden, penetrate within the biofilm, and prevent further biofilm formation. Mortality and morbidity from these infections remain significant. SUMMARY: A multidisciplinary approach with a limited number of reference centres, recruiting sufficient numbers of patients to perform controlled trials, and to provide expert recommendations, could be the best way to answer unresolved questions and improve the prognosis.

Fenestrated endovascular repair of type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms: device design and implantation technique.

Treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has traditionally been by means of open surgery, but in recent years endovascular approaches have emerged as a viable and perhaps superior alternative. Some confusion appears to exist in discussions in the literature regarding the exact definition of the various types of thoracoabdominal aneurysm depending on whether open or endovascular repair is undertaken, with some authors comparing the preoperative extent of disease and others comparing the degree of aortic coverage required. Accurate preoperative planning and meticulous implantation technique are critical to successful outcomes with the endovascular approach. This study discusses the anatomical classification of type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms as applied in open and endovascular surgery and outlines the authors' approach to the critical preoperative planning of endografts used to treat these aneurysms. The authors describe their techniques used to implant these devices, whether they consist of fenestrated or branched components, and some of the mechanisms by which minimization of complications such as spinal cord ischemia is sought.

Should we modify our indications after the EVAR-2 trial conclusions?

BACKGROUND: To compare the results of the endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients considered as unfit for surgery in a "high volume" center with the EVAR-2 trial results. METHODS: In our center, between January 2006 and December 2008, 469 endovascular aorta treatments were performed in high-risk patients. All the data were prospectively collected in a database. Among 469 patients, we selected 191 patients considered as unfit for open surgery (group 1) corresponding to the EVAR trial criteria. Variables such as postoperative mortality at 30 days and 1 year, complications rates, as well as early and late redo surgery were evaluated. Long-term pharmacological treatment before surgery was listed. These results were compared with the EVAR trial (group 2). Survival during the follow-up was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mortality at 30 days was 1.6% and 9% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.002). Global complication rate was 44% and 43% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.52). Over the follow-up period, the redo surgery rate was 13% and 26% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.0102). In our cohort, the survival rate at 2 years was 84% with a residual number of 102 patients. Before surgery, a long-term antiplatelet treatment was prescribed in 89% and 58% of the patients and statins in 74% and 39% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The EVAR-2 trial conclusions are in opposition to the practice of French vascular surgeons. Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in high-risk patients is justified. This study confirms the importance of a multidisciplinary treatment for high-risk patients in high-volume centers.

Anatomic study of juxta renal aneurysms: impact on fenestrated stent-grafts.

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated stent-grafts allow for treatment of patients with juxtarenal aneurysms (JRA) when they present with contraindications for conventional treatment. The fenestrated module is a custom-made module, specially designed to fit a specific patient, using computed tomographic scan measurements, which entails manufacturing delay and high cost. The aim of our study was to evaluate the possibility to reproduce the interrenal aorta anatomy to design a standard fenestrated module that would fit the maximum number of patients with JRA. METHODS: On a three-dimensional working station, we analyzed 289 preoperative computed tomographic scan results of patients with JRA and who were treated with fenestrated stent-grafts comprising two fenestrations for the renal arteries and a scallop for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). On curvilinear reconstructions, we successively measured the interrenal aorta diameter, its orientation, as well as the height of each renal ostium, taking the ostium center of the SMA as a reference mark. Later, a statistical analysis of these measures distribution was performed so as to design a fenestrated module that would fit the maximum number of patients. RESULTS: The center of the left renal artery presented with a median orientation of 82.5° (range, 37.5-150) and a median distance of 9 mm (range, 0-30), in relation to the SMA ostium. The ostium center of the right renal artery presented with a median orientation of 285° (range, 240-337.5) and a median distance of 8 mm (range, 3-30), in relation to the SMA ostium. By positioning the current renal fenestrations (6-mm wide), on the basis of the calculated median positions, in our series, only 20% of the patients could be treated with a standard fenestrated module. Should the diameter of these fenestrations be increased by 10 mm, it would then be possible to treat 50% of our patients. CONCLUSION: The anatomy of the interrenal aorta and its branches is quite reproducible to design standard fenestrated stent-grafts that could treat half of the patients with JRA.

Inverted limbs in fenestrated and branched endografts.

PURPOSE: To describe our experience with the use of custom-designed branched or fenestrated endoprostheses incorporating an inverted contralateral limb in the bifurcated component. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair using modular branched or fenestrated devices at a university teaching hospital between January 2004 and February 2010. Of 102 cases, 7 male patients (mean age 69 years) were treated with modular devices that incorporated an inverted contralateral limb in the bifurcated component. Five patients had thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (4 type IV and 1 type II), 1 patient had a pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, and another had type I endoleak from a migrated AneuRx stent-graft. The technique was used primarily because of an existing bifurcated prosthesis (n=5), but in 2 patients without prior open surgery, this technique was needed because of anatomical constraints. RESULTS: All devices were implanted as planned. There was no mortality. One patient required temporary hemodialysis prior to discharge; another patient developed permanent paraplegia, likely related to extensive aortic coverage. No device migration, component separation, or type I or III endoleaks were detected during a mean follow-up of 25 months, and no reinterventions have been necessary. CONCLUSION: The use of an inverted limb in the bifurcated component of modular endografts may allow endovascular treatment in scenarios where there is insufficient space to deploy a standard bifurcated component. This design modification allows an adequate sealing zone between the iliac extension limbs and the bifurcated component.

Challenging treatment of a secondary endoleak in a fenestrated endograft.

PURPOSE: To describe the novel use of an Amplatzer occluder device to seal a secondary endoleak arising at a scallop in a fenestrated stent-graft. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man with comorbidities precluding standard endovascular repair of a pararenal aortic aneurysm was treated with a fenestrated endoprosthesis containing one fenestration for the left renal artery and one scallop for the celiac trunk; the right renal and superior mesenteric arteries were occluded at presentation. Interval imaging at 2 years showed a proximal type I endoleak at the celiac trunk scallop associated with expansion of the aneurysm sac. Attempted repair with an aortic extension cuff and a "chimney" stent was unsuccessful. An Amplatzer Patent Foramen Ovale occluder device was deployed across the endoleak to provide aneurysm sac exclusion, which has been maintained at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Treatment of a secondary type I endoleak after implantation of a fenestrated endoprosthesis is challenging. The novel use of an Amplatzer occluder in this setting may be applicable to other situations in which an endovascular solution is desirable for complications of complex endovascular aneurysm repair.

Challenging catheterization of a branch in an endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To describe a novel technique of cannulating a side branch during endovascular repair of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA). TECHNIQUE: The approach evolved during endovascular repair of a type III TAAA in which a custom-designed graft with 3 caudally directed branches was being deployed in a patient who had a prior surgical repair for a type IV TAAA. Two of the branches were successfully cannulated and stented, but repeated efforts to cannulate the left renal branch and artery via the standard brachial approach were unsuccessful. A catheter positioned between the graft and the aneurysm sac was used to gain retrograde access to this branch. From a left brachial access this guidewire was snared and used to allow bridging stent deployment between the branch and the renal artery, thus completing the procedure. CONCLUSION: This report describes a novel technique to deal with challenging side branch cannulation that may be encountered during branched stent-graft deployment.