The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Background: Till today, Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is significantly more used than Hybrid or Uncemented Fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare Cemented, Uncemented and Hybrid Fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing TKA at Mid-term follow-up. Methods: This study was an extended data report of our prospective single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comprising 105 patients. The primary outcome was survival at five years of follow-up calculated by Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test. The secondary outcome was function based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results: Eighty-three patients were included, of which 25 belonged into group A (Cemented), 28 in group B (Uncemented), and 30 in group C (Hybrid). Mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 0.7 (range 5-7) years. The 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95%CI: 90.5; 100) in the Cemented group, 94.2% (95%CI: 86.4; 100) in the Uncemented group, and 93.8% (95%CI: 85.4; 100) in the Hybrid group for revision for any reason (p = 0.80). Functional outcome was similar among the groups. Conclusion: In our cohort of ACS Mobile Bearing TKA, there was no difference between Cemented, Uncemented, and Hybrid Fixation with regard to survival and function at Mid-term follow-up. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register (NTR3893), 2013-03-12. Level of evidence: II.

Lower revision rates for cemented fixation in a long-term survival analysis of three different LCS designs.

BACKGROUND: In primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), it is still not clear if cemented or uncemented fixation has the best long-term survival. The Low Contact Stress (LCS) mobile-bearing (MB) knee system was introduced in 1977. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term survival of this design with a minimum of 15-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed, with the primary endpoint for survival defined as revision. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between type of fixation and the risk of revision, while correcting for potential confounders (diagnosis, design, age and sex). RESULTS: 1271 cases were included with inflammatory joint disease (IJD) (657 cases) and non-IJD (614 cases). TKAs were performed cemented in 522 cases and uncemented in 749 cases. A bicruciate retaining design was used in 180 cases, a rotating platform design in 174 cases and an anterior posterior glide posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) design in 916 cases. Cumulative incidence of component revision at 15 years was 2.7% (95% CI 1.6; 4.5) for cemented and 10% (95% CI 8.1; 12.4) for uncemented TKA, respectively. The 20-year cumulative incidence was 2.9% (95% CI 1.7; 4.7) for cemented and 10.9% (95% CI 8.8; 13.4) for uncemented TKA, respectively. Age, non-IJD and PCR design were associated with a significantly higher risk of revision, regardless of the type of fixation. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival for patients undergoing cemented or uncemented TKA using the LCS MB system revealed lower revision rates for cemented fixation. Revision risk was higher in younger, non-IJD patients who had the PCR design, regardless of the type of fixation. For the LCS MB TKA design, it is recommended to use cemented fixation.

What is the role of cemented fixation in total knee arthroplasty? The two-year results of a randomized RSA controlled trial.

AIMS: For many designs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) it remains unclear whether cemented or uncemented fixation provides optimal long-term survival. The main limitation in most studies is a retrospective or non-comparative study design. The same is true for comparative trials looking only at the survival rate as extensive sample sizes are needed to detect true differences in fixation and durability. Studies using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) techniques have shown to be highly predictive in detecting late occurring aseptic loosening at an early stage. To investigate the difference in predicted long-term survival between cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of TKA, we performed a randomized controlled trial using RSA. METHODS: A total of 105 patients were randomized into three groups (cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS Mobile Bearing (ACS MB) knee system, implantcast). RSA examinations were performed on the first day after surgery and at scheduled follow-up visits at three months, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and after two years follow-up. Patients and follow-up investigators were blinded for the result of randomization. RESULTS: RSA secondary stabilization did not show a significant difference between the three types of fixation. A maximum total point motion of less than 0.2 mm in the second postoperative year was shown in each group, which suggests stabilization of the implant. At 24 months after surgery, PROMs significantly improved compared to baseline in all treatment groups. No significant difference was observed between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Secondary stabilization measurements in this study demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In all groups migration stabilized after initial settling of the implant. For this implant the long-term outcome is not expected to be influenced by the type of fixation to the bone. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):98-104.

No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years.

PURPOSE: The presence of anterior knee pain remains one of the major complaints following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since the introduction of the mobile TKA, many studies have been performed and only a few show a slight advantage for the mobile. In our short-term follow-up study, we found less anterior knee pain in the posterior stabilized mobile knees compared to the posterior stabilized knees. The concept of self-alignment and the results from our short-term study led us to form the hypothesis that the posterior stabilized mobile knee leads to a lower incidence of anterior knee pain compared to the posterior stabilized fixed knee. This study was designed to see whether this difference remains after 7.9 years in the follow-up. A secondary line of enquiry was to see whether one was superior to the other regarding pain, function, quality of life and survival. METHODS: This current report is a 6-10-year (median 7.9 years) follow-up study of the remaining 69 patients with a cemented three-component TKA for osteoarthritis in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. RESULTS: In the posterior stabilized group, five of the 40 knees (13%) versus five of the 29 posterior stabilized mobile group (17%) experienced anterior knee pain. No differences were observed with regard to ROM, VAS, Oxford 12-item knee questionnaire, SF-36, HSS patella, Kujala or the AKSS score. Patients with anterior knee pain reported more pain, lower levels of the AKSS, HSS patella and the Kujala scores than the patients without anterior knee pain. CONCLUSION: In the current clinical practice, the appearance of anterior knee pain persists as a problem; simply changing to a mobile bearing does not seem to be the solution. The posterior stabilized mobile total knee did not sustain the advantage of less anterior knee pain, compared with the posterior stabilized fixed total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

Hoffa nonunion, two cases treated with headless compression screws.

A coronal fracture of the distal femoral condyle is a rare entity and a nonunion even more so. The coronal fractures, also known as Hoffa fracture, more often involve the lateral than the medial condyle. Open reduction and internal fixation are the primary treatment of choice. We describe two cases of nonunion of a Hoffa fracture (one medial and one lateral). Although the nonunion fragment was not attached to any soft tissues in both cases the fragment was noted to be vital both clinically and histologically. After operative treatment, consisting of debridement, compression with use of headless screws, and liberal use of bone graft both nonunions healed. At latest follow-up, both patients had excellent function and reported no or minimal pain.

Long-term pain and functional disability after total knee arthroplasty with and without single-injection or continuous sciatic nerve block in addition to continuous femoral nerve block: a prospective, 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This is a follow-up to determine long-term outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients enrolled in a previous randomized trial that found reduced postoperative pain after addition of sciatic nerve block to continuous femoral nerve block for TKA. METHODS: Physical function after TKA was evaluated at 3 and 12 months in patients (n = 89) receiving continuous femoral nerve block alone (group F), combined with a single-injection (group Fs) or continuous sciatic nerve block (group FCS) after TKA, until the second postoperative day. Physical function, stiffness, and pain were measured by using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score 12-item knee questionnaires, and visual analog scale at rest and during mobilization before TKA and 3 and 12 months afterward. Post hoc, a median split on poor functioning (WOMAC) was analyzed. RESULTS: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Oxford Knee Score 12-item knee, and visual analog scale scores improved significantly in all patients, without any differences among groups. Median (range) WOMAC at 3 months were in group F, 83 (20-97); group Fs, 72 (25-99); and group, FCS 76 (28-100) and at 12 months 87 (35-98), 77 (43-100), and 89 (35-100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were detected in the secondary outcomes we examined. Thus, improved postoperative outcome did not translate into improved functional outcome or long-term pain.

Arthroereisis of the subtalar joint: an uncommon complication and literature review.

Arthroereisis is an operation to prevent abnormal pronation in the subtalar joint in children and adults with symptomatic flexible flatfeet. In the present report, we describe an uncommon late complication of a former variation of this procedure, namely the case of an adult male who experienced migration of a xenogeneic bone graft that had been implanted 55 years earlier. A thorough review of the existing data was also undertaken to better understand the complications of this procedure.

Value of single-injection or continuous sciatic nerve block in addition to a continuous femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Continuous femoral nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves and shortens postoperative rehabilitation. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of sciatic nerve block to continuous femoral nerve block will shorten the time-to-discharge readiness. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing TKA were prospectively randomized to 1 of 3 groups: patient-controlled analgesia via femoral nerve catheter alone (F group) or combined with a single-injection (Fs group) or continuous sciatic nerve block (FCS group) until the second postoperative day. Discharge readiness was defined as the ability to walk and climb stairs independently, average pain on a numerical rating scale at rest lower than 4, and no complications. In addition, knee function, pain, supplemental morphine requirement, local anesthetic consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were evaluated. RESULTS: Median time-to-discharge readiness was similar: F group, 4 days (range, 2-16 days); Fs group, 4 days (range, 2-7 days); and FCS group, 4 days (range, 2-9 days; P = 0.631). No significant differences were found regarding knee function, local anesthetic consumption, or postoperative nausea and vomiting. During the day of surgery, pain was moderate to severe in the F group, whereas Fs and FCS groups experienced minimal pain (P < 0.01). Patients in the F group required significantly more supplemental morphine on the day of surgery and the first postoperative day. Until the second postoperative day, pain was significantly less in the FCS group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A single-injection or continuous sciatic nerve block in addition to a femoral nerve block did not influence time-to-discharge readiness. A single-injection sciatic nerve block can reduce severe pain on the day of the surgery, whereas a continuous sciatic nerve block reduces moderate pain during mobilization on the first 2 postoperative days.

[A woman with a swelling of her left upper leg]. / Een vrouw met een zwelling van haar linker bovenbeen.

A 27-year-old woman came to the clinic with a tumour of her left upper leg: grade I chondrosarcoma, transformed from an osteochondroma. Radical excision with a total hip arthroplasty using a tumour prosthesis was performed.

The flying buttress construct for posterior spinopelvic fixation: a technical note.

BACKGROUND: Posterior fusion of the spine to the pelvis in paediatric and adult spinal deformity is still challenging. Especially assembling of the posterior rod construct to the iliac screw is considered technically difficult. A variety of spinopelvic fixation techniques have been developed. However, extreme bending of the longitudinal rods or the use of 90-degree lateral offset connectors proved to be difficult, because the angle between the rod and the iliac screw varies from patient to patient. METHODS: We adopted a new spinopelvic fixation system, in which iliac screws are side-to-side connected to the posterior thoracolumbar rod construct, independent of the angle between the rod and the iliac screw. Open angled parallel connectors are used to connect short iliac rods from the posterior rod construct to the iliac screws at both sides. The construct resembles in form and function an architectural Flying Buttress, or lateral support arches, used in Gothic cathedrals. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Three different cases that illustrate the Flying Buttress construct for spinopelvic fixation are reported here with the clinical details, radiographic findings and surgical technique used. CONCLUSION: The Flying Buttress construct may offer an alternative surgical option for spinopelvic fixation in circumstances wherein coronal or sagittal balance cannot be achieved, for example in cases with significant residual pelvic obliquity, or in revision spinal surgery for failed lumbosacral fusion.

Proximal tibiofibular synostosis as a possible cause of a pseudoradicular syndrome: a case report.

This paper presents a case report of persistent low back pain and suspected lumbar radiculopathy. A synostosis at the level of the proximal tibiofibular joint was diagnosed. After successful resection of the synostosis, the low back symptoms resolved completely. This is the first report of a proximal tibiofibular synostosis as a possible cause of referred pain proximally.