Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of two osimertinib isotopologues labeled with carbon-11 as PET tracers targeting the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor.

INTRODUCTION: Osimertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is able to inhibit the EGFR treatment resistance mutation T790M and primary EGFR mutations Del19 and L858R. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of carbon-11 labeled osimertinib to be used as a tracer for the PET imaging of tumors bearing the T790M mutation. METHODS: Osimertinib was labeled with carbon-11 at two positions, and the effect of the labeling position on the metabolism and biodistribution was studied in female nu/nu mice. The mutation status specificity of osimertinib was confirmed in vitro in a cell growth inhibition experiment, and the tumor-targeting potential of the carbon-11 isotopologues was evaluated using female nu/nu mice xenografted with NSCLC cell lines; the wild-type EGFR expressing A549, the primary Del19 EGFR mutated HCC827 and the resistance T790M/L858R mutated H1975. One of the osimertinib tracers was selected based on the results acquired and evaluated for tracer specificity and selectivity by assessment of tumor uptake in a PET study where HCC827 tumor-bearing mice were pretreated with osimertinib or afatinib. RESULTS: [Methylindole-11C]- and [dimethylamine-11C]osimertinib were synthesized by 11C-methylation of precursors AZ5104 and AZ7550, respectively. Rapid metabolism of both analogs of [11C]osimertinib was observed. Although the tumor uptake and retention of [methylindole-11C]- and [dimethylamine-11C]osimertinib in tumors were similar, the tumor-to-muscle ratios appeared to be higher for [methylindole-11C]osimertinib. The highest uptake, tumor-to-blood, and tumor-to-muscle ratio were observed in the Del19 EGFR mutated HCC827 tumors. However, the specificity and selectivity of [methylindole-11C]osimertinib PET could not be demonstrated in HCC827 tumors. The uptake of [methylindole-11C]osimertinib was not significantly higher in T790M resistance mutated H1975 xenografts compared to the negative control cell line A549. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib was successfully labeled at two positions with carbon-11, yielding two EGFR PET tracers, [methylindole-11C]osimertinib and [dimethylamine-11C]osimertinib. The preclinical evaluation demonstrated uptake and retention in three NSCLC xenografts; A549, HCC827, and H1975. The highest uptake was observed in the primary Del19 EGFR mutated HCC827. The ability of [methylindole-11C]osimertinib to distinguish between the T790M resistance mutated H1975 xenografts and the wild-type EGFR expressing A549 could not be confirmed in the ex vivo study.

Relationship between Biodistribution and Tracer Kinetics of 11C-Erlotinib, 18F-Afatinib and 11C-Osimertinib and Image Quality Evaluation Using Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven by activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are best treated with therapies targeting EGFR, i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Radiolabeled EGFR-TKI and PET have been investigated to study EGFR-TKI kinetics and its potential role as biomarker of response in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (EGFRm). In this study we aimed to compare the biodistribution and kinetics of three different EGFR-TKI, i.e., 11C-erlotinib, 18F-afatinib and 11C-osimertinib. METHODS: Data of three prospective studies and 1 ongoing study were re-analysed; data from thirteen patients (EGFRm) were included for 11C-erlotinib, seven patients for 18F-afatinib (EGFRm and EGFR wild type) and four patients for 11C-osimertinib (EGFRm). From dynamic and static scans, SUV and tumor-to-blood (TBR) values were derived for tumor, lung, spleen, liver, vertebra and, if possible, brain tissue. AUC values were calculated using dynamic time-activity-curves. Parent fraction, plasma-to-blood ratio and SUV values were derived from arterial blood data. Tumor-to-lung contrast was calculated, as well as (background) noise to assess image quality. RESULTS: 11C-osimertinib showed the highest SUV and TBR (AUC) values in nearly all tissues. Spleen uptake was notably high for 11C-osimertinib and to a lesser extent for 18F-afatinib. For EGFRm, 11C-erlotinib and 18F-afatinib demonstrated the highest tumor-to-lung contrast, compared to an inverse contrast observed for 11C-osimertinib. Tumor-to-lung contrast and spleen uptake of the three TKI ranked accordingly to the expected lysosomal sequestration. CONCLUSION: Comparison of biodistribution and tracer kinetics showed that 11C-erlotinib and 18F-afatinib demonstrated the highest tumor-to-background contrast in EGFRm positive tumors. Image quality, based on contrast and noise analysis, was superior for 11C-erlotinib and 18F-afatinib (EGFRm) scans compared to 11C-osimertinib and 18F-afatinib (EGFR wild type) scans.