Andexanet alpha versus four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in DOACs anticoagulation reversal: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of evidence for the comparative effectiveness of Andexanet alpha and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in anticoagulation reversal of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The primary aim of our systematic review was to verify which drug is more effective in reducing short-term all-cause mortality. The secondary aim was to determine which of the two reverting strategies is less affected by thromboembolic events. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were analysed in the systematic review and quantitative synthesis. In all-cause short-term mortality, Andexanet alpha showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.71(95% CI 0.37-1.34) in RCTs and PSMs, compared to 4F-PCC (I2 = 81%). Considering the retrospective studies, the pooled RR resulted in 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.01) for the common effects model and 0.82 (95% CI 0.63-1.07) for the random effects model (I2 = 34.2%). Regarding the incidence of thromboembolic events, for RCTs and PSMs, the common and the random effects model exhibited a RR of 1.74 (95% CI 1.09-2.77), and 1.71 (95% CI 1.01-2.89), respectively, for Andexanet alpha compared to 4F-PCC (I2 = 0%). Considering the retrospective studies, the pooled RR resulted in 1.21 (95% CI 0.87-1.69) for the common effects model and 1.18 (95% CI 0.86-1.62) for the random effects model (I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Considering a large group of both retrospective and controlled studies, Andexanet alpha did not show a statistically significant advantage over 4F-PCC in terms of mortality. In the analysis of the controlled studies alone, Andexanet alpha is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2024, CRD42024548768.

Co-administration of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate With Andexanet alfa for Reversal of Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Objective: Andexanet alfa is approved for the reversal of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding due to factor-Xa inhibitors. Data are limited on outcomes for patients who receive both andexanet alfa and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). The aim of this case series is to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes in patients receiving the two agents in combination. Methods: Electronic medical records of patients who received both 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage from January 2019 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Hemostatic efficacy and complications related to concurrent use of 4F-PCC with andexanet alfa were documented. Results: Nine patients received 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated intracranial bleeding, eight of whom required reversal of apixaban. Of these nine patients, five patients died within 28 days for a 56% incidence of mortality. The average time from 4F-PCC administration to andexanet alfa administration was 3 hours and 9 minutes. Most doses of andexanet alfa were given for concern for bleed expansion after 4F-PCC administration. Hemostatic efficacy based on stability of repeat computed tomography scans post-administration of both agents was found in six patients (66.67%), with a 55.56% n incidence of thromboembolism, including two pulmonary embolisms, two deep vein thromboses, and one renal artery thrombosis. Conclusion: Risks and benefits should be weighed to determine if there is benefit to adding andexanet alfa to 4F-PCC in patients with incomplete hemostasis and life-threatening hemorrhage. The combination of andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC may increase the risk of thrombotic complications without improving mortality.

Outcomes of 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients With Liver Disease and Nonvitamin K Antagonist-Related Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Study.

The administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) has expanded beyond its Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication for the emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits associated with the expanded use of 4F-PCC. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 4F-PCC administrations at our university hospital. Of the 159 patients who received 4F-PCC, 76% (n = 121) and 24% (n = 38) received it for the FDA-approved indication in the vitamin K-related coagulopathy (VKA) group and for expanded use in the nonvitamin K-related coagulopathy (nVKA) group, respectively. The expanded use of 4F-PCC was associated with a less robust reduction in the international normalized ratio (INR) (INR of -0.7 ± 1.3 vs INR of -1.6 ± 1.8, P = .002), and fewer patients in the nVKA group achieved a postadministration INR of less than1.5 (11% vs 79%, P = .001) than those in the VKA group. Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the nVKA cohort than in the VKA cohort (42% vs 20%, P = .04). Notably, based on our data, underlying differences in the patient's comorbidities, particularly advanced liver disease, may have contributed to the observed outcome variations, including mortality rate. Therefore, factors, including comorbidities and the underlying etiology of coagulopathy, should be considered when deciding on the expanded use of 4F-PCC. Further research is needed to better understand the potential risks and benefits of 4F-PCC in expanded use scenarios, and the clinical decision to use 4F-PCC outside its FDA-approved indication should be made carefully, considering this information.

Real-world clinical outcomes among US Veterans with oral factor xa inhibitor-related major bleeding treated with andexanet alfa or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate.

Oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors significantly reduce incidence of stroke and thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Due to various factors and the lack of a randomized controlled trial comparing andexanet alfa to usual care, non-specific replacement agents including 4 F-PCC are still used off-label for FXa inhibitor bleed management. Clinical and mortality data were extracted from the inpatient medical data and Veteran Affairs (VA) vital status files over the time of March 2014 through December 2020. Propensity score-weighted models were used for this retrospective cohort study using data from the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI). The study included 255 patients (85-andexanet alfa and 170-4 F-PCC) exposed to an oral factor Xa inhibitor and hospitalized with an acute major, gastrointestinal (GI), intracranial (ICH) or other bleed. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the andexanet alfa cohort compared to the 4 F-PCC cohort (10.6% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.01). Propensity score-weighted Cox models reveal a 69% lower hazard of in-hospital mortality for those treated with andexanet alfa (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.71) compared to those treated with 4 F-PCC. Additionally, those treated with andexanet alfa had a lower 30-day mortality rate and lower 30-day hazard of mortality in the weighted Cox model (20.0% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.039; HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.98) compared to those treated with 4 F-PCC. Among 255 US veterans with major bleeding in the presence of an oral factor Xa inhibitor, treatment with andexanet alfa was associated with lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than treatment with 4 F-PCC.

Thrombin generation in real life bleeding patients on oral anticoagulants reversed (or not) with (activated) prothrombin complex concentrate.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding during oral anticoagulant therapy is currently codified by expert guidelines. Monitoring of coagulation during bleeding events is challenging. Our study sought to assess thrombin generation assay (TGA) in direct oral anticoagulant-treated patients without bleeding (WB), bleeding without reversal therapy (BR-), and bleeding with reversal therapy (BR+). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, monocentric study from June 2015 to June 2018. For all bleeding groups, TGA was evaluated using platelet-poor plasma collected upon arrival at emergency (T0), and 30 min (T1), 6 h (T2) and 24 h (T3) after reversal therapy (if indicated) following activation by tissue factor 5 pM and phospholipids. RESULTS: Overall, 292 patients participated, including 91 BR+, 94 BR-, and 107 WB patients. At T0, vitamin K antagonist reversed (VKA-BR+) patients experienced a significant decrease in TGA parameters (ETP and peak) compared with VKA without bleeding (VKA-WB). Compared with healthy controls, VKA-BR+ patients reversed by four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) displayed comparable TGA 's ETP and peak at T1, T2, and T3, whereas direct anti-Xa BR+ patients reversed by 4F-PCC or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) reached thrombin generation parameters that exceeded normal range at T2 and T3. CONCLUSIONS: In VKA-treated patients reversed by 4F-PCC, TGA parameters were normalized, whereas in rivaroxaban or apixaban-treated patients reversed by 4F-PCC or aPCC, TGA parameters exceeded normal range. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of a different dose of reversal therapy and the impact on coagulation parameters.

A Retrospective Review of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Factor Xa Inhibitor-Related Bleedings.

BACKGROUND: The use of factor Xa inhibitors has grown in popularity; however, the risk of major bleeding events requires for the appropriate reversal agent. The recent approved agent for factor Xa inhibitor reversal, andexanet alfa, has limited clinical efficacy and safety data, and it can be a financial burden on healthcare systems due to its high cost. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) has been utilized off label in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-related bleedings. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of 4F-PCC in managing factor Xa inhibitor-related bleedings. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective review of 4F-PCC usage in treating factor Xa inhibitor-related bleeds from May 2014 to December 2018 at a single health system. Efficacy was evaluated using the assessment criteria described by Sarode et al. Secondary outcomes analyzed included thromboembolic events, length of stay, mortality, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patient charts were reviewed, and 48 patients were included in the study analysis. The administration of 4F-PCC achieved effective hemostasis in 33 patients (68%), and effective hemostasis was achieved in 12 patients (86%) who had intracranial hemorrhage and did not receive any surgical intervention. Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 patients within 30 days from 4F-PCC use. A majority of patients (85.4%) were discharged from the hospital to home or long-term care; 7 patients (14.6%) expired in the hospital. CONCLUSION: Efficacy was achieved in over half of the patient population in this cohort who received 4F-PCC for factor Xa inhibitor-related bleeding events.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate plus andexanet alfa for reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding: Case series.

PURPOSE: To manage factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated bleeding, andexanet alfa or 4-factor prothrombin concentrate (4F-PCC) has been used to restore hemostasis. However, literature on the outcomes for patients who received both andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC is limited. SUMMARY: We report a case series of 5 patients who received andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC for reversal of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. Patients were included in this case series if they received both andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC for reversal of FXa inhibitor-associated bleeding. They were followed to either discharge or death, and in-hospital complications related to concurrent use of andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC were documented. We report an incidence of thromboembolism of 40% (2 of 5 cases) and an in-hospital mortality rate of 60% (3 of 5 cases). Taking these cases together with those in the existing literature, we found a total of 23 reported cases of safety outcomes with andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC. The overall incidence of thromboembolism was 35% (8 of 23 cases). CONCLUSION: This case series adds to the limited literature describing the outcomes for patients receiving andexanet alfa plus 4F-PCC. We encourage other institutions to report safety data on administering both agents.

Impact of a pharmacist driven anticoagulation reversal program at a large academic medical center.

In major/life-threatening bleeding, administration of timely and appropriate reversal agents is imperative to reduce morbidity and mortality. Due to complexities associated with the use of reversal agents, a clinical pharmacist-driven anticoagulation reversal program (ARP) was developed. The goal of this program was to ensure appropriateness of reversal agents based on the clinical scenario, optimize selection and avoid unintended consequences. This study describes the impact of a pharmacist-driven anticoagulation program on patient outcomes and cost. A single center retrospective chart review of adult patients whom the ARP was consulted from October 2018 to January 2020 was performed. Patients were included in the efficacy analysis if they were > 18 years of age and presented with acute bleeding. Patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis if the recommended reversal agent was not administered, if a repeat head CT was not available for patients who presented with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), or if the patient was not bleeding. All patients were included in the economic evaluation. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved effective hemostasis within 24 h of anticoagulation reversal. Secondary outcomes include incidence of thromboembolic events, in-hospital mortality, and cost avoidance. One hundred twenty-one patients were evaluated by the ARP with 92 patients included in the efficacy analysis. The primary sites of bleeding were ICH in 46% and gastrointestinal (GI) in 29%. Hemostasis was achieved in 84% of patients. Thrombotic events occurred in 7.4% of patients and in-hospital mortality was 26.4%. Total cost avoidance was $1,005,871.78. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven ARP on clinical and economic outcomes. Implementation of a pharmacist-driven ARP was associated with favorable outcomes and cost savings.

Thromboelastometry-guided anticoagulation reversal in a patient with ventricular assist device with intracranial hemorrhage.

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a known complication in patients with ventricular assist devices (VAD). We present a case of a 42-year-old male with a VAD and on warfarin who presented to the emergency department with ICH necessitating anticoagulant reversal. An attenuated dose of 15 units/kg of 4-factor prothrombin complex-concentrates (4F-PCC) was given and the patient's coagulation profile was subsequently assessed using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) to determine appropriateness of reversal. ROTEM® analysis showed adequate reversal at the time of assessment and the patient ultimately returned home without further functional deficits, highlighting the role of ROTEM® to guide anticoagulation reversal in the VAD patient population.

The Association of ICH Exclusion Criteria With Mortality and Disability Rates in ICH Patients Receiving 4F-PCC for Anticoagulation Reversal.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) exclusion criteria in the landmark four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) trial have not been incorporated into clinical practice and incremental predictive ability is unknown. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the association of meeting at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion with the composite end point in-hospital mortality and modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 5 or 6. Determine the number and combination of criteria associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of adult ICH patients who received 4F-PCC for anticoagulant reversal. Patient demographics, ICH exclusion criteria, in-hospital mortality, disability, and disposition were collected. χ2 Analysis and logistic regression were used to assess differences between patients with and without ICH exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Data from 167 patients were analyzed: 103 (61.7%) met at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion. The composite end point occurred more in those with at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion (74.8% vs 39%; P < 0.0001). Presence of 2 or more ICH exclusion criteria was associated with higher odds of the composite end point, higher mRS score, and long-term care facility disposition (P < 0.0001). Glasgow Coma Scale score <7 and at least 1 other ICH exclusion criterion had negative effects on composite end point and mortality: 95% to 100% and 85% to 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patients meeting at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion had greater death/disability compared with those who did not. More ICH exclusion criteria were associated with higher rates of death, disability, and worse disposition. These data may aid in developing optimal 4F-PCC use criteria.

Efficacy and safety of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate fixed, weight-based dosing for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is widely used for urgent reversal of anticoagulation with warfarin, but the optimal 4F-PCC dosing approach is unknown. Herein, we sought to determine the efficacy of a novel fixed, weight-based dosing nomogram. METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients receiving fixed, weight-based 4F-PCC dosing for warfarin reversal between 30 April 2009 and 31 December 2010. The primary outcome was reversal of warfarin anticoagulation, defined as INR ≤1.5 within 6 h. Secondary outcome was the occurrence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (56% male), with a median age of 74 years and a median weight of 76kg were evaluated. The most common indications for 4F-PCC were active bleeding (37.4%: 12.7% intracranial, 12.3% gastrointestinal, 4.0% trauma, 8.4% other), reversal for a procedure (22.0%), reversal for surgery (29.5%) or other (11.1%). 66.1% of patients achieved an INR ≤1.5 within 6 h of 4F-PCC administration. 95.0% (57/60) of patients completed a planned procedure and 95.7% (67/70) of patients completed a planned surgery. The median baseline INR was 2.9 (1.5-10) and decreased significantly to a median of 1.3 (1.0-3.7) (p < .001) post-4F-PCC administration. There was no statistically significant difference in response to a fixed, weight-based dose of 4F-PCC based on pre-PCC INR, as long as the pre-treatment INR was ≤ 4.5. Although the majority of patients in our study (99%) received doses over 1000IU, rates of thrombosis were low (1.8%). CONCLUSION: Fixed, weight-based dosing of 4F-PCC is effective for reversing warfarin anticoagulation in patients with a pre-dosing INR ≤ 4.5.

The use of 4F-PCC to correct direct oral anticoagulant-induced coagulopathy: An observational analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the approval of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC, Kcentra) for the reversal of vitamin K antagonist-associated bleeding in the United States, it has become a relatively common practice for 4F-PCC to be used in an "off-label" fashion to correct coagulopathy caused by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC have not been well studied in this scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study on the off-label use of 4F-PCC for reversing bleeding associated with DOACs in a level 1 trauma centre between November 2014 and February 2017. International normalised ratio (INR) and Hgb prior to and post 4F-PCC infusion, clinical outcome and thromboembolic events within 24 hours and 45 days of 4F-PCC administration were collected. RESULTS: We identified 24 patients on DOACs who received 4F-PCC for severe haemorrhage and emergent surgeries. Most patients showed improved haemorrhage as demonstrated by stabilised intracranial haemorrhage sizes and/or by steady Hgb levels. No thromboembolic event was identified within 24 hours of 4F-PCC administration. However, 16.7% patients (4/24) experienced thromboembolic events 2 to 45 days after receiving 4F-PCC. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that 4F-PCC was relatively efficient in correcting DOAC-induced coagulopathy. We did notice that 16.7% of patients experienced some form of thromboembolic events in the days-to-weeks after 4F-PCC administration, although the imputability of 4F-PCC in these processes (vs their underlying disease) is difficult to determine. Additional prospective studies would be warranted to further evaluate the safety of 4F-PCC for this off-label indication.

Coagulation in chronic liver disease and the use of prothrombin complex concentrate for an emergent procedure: a case report and review of literature.

Synthetic dysfunction observed in cirrhosis results in altered production of procoagulants and anticoagulants that can lead to both bleeding and thrombotic events, respectively. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, frequent hospital visits often require bedside procedures such as diagnostic paracenteses, thoracenteses and endoscopy. It can be difficult to determine at what coagulation threshold procedures can safely be performed. Currently, the most common therapies given pre-procedurally include fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and vitamin K. The effectiveness of these treatments is estimated by international normalized ratio (INR), an imprecise measure of coagulation in the setting of cirrhosis. Transfusion with FFP may lead to detrimental side effects, including worsening volume overload and increased portal hypertension. We present a case of a 60-year-old patient intubated for acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to volume overload who subsequently developed bilateral pneumothoraces, requiring immediate chest tube placement. In this case, the patient had ongoing hepatic decompensation with volume overload and acute worsening of coagulopathy with an INR of 4.2. In this setting, 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (4F-PCC) was chosen to correct coagulation parameters with a low infusion volume. One hour following administration, INR was 1.5. Chest tubes were placed bilaterally and oxygenation improved without bleeding complications. While the data is still lacking, 4F-PCC may be considered for urgent and emergency situations in cirrhotic patients.

Intraoperative Administration of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Reduces Blood Requirements in Cardiac Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing the efficacy of intraoperative 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) use in blood product utilization, time to chest closure, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), thromboembolic complications, renal injury and mortality in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients on home anticoagulation therapy with warfarin, undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of OHT patients at Tufts Medical Center from May 2013 to October 2016. SETTING: Single-institution, university hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with preexisting LVADs who received orthotopic heart transplants (n = 74; 32 patients 4F-PCC, 42 patients no 4F-PCC). INTERVENTIONS: Warfarin reversal using 4F-PCC in patients with LVADs undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation with the 4F-PCC dosing partitioned such that one-third was given pre-CPB and two-thirds were given post-CPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 4F-PCC group required less plasma (6 [IQR 4] v 1.31 [IQR 2] U, p < 0.001), cryoprecipitate (10 [IQR 10] v 7.50 [IQR 5] U, p < 0.001), and packed red blood cells (5 [IQR 4] v 2 [IQR 1.5] U, p < 0.001) and had a shorter time to chest closure (618.8 ± 111.4 v 547.9 ± 110.1 minutes, p = 0.008). There was no difference in platelet transfusion (2 [IQR 1] v 2 [IQR 1] U, p = 0.16), ICU or hospital LOS, acute kidney injury, or mortality. No thrombotic complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Replacing plasma with 4F-PCC to reverse preoperative warfarin anticoagulation during OHT was associated with a shorter time to chest closure and less blood product utilization, without an increase in acute kidney injury, thromboembolic complications, or death.