Triple-Organ Transplantation: Dual Heart-Kidney Transplantation After Lung Transplantation.

We present a patient with a history of lung transplantation who subsequently underwent dual heart-kidney transplantation for nonischemic cardiomyopathy and chronic kidney disease, becoming one of the rare cases of triple-organ transplantation. This case underscores the evolving challenges and successes in managing complex transplant recipients.

Dual Training in Interventional Cardiology: The Next Frontier.

Dual training in Interventional Cardiology (IC) with other cardiac subspecialties such as Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology (AHFTC) and Critical Care Cardiology (CCC) is becoming a pathway for trainees to acquire a needed skill set to deliver comprehensive care for increasingly complex patients in the intensive care unit and catheterization laboratory settings. The makeup of these training pathways varies depending on several factors, with the resultant role of the specialist reflecting this reality. Herein, we review the merits to combined fellowship training for the Interventional Cardiologist, the ideal structure of programs to facilitate this, and how the faculty position for such a unique specialist can enhance a program.

The relation between socioeconomic status and invasive haemodynamics at evaluation for advanced heart failure.

AIMS: Socioeconomic deprivation is a risk marker for worse prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF), and a potential barrier to referral for advanced HF evaluation. The relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and invasive haemodynamics in patients undergoing evaluation for advanced HF therapies is unknown. METHODS: We combined a consecutive clinical registry of patients evaluated for advanced HF with patient-level data on SES (household income, education, workforce status, cohabitant status and distance from home to tertiary HF centre) derived from nationwide registries. Using this information, the cohort was divided into groups of low-, medium- and high degree of socioeconomic deprivation. The associations between SES and invasive haemodynamics were explored with multiple linear regression adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: A total of 631 patients were included. The median age was 53 years, and 23% were women. Patients in the highest income quartile versus the lowest (Q4 vs. Q1) were older (median age 57 vs. 50 years) and more often male (83% vs. 67%), both P < 0.001. Increasing household income (per 100 000 Danish kroner,1 EUR = 7.4 DKK) was associated with lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) [-0.18 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.36 to -0.01, P = 0.036] but not significantly associated with central venous pressure (CVP) (-0.07 mmHg, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.06, P = 0.27), cardiac index (-0.004 L/min/m2, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.01, P = 0.60), or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (-0.003 Wood units, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.16, P = 0.84). Comparing the most deprived with the least deprived group, adjusted mean PVR was higher (0.35 Wood units, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.68, P = 0.04), but PCWP (0.66 mmHg, 95% CI -1.49 to 2.82, P = 0.55), CVP (-0.26 mmHg, 95% CI -1.76 to 1.24, P = 0.73) and cardiac index (-0.03 L/min/m2, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.17, P = 0.78) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Most haemodynamic measurements were similar across layers of SES. Nevertheless, there were some indications of worse haemodynamics in patients with lower household income or a high accumulated burden of socioeconomic deprivation. Particular attention may be warranted in socioeconomically deprived patients to ensure timely referral for advanced HF evaluation.

Anesthetic Approach for Non-Cardiac Procedures in Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Background: The use of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for advanced heart failure is increasing and a growing number of patients will require anesthesia for non-cardiac procedures (NCPs). The goal of this study was to describe our experience with NCPs for LVAD patients. Methods: All anesthetic procedures performed in LVAD patients at a single center were reviewed from 2014 to 2023. Perioperative management data and complications were assessed. Results: In total, 16 patients had an LVAD implanted and 9 (56.3%) patients underwent anesthesia for a total of 22 NCPs. Most of the procedures took place outside of the operating room, mainly in the endoscopy unit, as gastrointestinal endoscopy was the most common procedure (13, 59.2%). Sedation was provided in 17 procedures (77.3%). Standard monitoring was used in all cases, and invasive monitoring was applied just in cases of major surgeries. There were no intraoperative complications reported. Postoperative complications were recorded after eight (36.4%) of the procedures, consisting mainly of lower gastrointestinal bleeding after lower endoscopy, which increased the length of hospital stay. All procedures were performed by non-cardiac anesthesiologists. Conclusions: Our data suggest that, in most cases, adherence to standard anesthesia practices can be suitable for NCPs in LVAD patients.

Contemporary clinical role of echocardiography in patients with advanced heart failure.

Echocardiography represents an essential tool for imagers and clinical cardiologists in the management of patients with heart failure. Advanced heart failure (AdHF) is a more severe and, typically, later stage of HF that exposes patients to a high risk of adverse outcomes, with a 1-year mortality rate of around 50%. Currently, several therapies are available to improve the outcomes of these patients, reduce their mortality rate, and, possibly, delay the need for advanced therapies such as heart transplant and long-term mechanical circulatory support. When accurately performed and interpreted, echocardiography provides crucial information to properly tailor medical and device therapy of patients with AdHF and to identify those at even higher risk. In this review, we present the state of the art of echocardiography applications in the clinical management of patients with AdHF. We will discuss the role of echocardiography chronologically, beginning with the prediction of AdHF, proceeding through diagnosis, and detailing how echocardiography informs clinical decision-making, before concluding with indications for advanced therapies.

Feasibility of a Multidomain Resiliency Assessment in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure Requiring Surgery: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: The resiliency of patients who have advanced heart failure (HF) and undergo a physical stressor such as heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation has yet to be studied in the physical, cognitive, and psychosocial domains. The primary aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of a multidomain resiliency assessment in patients who have advanced HF and require surgery. METHODS: A battery of assessments in each of the domains was completed at baseline before surgical intervention, after intensive care discharge, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Feasibility was assessed through completion rates, time required to complete the assessments, and qualitative feedback from assessors. RESULTS: Although various completion rates were noted at different time points, high completion rates were seen for grip strength, the modified Fried frailty phenotype, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Additionally, when controlled for patients who were medically restricted from physical function, the Short Physical Performance Battery, gait speed, and the 30-second chair stand test also had high completion rates. A trend toward return to baseline status or an improvement in baseline status was observed in all physical and cognitive assessments and most psychosocial assessments at 3 and 6 months. Minimal change was noted in the Brief Resilience Scale questionnaire. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrates that a multidomain assessment of resiliency is feasible in patients with advanced HF. Future studies are needed to help determine specific assessments or patient factors that would help predict positive postsurgical outcomes in this population. IMPACT: This study has implications for clinical practice on the most feasible assessments in multiple domains for patients who have advanced HF and are being evaluated for heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device.

Timing and content of serious illness conversations for patients with advanced heart failure in a specialty-aligned palliative care service.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) desire communication around values and goals prior to treatment decisions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the timing and content of the first serious illness communication (SI conversation) for patients with AHF after referral to a specialist palliative care (PC) team (HeartPal). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used electronic health records to identify patients referred to HeartPal and their first SI conversations at a tertiary care hospital between October 2018 and September 2021. We used natural language processing and predetermined codes to quantify prevalence of prior goals of care conversations by the cardiology team within six months preceding the HeartPal consultation and the prevalence of hopes, fears, and seven conversation content codes. Consecutive SI conversations and patient outcomes were followed until March 2022. RESULTS: Of 468 patients (mean age: 64 years, 72 % male, 66 % referred for goals of care conversation), 25.2 % had prior documented goals of care conversations preceding the HeartPal consultation. During the study period, 206 (44.0 %) patients died (median time from initial SI conversation to death: 65 days, IQR 206) and 43.2 % engaged in multiple SI conversations before death. SI conversation analysis (n = 324) revealed that patients hoped to "be at home" (74.1 %, n = 240), "be independent" (65.7 %, n = 213) and "live as long as possible" (53.4 %, n = 173). Conversation content included goals of care (83.0 %), strengths (83.0 %), decision-making (79.3 %), spirituality (71.0 %), coping (52.2 %), and prognostic communication (43.5 %). CONCLUSION: Specialist PC service provides documentation of goals and values and offers longitudinal follow-up for patients with AHF.

Short term outcomes and resource utilization in de-novo versus acute on chronic heart failure related cardiogenic shock: a nationwide analysis.

Background: There has been growing recognition of non-ischemic etiologies of cardiogenic shock (CS). To further understand this population, we aimed to investigate differences in clinical course between acute on chronic heart failure related (CHF-CS) and de-novo CS (DN-CS). Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, we examined 92,426 CS cases. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital and 30-day outcomes and use of advanced heart failure therapies. Results: Patients with DN-CS had higher in-hospital mortality than the CHF-CS cohort (32.6% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001). Mechanical circulatory support (11.9% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001) was more utilized in DN-CS. Renal replacement therapy (13.8% vs. 15.5%, p < 0.001) and right heart catheterization (16.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001) were implemented more in the CHF-CS cohort. The CHF-CS cohort was also more likely to undergo LVAD implantation (0.4% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) and heart transplantation (0.5% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001). Over the study period, advanced heart failure therapy utilization increased, but the proportion of patients receiving these interventions remained unchanged. Thirty days after index hospitalization, the CHF-CS cohort had more readmissions for heart failure (1.1% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001) and all causes (14.1% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001) with higher readmission mortality (1.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings align with existing research, demonstrating higher in-hospital mortality in the DN-CS subgroup. After the index hospitalization, however, the CHF-CS cohort performed worse with higher all-cause readmission rate and readmission mortality. The study also underscores the need for further investigation into the underutilization of certain interventions and the observed trends in the management of these CS subgroups.

[Advanced heart failure : what are the prospects for patients ?] / L'insuffisance cardiaque avancée : quelles perspectives pour le patient ?

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem in our country and in most developed countries. Despite advances in the diagnosis and management of this condition and numerous therapeutic innovations, many patients with chronic HF progress inexorably to advanced HF, characterized by persistent symptoms despite maximal treatment. The prognosis for this condition is poor. However, mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation, when considered in suitable candidates, are likely to improve the quality of life and life expectancy of these patients. In this context, timely referral to referral centers for the management of advanced HF is crucial. This article reminds the definition of advanced HF, details its specific management and specifies the criteria and timing for appropriate referral.

L'insuffisance cardiaque (IC) est un problème de santé publique majeur au sein de notre pays et dans la plupart des pays développés. Malgré les progrès réalisés dans le diagnostic et la prise en charge de cette pathologie ainsi que les nombreuses innovations thérapeutiques, beaucoup de patients atteints d'IC progressent inexorablement vers une IC avancée, caractérisée par la persistance de symptômes en dépit d'un traitement maximal. Le pronostic de cette condition est sombre. Cependant, les assistances mécaniques circulatoires et la transplantation cardiaque, lorsqu'elles sont envisagées chez de bons candidats, sont susceptibles d'améliorer la qualité de vie et l'espérance de vie de ces patients. Dans cette optique, le référencement selon un timing adéquat vers des centres de référence de prise en charge de l'IC avancée est crucial. Cet article revient sur la définition de l'IC avancée, détaille sa prise en charge spécifique et précise les critères et le timing pour un référencement adéquat.

Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multifactorial clinical syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that could be associated with multisystem organ failure, presenting a diverse range of causes and symptoms. Despite improving survival in recent years due to new advancements, CS still carries a high risk of severe morbidity and mortality. Recent research has focused on improving early detection and understanding of CS through standardized team approaches, detailed hemodynamic assessment, and selective use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, leading to better patient outcomes. This review examines CS pathophysiology, emerging classifications, current drug and device therapies, standardized team management strategies, and regionalized care systems aimed at optimizing shock outcomes. Furthermore, we identify gaps in knowledge and outline future research needs.

Vascular function in patients with advanced heart failure and continuous-flow or pulsatile ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) progress to an advanced stage, which is associated with a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. These patients may be eligible for advanced treatment strategies such as mechanical circulatory support with ventricular assist devices (VAD). Vascular dysfunction is a hallmark of heart failure pathophysiology and prognosis. However, whether and to what degree the hemodynamic benefits of VADs influence vascular function remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we evaluated endothelial vascular function with flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) and with flicker-light induced retinal vasodilatation (FID). 34 patients with a VAD (age 58 ± 10 years, 85% male, 74% ischemic heart disease, 26 continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD, and 8 pulsatile biventricular (bi)-VAD) were compared to 34 propensity-matched patients (mean age 62 ± 9 years, 68% male, 59% ischemic heart disease) with advanced HF (AdvHF). Endothelial function of larger arteries (FMD) was significantly better in patients after VAD implantation compared to matched AdvHF patients (7.2 ± 4.6% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, p = 0.03), whereas microvascular arteriolar function (FIDart) did not differ (0.99 ± 1.43% vs. 1.1 ± 1.7%, p = 0.78). The arterio-venous ratio (AVR) was higher in the VAD group (0.90 ± 0.06 vs 0.85 ± 0.09, p = 0.01), reflecting wider retinal arteriolar and narrower venular diameters. There was no difference in vascular function between patients with CF-LVAD and pulsatile Bi-VAD. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced heart failure, VAD implantation was associated with better endothelial function at the level of large arteries, but not in the microcirculation.

Guide to Temporary Mechanical Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Choosing Wisely.

Cardiogenic shock is a multisystem pathology that carries a high mortality rate, and initial pharmacotherapies include the use of vasopressors and inotropes. These agents can increase myocardial oxygen consumption and decrease tissue perfusion that can oftentimes result in a state of refractory cardiogenic shock for which temporary mechanical circulatory support can be considered. Numerous support devices are available, each with its own hemodynamic blueprint. Defining a patient's hemodynamic profile and understanding the phenotype of cardiogenic shock is important in device selection. Careful patient selection incorporating a multidisciplinary team approach should be utilized.

SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2-i) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, evidence in patients with advanced HF is lacking. We aimed to determine the effect of SGLT2-i in advanced HFrEF compared to their effect on a non-advanced population. METHODS: Consecutive HFrEF outpatients who started SGLT2-i were observed for 6-months. Patients were categorized as having advanced or non-advanced HFrEF. The primary outcome was the trend of NTproBNP in the two groups. Secondary outcomes included changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and ejection fraction (LVEF). The association between advanced HF diagnosis and including N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) reduction was tested using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 105 patients (45 advanced, 60 non-advanced) were included. Mean age was 56 ± 10 years, 22 % were female, and 35 % had ischemic heart disease. Median NTproBNP at baseline for advanced and non-advanced patients was 1672pg/ml (IQR 520-3320) vs. 481 pg/ml (IQR 173-917), respectively (p < 0.001). At follow-up, only non-advanced patients reduced their NTproBNP (-32 % (95 % CI -51 to -3), p < 0.001), while advanced patients had an increase in NTproBNP. LVEF and NYHA class improved only in non-advanced patients. GFR was stable in both subgroups. At multivariate analysis a diagnosis of advanced HF was independently associated with a reduced probability of NTproBNP reduction (OR 0.041 (95 % CI 0.002-0.752), p = 0.031). Only one patient discontinued the drug due to side effects. CONCLUSION: In advanced HFrEF, SGLT2-i do not impact on NTproBNP, LVEF or NYHA class but are well tolerated.

Quality of Life in Palliative Care: A Systematic Meta-Review of Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Background: The area of palliative care is a setting in which the evaluation of the quality of life (QoL) is fundamental. However, the topic has been covered from many different points of view, and there is a lack of comprehensive synthesis of the evidence drawn from the available literature. Objective: We carried out a meta-review of all available systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have dedicated part or most of the investigation to the assessment of QoL in palliative care to provide the most updated and comprehensive depiction of all available information about measurement and intervention aimed at improving QoL in palliative care. Methods: A meta-review of all recent (5 years) available systematic reviews and meta-analyses on "palliative care" and "quality of life" was carried out. The quality of the extracted studies was assessed with the AMSTAR scale. Results: The search extracted 24 systematic reviews, 14 systematic reviews followed by a meta-analysis on a subset of data, and 2 meta-analyses. In many studies, the investigation of QoL represented a secondary or even marginal outcome. In general, the results supported the efficacy of palliative care in terminal patients or patients with a permanent disability. However, the quality of the studies had a strong influence on the chance that some improvement in QoL was found in relation to palliative care. Studies of lower quality were more likely to report some efficacy of palliative care than studies with better quality. Conclusion: The investigation of QoL in palliative care is understudied. In many studies, QoL is a secondary outcome, and there is some tendency to use a disparate range of tools to measure it, whose reliability and validity should still be established in some groups of patients.

The Impact of Kinlessness on Older Adults with Advanced Heart Failure.

Markers of social health, including kinlessness, social isolation and loneliness, have important implications for quality of life and health for older adults. As the population ages, there is a growing cohort of kinless older adults without living partners or children, particularly among disadvantaged groups. Kinlessness has been associated with worse mental and physical health, significant unmet care needs, increased risk of dementia, higher rates of long-term placement, and higher mortality rates than those for patients with kin. Although other markers of social health have been studied in patients with heart failure, little is known about kinlessness in this population of patients. This review outlines the data on kinlessness and its impact on patients' outcomes, and it proposes novel interventions to mitigate its effects.

Pre-operative pectoralis muscle area index is associated with biomarkers of inflammation and endotoxemia and predicts clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pre-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pectoralis muscle assessment, an estimate of sarcopenia, has been associated with postoperative mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding, though its association with inflammation, endotoxemia, length-of-stay (LOS), and readmissions remains underexplored. METHODS: This was a single-center cohort study of LVAD patients implanted 1/2015-10/2018. Preoperative pectoralis muscle area was measured on chest computed tomography (CT), adjusted for height squared to derive pectoralis muscle area index (PMI). Those with PMI in the lowest quintile were defined as low-PMI cohort; all others constituted the reference cohort. Biomarkers of inflammation (interleukin-6, adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor-α [TNFα]) and endotoxemia (soluble (s)CD14) were measured in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Of the 254 LVAD patients, 95 had a preoperative chest CT (median days pre-LVAD: 7 [IQR 3-13]), of whom 19 (20.0%) were in the low-PMI cohort and the remainder were in the reference cohort. Compared with the reference cohort, the low-PMI cohort had higher levels of sCD14 (2594 vs. 1850 ng/mL; p = 0.04) and TNFα (2.9 vs. 1.9 pg/mL; p = 0.03). In adjusted analyses, the low-PMI cohort had longer LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.56 [95% confidence interval 1.16-2.10], p = 0.004) and higher risk of 90-day and 1-year readmissions (subhazard ratio 5.48 [1.88-16.0], p = 0.002; hazard ratio 1.73 [1.02-2.94]; p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-LVAD PMI is associated with inflammation, endotoxemia, and increased LOS and readmissions.

Anomalous Coronary Artery Identified Post Heart Transplantation.

The following case details a 67-year-old male with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction secondary to cardiac amyloidosis who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and was later found to have an anomalous left circumflex arising from the right coronary artery in the donor heart.