Prognostic Expression Signature of RB1, PTEN, and TP53 Genes in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors.

Alterations in the tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) RB1, PTEN, and TP53 are associated with treatment resistance, worse survival, and aggressive variants of prostate cancer (AVPC). We previously developed and validated a signature reflecting low TSG expression (TSGlow) that was associated with poor outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) ± docetaxel. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to validate the TSGlow signature in patients with mHSPC treated with ADT and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and to explore clinical characteristics at progression according to TSG status. TSG mRNA expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples was assessed via nCounter. Correlation of expression levels with castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS; primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) was investigated via Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analyses. Of the 137 patients included, 77.4% had de novo stage IV cancer and 44.5% had high-risk disease. TSGlow (16.8%) was correlated with visceral metastases (p = 0.013), high-risk disease (p = 0.038), higher Gleason score (p = 0.026), shorter CRPC-FS (hazard ratio 1.9; p = 0.046) and higher AVPC frequency (p = 0.01). Our results confirm that a TSGlow signature is an adverse prognostic factor and is associated with AVPC development in patients with mHSPC treated with ADT + ARPI. Further prospective validation is needed to define specific therapeutic strategies for these patients. Patient summary: We looked at outcomes for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with hormone therapies. We found that patients with low expression of two out of three tumor suppressor genes (TP53, RB1, PTEN) had worse clinical outcomes and had aggressive variants of prostate cancer. Measuring the expression of these genes in early-stage prostate cancer could help in finding better treatments for these patients.

Prostatic duct adenocarcinoma-A challenging variant of prostate cancer in a low-resource setting.

This case emphasizes the challenges in diagnosing and treating Prostatic Duct Adenocarcinoma, especially in resource-limited settings. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for better patient outcomes, but limited access to advanced diagnostics and specialized treatments significantly hinders the effective management of this aggressive form of prostate cancer.

Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitor Withdrawal Syndrome After Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Androgen-deprivation therapy is an extremely effective treatment for progressive prostate cancer. Previously, the first-line treatment for progressive prostate cancer was combined androgen blockade (CAB). If the disease progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer, the administration of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) was recommended. When elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are seen during CAB treatment, it is important to suspect antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AWS), discontinue CAB, and monitor the changes in the serum PSA levels. If a reduction in the patient's PSA levels is subsequently observed, antiandrogens should be discontinued and the patient should be followed, but if their PSA level rises they should be transitioned to ARSI treatment. Recently, there have been reports of withdrawal syndrome (WS) after ARSI treatment. With the increased use of ARSIs, such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide, and dalorutamide, it is necessary to consider ARSI WS when a patient's serum PSA level increases during ARSI treatment. Unnecessary treatment can be avoided if the confirmation of ARSI WS is prioritized. Conversely, if it is not confirmed there is a risk that second-line treatment will be delayed. This is a review of recent studies of ARSI WS. It also discusses future prospects in this field.

Plain language review: the safety of relugolix combination therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Advanced prostate cancer is a cancer that began in the prostate (a part of the male body) and has spread to other parts of the body. This is a review of two clinical research studies of patients with advanced prostate cancer who were treated with relugolix combination therapy. Relugolix is a medicine taken by mouth that lowers a male sex hormone, called testosterone. Relugolix is sometimes combined with other medicines such as novel hormonal therapies (NHTs) or chemotherapy to treat advanced prostate cancer. In one study, patients were treated with relugolix combined with an NHT (abiraterone or apalutamide). In a second study, patients were treated with relugolix combined with an NHT (enzalutamide) or chemotherapy (docetaxel). Researchers wanted to understand what possible side effects may happen due to taking these medicines together as prescribed. They also wanted to see if relugolix combination therapy worked to lower testosterone in the same way as relugolix taken alone. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: Researchers found that most of the side effects of relugolix combined with an NHT or chemotherapy were mild or moderate. Side effects of relugolix combination therapy were similar to the side effects of the medicines when taken alone. However, patients who received relugolix with enzalutamide or docetaxel were more likely to have a serious side effect compared with patients who received relugolix taken alone. Testosterone stayed below 50 nanograms per deciliter (known as castration levels) for patients who received relugolix with NHT or chemotherapy. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: Patients who receive relugolix combination therapy generally experience mild or moderate side effects, rather than serious side effects. No new safety issues were found during these studies. Patients maintained low testosterone levels. Patients and their doctors should discuss the benefits and possible harms of relugolix combination therapy to treat advanced prostate cancer.

Tumor regression after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in high risk prostate cancer: pathological outcomes from a randomized phase II trial.

PURPOSE: High-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) commonly progresses to metastatic disease after local treatment. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) has recently been suggested to improve early oncological outcomes in HRLPC. We aimed to perform an exploratory analysis of the pathological outcomes from a prospective trial testing nADT before RP. METHODS: Prospective, single-centered, phase II, randomized trial performed between October 2018 and July 2021. Random assignment (1:1) for nADT modalities: goserelin (10.8 mg) plus abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/d) plus prednisone (5 mg/d), with or without apalutamide (240 mg/d) for 12 weeks, followed by RP (within 30 days) and extended lymph node dissection. Baseline clinical and pathological variables were assessed in needle biopsies before nADT. Tumor regression was histologically evaluated in surgical specimens using the residual cancer burden index (RCB). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients reached the surgical phase. Good response (RCB ≤ 0.25 cm³) was achieved in 14 patients (22.5%). Overall stage migration rate between baseline status (MRI before nADT) and final status (after surgery) was 27.4%. Late stage detection (high tumor burden, perineural invasion) and altered PTEN/ERG immunostatus showed significant association with poor response in univariate analysis. Higher baseline tumor burden was the only independent factor related to poor response in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There are subgroups of patients, such as those with low baseline cancer burden and PTEN/ERG wild-type status, more likely to achieve good response with nADT. In the case of long term oncological benefit to be proven, nADT might be an additional therapeutic resource for these patients.

Prostate Cancer, Pathophysiology and Recent Developments in Management: A Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. The different stages of prostate cancer which include localised (low, intermediate, and high risk) disease, locally advanced, non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (M0 CRPCa), and metastatic disease. The main treatment of locally advanced disease is external beam radiotherapy with hormonal therapy which are associated with good prognosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Current treatments for M0 CRPCa include androgen deprivation therapy in combination with apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide, all of which are associated with good metastatic-free survival rates in clinical trials. Hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer comprises the same treatments as M0 CRPCa, whereas further treatment includes docetaxel and abiraterone. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatments include sipuleucel-T, radium-223, abiraterone, enzalutamide and cabazitaxel, which aim to slow down the progression of the disease and to prolong life. This article also provides insight into the development of new drugs recently approved for metastatic castration prostate cancer, which include PARP inhibitors and Lutetium-177 which have shown to have significantly good overall survival and to improve radiographic progression-free survival. In addition, new clinical trials are ongoing to test new medications such as cabozantinb and chimeric-antigen receptor T-cell therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. With the aim to slow down the progression of the disease and to prolong life, new drug developments are underway to hopefully provide a positive impact on overall survival and improve progression-free survival, especially in advanced prostate cancer.

Phase 2 trial of PSMA PET CT versus planar bone scan and CT in prostate cancer patients progressing while on androgen deprivation therapy.

For prostate cancer patients who experience biochemical progression during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) has not been prospectively compared to planar bone scan plus CT. This was a single-arm, head-to-head, prospective phase II trial (NCT04928820) designed to enroll 102 men with prostate cancer who experienced biochemical progression (rising prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 1 ng/mL) during ADT. All patients received 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP planar bone scans. Each scan was interpreted by three central independent readers. The primary endpoint was the per-patient bone metastasis detection rate of PSMA PET/CT versus planar bone scan and CT. Secondary endpoints compared the number of bone metastases detected per patient and the inter-reader agreement of each imaging modality. Twenty-two men were enrolled between July 2021 and June 2022. Due to slow accrual following approval of PSMA PET radiotracers in the U.S. and a lack of a statistical signal between the two imaging modalities on interim analysis, this trial was closed early on October 2022. Median PSA was 8.5 ng/mL (interquartile range: 1.6-77.6). There was 100% agreement between the two scans. Six patients (27%) had negative findings and 16 patients (73%) had positive findings on both scans. PSMA PET/CT and bone scan plus CT detected an equal number of bone lesions for 14 patients (64%), PSMA PET/CT detected more bone lesions for six patients (27%), and bone scan plus CT detected more bone lesions for two patients (9.1%) (p = 0.092). The inter-reader agreement rates of PSMA PET/CT and bone scan plus CT were 96% and 82%, respectively (p = 0.25). In men with biochemical progression during ADT, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP planar bone scan plus CT had identical bone metastasis detection rates. Bone scan plus CT can continue to serve as a cost-effective and readily accessible restaging modality in patients with biochemical progression. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04928820. Registered 16/06/2021.

Hypoxia-associated gene signatures are not prognostic in high-risk localised prostate cancers undergoing androgen deprivation therapy with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy, but the disease reoccurs in 30% of patients. Biochemical recurrence of PCa after treatment is influenced by tumour hypoxia. Tumours with high levels of hypoxia are aggressive, resistant to treatment, and have increased metastatic capacity. Gene expression signatures derived from diagnostic biopsies can predict tumour hypoxia and radiosensitivity, but none are in routine clinical use, due to concerns about the applicability of these biomarkers to new patient cohorts. There has been no or limited testing in cohorts of high-risk PCa. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We generated transcriptomic data for cohorts of high-risk PCa patients. Patients were treated with ADT followed by external beam radiotherapy with or without a brachytherapy boost. Biomarkers curated from the literature were calculated from pre-treatment biopsy gene expression data. The primary endpoint for survival analyses was biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) and the secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival. RESULTS: The performance of the selected biomarkers was poor, with none achieving prognostic significance for bRFS or DMFS in any cohort. The brachytherapy boost cohort received shorter durations of ADT than the conventionally fractionated or hypofractionated cohorts (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p=2.1 × 10-18 and 2.3 × 10-10 respectively) and had increased risk of distant metastasis (log-rank test, p=8 × 10-4). There were no consistent relationships between biomarker score and outcome for any of the endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxia and radiosensitivity biomarkers were not prognostic in high-risk PCa patients treated with ADT plus radiotherapy. We speculate that the lack of prognostic capability could be caused by the variable hypoxia-modifying effects of the ADT that these high-risk patients received before and during definitive treatment with radiotherapy. A deeper understanding of biomarker construction, performance and inter-cohort transferability in relation to patient characteristics, sample handling and treatment modalities is required before hypoxia biomarkers can be recommended for routine clinical use in the pre-treatment setting.

Estetrol Inhibits the Prostate Cancer Tumor Stimulators FSH and IGF-1.

Background: The co-treatment of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) with the fetal estrogen estetrol (E4) may further inhibit endocrine PCa tumor stimulators. We previously reported the suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), total and free testosterone, and prostate-specific antigen by ADT+E4. Here, we provide more detailed data on FSH suppression by E4 and present new findings on the effect of ADT+E4 on insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). Methods: A Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (the PCombi study) was conducted in advanced PCa patients treated with ADT. The study assessed the effect of E4 co-treatment with LHRH agonist ADT on tumor stimulators, including FSH and IGF-1. Patients starting ADT were randomized 2:1 to receive either 40 mg E4 (n = 41) or placebo (n = 21) for 24 weeks. Non-parametric analyses were performed on the per-protocol population (PP) and individual changes were visualized. Results: The PP included 57 patients (37 ADT+E4; 20 ADT+placebo). ADT+E4 almost completely suppressed FSH in all patients (98% versus 37%; p < 0.0001). IGF-1 levels decreased by 41% with ADT+E4 versus an increase of 10% with ADT+placebo (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The almost complete suppression of the tumor stimulator FSH using ADT plus E4 observed in all individual patients in this study, along with the augmented suppression of IGF-1 versus an increase by ADT only, may be clinically relevant and suggest the enhanced anti-cancer treatment efficacy of E4 in addition to the previously reported additional suppression of total and free T and PSA.

Adiposity and Muscle Strength in Men With Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Background: There are limited data on the physical effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC), and on the relationships of such measures of adiposity and strength to cardiovascular outcomes. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the relationships of measures of adiposity and strength to cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, arterial revascularization, peripheral arterial disease, and venous thromboembolism) in patients with PC. A secondary objective was to characterize the relationships between ADT use and 12-month changes in these physical measures. Methods: This international, prospective cohort study included 3,967 patients with PC diagnosed in the prior 12 months or being treated with ADT for the first time. Median follow-up duration was 2.3 years. Results: Participants' mean age was 68.5 years, and 1,731 (43.6%) were exposed to ADT. ADT was associated with a 1.6% increase in weight, a 2.2% increase in waist circumference, a 1.6% increase in hip circumference, a 0.1% increase in waist-to-hip ratio, a 27.4% reduction in handgrip strength, and a 0.1% decrease in gait speed. High waist circumference and low handgrip strength were associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Adjusting for age, education, race, tobacco and alcohol use, physical activity, cardiovascular disease, glomerular filtration rate, and ADT use, waist circumference above the highest quartile (110 cm) and handgrip strength below the lowest quartile (29.5 kg) were associated with higher likelihoods of a future cardiovascular event, with respective HRs of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.03-1.90; P = 0.029) and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.14-2.22; P = 0.006). Conclusions: ADT was associated with increased adiposity and reduced strength over 12-month follow-up. High waist circumference and low baseline strength were associated with future adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Metabolic, cardiac, and bone health testing in patients with prostate cancer on androgen-deprivation therapy: A population-based assessment of adherence to therapeutic monitoring guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a cornerstone in treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer. ADT is associated with several adverse effects, including osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular events, leading to guidelines recommending routine testing to monitor for these toxicities. There is a lack of data assessing adherence to these recommendations. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data from Ontario, Canada between 2008 and 2021. They identified all older men (aged 65 years and older) who received ADT for prostate cancer using comprehensive provincial health databases. The primary outcomes were the use of testing for lipids, dysglycemia (glucose), bone health serum, and bone density between 6 weeks before and 1 year after the initiation of ADT. RESULTS: In total, 29,097 patients were examined, of whom 52.8% were prescribed ADT by urologists, 37.9% were prescribed ADT by radiation oncologists, 2.8% were prescribed ADT by medical oncologists, and 2.4% were prescribed ADT by other physicians. Adherence to guidelines was low: only 21.3% of patients received a bone density scan, 41.2% underwent bone health-related serum tests, 51.3% completed a lipid profile, and 65.9% underwent dysglycemia testing within 1 year of diagnosis. Overall, only 11.9% of patients received all of the recommended investigations. Adherence to testing did not appear to improve over time (2008-2021) or with guideline publication. Patient (age) and physician (specialty) factors had important associations with adherence to testing. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving ADT for prostate cancer do not receive recommended testing to monitor for treatment-related toxicity. Further study is required to address barriers to therapeutic monitoring of men on ADT and to reduce treatment-associated adverse events.

Androgen deprivation therapy, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a multi-center real-world retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Determining the potential benefit of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant ADT in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) undergoing complete resection. METHODS: 139 patients diagnosed with cT3-4, or cN+ LAPC in Xiangya Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China from 2010 to 2021 were collected. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of patients were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional risk analysis. We also analyzed the functional outcomes of two subgroups of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: Of the 182 patients with cT3-4, or cN+ LAPC, 139 patients (76.4%) were enrolled in the study with a 5-year survival rate of 82.3%. 45 patients (32.4%) received ADT alone, 46 patients (33.1%) received neoadjuvant ADT before surgery, and the remaining 48 patients (34.5%) received surgery with adjuvant ADT. Neoadjuvant ADT before surgery and surgery with adjuvant ADT were associated with significantly improved survival compared with ADT alone. Multivariate Cox models showed that neoadjuvant ADT before surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.92) or surgery with adjuvant ADT (HR, 0.26; 95% CI 0.16-0.78) was associated with improved CSS compared with ADT alone. Regional lymph node metastasis, positive lymphovascular invasion, and Gleason score 9 + were independent predictors of LAPC CSS and OS. More patients in the neoadjuvant ADT before surgery group achieved final continence status within 12 months after surgery (93.48% v 77.08%). CONCLUSION: CSS and OS were significantly prolonged in cT3-4, or cN+ LAPC patients who received neoadjuvant ADT before surgery and surgery with adjuvant ADT compared to ADT alone.

Opposing impact of hypertension/diabetes following hormone therapy initiation and preexisting statins on castration resistant progression of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a multicenter study.

Hormone therapy, especially androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is effective against prostate cancer (PC), whereas long-term ADT is a risk for metabolic/cardiovascular disorders including diabetes (DM), hypertension (HT) and dyslipidemia (DL), and might result in progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We thus conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to ask whether CRPC progression would be associated positively with HT, DM or DL and negatively with statins prescribed for treatment of DL. In this study, 1,112 nonmetastatic PC patients undergoing ADT were enrolled. Univariate statistical analyses clearly showed significant association of HT or DM developing after ADT onset, though not preexisting HT or DM, with early CRPC progression. On the other hand, preexisting DL or statin use, but not newly developed DL or started statin prescriptions following ADT, was negatively associated with CRPC progression. Multivariate analysis revealed significant independent association of the newly developed DM or HT, or preexisting statin use with CRPC progression [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals): 3.85 (1.65-8.98), p = 0.002; 2.75 (1.36-5.59), p = 0.005; 0.25 (0.09-0.72), p = 0.010, respectively]. Together, ADT-related development of HT or DM and preexisting statin use are considered to have positive and negative impact on CRPC progression, respectively.

Impact of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Cognitive Function of Elderly Men With Prostate Cancer.

Background Prostate cancer affects millions of men worldwide. Androgen deprivation therapy is the most prescribed medication for elderly men with prostatic cancer to slow and suppress the disease progression. Androgen deprivation therapy works on decreasing testosterone levels, and that can cause multiple side effects, including potential cognitive affection in the form of accelerating cognitive aging and potentially increasing the risk of dementia. This study is aimed at evaluating the impact of androgen deprivation therapy on the cognitive function of elderly men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods The current research is a prospective cohort study conducted on 85 elderly patients recently diagnosed with prostate cancer who are about to start androgen deprivation therapy within two weeks of the diagnosis. These patients were recruited from the oncology and geriatrics outpatient clinics of Ain Shams University hospitals and were followed up on androgen deprivation therapy for at least six months. Cognitive and depression assessments were done using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test-Basic (according to their education) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The cases were assessed at the start, after two months, and after six months of androgen deprivation therapy use. Cognitively impaired or depressed patients were excluded at the beginning of the study. Results This study showed that 49 out of 85 (57.6%) of the studied participants had a lower Montreal cognitive assessment test score average after six months, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Cognitive domains such as visuospatial, language, and attention were affected. About one-third of the participants were diagnosed with depression after six months of the androgen deprivation therapy. All the depressed participants had cognitive impairment. Conclusion The use of androgen deprivation therapy carries the risk of cognitive decline and regression of some of the cognitive domains such as language, visuospatial, attention, and depression in the elderly with recently diagnosed prostate cancer who received ADT for six months. Conversely, depression could not be linked to cognitive decline. Further research should continue exploring the relationship between cognitive decline and ADT and seek strategies to mitigate these effects, ensuring comprehensive patient care targeting cognitive and psychological well-being.

Systemic treatments in recurrent or metastatic salivary gland cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Salivary gland cancers are infrequent and pose a challenge owing to their histological diversity and varied clinical behavior, making the selection of optimal systemic treatments for advanced or recurrent stages difficult. This systematic review aims to assess overall survival outcomes and systemic treatment responses across four types of salivary cancers. METHODS: A PubMed and Google Scholar search identified studies involving initially advanced or relapsed cases undergoing systemic treatment. Studies with clear, individualized data on treatment responses and outcomes were selected based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Of the 723 studies screened, 44 met our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 426 cases of recurrent/metastatic salivary gland cancer, mostly salivary duct carcinoma (SDC; n = 219) and adenoid cyst carcinoma (ACC; n = 167), were included. Histomolecular markers were heavily associated with histology, with HER2 overexpression and androgen receptor nuclear expression typically found in SDC and adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified cases and KIT overexpression only in ACC. The response rates were associated with specific receptor blockage, with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, and bicalutamide being the most effective (overall response rate 80% and 42.8%, respectively). Moreover, the response to treatment positively influenced overall survival (responders 38 versus non-responders 18.7 median months; P < 0.001). In this retrospective analysis of a particular cohort, survival outcomes per histology types showed that anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy was more effective for SDC, while chemotherapy was more effective for ACC. CONCLUSION: Systemic treatments contribute to the survival of patients with salivary gland cancer at relapsed or newly advanced stages. The response to treatment is heavily influenced by histological subtype and treatment specificity.

Current Clinical Aspects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review for Urologists and Medical Providers.

Prostate cancer (PCa) currently stands as the most common malignancy and the second most common cause of death in men worldwide. Dr. C. Huggins revolutionized the field of PCa treatment through his work investigating the therapeutic effects of androgen deprivation. These early surgical castration methods were expanded upon by integrating reversible pharmacologic castration via biologic agonists. Following this, intermittent ADT (iADT) became a medical substitute for its continuous counterpart. This data synthesis aims to highlight and assess the pertinent adverse effects of ADT, to compare mortality for PCa treatment plans, and consequently provide direction for clinicians in choosing the suitable systemic ADT approach. We performed a thorough systematic search across the PubMed database to identify prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing continuous and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (cADT and iADT). Our qualitative analysis aimed to evaluate the potential of iADT as an alternative treatment approach, emphasizing recent clinical outcomes. The analysis of randomized control trials in the literature revealed no discernable statistical difference in PCa-specific mortality in comparison of iADT and cADT treatments. Further, in the analysis of mortality due to non-PCa causes, iADT patients fared more favorably compared to cADT. Due to iADT's characteristics of being more cost-efficient and less likely to cause undesirable side effects, urologic healthcare professionals should be made aware of these findings when counseling patients on the optimal form of ADT and consulting for future treatment guidelines.

A randomized phase II trial on the addition of dutasteride to combined androgen blockade therapy versus combined androgen blockade therapy alone in patients with advanced or metastatic salivary duct carcinoma - the DUCT study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, frequently associated with incurable recurrences and distant metastases (R/M). Proliferation of SDC relies on androgen receptor (AR) signalling, prompting the use of combined androgen blockade (CAB, i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and/or AR antagonists) to R/M SDC patients. However, only a subset of patients benefits from such treatments. We have shown that response to CAB is associated with steroid 5α-reductase 1 (SRD5A1) mRNA expression. SRD5A1 catalyses the intracellular conversion of testosterone into the more potent AR-agonist dihydrotestosterone. This conversion can be inhibited by dutasteride, a potent SRD5A1-inhibitor, which is currently prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We hypothesize that repurposing dutasteride to target AR signalling in SDC could enhance therapeutic response and clinical outcome in SDC patients. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, is designed to investigate whether dutasteride as an adjunct drug to CAB improves response rate and clinical outcome in patients with AR-positive R/M SDC. Patients are divided in two cohorts based on their prior systemic treatments. In cohort A, CAB-naïve patients (n = 74) will be randomly assigned to either a control arm (Arm 1) receiving CAB (goserelin 10.8 mg/3m and bicalutamide 50 mg/OD) or an experimental arm (Arm 2) where dutasteride (0.5 mg/OD) is added to the CAB regimen. In cohort B, patients with disease progression after adjuvant or first-line palliative CAB therapy (max. n = 24) will receive goserelin, bicalutamide, and dutasteride to assess whether the addition of dutasteride can overcome therapy resistance. The primary endpoints are the objective response rate and duration of response. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Translational research will be performed to explore molecular target expression differences and their correlation with clinical outcome. DISCUSSION: The DUCT study addresses an unmet medical need by investigating the repurposing of dutasteride to enhance treatment response and improve clinical outcome for patients with R/M SDC, especially those with limited alternative treatment options, such as HER2-negative cases. By repurposing a registered low-cost drug, this trial's findings could be readily applied into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05513365. Date of registration: August 24, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: Current protocol version 4.0, February 21, 2024.

Influences on androgen deprivation therapy prescribing before surgery in high-risk prostate cancer.

Objectives: To understand how best to further reduce the inappropriate use of pre-surgical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), we investigated the determinants (influences) of ADT prescribing in urologists in two European countries using an established behavioural science approach. Additionally, we sought to understand how resource limitations caused by COVID-19 influenced this practice. Identification of key determinants, of undistributed and disrupted practice, will aid development of future strategies to reduce inappropriate ADT prescribing in current and future resource-limited settings. Participants and Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with urologists practicing in Italy and the UK from February to July 2022. Interviews focussed on undisrupted (usual) practice and disrupted practice (changes made during COVID-19 restrictions). Codes were generated inductively and were mapped to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Relevant domains of influence were identified, and the similarities and differences between the UK and Italy were distinguished. Results: We identified 10 domains that were influential to ADT prescribing in the UK and eight in Italy. The role of guidance and evidence, the cancer care setting, the patients and the urologist's beliefs and experiences were identified as areas that were influential to ADT prescribing before surgery. Twenty-one similarities and 22 differences between the UK and Italy, for usual and COVID-19 practice, were identified across these 10 domains. Conclusion: Similarities and differences influencing ADT prescribing prior to surgery should be considered in behavioural strategy development and tailoring to reduce inappropriate ADT use. We gained an understanding of usual, undistributed care and resource-limited or disrupted care due to COVID-19 in two European countries. This gives an indication of how influences on ADT prescribing may change in future resource-limited circumstances and where efforts can be focused now and in future.

The Rapidly Evolving Treatment Landscape of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

The management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has become increasingly complex with the tremendous progress that has been made in this space within the past few decades. In the early days of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), ADT monotherapy was the mainstay for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. However, novel hormone therapies in the form of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have emerged; vaccine therapy, chemotherapy with docetaxel and cabazitaxel, and radioactive ligands have shaped the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in the last decade. Following the initial approval of several drugs for use in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in combination with primary ADT, these agents were studied and subsequently approved for use in mCSPC. Therefore, ADT monotherapy no longer constitutes an optimal therapeutic option for otherwise fit patients who present with mCSPC. We focus on the treatment of first-line de novo mHSPC or mCSPC and explore frontline doublet and triplet therapy and the pivotal trials that led to their United States Food and Drug Administration approval.

A Non-Randomized Comparison of Online and In-Person Formats of the Canadian Androgen Deprivation Therapy Educational Program: Impacts on Side Effects, Bother, and Self-Efficacy.

Although Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is effective in controlling prostate cancer (PCa) and increasing survival, it is associated with a myriad of side effects that cause significant morbidity. Previous research has shown that PCa patients starting on ADT are neither fully informed nor well-equipped to manage the breadth of ADT's side effects. The ADT Educational Program (a 1.5 h interactive class plus a book) was developed as an evidence-based resource for patients dealing with ADT. Our aim here was to compare the efficacy of an online version of the class with a previously assessed in-person version of the class. Using mixed MANOVAs within a non-randomized comparison design, we assessed: (1) changes in patients' experiences of self-efficacy to manage and bother associated with side effects approximately 10 weeks after attending a class, and (2) potential differences in these variables between online and in-person class formats. Side effect bother decreased from pre- to post-class but did not differ between in-person (n = 94) and online (n = 137) class cohorts. While self-efficacy to manage side effects was slightly higher post-class in both cohorts, the increase was not statistically significant. Average self-efficacy ratings were significantly higher among in-person versus online class participants (p < 0.05; ηp2 = 0.128). Both online and in-person classes are associated with a significant reduction in the severity of side effect bother reported by PCa patients, suggesting non-inferiority of online versus in-person formats. Online classes offer greater accessibility to the program for patients outside the reach of in-person classes, increasing the availability of the program to more PCa patients and family members across Canada.