Measurement of PDE5 concentration in human serum: proof-of-concept and validation of methodology in control and prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate if the type 5 phosphodiesterase (PDE5), an enzyme with cardinal biological functions in sexual and cardiovascular health, can be detected and quantited in human serum. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from control male and female subjects. PDE5 levels were measured by a specific ELISA kit. ROC curves weighted for age and serum levels of PSA (male subjects), or age (female subjects) were used to identify the predictive ability in the detection of PCa. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were determined for cut-off value determined during ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: 41 control male subjects, 18 control female subjects, and 55 consecutive subjects, of which 25 were affected by benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and 30 with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (PCa), were studied. PDE5 serum levels were detectable in all subjects (range: 5 to 65 ng/ml). Analysis by MANCOVA identified a significant difference in serum PDE5 between control subjects or hyperplasia patients and PCa patients. Marginal means of serum PDE5 concentrations showed a significant difference (p < 0.001). The ROC curve demonstrated that PDE5 serum levels can predict men with or without PCa, with 0.806 AUC value (p < 0.0001). Using a 12.705 ng/ml PDE5 serum cut-off yielded sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 83.3%, 77.27%, 62.5%, and 91.1% in detecting men with histologically proven PCa, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated, for the first time, that PDE5 levels can be detected in human sera and that PCa patients have significantly higher PDE5 concentration compared to BPH patients or male and female controls. While serum PDE5 level measurement may open new research avenues, the clinical relevance of PDE5 levels in PCa patients deserves further investigation.

Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy mitigates perioperative morbidity compared to open simple prostatectomy - a single institution report.

BACKGROUND: According to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology, open simple prostatectomy should be offered to men with a prostate size exceeding 80 mL suffering from moderate to severe LUTS in the absence of a transurethral enucleation technique. However, open simple prostatectomy is associated with complications such as bleeding, blood transfusions and increased length of stay compared to minimally invasive procedures. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative data from the first cases of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) to that of patients subjected to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) at our department. METHODS: The patients were identified by a search for the respective procedure codes. In the OSP group enucleation of the adenoma was performed through the prostatic capsule (Millin procedure), while access to the adenoma was gained through the bladder in the RASP group. Complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: 27 patients who underwent OSP were retrospectively identified and compared to the first 26 patients who were subjected to RASP. The groups were similar with respect to age, body mass index and ASA score. Operative time was significantly shorter in the OSP group compared to the RASP group. Bleeding volume, drop in postoperative hemoglobin and the number of blood transfusions were all significantly higher in the OSP group compared to the RASP group. Average length of stay was 5.5 (2-18) days in the OSP group compared to 1.6 (1-5) days in the RASP group (p < 0.001). The number of postoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2, were significantly higher in the OSP group (11) compared to the RASP group (none, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy reduced perioperative morbidity at our department.

Recent Advancements in Prostate Catheters and Stents for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is rising, however, current treatment options present severe complications and limit patient's quality of life. Accordingly, advancements in prostatic catheter and stent designs for use in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in BPH patients have largely expanded in the past five years and we aim to provide an exhaustive summary of recent outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: The dual dilation and paxlitaxel eluting Optilume BPH Catheter System enhances promise in catheter-based treatments, providing the longest sustained increase in max urinary flow rate and decrease in post-void residual volume compared to alternative MISTs. Additionally, use of iTiND, along with recent advancements in temporary (EXIME, Prodeon Urocross) and permanent (Zenflow Spring, Butterfly, and ClearRing) stent designs, have demonstrated rapid, lasting, and low-cost LUTS relief with sustained sexual function. Minimally invasive solutions that offer in-office treatment, rapid symptom relief, shorter recovery times, and preservation of sexual function hold great promise in improving outcomes in managing BPH patients with LUTS.

A genetic study to identify pathogenic mechanisms and drug targets for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multi-omics Mendelian randomization study.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) as a common geriatric disease in urology, the incidence and prevalence are rapidly increasing with the aging society, prompting an urgent need for effective prevention and treatment of BPH. However, limited therapeutic efficacy and higher risk of complications result in the treatment of BPH remaining challenging. The unclear pathogenic mechanism also hampers further exploration of therapeutic approaches for BPH. In this study, we used multi-omics methods to integrate genomics, transcriptomics, immunomics, and metabolomics data and identify biomolecules associated with BPH. We performed transcriptomic imputation, summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR), joint/conditional analysis, colocalization analysis, and FOCUS to explore high-confidence genes associated with BPH in blood and prostate tissue. Subsequently, three-step SMR was used to identify the DNA methylation sites regulating high-confidence genes to improve the pathogenic pathways of BPH. We also used cis-instruments of druggable genes to conduct SMR analysis to find potential drug targets for BPH. Finally, we used MR analysis to explore the immune pathways and metabolomics related to BPH. Multiple analytical methods identified BTN3A2 (Blood: TWAS Z score = 5.02912, TWAS P = 4.93 × 10-7; Prostate: TWAS Z score = 4.89, TWAS P = 1.01 × 10-6) and C4A (Blood: TWAS Z score = 4.90754, TWAS P = 9.22 × 10-7; Prostate: TWAS Z score = 5.084, TWAS P = 3.70 × 10-7) as high-confidence genes for BPH and identified the cg14345882-BTN3A2-BPH pathogenic pathway. We also used druggable gene data to identify 30 promising therapeutic target genes, including BTN3A2 and C4A. For MR analysis of immune pathways, we identified immune cell surface molecules as well as the inflammatory factor IL-17 (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.09-1.43, PFDR = 0.12, Maximum likelihood) as risk factors for BPH. In addition, we found that disulfide levels of cysteinylglycine (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.05-1.18, P = 5.18 × 10-4, Weighted median), oxidation levels of cysteinylglycine (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04-1.14, P = 3.87 × 10-4, Weighted median), and sebacate levels (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.08, P = 3.0 × 10-4, Maximum likelihood) increase the risk of BPH. This multi-omics study explored biomolecules associated with BPH, improved the pathogenic pathways of BPH, and identified promising therapeutic targets. Our results provide evidence for future studies aimed at developing appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with obstructive uropathy attributable to bladder outlet obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in individuals presenting with obstructive-uropathy (OU) attributable to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLEP from August 2017 to January 2023 at our institution. We identified patients with preoperative OU defined by presence of chronic hydronephrosis suggestive of BOO and conducted a matched-pair analysis (1:2) with patients undergoing HoLEP without OU. Patients' demographic, perioperative and postoperative voiding parameters, serum creatinine level, and complications were analyzed up to one-year of follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperative OU was present in 42 patients. Demographic and preoperative parameters were comparable except median preoperative creatinine (1.245 vs. 1.065 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and catheterization rates (76.2% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) were higher in the OU group. The mean duration of postoperative catheterization was longer in the OU group (3.83 vs. 2.26 days, p = 0.048). Two patients in the OU group developed postoperative acute kidney injury. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications, improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum urinary flow amongst both groups except a higher post-void residual volume at 3- and 12-months (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively) in OU patients. Patients noted significant improvement in serum creatinine level at 6-12 weeks postoperatively from peak baseline level (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: HoLEP is effective and safe in patients with OU suggestive of BOO, though they are at higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury.

Can We Differentiate Between Organic and Functional Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Males With Parkinson's Disease?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the type of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A case-control study was carried out in 46 patients divided into two groups. Group 1 formed by 23 PD patients with BOO (a URA parameter ≥ 29 cm H2O). Group 2 formed by 23 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and compressive obstruction (an opening pressure > 35 cm H2O) and URA parameter ≥ 29 cm H2O). Both groups underwent a pressure-flow study to calculate Dynamic Urethral Resistance Relationship (DURR) patterns. Based on previous research, we describe two types of DURR pattern. Pattern A typical of dynamic or functional obstruction and pattern B typical of static or organic obstruction. RESULTS: We found that PD patients had a significantly higher frequency of pattern A (70%) than BPH patients (4%). Other significant differences between groups were age (greater in PD group), bladder compliance (greater in PD group), maximum flow rate [Qmax (greater in BPH group)], maximum detrusor pressure [Pmax (greater in BPH group)], detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate [PQmax (greater in BPH group)], opening detrusor pressure (greater in BPH group), and the bladder contractility parameters BCI and Wmax (greater in BPH group). There were no significant differences in perineal voiding electromyography (EMG) activity between groups nor relationship between voiding EMG activity and the type of DURR pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with the usefulness of the DURR pattern to differentiate between functional and organic BOO in PD patients. Most PD patients have functional obstruction although a minority has organic obstruction consistent with BPH.

Does size matter? A single institution's comparison of Aquablation in prostates greater than or less than 150 mL.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management options for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hypertension have remained limited in prostates of large volume. The advent of the Aquablation has created a potential minimally invasive option for treatment in prostates of all volumes. Thus, this study aims to evaluate outcomes and complications of Aquablation in clinical practice based on prostate volume. METHODS: Collected variables included adverse events with Clavien-Dindo classifications, transfusion rates, surgical retreatment rates, continued medication use postoperatively, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) with Quality-of-Life indicator. Aquablations were stratified by preoperative prostate volume. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four men were included in the study. The average postop decrease in IPSS was 10.28, with a 2.02 point decrease in Quality-of-Life at 1 year. Postop increase in peak urinary flow rate was 7.65 mL/s for an average of 16.44 mL/s. Hemoglobin drop average was 1.78 g/dL, but only 2.3% of patients required a transfusion. 12.9% of patients required surgical retreatment. Six months after Aquablation, 22.9% and 12.9% of patients continued taking Alpha-blockers and Androgen receptor inhibitors, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 33 patients (19.0%). Eighteen patients were excluded from secondary analysis due to unrecorded prostate volume, leaving 123 with volumes <150 mL and 33 with volumes ≥150 mL. Groups were comparable with respect to length of stay, adverse events, blood transfusion, IPSS with Quality-of-Life indicator preoperative and postoperative, postop peak urinary flow, and postop alpha-blocker use. Larger prostates had a higher rate of adverse events, retreatment, postop hemoglobin drop, and postop use of finasteride. CONCLUSIONS: Aquablation is a viable treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Efficacy, safety, subjective outcomes, and adverse event rates were not impacted by prostate volume. However, size does matter as prostates ≥150 mL had higher surgical retreatment rates and postop finasteride use.

Comparative assessment of attitudes and expectations: Iranian patients versus urologists in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common and presents as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Understanding patient concerns and treatment preferences is essential for effective management. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes, preferences, and expectations of Iranian patients with BPH, and compare them with those of urologists in addressing this condition. METHODS: A cohort of patients diagnosed with BPH underwent assessment during their initial visit. Before any counseling, their attitudes, concerns, and expectations regarding benign prostate enlargement were evaluated using semi-structured interviews. Patient responses were analyzed based on educational levels and age. Additionally, correspondence was initiated with thirty urologists who graduated within the past twelve years to assess their attitudes toward BPH, concerns, and treatment approaches. Interview questions were constructed using the Delphi method, and their validity was confirmed. Responses from both groups were analyzed and compared. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U, and principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The study comprised 261 patients and 30 urologists. Findings revealed that 86.2% of patients and 86.7% of urologists perceived a lack of sufficient patient knowledge about BPH. Patients across all educational levels and age groups expressed a desire for more information about their condition. Primary concerns among patients included exacerbation of urinary symptoms, potential malignancy, and sexual dysfunction. While patients generally preferred pharmacological treatments, those older than 75 years showed a significantly higher preference for surgical options. Conversely, urologists exhibited greater concern for long-term clinical complications associated with BPH. Results indicated significant parallels between the attitudes of urologists and patients in assessing the multifaceted impact of BPH on patient well-being. CONCLUSION: This study enhances our understanding of patient attitudes and concerns regarding BPH, thereby facilitating more effective treatment strategies. Our findings encourage urologists to enhance patient perspectives by delivering comprehensive information. Furthermore, the comparison between patient and urologist attitudes towards BPH underscores the importance of tailored care and patient-centered approaches in optimizing outcomes for individuals with BPH.

Single-cell sequencing analysis revealed that NEAT1 was a potential biomarker and therapeutic target of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) usually manifests atypical symptoms in the early stage, and once symptoms appear, most PCa patients have developed to the advanced stage, failing to undergo radical surgery. In this study, PCa occurrence-related biomarkers were explored based on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. METHODS: scRNA-seq data of prostate normal (Normal), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and PCa (Tumor) samples were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Cellular subsets associated with PCa occurrence were obtained using cell annotation. Additionally, the mRNA expression of nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) was detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The effects of NEAT1 on cell proliferation and apoptosis were analyzed by 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) and flow cytometry. Subsequently, cell-derived xenograft (CDX) models were constructed and divided into the LV-NC and LV-shNEAT1 groups. After the tumor tissues of CDX model mice in each group were extracted, the cell growth and Ki67 expression were observed separately using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Ten cellular subsets were obtained via cell annotation, and significantly differential changes were observed between Basal intermediate and Luminal during the course of BPH to PCa. NEAT1-Luminal was highly recruited in the Tumor group with low stemness and high malignancy scores. Matrix metallopeptidase 7 (MMP7)- keratin 17 (KRT17)-Basal intermediate had high ratios in the Tumor group with low stemness and high malignancy scores. The results of pseudotime analysis revealed that NEAT1-Luminal in the Tumor group were consistently distributed with tumor stage cells. In vitro assays showed that NEAT1 expression was elevated in PCa cells, and NEAT1 knockdown could inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. CDX assays indicated that silencing NEAT1 could reduce the growth rate of PCa tumor volume in CDX model mice. H&E staining results showed that nuclei of tumor cells were reduced and exhibited lighter color in the LV-shNEAT1 group compared with the LV-NC group. IHC results showed that Ki67 positivity was significantly lower in the LV-shNEAT1 group than in the LV-NC group. CONCLUSION: NEAT1 expression is increased in PCa, and NEAT1 can be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for PCa.

Evaluation of Peri-Operative Outcomes after Prostatic Urethral Lift with Emphasis on Urodynamic Changes, Symptom Improvement and Sexual Function.

Background and Aims: The aim of our study is to evaluate the possible urodynamic effect of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: A consecutive series of patients undergoing PUL placement were consecutively enrolled in two centers. Inclusion criteria: ≥50 years of age, benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) ≥ 13, prostate volume ≤ 60 mL, and no middle prostate lobe. All patients were evaluated using a detailed clinical history, a validated questionnaire, flexible cystoscopy, and pressure flow studies (PFS) at baseline. PFS were performed at 6 months to evaluate the urodynamic effect of PUL. Results: Overall, 20 patients with a median age of 63 were enrolled. At six months, statistically significant improvements in terms of median Qmax (11.5 vs. 8.5; p < 0.05) and median IPSS (16 vs. 10.5; p < 0.05) were recorded, and sexual function was maintained. All urodynamic parameters improved at 6 months, and significance was reached for all values except for PdetQmax. Finally, Schäfer's class improved from a median of III to a median of II. More specifically, 16/20 presented an improvement in the Schäfer class, and 12/20 patients presented a BOOI < 20 at 6 months. Conclusions: PUL represents an effective treatment in patients with LUTS due to BPH and improves bladder outlet obstruction without any effect on sexual function.

Evaluating Prostate Cancer: The Diagnostic Impact of MRI and Its Relationship With Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)-Guided Biopsy.

Background Prostate disorders, including benign enlargement and malignancy, are commonly evaluated through imaging techniques. Historically, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has been used for prostate imaging and biopsy. However, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which integrates structural and functional imaging methods, offers enhanced diagnostic capabilities. This study evaluates the effectiveness of mpMRI, including its grading via Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) or Likert scoring, in distinguishing between benign and malignant prostatic conditions and compares these findings with TRUS outcomes. Methodology This prospective study enrolled 30 male patients aged 45 to 75 years (mean age 60 years), selected based on prostatic abnormalities, elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/dL), or palpable nodules detected via digital rectal examination. MRI, including PI-RADS or Likert scoring, was utilized to assess prostatic lesions, and results were compared with histopathological data obtained from TRUS-guided biopsies. Results Among the 30 patients, common symptoms included urinary retention (60%) and painful urination (53.3%). Malignant tumors were diagnosed in 12 patients (40%). MRI identified eight cases with enlarged transitional zones and irregular signals in peripheral zones (benign prostatic hyperplasia with tumor) and four cases with irregular signals in both zones (sarcoma). Concordance between MRI T2-weighted (T2W) observations and biopsy results showed 60% malignancy detection. Sensitivity assessments revealed MRI detected 15 true-positives (50%), TRUS detected six true positives (20%), and multivoxel spectroscopic analysis (MVS) identified 14 true-positives (46.7%). PI-RADS or Likert scoring of mpMRI was correlated with TRUS outcomes, highlighting its enhanced diagnostic accuracy compared to TRUS alone. Conclusion While TRUS remains a standard diagnostic tool, it is limited by significant sampling errors and complications. The integration of mpMRI, with its grading system, significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Although mpMRI alone has limitations, its combination with contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, and MR spectroscopy offers a comprehensive approach to enhanced prostate cancer detection.

Second-generation MOSES 2.0 versus MOSES 1.0 pulse-modulation technologies for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To report our initial experience with enhanced MOSES 2.0 technology in patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), in comparison to those who underwent HoLEP with MOSES 1.0 technology at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent HoLEP using MOSES 1.0 or MOSES 2.0 pulse-modulation technology from December 2020 to September 2023. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, as well as perioperative complications were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the study. Among them, 146 patients underwent MOSES 1.0 HoLEP, while 50 had MOSES 2.0 HoLEP. No statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics were observed between the two groups. The median prostate volume for the MOSES 1.0 and MOSES 2.0 HoLEP groups was 109 cc and 117.5 cc, respectively. Patients in the MOSES 2.0 group had a shorter median enucleation time (52.5 vs. 42.5 min, p < 0.001) and hemostasis time (8 vs. 6 min, p = 0.002), along with lower laser energy usage (101 vs. 86.4 kJ, p = 0.012), when compared to those in the MOSES 1.0 cohort. Postoperative outcomes, including IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR, were comparable between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperative. The incidence of hospital readmission (p = 0.42), as well as one-month postoperative urge urinary incontinence (p = 0.2) and stress urinary incontinence (p = 0.13) were also comparable between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP with second-generation MOSES 2.0 technology is a safe and effective treatment option for BPH. It offers notable improvements, including reduced enucleation and hemostasis times, while using less energy when compared to MOSES 1.0.

Does sheath size matter: benchtop comparison of flow and pressure across variety of continuous flow endoscopes.

INTRODUCTION: Laser enucleation utilizes purpose-built endoscopes for laser stabilization and continuous flow. No evaluation has been done with respect to flow or intravesical pressure with these scopes. We sought to evaluate the effect different endoscopes and sheath sizes on irrigation outflow and intravesical pressure. METHODS: Using a benchtop model using a silicone bladder model, five outer/inner sheath combinations were assessed: Storz 28/26Fr, Storz 26/26Fr, Wolf 26/24Fr, Wolf 26/22Fr, and Wolf 24/22Fr. A urodynamics pressure transducer was inserted alongside the scope for bladder pressure measurement and outflow from scope to drain was measured using uroflowmetry device. Four 1-minute trials were recorded for each sheath and the steady state flow and pressure was recorded. RESULTS: The Storz 28 F outer sheath and 26 F inner sheath had the highest outflow (12.4 ± 0.5 mL/s, p < 0.01). The Wolf 24 F outer and 22 F inner had the lowest outflow (7.0 ± 0.0 mL/s, p < 0.01). The steady state bladder pressure was the lowest in the Storz 28/26 (1.5 ± 1.7 cm H2O, p < 0.01)) and the greatest in the Storz 26/26 (24.2 ± 1.9 cm H2O, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Storz 28/26 combination had best outflow rate and lowest intravesical pressures in our benchtop study. Flow rates generally decreased with smaller sheath sizes and steady state bladder pressures increased as the difference between the outflow and inflow sheath size narrowed. These findings provide initial parameters that could guide sheath selection in future to optimize visualization and success of voiding trials.

Transurethral resection and other minimally invasive treatment options for BPH: would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Results from EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) decision-making survey among urologists.

Introduction: With the introduction of novel treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), decision making regarding surgical management has become ever more complex. Factors such as clinical exposure, equipment availability, patient characteristics and hospital setting may affect what treatment is offered and an informed patient choice. The aim of this study was to investigate how urologists help patients make decisions regarding BPH management and whether their practice would differ if they were the patient themselves. Material and methods: A 52-question survey presenting hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to European urologists and trainees/residents online and in person. In each scenario, regarding treatment options for BPH, the participant considered themselves firstly as the treating clinician and secondly as the patient themselves. Details regarding the participants' clinical experience, awareness of treatment options and exposure to these options were obtained. Results: There were 139 participants; 69.8% of whom were consultants, with 82.1% of participants having practiced urology for more than 5 years. A total of 59.7% of urologists consider themselves BPH specialists. Furthermore, 93.5% of those surveyed had performed transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), whilst procedures performed the least by participants were minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) options. Only 17.3% had seen and 1.4% had performed all of the treatment options. When considering themselves as a patient within standard practice, there was a preference for HoLEP amongst participants. Conclusions: The majority of urologists surveyed had minimal experience to newer BPH techniques and MIST, suggesting that more exposure is required. A higher rate of HoLEP was chosen as a treatment option for urologists themselves as a patient than what they would choose as an option for their patients.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia using Schelin catheter: a preliminary communication.

Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of the use of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin CatheterTM (SC) in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Material and methods: TUIA was performed using SC, a catheter equipped with an operative channel with a retractile needle, a standard drainage outlet, and a balloon port. After inserting the SC into the patient's urethra and filling the balloon to anchor it in the bladder neck, four target injections with local anesthetic were performed, one in each quadrant in the base area of the prostate. After injections, the catheter was removed and the HoLEP procedure started. During the procedure, patients also received moderate sedation/analgesia. Results: We selected two 63-year-old patients with good performance status. Prostate volume was 40 ml for the first patient and 31 ml for the second. TUIA and HoLEP operative times were 68 minutes in the first patient and 42 minutes in the second.During the procedure, patients complained of only minimal discomfort, and during hospitalization patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ranging from 1 to 0, with no need for additional analgesics. No complications were reported perioperatively and 15 days after the procedure. Conclusions: This is the first report on TUIA via SC in patients undergoing HoLEP. In our preliminary experience, TUIA via SC was safe and feasible, showing complete perioperative pain control. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results and better define the category of patients eligible for this type of treatment.

Predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference in lower urinary tract symptoms 3 months after Rezum therapy.

Introduction: Gaining insight into patient characteristics to predict the success of procedures is crucial for improving outcomes and for preoperative counselling. We identified predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) 3 months after Rezum. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezum. Patients with moderate or severe LUTS and a recorded International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 months were included and categorised into 2 cohorts based on experiencing a MCID at 3 months (≥ 25% improvement in IPSS). Predictors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Out of 174 patients, 134 (77%) achieved a MCID at 3 months, and those who did had a higher median baseline IPSS (20 [16-26] vs 15 [10-21], P <0.001) and were more likely to have severe LUTS at baseline (53.0% vs 35.0%, P = 0.046) when compared to those who did not experience a MCID at 3 months. Higher baseline IPSS (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17) and larger baseline prostate volumes (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 1.0-1.05) were predictors of achieving a MCID at 3 months. More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of patients with severe LUTS (83.5 vs 70.8%, P = 0.046) and prostate volume ≥60 cc (94.6 vs 71.4%, P = 0.003) achieved MCID at 3 months when compared to patients with moderate LUTS and prostate volumes <60 cc, respectively. Conclusions: More than three-quarters of patients treated with Rezum achieved a MCID at 3 months. Patients with severe LUTS and prostate volumes ≥ 60 cc may be optimal candidates for experiencing early relief in LUTS following Rezum.

The Etiology and Pathogenesis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: The Roles of Sex Hormones and Anatomy.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) mainly causes lower urinary tract symptoms in ageing men, but its exact etiology and pathogenesis have not been established. The objective of this review was to design an update on the advances of human BPH research. We undertook a literature search for identifying studies of the roles of sex hormones (androgens and estrogens) in the onset and development of human BPH using the Pubmed database. In literature, many studies have indicated that ageing and obesity are the factors for preceding the onset of BPH. No evidence for the role of testosterone (T) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is found in BPH initiation. Since BPH exclusively occurs in the transitional zone (TZ) surrounding the urethra, it is postulated that years of exposure to uncharacterized urinary toxins could disrupt the homeostasis of the stroma and/or epithelium of this prostatic zone that are typically occurring in ageing men. After cellular damage and subsequent inflammation generated, the intraprostatic DHT produced mainly from T by 5α-reductase promotes BPH development. Further, estrogens could take part in the nodular proliferation of stromal cells in some BPH patients. The confounding of BPH may attenuate the development of prostate tumor in the TZ. In conclusion, evidence in literature suggests that androgens are not etiological factors for BPH, and intraprostatic DHT along with chronic inflammation are mainly responsible for nodular proliferation of stromal and/or epithelial cells in prostatic TZ. The urinary factors for the etiology of BPH and BPH as a prediction of PCa progression still need further investigation.

Tamsulosin and Dutasteride Combination Therapy for Asian Men With Moderate-to-Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review of Clinical Considerations That Influence the Prescription.

The goal of combination therapy for moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) is to ease both the dynamic and static symptoms by using agents that have complementary mechanisms of action. Similar to prescribing other drugs, LUTS/BPH combination therapy has been affected by multiple factors. Previous qualitative research discussed the individual perspectives that influenced combination therapy administration. Yet, until recently, there has been limited interest in clinical reasons that physicians have to consider before prescribing LUTS/BPH combination treatment. This systematic review aimed to identify the clinical considerations that influence the decision to prescribe combination therapy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg + dutasteride 0.5 mg for Asian men with LUTS/BPH. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was performed in databases Medline, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception until January 2024 using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords with truncation for alternative acronyms. A citation search was performed to gather works of literature on LUTS/BPH combination treatment in addition to the "PICO" framework for search terms. Five English-language primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the narrative analysis using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist after critical appraisal. Several dosages of tamsulosin (0.2 mg and 0.4 mg) have been administered in LUTS/BPH combination treatment over the last few decades despite 0.2 mg tamsulosin being standardized as an effective regime in Asian countries. A remarkable correlation between prostate volume (PV) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was found in Asian men, which requires higher PSA secretion to enlarge each prostate unit and causes an increased risk of moderate-to-severe LUTS. Additionally, BPH baseline variables may lead to a different response to combination therapy, especially the PV and PSA differences. In conclusion, compared with Caucasian men, a significantly higher risk of moderate-to-severe LUTS was found in Asian men. Initiation of combination therapy, especially dutasteride, depends on a larger PV (≥ 30 mL); it is possible, therefore, that earlier PV and PSA examinations and baseline variables assessments ought to be performed by physicians before the combination therapy prescription. Alternative treatment options may be considered for a patient who prefers an active pattern of sexual activity during their BPH combined pharmacotherapy. These clinical considerations may influence the prescription of tamsulosin 0.4 mg + dutasteride 0.5 mg combination therapy for Asian men with moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024575528).

Comparative Analysis of Three Surgical Instruments in the Treatment of High Critical Enucleation of Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study to assess the effectiveness and safety of three different surgical instruments for enucleation in treating high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). These instruments include red laser, green laser, and plasma surgical equipment for enucleation of the prostate. METHOD: In a retrospective analysis, 237 patients diagnosed with high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) underwent prostate enucleation using three different groups of surgical instruments at the Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University. These groups included the red laser device group (n = 67), the green laser device group (n = 61), and the plasma device group (n = 109). The study evaluated changes in prostate mass, blood loss, operation time, and postoperative efficacy at 1- and 6-month intervals, as well as any associated complications. RESULTS: The red and green laser surgical instrument groups demonstrated superiority over the plasma group in several aspects. (1) Operation Time: *1* Red laser group: 87.9 ± 14.7 minutes; *1* Green laser group: 86.1 ± 15.3 minutes. (2) Blood Loss: *1* Red laser group: 30.1 ± 5.9 mL; *2*Green laser group: 30.9 ± 6.1 mL. (3) Temporary Urinary Incontinence: *1*Red laser group: 3 cases (4.48%); *2*Green laser group: 2 cases (3.28%). These differences were statistically significant. Additionally, postoperative indicators such as IPSS(International Prostate Prostate Symptom Score), QoL(Quality of Life), Q max(The Maximum Flow Rate), and RUV(Residual Urine Volume) showed significant improvement in all three groups compared to the preoperative state. CONCLUSION: Red laser, green laser and plasma surgical devices were safe and effective in the treatment of high critical benign prostatic hyperplasia; laser surgical devices showed better performance in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding and complications.

Clinical application of the UroLift® prostatic urethral lift in Spain: consensus on the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with urinary flow obstruction and secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an increasingly common pathology in the adult male. BPH increases after the age of 40-45 years, and its management consumes an enormous amount of resources. The UroLift® System is an approved technology designed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH and is used to perform the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) procedure. Various urology specialists in Spain with experience in PUL have prepared this consensus document. Endorsed by the Spanish Urology Association, its information is based on the most recent findings. The main objective of this document is to disseminate the consensus recommendations among all professionals treating patients with LUTS/BPH. Both primary care physicians and urologists can assess and offer PUL as an effective, minimally invasive treatment.