The potential role of lung microbiota and lauroylcarnitine in T-cell activation associated with checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal adverse event characterized by new pulmonary infiltrates in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This study aims to explore the interplay between lung microbiota, dysregulated metabolites, and host immunity in CIP. METHODS: We recruited thirteen hospitalized CIP patients, eleven idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, and ten new-onset non-small cell lung cancer patients. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The percentages of immune cells were determined using manual counting and flow cytometry. Interactions among microbiota, metabolites, and lymphocytes were analyzed using cultured mouse splenocytes and human T cells. FINDINGS: Proteobacteria emerged as the dominant phylum, notably abundant in both the CIP and IPF groups. Vibrio, Halomonas, Mangrovibacter, and Salinivibrio were the predominant microbiota because of their discriminative abundance patterns. Vibrio (r = 0.72, P-adj = 0.007) and Halomonas (r = 0.65, P-adj = 0.023) demonstrated strong correlations with lymphocytes. Vibrio metschnikovii and Mangrovibacter plantisponsors were more abundant in the CIP group than in the IPF group. Lauroylcarnitine, a key intermediary metabolite co-occurring with the predominant microbiota, exhibited a potent effect on cytokine secretion by mouse and human T cells, notably enhancing IFN-γ and TNF-α production from CD4 and CD8 cells in vitro. INTERPRETATION: Lauroylcarnitine, co-occurring with the predominant lung microbiota in CIP, could activate T cells in vitro. These findings suggest potential involvement of lung microbiota and acylcarnitine metabolism dysregulation in the pathogenesis of CIP. FUNDING: This work was supported by Peking University People's Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds (RDJ2022-15) and Provincial Key Clinical Specialty Capacity Building Project 2020 (Department of the Respiratory Medicine).

Phase I studies of davoceticept (ALPN-202), a PD-L1-dependent CD28 co-stimulator and dual PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitor, as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors (NEON-1 and NEON-2).

BACKGROUND: Davoceticept (ALPN-202) is an Fc fusion of a CD80 variant immunoglobulin domain designed to mediate programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-dependent CD28 co-stimulation while inhibiting the PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) checkpoints. The safety and efficacy of davoceticept monotherapy and davoceticept and pembrolizumab combination therapy in adult patients with advanced solid tumors were explored in NEON-1 and NEON-2, respectively. METHODS: In NEON-1 (n=58), davoceticept 0.001-10 mg/kg was administered intravenous either once weekly (Q1W) or once every 3 weeks (Q3W). In NEON-2 (n=29), davoceticept was administered intravenously at 2 dose levels (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg) Q1W or Q3W with pembrolizumab (400 mg once every 6 weeks). In both studies, primary endpoints included incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT); type, incidence, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities; and seriousness of AEs. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy assessed using RECIST v1.1, pharmacokinetics, anti-drug antibodies, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. RESULTS: The incidence of treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 67% (39/58) and 36% (21/58) with davoceticept monotherapy, and 62% (18/29) and 31% (9/29) with davoceticept and pembrolizumab combination, respectively. The incidence of ≥grade (Gr)3 TRAEs and ≥Gr3 irAEs was 12% (7/58) and 5% (3/58) with davoceticept monotherapy, and 24% (7/29) and 10% (3/29) with davoceticept and pembrolizumab combination, respectively. One DLT of Gr3 immune-related gastritis occurred during davoceticept monotherapy 3 mg/kg Q3W. During davoceticept combination with pembrolizumab, two Gr5 cardiac DLTs occurred; one instance each of cardiogenic shock (0.3 mg/kg Q3W, choroidal melanoma metastatic to the liver) and immune-mediated myocarditis (0.1 mg/kg Q3W, microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma), prompting early termination of both studies. Across both studies, five patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) exhibited evidence of clinical benefit (two partial response, three stable disease). CONCLUSIONS: Davoceticept was generally well tolerated as monotherapy at intravenous doses up to 10 mg/kg. Evidence of clinical activity was observed with davoceticept monotherapy and davoceticept in combination with pembrolizumab, notably in RCC. However, two fatal cardiac events occurred with the combination of low-dose davoceticept and pembrolizumab. Future clinical investigation with davoceticept should not consider combination with programmed death-1-inhibitor anticancer mechanisms, until its safety profile is more fully elucidated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NEON-1 (NCT04186637) and NEON-2 (NCT04920383).

Treatment-Switching Adjustment of Overall Survival in CheckMate 227 Part 1 Evaluating First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) evaluated first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% and no EGFR/ALK alterations. However, many patients randomized to chemotherapy received subsequent immunotherapy. Here, overall survival (OS) and relative OS benefit of nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab were adjusted for potential bias introduced by treatment switching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment-switching adjustment analyses were conducted following the NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Document 16, for CheckMate 227 Part 1 OS data from treated patients (database lock, July 2, 2019). Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used in the base-case analysis; other methods were explored as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Of 1166 randomized patients, 391 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 185 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab; 387 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 183 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received chemotherapy, with 29.3-month minimum follow-up. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 169/387 (43.7%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 66/183 (36.1%; PD-L1 < 1%) switched to immunotherapy poststudy. Among treated patients, median OS was 17.4 months with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus 14.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.95) in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup and 17.1 versus 12.4 months (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80) in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. After treatment-switching adjustment using IPCW, the HR (95% CI) for OS for nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was reduced to 0.68 (0.56-0.83; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 0.53 (0.40-0.69; PD-L1 < 1%). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the results. CONCLUSION: Treatment-switching adjustments resulted in a greater estimated relative OS benefit with first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors of high tumor mutational burden.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated overall survival benefit in multiple tumor types. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapies. This study evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab+ipilimumab in multiple tumor types based on TMB status evaluated using either tumor tissue (tTMB) or circulating tumor DNA in the blood (bTMB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors with high (≥10 mutations per megabase) tTMB (tTMB-H) and/or bTMB (bTMB-H) who were refractory to standard therapies were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab+ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy in an open-label, phase 2 study (CheckMate 848; NCT03668119). tTMB and bTMB were determined by the Foundation Medicine FoundationOne® CDx test and bTMB Clinical Trial Assay, respectively. The dual primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) in patients with tTMB-H and/or bTMB-H tumors treated with nivolumab+ipilimumab. RESULTS: In total, 201 patients refractory to standard therapies were randomized: 135 had tTMB-H and 125 had bTMB-H; 82 patients had dual tTMB-H/bTMB-H. In patients with tTMB-H, ORR was 38.6% (95% CI 28.4% to 49.6%) with nivolumab+ipilimumab and 29.8% (95% CI 17.3% to 44.9%) with nivolumab monotherapy. In patients with bTMB-H, ORR was 22.5% (95% CI 13.9% to 33.2%) with nivolumab+ipilimumab and 15.6% (95% CI 6.5% to 29.5%) with nivolumab monotherapy. Early and durable responses to treatment with nivolumab+ipilimumab were seen in patients with tTMB-H or bTMB-H. The safety profile of nivolumab+ipilimumab was manageable, with no new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors with TMB-H, as determined by tissue biopsy or by blood sample when tissue biopsy is unavailable, who have no other treatment options, may benefit from nivolumab+ipilimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03668119.

Pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis: Two patients' experiences.

Checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used to treat patients with gynecologic malignancies and can cause rare and unusual side effects, also known as immunotoxicities, that are rarely observed in patients receiving traditional immunotherapy. If these are not identified and treated, they can cause disability and even death for patients undergoing treatment. This report describes the range of pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis (MG) immunotoxicity through two cases. The first patient is an 85-year-old woman with recurrent vulvar carcinoma who completed two cycles of pembrolizumab. She had a severe presentation leading to respiratory failure. The second patient is an 80-year-old woman with recurrent serous endometrial carcinoma who developed isolated ocular myasthenia after her second cycle of pembrolizumab. The symptoms and physical examination findings described here illustrate the breadth of symptom severity associated with pembrolizumab-induced MG and importance of early identification and treatment to minimize symptoms and improve outcomes.

Multidisciplinary management of ulcerative colitis complicated by immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated colitis with life-threatening gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating various advanced malignant tumors. While most patients tolerate treatment well, several adverse drug reactions, such as fatigue, myelosuppression, and ICI-associated colitis, have been reported. CASE SUMMARY: This case involved a 57-year-old male patient with ulcerative colitis complicated by hepatocarcinoma who underwent treatment with tirelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) for six months. The treatment led to repeated life-threatening lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The patient received infliximab, vedolizumab, and other salvage procedures but ultimately required subtotal colectomy due to uncontrollable massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Currently, postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding has stopped, the patient's stool has turned yellow, and his full blood cell count has returned to normal. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the necessity of early identification, timely and adequate treatment of ICI-related colitis, and rapid escalation to achieve the goal of improving prognosis.

Outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the phase III randomised HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In the global, phase III HIMALAYA study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib; durvalumab was noninferior to sorafenib. HBV is the predominant HCC aetiology in most of Asia vs. HCV or nonviral aetiologies in Western countries and Japan. This analysis evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes for STRIDE and durvalumab monotherapy vs. sorafenib, in HIMALAYA participants enrolled in Asia, excluding Japan. METHODS: In HIMALAYA, participants were randomised to STRIDE, durvalumab, or sorafenib. The Asian subgroup in this analysis included participants enrolled in Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. OS, objective response rate (ORR; per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), and safety were assessed in the Asian subgroup and in an exploratory subgroup of participants in Hong Kong and Taiwan. RESULTS: The Asian subgroup included 479 participants randomised to STRIDE (n=156), durvalumab (n=167), or sorafenib (n=156). OS was improved for STRIDE vs. sorafenib (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89]). The OS HR for durvalumab vs. sorafenib was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-1.06). In Hong Kong and Taiwan (n=141), OS HRs for STRIDE vs. sorafenib and durvalumab vs. sorafenib were 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-1.08), respectively. In the Asian subgroup, ORR (including unconfirmed responses) was numerically higher for STRIDE (28.2%) and durvalumab (18.6%) vs. sorafenib (9.0%), and Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were numerically lower for STRIDE (19.9%) and durvalumab (13.3%) vs. sorafenib (30.5%). CONCLUSIONS: STRIDE improved outcomes vs. sorafenib in the Asian subgroup. These results support the benefits of STRIDE for participants with uHCC globally, including the Asia-Pacific region. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03298451 IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The global, phase III HIMALAYA study found that the STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) regimen improved overall survival (OS), including long-term OS, vs. sorafenib, and that durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there are differences in the aetiology and clinical practices related to HCC in parts of Asia, compared to Western countries and Japan, which could lead to differences in treatment outcomes between these regions. The results of this analysis demonstrate the benefits of STRIDE for participants in the Asia-Pacific region, consistent with the full, global study population. Overall, these findings continue to support the use of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.

Prophylactic IL-23 blockade uncouples efficacy and toxicity in dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), characterized by targeted inflammation, occur in up to 60% of patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Evidence proved that the baseline peripheral blood profiles of patients at risk for severe irAEs development paralleled clinical autoimmunity. Interleukin (IL)-23 blockade with risankizumab is recommended for cases that are suffering from autoimmune disease, such as autoimmune colitis. However, currently, the role of IL-23 in irAEs onset and severity remains poorly understood. METHODS: The pro-inflammatory cytokines most associated with severe irAEs onset were identified by retrospective analysis based on GSE186143 data set. To investigate the efficacy of prophylactic IL-23 blockade administration to prevent irAEs, refer to a previous study, we constructed two irAEs murine models, including dextran sulfate sodium salt (DSS)-induced colitis murine model and a combined-ICIs-induced irAEs murine model. To further explore the applicability of our findings, murine models with graft-versus-host disease were established, in which Rag2-/-Il2rg-/- mice were transferred with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and received combined cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) treatment. Human melanoma cells were xenografted into these mice concomitantly. RESULTS: Here we show that IL-23 was upregulated in the serum of patients suffering from irAEs after dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 treatment, and increased as a function of irAEs severity. Additionally, Augmented CD4+ Tems may preferentially underlie irAEs onset. Treating mice with anti-mouse IL-23 antibody concomitantly with combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 immunotherapy ameliorates colitis and, in addition, preserves antitumor efficacy. Moreover, in xenografted murine models with irAEs, prophylactic blockade of human IL-23 using clinically available IL-23 inhibitor (risankizumab) ameliorated colitis, hepatitis and lung inflammation, and moreover, immunotherapeutic control of tumors was retained. Finally, we also provided a novel machine learning-based computational framework based on two blood-based features-IL-23 and CD4+ Tems-that may have predictive potential for severe irAEs and ICIs response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study not only provides clinically feasible strategies to dissociate efficacy and toxicity in the use of combined ICIs for cancer immunotherapy, but also develops a blood-based biomarker that makes it possible to achieve a straightforward and non-invasive, detection assay for early prediction of irAEs onset.

Pneumonitis Incidence in Patients With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer on Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, often diagnosed at the advanced stage (metastatic). Treatment options for metastatic NSCLC include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, target drug therapy, and immunotherapy. Immunotherapy (utilization of checkpoint inhibitors) boosts the immune system to recognize and destroy cancer cells. However, it is often associated with immune-related complications such as pneumonitis. This review aims to determine the incidence of pneumonitis in metastatic NSCLC patients treated with different immunotherapy drugs. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were scoured for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until October 2023. Published RCTs with similar research objectives were included, while non-English articles, reviews, case reports, ongoing trials, non-randomized studies, conference abstracts, and studies on small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were excluded. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used to assess the risk of bias among the included studies. The statistical analyses were performed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The subgroup analysis of the 16 included RCTs showed that metastatic NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab and pembrolizumab had a higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis than those treated with atezolizumab (4.5% and 5.1% vs. 1.6%, respectively). Similarly, the incidence of grade ≥3 pneumonitis was higher among patients receiving nivolumab (1.3%) and pembrolizumab (2.4%) than those receiving atezolizumab (0.7%). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that patients with naive-treated NSCLC on immunotherapy had a higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis than those with previously treated NSCLC (6.5% vs. 3.9%). Treatment-naive patients recorded higher grade ≥3 pneumonitis incidences than those previously treated (3.1% vs. 1.3%). Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (i.e., pembrolizumab and nivolumab) have higher incidences of pneumonitis than programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors (atezolizumab).

Final Analysis of a Noninterventional Study on Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of the German Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors (IAG-N).

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany. INTERVENTIONS: Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment.

Zanzalintinib (XL092): a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor-comprehensive review of early safety & efficacy data.

INTRODUCTION: Zanzalintinib (XL092) is a next-generation anti-VEGFR-related multi-targeted TKI that exhibits immunomodulatory effects. AREAS COVERED: This review explores preclinical and clinical data, along with the future directions associated with zanzalintinib and its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). EXPERT OPINION: In addition to its anti-VEGFR activity, zanzalintinib demonstrates potential synergistic effects with ICIs through its immunomodulatory impact, attributed to its inhibition of MET and TAM kinases. Recent preclinical studies provide compelling evidence supporting this synergistic potential. Furthermore, a recent phase 1 dose escalation study confirmed the tolerability of the zanzalintinib and anti-PDL1 combination without major safety concerns.Multiple ongoing clinical trials are investigating the combination of zanzalintinib and ICIs across various solid tumor types, including phase 3 studies for renal cell carcinoma, colorectal, and head and neck cancer. These trials aim to elucidate the therapeutic role of this new-generation TKI and ICI combination.However, the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers for the zanzalintinib and ICI combination presents significant challenges. Given the intricate nature of their mechanistic rationale and the difficulties in identifying reliable biomarkers for combined anti-angiogenesis and ICI therapies, addressing this challenge remains a priority for ongoing and future research.

Extracellular vesicles miR-574-5p and miR-181a-5p as prognostic markers in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although patient survival is still unsatisfactory. Accurate predictive markers capable of personalizing the treatment of patients with NSCLC are still lacking. Circulating extracellular vesicles involved in cell-to-cell communications through miRNAs (EV-miRs) transfer are promising markers. Plasma from 245 patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab as second-line therapy was collected and analyzed. EV-miRnome was profiled on 174/245 patients by microarray platform, and selected EV-miRs were validated by qPCR. A prognostic model combining EV-miR and clinical variables was built using stepwise Cox regression analysis and tested on an independent patient cohort (71/245). EV-PD-L1 gene copy number was assessed by digital PCR. For 54 patients with disease control, EV-miR changes at best response versus baseline were investigated by microarray and validated by qPCR. EV-miRNome profiling at baseline identified two EV-miRs (miR-181a-5p and miR-574-5p) that, combined with performance status, are capable of discriminating patients unlikely from those that are likely to benefit from immunotherapy (median overall survival of 4 months or higher than 9 months, respectively). EV-PD-L1 digital evaluation reported higher baseline copy number in patients at increased risk of mortality, without improving the prognostic score. Best response EV-miRNome profiling selected six deregulated EV-miRs (miR19a-3p, miR-20a-5p, miR-142-3p, miR-1260a, miR-1260b, and miR-5100) in responding patients. Their longitudinal monitoring highlighted a significant downmodulation already in the first treatment cycles, which lasted more than 6 months. Our results demonstrate that EV-miRs are promising prognostic markers for NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

Clinical outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with uncommon driver gene alterations.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon driver alterations in genes such as ERBB2, BRAF, RET, and MET. This study retrospectively assessed ICI-combination therapy outcomes in this molecular subset of NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC confirmed with driver alterations in genes including ERBB2, BRAF, RET or MET, and received ICI combined with chemotherapy (ICI + chemo) and/or targeted therapy (ICI + chemo/TT) as first-line (1L) or second- or third-line (≥ 2L) treatment at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and May 2024. RESULTS: Of the 181 patients included in the study, 131 patients received 1L-ICI + chemo (ERBB2, n = 64; BRAF, n = 34; RET, n = 23; and MET, n = 10), and 50 patients received ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT (ERBB2, n = 16; BRAF, n = 7; RET, n = 14; MET, n = 13). The full cohort had an overall response rate (ORR) of 45.9% and disease control rate of 84.0%. Among patients who received 1L-ICI + chemo, ORR ranged between 51.6% and 60.0%, with the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) of 8.2 and 21.0 months for those with ERBB2-altered tumors, 10.0 and 15.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 12.1 months and OS not reached for RET-altered tumors, and 6.2 and 28.0 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. Additionally, ORR ranged between 14.3% and 30.8% for ≥ 2L-ICI + chemo/TT; mPFS and mOS were 5.4 and 16.2 months for patients with ERBB2-altered tumors, 2.7 and 5.0 months for BRAF-altered tumors, 6.2 and 14.3 months for RET-altered tumors, and 5.7 and 11.5 months for MET-altered tumors, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICI-based combination therapies, regardless of treatment line, were effective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver alterations in ERBB2, BRAF, RET, or MET. This suggests their potential as alternative treatment options in this patient population.

Cyclin dependent kinase 9 inhibition reduced programmed death-ligand 1 expression and improved treatment efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody is a standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor expression of PD-L1 can be induced upon stimulus. Because cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibition reduces the expression of inducible proteins, we explored the influence of CDK9 inhibition on PD-L1 expression in HCC cells. We found that PD-L1 expression was low in HCC cells; however, IFN-γ treatment increased this expression. CDK9 inhibitors AZD4573 and atuveciclib reduced the IFN-γ induced PD-L1 expression in a dose-dependent manner. CDK9 knockdown yielded similar results, but CDK9 overexpression reversed the influence of the CDK9 inhibitors. In the orthotopic mouse model, mice treated with a CDK9 inhibitor and an anti-PD-L1 antibody had significantly smaller tumors and exhibited longer survival than mice treated with either agent. In conclusion, CDK9 inhibition could reduce the expression of PD-L1 in HCC cells. Using both CDK9 inhibitors and anti-PD-L1 antibodies is more effective than using either agent alone.

A case of rapidly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus without islet autoantibodies developed over two years after the first dose of nivolumab.

The case was an 80-year-old Japanese man. He was diagnosed with right renal cell carcinoma when he was 74. After laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, the patient received interferon, sorafenib, axitinib, and nivolumab therapy. The patient developed rapid progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) after 46 courses of nivolumab monotherapy (772 days from the first nivolumab treatment). Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody, islet cell cytoplasmic antibody, islet cell antigen-2 antibody, insulin antibody, and zinc transporter 8 antibody were all negative. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing showed DRB1*09:01, DRB1 *13:02, DQB1*03:03, and DQB1 *06:04. Multiple daily insulin injections were started. However, controlling his blood glucose by standard multiple daily insulin injection treatments was difficult. The patient survived more than two years after the onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated DM (ICI-DM). This is a valuable report of late-onset ICI-DM with a detailed patient background and clinical course over two years after the first dose of nivolumab.

Comparative analysis of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Whether immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus ICI combination therapy or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy is useful for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT) remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effects and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) associated with ICI-based combination therapy in 36 patients with advanced RCC with IVCTT. RESULTS: The median age at initiation of treatment was 71 years; the IVCTT stages were cT3b in 22 patients and cT3c in 14. The ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI groups comprised 15 and 21 patients, respectively. Median tumor shrinkage at the best response showed that the primary tumor diameter decreased by 1.8 cm (22%), and the IVCTT height decreased by 1.5 cm (26%). A higher proportion of patients in the ICI-TKI group experienced tumor shrinkage than those in the ICI-ICI group (primary tumor, p = 0.0325; IVCTT, p = 0.0112). Approximately 27% of patients experienced an increase in the IVCTT height with ICI-ICI combination therapy. No significant difference was observed in the relative tumor shrinkage of IVCTT, primary or level-down staging of IVCTT, other treatment effects, incidence of TRAEs, surgical outcomes, or prognosis between the groups. CONCLUSION: ICI-based combination therapy is effective against IVCTT and primary RCC. Although ICI-ICI is associated with a higher probability of tumor growth compared with ICI-TKI in the frequency of tumor regression, both therapies may be almost equally effective against primary RCC with IVCTT.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy is effective in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effect of first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy for advanced G/GEJ cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to December 2021. Randomized trials comparing ICI plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer were included. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Analyses were performed in Stata 14.0 software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022300907. Results: Five trials were included for analysis, involving 2, 814 patients. ICI plus chemotherapy can significantly improve OS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.94; P = .002), PFS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; P ＜ .001) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% CI 1.11-1.30; P < .001). In safety analyses, there were no significant differences in incidence of all AEs, treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), TRAE of grade 3 or higher, serious TRAE and TRAE leading to death between two arms (P > .05). Conclusions: ICI plus chemotherapy is more effective first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer in contrast to chemotherapy regrading to improving OS, PFS and ORR, without increasing TRAE risk. This study will redefine the role of ICI in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting for G/GEJ cancer, and provide reference for clinical treatment.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Guillain Barre Syndrome: A Single-Institution Case Report and Narrative Review.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) resulting from the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is relatively uncommon but has been reported. Herein, we discuss a case of a 67-year-old patient who received neoadjuvant ICI for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and then presented with lower extremity weakness and areflexia, progressing to respiratory muscle and upper extremity weakness. Given the increasing use of ICI in cancer management, awareness of neurological autoimmune side effects is essential. ICI-mediated GBS can be severe and fatal if not diagnosed promptly. We discuss a case of ICI-induced GBS and review literature on current management approaches.

The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women, however mortality in the US and EU are recently declining in parallel with the gradual cut of smoking prevalence. Consequently, the relative frequency of adenocarcinoma increased while that of squamous and small cell carcinomas declined. During the last two decades a plethora of targeted drug therapies have appeared for the treatment of metastasizing non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Personalized oncology aims to precisely match patients to treatments with the highest potential of success. Extensive research is done to introduce biomarkers which can predict the effectiveness of a specific targeted therapeutic approach. The EGFR signaling pathway includes several sufficient targets for the treatment of human cancers including NSCLC. Lung adenocarcinoma may harbor both activating and resistance mutations of the EGFR gene, and further, mutations of KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. Less frequent but targetable genetic alterations include ALK, ROS1, RET gene rearrangements, and various alterations of MET proto-oncogene. In addition, the importance of anti-tumor immunity and of tumor microenvironment has become evident recently. Accumulation of mutations generally trigger tumor specific immune defense, but immune protection may be upregulated as an aggressive feature. The blockade of immune checkpoints results in potential reactivation of tumor cell killing and induces significant tumor regression in various tumor types, such as lung carcinoma. Therapeutic responses to anti PD1-PD-L1 treatment may correlate with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells. Due to the wide range of diagnostic and predictive features in lung cancer a plenty of tests are required from a single small biopsy or cytology specimen, which is challenged by major issues of sample quantity and quality. Thus, the efficacy of biomarker testing should be warranted by standardized policy and optimal material usage. In this review we aim to discuss major targeted therapy-related biomarkers in NSCLC and testing possibilities comprehensively.

Management and treatment of severe immune-related hepatotoxicity based on clinical and pathological characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The management of severe immune-related hepatotoxicity (irH) needs to be further optimized. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics of severe irH; improve the therapeutic strategy, especially salvage treatment in steroid-refractory irH; and determine the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi)-rechallenge. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who developed severe irH and those without irH after immunotherapy between May 2019 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was used to match these two cohorts with similar baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Among 5,326 patients receiving ICPis, 51 patients developed severe irH. irH occurred after a median duration of 36 days and a median of two doses after the first ICPi administration. Patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors faced a lower risk of developing severe irH. A higher dose of glucocorticoids (GCS) was administered to grade 4 irH than grade 3 irH. For steroid-sensitive patients, grade 4 irH individuals received a higher dosage of GCS than those with grade 3 irH, with no difference in time to resolution. Meanwhile, a significantly higher dose of GCS plus immunosuppression was needed in the steroid-refractory group. Liver biopsy of the steroid-refractory patients exhibited heterogeneous histological features. Twelve patients were retreated with ICPi. No irH reoccurred after a median follow-up of 9.3 months. CONCLUSION: irH requires multidimensional evaluation. PD-L1 inhibitors correlated with a lower risk of severe irH. Grade 4 irH demands a higher dose of GCS than recommended. Pathology may guide the salvage treatment for steroid-refractory irH. ICPi rechallenge in severe irH is feasible and safe.