Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Multiple Valvular Heart Disease: Outcomes and Insights on Combined Aortic Insufficiency and Mitral Regurgitation.

The presence of concomitant aortic insufficiency (AI) and mitral regurgitation (MR) is common and may further accelerate cardiac dysfunction. However, there exists no United States regulatory approved transcatheter device for the treatment AI. The effectiveness of isolated transcatheter mitral therapy in this population is not well understood, thus we aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients with combined AI and MR in comparison to isolated MR that underwent mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (m-TEER). Retrospective data were obtained from Northwell m-TEER registry. A total of 587 patients that underwent m-TEER at four high volume TAVR/TEER centers within the Northwell Health system were included. All patients had severe MR and were divided into two groups: Group 1 with ≥ 3+ AI (AI+) and the Group 2 with <3+ AI (AI-). Echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at 1 month. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at one month and 1 year. The primary endpoint was death or re-hospitalization at 1 year. 587 patients were included in the study, 92 in the AI+ group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Approximately two-thirds of patients in the AI+ group demonstrated an improvement in AI severity after isolated mitral therapy. There was no difference in the primary outcome at 1 month or 1 year. There was also no significant difference in NYHA functional class at 1 month between groups. In conclusion, patients that underwent m-TEER with combined MR and AI (AI+) fared well in comparison to isolated mitral valve dysfunction (AI-), with no discernible differences in survival, NYHA class, or re-hospitalization rates at 1 month or 1 year. Hence, isolated m-TEER is a reasonable treatment approach in patients with a high surgical risk with combined AI and MR.

Exercise testing in patients with tricuspid regurgitation undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has shown promising results with persistent reduction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and improvements in functional class and quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact of TTVI on maximal and submaximal exercise capacity (SEC). METHODS: Constant work-rate exercise-time (CWRET) testing reflects SEC, which is more likely to be relevant for daily life activities and provides more differentiated physiological insight into the nature of exercise intolerance. Thus, 30 patients undergoing TTVI (21 direct annuloplasty and 9 edge-to-edge repair) received cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and CWRET (at 75% of maximum work rate in the initial CPET) before and 3 months after TTVI. RESULTS: Patients' age was 80.5 [74.8-82.3] years and 53.3% were female. TR reduction ≥ 2 grades was achieved in 93.3% (TR grade ≤ moderate in 83.3%). Echocardiography revealed improved right ventricular (RV) characteristics with decreased RV basal diameter (47.0 mm [43.0-54.3] vs. 41.5 mm [36.8-48.0]; p < 0.001) and decreased inferior caval vein diameter. CWRET testing showed a significantly improved SEC (246.5 s [153.8-416.8] vs. 338.5 s [238.8-611.8] p = 0.001). Maximum oxygen uptake showed a positive trend without statistically significant differences (9.9 ml/min/kg [8.6-12.4] vs. 11.7 ml/min/kg [9.7-13.3]; p = 0.31). In contrast to the six-minute-walking distance (6MWD), SEC correlated moderately with effective regurgitation orifice area reduction (r = 0.385; p = 0.036), increased cardiac output (r = 0.378; p = 0.039), and improved QOL (r = 387; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Improvements in exercise capacity after TTVI mainly occur in the submaximal rather than in the maximal exercise range and correlate with hemodynamic effects and QOL. This may have a methodological impact on assessment of exercise capacity in these patients.

Cerebral Embolic Protection: Is There a Benefit for Left Atrial and Mitral Valve Procedures?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to highlight the current evidence on the use of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) in left atrial and transcatheter mitral valve procedures. It also aims to summarize the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing such procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Ischemic stroke is one of the most devastating complications of structural heart procedures. The manifestation of periprocedural stroke can range from asymptomatic and detectable only through brain imaging to major stroke with neurological deficits. CEP devices were initially developed to mitigate the risk of stroke associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the efficacy of such devices during different cardiac interventions is yet to be fully demonstrated, especially in left atrial appendage closure (LAAO), and mitral valve interventions. Few studies demonstrated that the risk of periprocedural strokes after LAAO and mitral valve interventions is not negligible and is highest during the periprocedural period and then falls. The majority of patients undergoing those procedures have cerebral ischemic injuries detected on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Moreover, a reasonable number of those patients had debris embolization on the filters of the CEPD. Pharmacological therapy with antithrombotic agents before, during, or after structural heart interventions is crucial and should be tailored to each patient's risk of bleeding and ischemia. Close monitoring that includes a full neurological assessment and frequent follow-up visits with cardiac echocardiography are important. The risk of periprocedural stroke in left atrial and transcatheter mitral valve procedures is not negligible. Pharmacological therapy with antithrombotic agents before, during, or after structural heart interventions is important to mitigate the risk of stroke, especially the long-term risk. More prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy of CEPD in such procedures.

Is there an obesity paradox in cardiovascular outcomes for patients undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair? A pilot meta-analysis.

Background: The impact of body mass index (BMI) on Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) outcomes remains uncertain, with studies showing conflicting results. Some suggest an 'obesity paradox' exists, favoring better outcomes for obese patients and worse outcomes for underweight patients, while others report no significant impact of BMI. Methodology: We systematically searched major databases for studies on baseline BMI and post-procedural outcomes in TEER patients. Patients were grouped by BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with risk ratios (RRs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) as effect measures. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Our study, analyzing five observational studies with 7580 obese and 74,717 non-obese patients, found no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the groups (RR: 0.85; p = 0.427). Subgroup analysis indicated a higher mortality risk for underweight patients compared to overweight (RR: 1.48; p = 0.006) and obese patients (RR: 1.40; p = 0.036), though the difference between underweight and normal-weight patients was not significant (RR: 1.18; p = 0.216). The risks of myocardial infarction (RR: 1.10; p = 0.592) and stroke (RR: 0.43; p = 0.166) were also similar between obese and non-obese patients. Conclusions: In conclusion, our analysis found no significant difference in in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke risk between obese and non-obese patients undergoing TEER. However, underweight patients may have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared to overweight and obese individuals, highlighting the potential impact of BMI on outcomes in TEER patients.

Outcomes of mitral transcatheter edge to edge repair with MitraClip™ - An Indian single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip™ (Abbott Vascular) in symptomatic high surgical risk Indian patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: Patients with moderately severe or severe primary or secondary MR and deemed high surgical risk were treated with MitraClip™. The data were collected retrospectively from medical records. The primary outcome was technical success, and secondary outcomes were ≤2+ MR reduction and improvement in functional capacity at 30 days. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and August 2023, 64 patients were treated with MitraClipTM. The mean age was 70.0 ± 12.1 years and 64 % were males. The mean EuroScore II and STS score predicted mortality for mitral valve repair were 5.8 ± 4.5 % and 4.0 ± 3.8 % respectively. MR etiology was primary in 56.3 %, secondary in 40.6 % and mixed in 3.1 %. The device was implanted successfully in all but one patient with technical success rate of 98.4 %. The average number of clips per patient was 1.5 ± 0.6 and 42.2 % patients received more than one clip. The mean mitral valve gradient was 3.5 ± 1.6 mmHg. The MR severity of ≤2+ was achieved in 91.8 % of the subjects and similar proportion were in New York Heart Association Functional Class I or II at 30 days. CONCLUSION: In high-risk Indian patients with symptomatic significant MR, TEER with MitraClip™ was achieved with a high technical success rate. It was associated with significant reduction in MR severity and improvement in functional capacity in >90 % of the subjects.

Impact of Renal and Liver Function on Clinical Outcomes Following Tricuspid Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: The TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Venous congestion due to TR may lead to end-organ dysfunction and failure. The potential to reverse or stop further deterioration in end-organ function is an important goal of treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine changes in end-organ function after tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and assess the association of baseline end-organ function with heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and mortality. METHODS: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to either the TEER group (TriClip System + medical therapy) or control group (medical therapy alone). Laboratory assessments and TR grading were performed at baseline and at all follow-up visits (discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months). An independent echocardiography core laboratory assessed TR severity and an independent clinical events committee adjudicated adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 572 subjects were enrolled and randomized (285 TEER, 287 control patients). Patients with moderate-to-severe end-organ impairment (estimated glomerular ejection fraction [eGFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding INR [MELD-XI] >15) at baseline had increased incidence of HF hospitalization and death through 12 months, regardless of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between TEER and control patients in eGFR or MELD-XI at 12 months. In subgroup analyses examining only successful TEER patients (moderate or less TR at discharge) compared with control patients, as well as when censoring patients with normal baseline values, both eGFR (+3.55 ± 1.04 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 0.07 ± 1.10 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.022) and MELD-XI (-0.52 ± 0.18 vs 0.34 ± 0.18; P = 0.0007) improved. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline end-organ function was associated with HF hospitalization and death in patients with severe TR. At 12 months, eGFR and MELD-XI scores were not statistically significantly different between the overall TEER and control groups. In patients who had successful TEER, statistically significant, yet small, favorable changes occurred for both eGFR and MELD-XI. Further investigation is needed to assess whether these changes in end-organ function after successful TEER are clinically meaningful and reduce HF hospitalization or death. (Clinical Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients Treated With the Tricuspid Valve Repair System Pivotal [TRILUMINATE Pivotal]; NCT03904147).

Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation: From Diagnosis to Current Interventional Therapies.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most common valvular pathologies worldwide, contributing to the morbidity and mortality of several cardiovascular pathologies, including heart failure (HF). Novel transcatheter treatment for MR has given the opportunity for a safe and feasible alternative, to surgery, in order to repair the valve and improve patient outcomes. However, after the results of early transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) trials, it has become evident that subcategorizing the mitral regurgitation etiology and the left ventricular function, in patients due to undergo TEER, is of the essence, in order to predict responsiveness to treatment and select the most appropriate patient phenotype. Thus, a novel MR phenotype, atrial functional MR (AFMR), has been recently recognized as a distinct pathophysiological entity, where the etiology of the regurgitation is secondary to annular dilatation, in a diseased left atrium, with preserved left ventricular function. Recent studies have evaluated and compared the outcomes of TEER in AFMR with ventricular functional MR (VFMR), with the results favoring the AFMR. In specific, TEER in this patient substrate has better echocardiographic and long-term outcomes. Thus, our review will provide a comprehensive pathogenesis and mechanistic overview of AFMR, insights into the echocardiographic approach of such patients and pre-procedural planning, discuss the most recent clinical trials and their implications for future treatment directions, as well as highlight future frontiers of research in the setting of TEER and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) in AFMR patients.

Impact of systolic dominant pulmonary venous flow morphology on outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of intraprocedural pulsed-wave Doppler analysis of pulmonary venous flow (PVF) during mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains understudied. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of systolic dominant-PVF (SD-PVF) morphology post-TEER. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis from December 2019 to December 2022, patients undergoing mitral TEER were categorized into SD-PVF and systolic blunting (SB)-PVF groups based on post-TEER morphology. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization at 1 year. We investigated the association of PVF morphology post-TEER with the primary endpoint at 1 year using Cox regression and compared the prognostic accuracy of PVF variables through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Among 187 patients (mean age 76.4 ± 10.5 years, 51.3% primary etiology), residual mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤mild was observed in 147 (82.4%) patients and 105 (56.2%) had SD-PVF post-TEER. Patients with SD-PVF had a lower incidence of >2+ residual MR after clip deployment, at 30 days (2.1% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.005) and at 1 year (1.4% vs. 9%; p = 0.08). SD-PVF post-TEER was independently associated with the primary endpoint (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.87; p = 0.009). ROC curve analysis of the prognostic accuracy of SD-PVF demonstrated an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI = 0.54-0.73), comparable to other quantitative measures of PVF. CONCLUSION: Assessing PVF morphology after clip deployment offers a simple prognostic tool for patients undergoing mitral TEER. Multicenter cohorts will be necessary to further investigate its prognostic value.

Acute type B aortic dissection following transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair: a case report.

Background: Transoesophageal echocardiography is rarely reported as a possible cause of aortic dissection during the transcatheter edge-to-edge repair procedure. Herein, we present a case of type B aortic dissection following the transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair procedure, most likely related to the transoesophageal echocardiography probe. Case summary: A 68-year-old Chinese man complained of exertional dyspnoea lasting over 2 years and had been diagnosed with severe mitral regurgitation. He was admitted to our hospital for the treatment of severe mitral regurgitation with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. One MitraClip XTR (Abbott Vascular) was successfully implanted under the guidance of active transoesophageal echocardiography, and the mitral regurgitation became trace. However, the patient complained of persistent back pain after the treatment, and computed tomography angiography revealed a type B aortic dissection in the descending aorta. After 2 weeks of unsuccessful conservative treatment, he successfully underwent endovascular stenting and was discharged from the hospital. The patient recovered well and remained event free during the 6-month follow-up. Discussion: Herein, we presented a rare complication following transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair that was most likely related to the transoesophageal echocardiography probe-type B aortic dissection. We postulated that repetitive flexion of the transoesophageal echocardiography probe led to compression-induced injury to the descending aorta wall at the mid-oesophageal level, which was the most probable aetiology of type B aortic dissection. Although this complication is rare, it is potentially fatal and therefore needs attention.

Tricuspid regurgitation and heart failure: the fate of treated vs. untreated cohort in the percutaneous era.

Aims: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with heart failure (HF) and reduced survival. Within a short-time period, transcatheter tricuspid valve repair or replacement (TTVR/TTVr) for TR has evolved from innovation to clinical reality. The present study's aim is to provide 1-year results between TR patients treated with TTVR and TTVr compared with untreated patients, in terms of cardiac survival, rehospitalization, right-side HF symptom development, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) improvement. Methods and results: Seventy-seven patients (pts) have been prospectively inserted into a dedicated database from January 2020 till January 2023. Twenty-six patients (33.8%) have been treated with TTVR/r [treated group (TG)], and 51 pts (66.2%) have been left untreated with medical therapy optimization [untreated group (UNTG)]. Analysing the cardiac death between the two groups, there was a significant statistical difference since TG has less incidence of exitus in the general population (P = 0.05). Concerning HF hospitalization, TG has a lower incidence with a P = 0.005. In TG, there was a significant improvement in NYHA class at follow-up (FUP) (P = 0.001) as well as an improvement in right-side HF symptoms (P = 0.001). Conclusion: This study shows that treatment in the case of TR with right-side HF has a positive impact on cardiac death and HF hospitalization at 1 year. And there is a significant improvement in clinical and echocardiographic status at FUP in the TG.

Iatrogenic atrial septal defects in structural heart interventions: Opening the Pandora's box.

In the modern era of structural heart interventions, the total number of transseptal procedures is growing exponentially, thus increasing the rate and need for management of iatrogenic atrial septal defects (iASDs). To date, there are no official guidelines on the assessment and management of iASDs, due to inconclusive evidence on whether patients benefit more from the percutaneous closure of iASD than from conservative management and vigorous follow-up. Despite the abundance of observational studies on iASDs, there is still a lack of randomized studies. Evidence so far show that percutaneous closure is no superior over conservative treatment in patients with iASDs, however, it has been demonstrated that patients with spontaneous closure of iASDs experience less heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. On the other hand, researchers have investigated the beneficial nature of interatrial shunt therapy in patients with HFpEF and, more recently, with HFrEF, due to the presumed hemodynamic benefits. Herein, we provide an updated review of relevant literature, focusing on iASD persistence rates, predicting factors for their persistence, and clinical outcomes of iASD persistence, to summarize available evidence and discuss future directions in the field.

Robustness of tricuspid regurgitation reduction at 1 year following edge-to-edge repair for primary tricuspid regurgitation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Within recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, for primary TR, data on the robustness and durability of TR reduction 1 year following T-TEER is limited. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated with T-TEER for TR at two high-volume centers between September 2018 and December 2022 were enrolled in a registry. Primary TR was defined as tricuspid valve (TV) prolapse or flail TV leaflets as assessed by pre- and peri-interventional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). RESULTS: 201 patients were included in this analysis, of whom 27 (13.4%) were classified as primary TR and 174 (86.6%) as TR of secondary origin. All-cause mortality during 1-year follow-up was reached by 50 patients (24.9%) [primary: 7 (25.9%), secondary: 43 (24.7%)], and 151 (75.1%) completed follow-up with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Patients' median age was 80 (76-83) years, 112 (55.7%) were female and 181 (90.1%) reported a New-York heart association functional class (NYHA-FC) of III or IV. The remaining baseline clinical and echocardiographic parameters were comparable between the groups, but secondary TR patients had a significantly higher TRI-SCORE (5 (4-8) vs. 7 (5-14), P = 0.010). In both groups, an immediate reduction of TR-Grade post-intervention was observed. This reduction was sustained at follow-up with 80.0% of the primary TR patients classified as moderate or less and 61.8% of the secondary TR patients. This translated to a significant improvement of NHYA-FC in both groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no differences regarding rates for all-cause mortality between the groups (P < 0.99). CONCLUSION: T-TEER achieves a robust TR reduction in primary TR patients 1 year after intervention with noninferior clinical results to treatment for secondary TR with regards to mortality, re-hospitalization, and NYHA-FC.

Mismatch Between Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Left Atrial Pressure Predicts Prognosis After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism and impact of mismatch between residual mitral regurgitation (MR) and postprocedural left atrial pressure (LAP) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), which may adversely affect clinical outcome, is of great interest. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the effect of hemodynamic mismatch after TEER on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure due to severe MR and investigate the predictive factors for the mismatch using a prospective multicenter registry. METHODS: We categorized 1,477 patients into optimal (residual MR grade ≤1 and postprocedural LAP ≤15 mm Hg), mismatched (residual MR grade >1 or postprocedural LAP >15 mm Hg), and poor (residual MR grade >1 and postprocedural LAP >15 mm Hg) groups and examined their prognosis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS: There were 927 (62.7%), 459 (31.1%), and 91 (6.2%) patients categorized into optimal, mismatched, and poor groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis, referenced to the optimal group, revealed that the mismatched and poor groups exhibited a higher risk for the primary endpoint (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.28-1.88; and HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.38-2.74, respectively). Six risk factors were identified as predictors of hemodynamic mismatch after TEER: body mass index, baseline left atrial volume index, atrial fibrillation, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion value, preprocedural mean left atrial pressure, and postprocedural mean mitral valve pressure gradient. CONCLUSIONS: Post-TEER hemodynamic mismatch between residual MR and postprocedural LAP was associated with a poor prognosis. Six readily accessible perioperative parameters predict the hemodynamic mismatch. (OCEAN-Mitral registry; UMIN000023653).

Impact of residual mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in atrial functional mitral regurgitation: Results from MITRA-PRO registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged to address symptomatic atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR) in patients who are at high operative risk. AIMS: No clinical data is available on the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) following TEER in aFMR compared to ventricular functional MR (vFMR). METHODS: In the MITRA-PRO registry, 846 patients with FMR and MitraScore assessment for residual MR quantification were included (722 patients with vFMR and 124 patients with aFMR). RESULTS: Compared to vFMR similar procedural results in regard of residual MR following TEER were found in aFMR patients (MitraScore post TEER 2.5 ± 1.8 vs. 2.7 ± 1.9), while the amount of implanted TEER devices was increased in vFMR. 1-year survival was better in aFMR compared to vFMR regardless of relevant residual MR (MitraScore ≥ 4), while 1-year rehospitalization was comparable for both MR entities. Patients with aFMR and mild residual MR had a lower mortality rate (6.6% vs. 10.3%) and rehospitalization rate (29.1% vs. 46.2%) 1 year after mitral TEER. However, in contrast to vFMR a MitraScore ≥4 was no independent predictor of mortality in aFMR indicating a better tolerance toward residual MR. CONCLUSIONS: Residual MR is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality in vFMR patients, whereas in aFMR patients, a MitraScore of ≥4 is associated with higher mortality but is not an independent predictor in multivariate analysis. Therefore, minimizing MR through mitral TEER is crucial for survival in vFMR patients, while aFMR patients tolerate significant residual MR better 1 year after the procedure.