RESUMO
PURPOSE: Differentiating subtalar and ankle instability in the clinical setting is challenging. This study aims to analyze the rotational laxity of the subtalar joint bilaterally in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic ankle instability under simulated load and stress-induced position of the subtalar joint. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted using an adjustable load device (ALD). Patients with chronic ankle instability and healthy volunteers were included. Each subject underwent a CT scan under mechanical stress and simulated weight-bearing conditions, maintaining maximum eversion and inversion hindfoot positions. The images were obtained in a single model, allowing calculations of the motion vector as well as the helical axis. The helical axis was defined by a rotation angle and a translation distance. RESULTS: A total of 72 feet were included in the study. Thirty-one patients with unilateral symptoms and five healthy controls were selected, defining two groups: symptomatic (n = 31) and asymptomatic (n = 41). An absolute difference of 4.6º (95%CI 2-11.1) rotation angle was found on the helical axis of the symptomatic vs. asymptomatic group (p = 0.001). No significant differences were detected in the translation distance (n.s.) between the groups. Additionally, a significant positive correlation was found between the rotation angle and translation distance through the helical axis in the asymptomatic group (r = 0.397, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic ankle instability suspected of having subtalar joint instability showed a wider subtalar range of laxity in terms of rotation about the helical axis. Furthermore, differences in kinematics between symptomatic and asymptomatic hindfeet was demonstrated when both feet were compared. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Determining the treatment of subtalar joint (STJ) instability requires a better understanding of the biomechanical principles underlying the condition and, a proper diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze "in vivo" the range of motion of the subtalar joint (STJ) measured on two (2D) and three dimensions (3D) image-based on CT Scan using an original device that maintains a simulated weightbearing. The secondary goal was to correlate the 2D and 3D measurement. METHODS: An observational study was conducted, using an original Dynamic Simulated Weightbearing Device. Asymptomatic ankles were included. Each subject underwent a CT scan under mechanical stress and simulated weightbearing conditions, maintaining maximum eversion and inversion hindfoot positions. The images were obtained, combining both inversion and eversion positions in a single model, which allows for to calculation of the motion vector as well as the helical axis. The helical axis (rotation angle and translation distance), subtalar tilt, anterior drawer, and, subtalar and calcaneocuboid uncoverage were the determinations. RESULTS: Forty asymptomatic ankles were included. The average range of motion of the STJ amounts to 31.5° ± 9.1° of rotation and 1.56 ± 0.8 mm of translation distance. The anterior drawer and subtalar uncoverage variables were statistically significantly related to each other (r = 0.57; P = 0.00001). However, these 2-D measured variables were not related to kinematic measures of rotation through the helical axis (3D) (p = 0.14; p = 0.19) CONCLUSIONS: The average range of motion of the STJ amounts to 31.5° ± 9.1° of rotation and 1.56 ± 0.8 mm of translation distance. We found no significant correlation between 2D and 3D measurements. In our opinion, the rotation angle and translation distance should be considered the most accurate measurements and should be calculated on every STJ instability for comparison with the asymptomatic population LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Observational study.
