Relato de caso de lombalgia inflamatória com extenso comprometimento anatômico-funcional: a importância de uma adequada abordagem da dor lombar na Atenção Primária à Saúde / Case report of inflammatory low back pain with extensive anatomical-functional impairment: The importance of an adequate approach to low back pain in Primary Care / Presentación de un caso de lumbalgia inflamatoria con afectación anatómico-funcional extensa: La importancia de un abordaje adecuado de la lumbalgia en Atención Primaria de Salud

Introdução: A lombalgia é uma condição prevalente e que apresenta importante impacto na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida, sendo a sua correta abordagem na Atenção Primária à Saúde fundamental para a identificação e o estabelecimento de um diagnóstico etiológico precoce de possíveis patologias que possam estar relacionadas a desfechos mórbidos e a graves limitações funcionais. Apresentação do caso: Paciente de 56 anos, sexo masculino, hipertenso, foi encaminhado para serviço especializado de reumatologia com histórico de lombalgia havia mais de 20 anos. Ao exame físico foi constatada presença de deformidades da coluna vertebral e extensa limitação de movimentos. Exames radiográficos mostravam esclerose de articulações sacroilíacas, osteopenia difusa e coluna vertebral em aspecto de "bambu". Conclusões: Constata-se a importância de que na abordagem das lombalgias na atenção primária se busque o reconhecimento de possíveis etiologias graves e potencialmente incapacitantes que possam estar subjacentes à queixa de dor lombar. Com esse objetivo, é fundamental o reconhecimento das chamadas red flags relacionadas às lombalgias, além de sua caracterização como mecânica ou inflamatória. Perante a atuação da atenção primária no oferecimento de um cuidado pautado na integralidade e na prevenção de agravos, reafirma-se a importância de uma avaliação clínica pormenorizada das lombalgias nesse nível de atenção à saúde.

Introduction: Low back pain is a prevalent condition that has an important impact on functional capacity and quality of life, and its correct approach in Primary Care is fundamental to the identification and establishment of an early etiological diagnosis of possible pathologies that may be related to outcomes morbid conditions and serious functional limitations. Case presentation: 56-year-old male patient, hypertensive, referred to a specialized rheumatology service with a history of low back pain for over 20 years. Physical examination revealed the presence of spinal deformities and extensive movement limitations. Radiographic examinations showing sclerosis of the sacro-iliac joints, diffuse osteopenia and a "bamboo" appearance of the spine. Conclusions: It is important that in the approach of low back pain in Primary Care, we seek to recognize possible serious and potentially disabling etiologies that may underlie the complaint of low back pain. For that, it is essential to recognize the so-called "red flags" related to low back pain, in addition to its characterization as mechanical or inflammatory. Given the role of Primary Care in offering care based on integrality and in the prevention of injuries, the importance of a detailed clinical assessment of low back pain at this level of health care is reaffirmed.

Introducción: La lumbalgia es una patología prevalente que tiene un impacto importante en la capacidad funcional y la calidad de vida, y su correcto abordaje en Atención Primaria de Salud es fundamental para la identificación y establecimiento de un diagnóstico etiológico precoz de posibles patologías que puedan estar relacionadas con los resultados, condiciones morbosas y limitaciones funcionales graves. Presentación del caso: Paciente masculino de 56 años, hipertenso, remitido a servicio especializado de reumatología con antecedentes de dolor lumbar de más de 20 años. El examen físico reveló la presencia de deformidades de la columna y amplias limitaciones de movimiento. Los exámenes radiológicos muestran esclerosis de las articulaciones sacroilíacas, osteopenia difusa y una apariencia de "bambú" de la columna. Conclusiones: Es importante que al abordar la lumbalgia en Atención Primaria de Salud busquemos reconocer las posibles etiologías graves y potencialmente incapacitantes que pueden subyacer a la queja de lumbalgia. Con este objetivo, es fundamental reconocer las llamadas "banderas rojas" relacionadas con la lumbalgia, además de su caracterización como mecánica o inflamatoria. Dado el papel de Atención Primaria de Salud a la hora de ofrecer una atención basada en la integralidad y prevención de enfermedades, se reafirma la importancia de una evaluación clínica detallada de la lumbalgia en este nivel de atención sanitaria.

L4-L5 anatomy classification system for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), developed by Dr. Luiz Pimenta in 2006, allows access to the spinal column through the psoas major muscle. The technique has many advantages, such as reduced bone and muscular tissue damage, indirect decompression, larger implants, and lordosis correction capabilities. However, this technique also has drawbacks, with the most notorious being the risk of spinal pathologies due to indirect injury of the lumbar plexus, but with low rates of persistent injuries. Therefore, several groups have proposed classifications to help identify patients at a greater risk of presenting with neurological deficits. The present work proposes a classification system that relies on simple observation of easily identifiable key structures to guide lateral L4-L5 LLIF decision-making. Patients aged > 18 years who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2022 and 2023 were included until 50 high-quality images were acquired. And excluded as follow Anatomical changes in the vertebral body or major psoas muscles prevent the identification of key structures or poor-quality MRIs. Each anatomy was classified as type I, type II, or type III according to the consensus among the three observers. Fifty anatomical sites were included in this study. 70% of the L4-L5 anatomy were type I, 18% were type II, and 12% were type III. None of the type 3 L4-L5 anatomies were approached using a lateral technique. The proposed classification is an easy and simple method for evaluating the feasibility of a lateral approach to-L4-L5.

Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with large cage: a technique without additional spacer portal.

BACKGROUND: Large spacers offer numerous advantages such as higher fusion rates and lower subsidence rates. However, due to the anatomical constraints of the approach, the use of large spacers in biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(BE-TLIF) necessitates an additional incision and special instruments for spacer implantation leading to less frequent use. METHODS: This study has refined several techniques within BE-TLIF. We insert the cage and impact the cage transverse with a special design instrument in the same working portal. This allows for the use of large spacers during BE-TLIF procedures without the need for an auxiliary cage-inserting incision. CONCLUSION: The technique is a straightforward, safe, and minimally invasive method for inserting large cages in the treatment of lumbar instability.

Reducing Chronic Spine Pain in an Adult Male by Decreasing Lumbar Scoliosis and Increasing Cervical Lordosis Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Protocols: A 26-Month Follow-Up Case Report.

We present a case report of a patient suffering from chronic low back pain (CLBP) and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), both of which were caused and complicated by a physically demanding occupation, a history of mixed martial arts, and lumbar scoliosis. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic findings were observed following conservative spine rehabilitation. The patient, a 34-year-old male, had experienced chronic spine pain, particularly CLBP and CNSNP, for several years. He reported severe pain and increasing disability after a recent neck injury sustained while practicing jiu-jitsu. Radicular pain, along with numbness and tingling, was noted in the right upper extremity, extending to the first three digits, and there were also altered sensations and temperature changes in both feet. He described sharp, pinching mid-back pain and worsening disability due to the persistent pain, which led him to seek manual manipulative chiropractic spine therapy, though he reported little benefit from it. The patient had relied on over-the-counter pain medications for many years without achieving long-term pain and disability relief, and these medications were no longer used following treatment. Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) spinal structural rehabilitation protocols were used to improve coronal and sagittal balance, as well as paraspinal muscular strength, addressing posture, mobility, and related aspects. These protocols include postural exercises, postural Mirror Image® traction, and postural spinal manipulative therapy. All PROs improved, with a near resolution of all initial symptoms of chronic spine pain. Outcomes measured included disability indices and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators. Radiographic parameter improvements were significant, demonstrating improved coronal and sagittal balance as a result of the treatment. Following 30 in-office treatments, administered three times per week for 10 weeks, initial outcomes were reassessed. The patient then received 13 in-office treatments periodically over one year, and all initial outcomes were repeated. The improvements remained stable over time. A 26-month follow-up found that the improvements were sustained over a very long period without additional treatment after the 13-month examination. Chronic spine pain, specifically CLBP and CNSNP, is a significant source of suffering and contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Improvement in HRQoLs, PROs, and objective spine parameters are desirable clinical outcomes. Our case report documents objective improvement in lumbar scoliosis and spine pain, which is rare in conservative studies. This successful treatment of chronic pain with long-term follow-up contributes to the growing evidence supporting conservative, non-surgical treatments for CNSNP and CLBP. Successful management of chronic spine pain was observed in a patient undergoing CBP® treatment. The treatment was designed to address abnormal sagittal and coronal postural balance and radiographic abnormalities indicating spinal misalignment and reassess progress in PROs, as well as objective and subjective HRQoL measures, both following treatment and 13 months later. However, larger studies are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment for chronic pain.

A Holistic Approach to Physiotherapy Treatment for Scheuermann Disease Along With Lumbar Canal Stenosis and Bilateral Lower Limb Radiculopathy: A Case Report.

Scheuermann disease, a structural deformity marked by kyphotic alterations in the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine, is frequently accompanied by back discomfort and spinal wedging. Scheuermann disease predominantly affects the thoracic and thoracolumbar parts of the spine; thus, there is an indirect link between the two conditions. This case report describes a rare form of Scheuermann illness in which lumbar canal stenosis caused bilateral lower limb radiculopathy. A 50-year-old male with a confirmed diagnosis of Scheuermann illness complained of severe back discomfort, developing bilateral lower limb weakness, and sensory impairments. Clinical and radiographic investigations indicated lumbar canal stenosis at multiple levels, resulting in nerve root compression and radiculopathy. MRI reports of the lumbosacral spine were suggestive of severe, multiple-level degenerative changes. Spinal canal stenosis was noted at lumbar levels. Following the investigation findings suggestive of Scheuermann disease, the patient underwent posterior decompression and spinal fixation of L3-L4 and L4-L5. The outcome led to the decompression of the lumbar canal and the stabilization of the affected spinal segments. A personalized postoperative rehabilitation plan was developed based on the patient's complaints of pain, stiffness, and the difficulties he faced associated with the disease. Overall physiotherapy rehabilitation plays an essential role in the overall care of Scheuermann's illness and postoperative lumbar spine disease, aiding in functional restoration, enhancing quality of life, and encouraging long-term spinal health. Although exercise therapy is intense, it shows promising results and is beneficial for these conditions. Physical therapy in the postoperative period plays a significant role in promoting the patient's functional independence.

Peripheral facial palsy in children: Serum Borrelia antibodies may reduce the need for lumbar puncture.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the causes of acute peripheral facial palsy (PFP) in Danish children and to explore whether neuroborreliosis-related PFP could be diagnosed without lumbar puncture using clinical symptoms and serum Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies. METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study included children undergoing lumbar puncture for PFP between 2019 and 2023 in Denmark's Capital Region. Diagnostic performance measures for neuroborreliosis-related PFP were compared between serum Bb IgG alone and clinical risk scores combining Bb IgG with clinical parameters. RESULTS: Of the 326 patients with PFP, 137 (42%) were diagnosed with neuroborreliosis and 151 (46%) had Bell's palsy. Positive predictive value for serum Bb IgG alone was 88% (95% CI 79-93) and negative predictive value was 83% (95% CI 75-88). The positive predictive value of a risk score with seven additional parameters was 90% (95% CI 81-95) and negative predictive value 87% (95% CI 80-92). CONCLUSION: The positive predictive value of serum Bb IgG alone was high in our setting, where nearly half of children with PFP had neuroborreliosis. In high endemic settings, lumbar punctures may be reduced by (i) treating all children with PFP with doxycycline or (ii) treating Bb IgG positive children and performing lumbar puncture in seronegative children.

"Advancements in minimally invasive treatment for lumbar disc herniation: insights into condoliase and chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase".

This study examines the efficacy and safety of condoliase chemonucleolysis (CC) in treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and highlights emerging alternatives like chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase. Research indicates that condoliase, an enzyme used to degrade glycosaminoglycans in the nucleus pulposus, provides effective and prompt relief of leg pain, with significant reductions observed within a day of treatment. Studies reveal that a lower pretreatment straight leg raising (SLR) angle may predict early symptom relief, and condoliase is generally effective at doses up to 1.25 U, balancing efficacy and safety. Despite promising results, concerns about long-term safety, including disc height reduction and imaging changes, persist. Additionally, chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase shows potential as a safer and more effective alternative, though further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols and assess long-term outcomes. Future investigations should address current limitations, such as small sample sizes and short follow-up periods, to better understand the long-term benefits and risks of these treatments.

Therapeutic effect of a single lumbar puncture in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a neurological disorder characterized by increased intracranial pressure. Whilst lumbar puncture (LP) is necessary for the diagnosis of IIH, its therapeutic effect remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of a single LP in people with IIH (pwIIH). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we analysed short-term neurological and ophthalmological outcomes in pwIIH before, one (D1) and seven days (D7) after the LP. The primary outcome was the change in papilledema degree from baseline. Secondary outcomes included visual outcomes, morphological changes in optical coherence tomography (peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer [pRNFL] thickness and ganglion cell layer [GCL] volume) and transbulbar sonography (arachnoid optic nerve sheath diameter [AONSD]), and headache outcomes (peak and median headache severity and burden related to headache). RESULTS: We included 30 pwIIH (mean age 32.8 years [SD 8.4], 93.3% female, median cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] opening pressure 33.0 cmCSF [IQR 26.9-35.3], median body mass index (BMI) 34.8 kg/m2 [IQR 30.9-40.9]). The median papilledema grading at baseline was 2 (Friedman DI (1999) Pseudotumor cerebri. Neurosurg Clin N Am 10(4):609-621 viii); (Mollan SP, Aguiar M, Evison F, Frew E, Sinclair AJ (2019) The expanding burden of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eye Lond Engl 33(3):478-485); (Ab D, Gt L, Nj V, Sl G, Ml M, Nj N et al. (2007) Profiles of obesity, weight gain, and quality of life in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Am J Ophthalmol [Internet]. Apr [cited 2024 Jun 2];143(4). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17386271/ ) and was significantly reduced at D7 (2 [1-2], p = 0.011). Median pRNFL thickness had decreased significantly at D7 (-9 µm [-62.5, -1.3], p = 0.035), with pRNFL thickness at baseline being associated with the pRNFL change (F(1,11) = 18.79, p = 0.001). Mean AONSD had decreased significantly at both D1 (-0.74 mm [0.14], p < 0.001) and D7 (-0.65 mm [0.17], p = 0.01), with AONSD at baseline being associated with the change in AONSD at both time points (D1: ß= -0.89, 95% CI -1.37, -0.42, p = 0.002; D7: ß= -0.85, 95% CI -1.42, -0.28, p = 0.007). Peak headache severity was slightly lower at D7 (-1/10 [-3, 0], p = 0.026), whereas median headache severity and headache burden remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: This short-term follow-up study in pwIIH undergoing a single LP suggests a moderate effect on ophthalmological but not headache outcomes. The usefulness of LP as a therapeutic measure in IIH remains controversial and should likely be reserved for patients with limited treatment options, e.g., in pregnancy or intolerability to medication.

Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) has yielded positive results in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Unilateral biportal ULBD (UB-ULBD) and percutaneous endoscopic ULBD (PE-ULBD) are gaining popularity because of the progress that has been made in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical results of UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD. METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent ULBD surgery for LSS. The patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of the surgical method: the UB-ULBD group and the PE-ULBD group. Data on the general demographic data, surgical details, clinical efficacy, radiography and complications were compared between the two groups were compared. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 113 LSS patients who had undergone ULBD at our institution were included, of whom 61 patients underwent UB-ULBD surgery and 52 underwent PE-ULBD surgery. The UB-ULBD group had a significantly shorter operation time (P < 0.05). The facet was significantly better preserved in the UB-ULBD group than in the PE-ULBD group, and the angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection in the UE-ULBD group was significantly smaller (P < 0.05). The ODI score, VAS score and modified Macnab criteria improved postoperatively in both groups. The UB-ULBD group had a 95.08% rate of excellent or good patient outcomes, whereas the PE-ULBD group had a 92.30% rate. CONCLUSION: Both UB-ULBD and PE-ULBD can provide favourable clinical outcomes when used to treat LSS. UB-ULBD is beneficial because of its shorter operation time, smaller angle of ipsilateral facet joint resection and better facet preservation, making it a viable and safe option for treating LSS while ensuring spinal stability.

Percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression and outpatient laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a 2-year Medicare claims benchmark study.

Background: This prospective longitudinal study compares outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries receiving outpatient percutaneous image-guided lumbar decompression (PILD) using the mild® procedure to patients undergoing outpatient laminectomy. All patients were diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication (NC). Methods: All medical claims for 100 % of Medicare beneficiaries were reviewed, with study subjects identified using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Research Identifiable Files. Baseline data were extracted individually to allow for longitudinal analysis through two-year follow-up. The index procedure was defined as the first mild or outpatient laminectomy during the enrollment period. The rate of subsequent surgical procedures and incidence of harms were used as study outcomes. Results: Cohorts included 2197 mild and 7416 laminectomy patients. mild patients were significantly older (76.7 years versus 73.4 years, respectively; p < 0.0001), and 57.4 % of mild were female, compared to 43.3 % of laminectomy (p < 0.0001). mild patients presented with significantly more baseline comorbidities compared to laminectomy patients (mean of 5.7 versus 4.8, respectively; p < 0.0001). Subsequent surgical procedure rate of 9.0 % for mild was significantly higher than 5.5 % for laminectomy (p < 0.0001). mild experienced harms at a significantly lower rate than laminectomy (1.9 % versus 5.8 %, respectively; p < 0.0001). The composite rate of subsequent surgical procedures and harms was similar between groups at 10.8 % for mild and 11.0 % for laminectomy. Conclusions: mild can be considered a viable option for treatment of LSS with NC as evidenced by real-world data in this study. At two-years, mild patients experienced fewer harms and underwent more subsequent surgical procedures than laminectomy patients. The higher rate of subsequent surgical procedures for mild may be attributable to its position earlier in the LSS treatment algorithm. The overall rate of harms and subsequent surgical procedures was similar between groups, suggesting that mild should be considered as a treatment option, particularly for older patients with multiple comorbidities.

True lateral imaging during lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: Interobserver reliability.

Background: True lateral imaging (TLI), obtained by superimposing bilateral lumbar spine structures and aligning superior endplate cortical bone, requires deliberate rotational adjustments of the laterally positioned fluoroscope in both the axial and longitudinal planes. True lateral segmental imaging is necessary to depict true and accurate radiofrequency (RF) cannula positioning relative to bony anatomy during lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (LMBRFN). Objective: To determine the interobserver reliability of TLI during LMBRFN. Methods: This was a retrospective review of a prospectively generated collection of lateral fluoroscopic images to determine the interobserver reliability of TLI during LMBRFN. Lateral fluoroscopic images were prospectively collected from 34 consecutive L4-5 and L5-S1 LMBRFN procedures during routine clinical practice. Employing International Pain and Spine Intervention Society (IPSIS) LMBRFN and TLI techniques, an RF cannula was positioned parallel to the L3 and L4 medial branches and the L5 dorsal rami. During the normal course of TLI, untrue and final true lateral segmental images were obtained and saved. An original data set of 100 pairs of true and untrue lateral images was reviewed to verify true laterality using established criteria; disagreement was resolved by consensus or discarding ambiguous cases. To measure interobserver reliability (Cohen's Kappa), two blinded expert reviewers independently reviewed the image set, identifying the true lateral image and the plane requiring correction. Results: The observers agreed upon 98/98 true lateral RF-segment images (Kappa score 1.0 [1.00,1.00]). The observers agreed upon 86/98 maneuvers to correct the untrue RF-segment image. The Kappa score for determining the most appropriate corrective maneuver was 0.76 (0.63,0.89), showing substantial interobserver agreement. Conclusions: The true lateral image of the targeted RF segment during LMBRFN was reliably determined with perfect interobserver agreement. Interobserver agreement was substantial regarding the maneuver to achieve TLI.

Efficacy of endoscopic decompression surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Background: The overall aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endoscopic decompression for outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort, single-institution study of n = 139 patients from 2019 to 2022 who underwent endoscopic decompression for LSS. The primary outcome was improvement of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between baseline and 12-month follow-up. Results: In the present sample (n = 139) the average age was 57.6 years (SD = 17.4, with even distribution of men (49%) vs. women (51%). In patients with LSS, lumbar disc herniation was the most common diagnosis in 49 patients followed by lumbar radiculopathy in 25 patients. Lumbar radicular pain was the 3rd most common diagnosis in 21 patients with all other diagnosis listed in Table S1. There was a significant improvement (i.e., decrease) in ODI following endoscopic decompression (mean change: -8.3, 95% CI: -9.4, -7.2, P < 0.001, Fig. 1). Prior lumbar spine surgery (P = 0.048), BMI (P = 0.053), and age (P = 0.022) were associated with changes in ODI. Nearly half (47%) of the sample had prior lumbar spine surgery. Those with prior lumbar spine surgery (-7.5, 95% CI: -8.3, -6.6) showed less improvement than those without prior lumbar spine surgery (-9.1, 95% CI: -10.9, -7.2, Fig. 2). For BMI, 23% had normal BMI while 24% were overweight and 53% were obese. Patients with normal BMI (-10.3, 95% CI: -13.4, -7.2) showed greater improvements compared to overweight (-7.9, 95% CI: -9.4, -6.4) and obese (-7.6, 95% CI: -9.0, -6.3, Fig. 3) patients. Patients under 40 years old (-10.2, 95% CI: -13.6, -6.8) showed greater improvements in ODI compared to those 40 years and older (-7.8, 95% CI: -8.6, -6.8, Fig. 4). Conclusions: In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, endoscopic decompression was associated with reduced disability. Patients with no prior lumbar spine surgery, normal BMI, and who were under 40 years old showed greater improvements.

High-fidelity 3D modelling of the lumbar dorsal rami.

Objective: Lumbar medial branch denervation is commonly used to treat chronic facetogenic low back pain. Controversy exists regarding risk to adjacent neural structures. The objectives of this cadaveric study were to: (1) dissect, digitize, and model in 3D the branches of the first (L1) to fifth (L5) lumbar dorsal rami located near the junction of the transverse process and lateral neck of the superior articular process; and (2) quantify the minimal distance between the lateral/intermediate and medial branches at the anterior quarter and midpoint of the lateral neck of the superior articular process. Design: Eighteen formalin-embalmed specimens were dissected, digitized and modeled in 3D. The high-fidelity 3D models were used to compare branching patterns and quantify the mean minimal distance between the lateral/intermediate and medial branches of the lumbar dorsal ramus at the anterior quarter and midpoint of the lateral neck of the superior articular process. A Two-way ANOVA was performed to determine if difference of mean distances was significant. Results: There was variability in the branching pattern of the lumbar dorsal rami. In 46 cases (51.1%) the lumbar dorsal ramus divided into 2 branches, in 41 cases (45.6%) into 3, and in 3 cases (3.3%) 4. The mean minimal distance between the lateral/intermediate and medial branches was significantly greater at the midpoint (3.2 ± 2.5 mm) than the anterior quarter (1.2 ± 1.8 mm) of the lateral neck of superior articular process. Conclusion: Minimal distance measurements between the branches of the lumbar dorsal rami at the anterior quarter and midpoint of the lateral neck of the superior articular process were computed. When placing the distal end of the needle tip at the anterior quarter of the lateral neck of the superior articular process, the smaller mean minimal distance between the branches suggests there is a greater risk for inadvertent denervation of the lateral/intermediate branches. Further anatomical and clinical investigations are required.

Clinical Utility and Patient Compliance With Mobile Applications for Home-Based Rehabilitation Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) via open or minimally invasive (MI) techniques is commonly performed. Mobile applications for home-based therapy programs have grown in popularity. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between postoperative patients who were the most and least compliant in using the mobile-based rehabilitation programs, (2) compare PROMs between open vs MI-TLIF cohorts, and (3) quantify overall compliance rates of home-based rehabilitation programs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients were automatically enrolled in the rehabilitation program. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected. Patients were separated into two study groups. Compliance rate was calculated as the difference between the number of active participants at the preoperative phase and final follow-up. RESULTS: 220 patients were included. Average follow-up time was 23.2 months. No difference was found in the change in (∆) PROMIS scores (P = 0.261) or ∆ODI scores (P = 0.690) regardless of patient compliance. No difference was found in outcome scores between open vs MI-TLIF techniques stratified by download compliance (downloaded, DL+; did not download, DL-) and phone reminder compliance (set reminder, R+; did not set reminder, R-) postoperatively. Both cohorts demonstrated clinical improvement exceeding minimal clinically important difference at final follow-up. Overall patient compliance was 71% at final postoperative follow up. CONCLUSION: Despite high long-term compliance and rising popularity, mobile applications for home-based postoperative rehabilitation programs have low clinical utility in patients undergoing TLIF.

Expanded Combined Loading Injury Criterion for the Human Lumbar Spine Under Dynamic Compression.

Contemporary injury tolerance of the lumbar spine for under-body blast references axial compression and bending moments in a limited range. Since injuries often occur in a wider range of flexion and extension with increased moment contribution, this study expands a previously proposed combined loading injury criterion for the lumbar spine. Fifteen cadaveric lumbar spine failure tests with greater magnitudes of eccentric loading were incorporated into an existing injury criterion to augment its applicability and a combined loading injury risk model was proposed by means of survival analysis. A loglogistic distribution was the most representative of injury risk, resulting in optimized critical values of Fr,crit = 6011 N, and My,crit = 904 Nm for the proposed combined loading metric. The 50% probability of injury resulted in a combined loading metric value of 1, with 0.59 and 1.7 corresponding to 5 and 95% injury risk, respectively. The inclusion of eccentric loaded specimens resulted in an increased contribution of the bending moment relative to the previously investigated flexion/extension range (previous My,crit = 1155 Nm), with the contribution of the resultant sagittal force reduced by nearly 200 N (previous Fr,crit = 5824 N). The new critical values reflect an expanded flexion/extension range of applicability of the previously proposed combined loading injury criterion for the human lumbar spine during dynamic compression.

Lumbar Sympathetic Block to Treat CRPS in an 18-Month-Old Girl: A Breaking Barriers Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Children under the age of 3 years have been diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). They were found to be functionally disadvantaged and psychologically distressed in relation to children with other painful conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-month-old baby girl was referred to the pain clinic with a history of severe right lower limb pain that had begun 2 months earlier. The parents were unable to recall any trauma before the painful situation. Pain and allodynia were severe and extended from the toes to the gluteus area. She was low weight for her age (6700 g). The patient was on the maximum doses of gabapentin and amitriptyline accepted for her body weight and did not have the possibility to start rehabilitation due to severe pain and allodynia. After discussing the risks and potential benefits of a planned lumbar sympathetic block (LSB), the parents approved the interventional procedure. This is the first case report describing the LSB technique at such a young age. METHOD: A lumbar sympathetic block was carried on at the third lumbar vertebral level, fluoroscopy-guided, and under general anesthesia (GA) initiated with ketamine iv. A 4-cm needle was introduced using a tunneled vision approach in an oblique view at the L3 level until adequate depth was confirmed in the lateral position. Safety considerations were taken in relation to the radiation dose and all drugs injected with dose adjustment to her body weight. The block was successful (the skin temperature increased by 2.8 °C) and was uneventful. Pain and allodynia were completely alleviated in the recovery room. At the follow-up after 3 and 8 weeks, the parents reported an 80% improvement in pain and allodynia, a 70% improvement in sleep, a weight gain of 900 g, and that she had started rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar sympathetic blocks can be considered at a very young age to treat CRPS if other non-invasive measures fail.

A New Minimally Invasive Technique for Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Focal Kyphosis Due to Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Case Report.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are common fractures in the elderly population and are often associated with low back pain and disruption in daily living activities. Reconstruction surgeries, such as corpectomy, are among the treatment options for these conditions. However, a corpectomy requires a longer surgical procedure and involves a significant amount of blood loss. We present the case of an 80-year-old woman with severe low back pain due to an L2 fracture and focal kyphosis treated with a novel minimally invasive technique. The patient underwent anterior and posterior surgery in the right decubitus position using a C-arm-free technique. Hyperlordotic cages were inserted in the upper and lower disc space via a lateral approach, while percutaneous pedicle screws were inserted from a posterior approach. These procedures were performed simultaneously under navigation guidance only.

Comparison of the short-term efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF for the treatment of two-segment lumbar degenerative disease.

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively compared short-term clinical outcomes and complications of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion(Endo-LIF))for two-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, aiming to guide spine surgeons in selecting surgical approaches. METHODS: From January 2019 to December 2023, 30 patients were enrolled,15 in the MIS-TLIF group and 15 in the Endo-LIF group. All patients were followed up for more than 3 months after surgery and the following information was recorded: (1)surgery time, difference in hemoglobin between preoperative and postoperative, surgical costs, first time out of bed after operation, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative complication; (2) ODI score (The Oswestry Disability Index), leg and back VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale), and lumbar vertebra JOA score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores); (3) MacNab score at final follow-up to assess clinical outcome, CT to evaluate lumbar fusion. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the two groups regarding operation time and cost, with the MIS-TLIF group performing significantly better. Intraoperative bleeding was considerably less in the Endo-LIF group compared to the MIS-TLIF group. However, there were no significant differences in the time of the first postoperative ambulation, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in preoperative VAS, ODI, and JOA between the two surgical groups There were no significant differences in VAS(leg), ODI, and JOA scores between the two groups before and at 1 day,7 days, 1 month, 3 months and final follow-up. However, at 1 day postoperatively, the VAS( back)score in the Endo-LIF group was lower than that in the MIS-TLIF group, and the difference was statistically significant. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved grade III and above according to the Bridwell criteria, and there was no significant difference between the two surgical groups compared to each other. According to the MacNab score at the final follow-up, the excellent rate was 80.00% in the Endo-LIF group and 73.33% in the MIS-TLIF group, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy and safety between Endo-LIF and MIS-TLIF for two-segment degenerative lumbar diseases. MIS-TLIF has a shorter operative time and lower costs, while Endo-LIF causes less tissue damage, blood loss, and early postoperative pain, aiding long-term recovery. Both MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF are promising for treating two-segment lumbar degenerative disease. The choice of a surgical procedure depends on the patient's financial situation, their ability to tolerate surgery, and the surgeon's expertise.