Mood Disorder Questionnaire Positivity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Other Chronic Diseases including Screen Bipolar Disorders or Rhythm and Energy Dysregulation Syndromes (DYMERS).

Introduction: This study explores the issue of paper-and-pencil screening tests for bipolar disorder, often leading to false positives. It discusses hypotheses that connect MDQ positivity with sleep disorders, a decline in health-related quality of life, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mood disorders. The study proposes that MDQ identifies a "Dysregulation of Mood, Energy, and Social Rhythms Syndrome" (DYMERS), indicating a stress-related condition. It aims to investigate the association between MDQ positivity and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in comparison to other chronic disorders. Methods: This case-control study, conducted from April 2019 to February 2020, investigated MDQ positivity in patients with SLE. Ethical approvals were obtained, and statistical analysis was used for data assessment. Results: This is a case-controlled study where MDQ positivity was significantly higher in systemic lupus erythematosus cases than controls. The analysis compared gender, age, and the presence of depressive episodes between MDQ-positive and MDQ-negative cases, revealing some differences but no significant variations. Interestingly, no association with high prednisone or biologics use was observed. The frequency of MDQ positivity in systemic lupus erythematosus was compared to other chronic pathologies, revealing varying associations with each condition. Conclusion: This study reveals a high rate of (MDQ) positivity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), associated with the risk of bipolar disorder in SLE. Notable discrepancies in MDQ positivity risk factors between SLE and bipolar disorder are observed. The study emphasizes the ability of MDQ to identify a distinct syndrome characterized by rhythm dysregulation, posing a risk for bipolar disorder and other disorders.

Validation, Reliability, and Clinical Significance of the Arabic Version of Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients significantly affects their quality of life. Almost all studies have assessed fatigue in this population using non-specific scales. The present multi-centric study aimed to assess the validity, reliability, and clinical significance of the Arabic version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ). METHODS: The present cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted at Aswan, Mansoura, Port Said, and Al-Azhar University Hospitals over a 6-month duration. The study included 311 patients with RA diagnosed according to the 2010 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. The Arabic version of BRAF-MDQ was developed to assess fatigue in these patients. All patients were subjected to careful history taking, thorough clinical assessment, and standard laboratory work-up. The obtained Arabic BRAF-MDQ was tested for construct validity, internal consistency, testretest reproducibility, and criterion validity. Construct validity was evaluated using factor analysis with the Kaiser Meyer Olkin tool of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's sphericity test. Internal consistency of subscales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reproducibility was assessed after a 1-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to correlate numerical variables. Predictors of fatigue were identified using binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The present study included 311 RA patients. Construct validity assessment showed a high loading of questionnaire items within the proposed construct subscales with a KMO measure of sphericity of 0.927 and Bartlett's test of sphericity p-value < 0.001. Internal consistency assessment showed adequate Cronbach's alpha of Arabic BRAF-MDQ subscales. Total Arabic BRAFMDQ had excellent criterion validity, as indicated by the high correlations with MAFS (r=0.95, p < 0.001) and SF-36 vitality subscale (r=-0.91, p < 0.001). Clinically significant fatigue was identified in 214 patients (68.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age (OR (95% CI): 1.07 (1.02-1.12), p < 0.001), disease duration (OR (95% CI): 1.82 (1.43-2.33), p < 0.001), DAS28CRP (OR (95% CI): 8.62 (4.63-16.02), p < 0.001), and mHAQ (OR (95% CI): 3.85 (1.07-13.9), p = 0 .039) as significant predictors of fatigue development in the studied patients. CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire is a valid, consistent, and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue in Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clinically significant fatigue was identified in 214 patients (68.8%). Further, risk factors for fatigue included older age, longer disease duration, and higher disease activity.

Knowledge and Behavior of Primary Care Physicians Regarding Utilization of Standardized Tools in Screening and Assessment of Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Disorders at a Large Integrated Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Standardized screening, objective evaluation, and management of behavioral health conditions are major challenges in primary care. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) provide standardized screening and symptom management tools for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and Mood Disorders (MD), respectively. This study explores family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the utilization of GAD-7, PHQ-9, and MDQ in outpatient primary care offices. METHODS: The study method was a cross-sectional electronic and paper survey utilizing a self-administered questionnaire that assessed primary care physicians' demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices in rural and urban outpatient clinical settings regarding GAD-7, PHQ-9, and MDQ. Statistical software SAS 9.4 was used for descriptive and Chi-Square statistics. RESULTS: Out of 320 total participants,145 responded (45.3%). Responding family physicians demonstrated a high level of familiarity with the GAD-7 (97.9%), PHQ-9 (97.9%), and MDQ (81.3%) assessment tools. However, the reported utilization rates were relatively lower than knowledge, with 62.7%, 73.1%, and 31.9% extremely likely or likely to utilize the GAD-7, PHQ-9, and MDQ as screening and monitoring tools, respectively. Less than a quarter of the total respondents use the objective score for the future management of GAD, with significantly more residents utilizing the score for GAD-7 compared to attendings (P < .05). There was no statistical significance difference between residents and attendings for the objective evaluation of Major Depressive Disorder (P = .26) and Mood Disorders (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being knowledgeable of the utility of GAD-7, PHQ-9, and MDQ, the primary care physicians in a large integrated health system in Central Pennsylvania and Northern Maryland report inconsistent utilization in their practice. Further studies are needed to determine the underlying factors contributing to the suboptimal usage of these screening tools and ways to increase it.

Postpartum depression: bipolar or unipolar? Analysis of 434 Polish postpartum women

Objective: To assess the prevalence of soft bipolar features in a sample of women with postpartum depressive symptoms, as well as to compare the sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of subjects with bipolar or unipolar postpartum depressive symptomatology. Methods: Four hundred and thirty-four participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Postpartum depression (PPD) symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), while the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) was used to screen for bipolarity features. Results: Of the 434 participants, 66 (15.2%) scored ≥ 13 points on the EPDS, thus fulfilling the screening criteria, and 103 scored ≥ 7 points on the MDQ. In comparison with non-depressed subjects, the women who scored positively on the EPDS were significantly more likely to exhibit symptoms of bipolar spectrum disorders (38 vs. 21%; chi-square test, p = 0.015). Women with bipolar PPD symptomatology were significantly younger than those exhibiting unipolar PPD symptoms (31.0±4.8 years vs. 28.5±4.1 years; t-test, p = 0.03). The groups did not differ in terms of obstetric characteristics. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that patients with PPD symptomatology may be more likely to exhibit soft bipolarity features as compared with non-depressed women.

Detección de bipolaridad y predictores asociados en pacientes con depresión unipolar tratados en el sistema público de salud / Detection of bipolary and associated predictors in patients with unipolar depression in treatment in the public health system

Objectives: to detect possible bipolarity in patients diagnosed with unipolar depression (intermittent and recurrent) who are being treated trough the public health system, by means of a survey which has been validated in our country (MDQ), to make a comparison between the groups that responded positively to the surveys criteria and those who did not, in relation to the variables associated to bipolarity in the literature. Method: 101 depressive outpatients from the Depression Programs of the Main Hospitals of Chillán and Los Angeles self administered by psychiatrist in order to ascertain the bipolarity predictor factors. The acquired information was analysed through the statistics software SPSS 12.0. The descriptive analysis of the sociodemographic and clinic variables was carried out through the summary frequency and statistics. Results: 33.7 per cent of the patients responded to he MDQ positively whit the survey being adequately validated and trusted (Cronbachs alpha 0.75). A positive relationship was found between the following and probable bipolarity: younger age during the first depressive episode, suicidal attempts background, post partum depression and drug abuse/dependency . Conclusions: according to a survey validated by our country, one third of the studied patients, who were diagnosed with unipolar depression present a probable bipolar disorder. The factors known through foreign studies are confirmed to be related to bipolarity. The correct and early detection of the Bipolar Disorder are imperative in order to perform and adequate treatment which improves the patients quality of life.

Objetivos: detectar probable bipolaridad en pacientes que hayan recibido el diagnóstico de depresión unipolar (episódica o recurrente) y que se tratan en elsistema público de salud mediante la aplicación de una encuesta validad en nuestro país (MDQ). Realizar una comparación en tre los grupos que respondieron positivamente a los criterios de la encuesta y lo que no lo hicieron, frente a variables asociadas con bipolaridad en la literatura. Método: 101 pacientes depresivos ambulatorios de los Programas de Depresión de los Hospitales base de Chillán y Los Ángeles se autoaplicaron del MDQ y se les solicitó responder un cuestionario anexo, aplicado por médico psiquiatra, para pesquisar factores predoctores de bipolaridad. Se analizó la información obtenida mediante el programa estadístico SPSS 12.0. se efectuó el análisis descriptivo de las variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, a través de distribución de frecuencia y estadísticos de resumen. Resultados: 33.7 por ciento de los pacientes respondió positivamente el MDQ, con una adecuada validez y confiabilidad de la encuesta (a de Cronbach 0.75). se encontró relación positiva entre menor edad del primer episodio depresivo, antecedente de intentos suicidas, depresión post parto y de abuso/dependencia de drogas con probable bipolaridad. Conclusiones: un tercio de los pacientes estudiados, diagnosticados como depresivos unipolares, presenta un probable trastorno bipolar según una encuesta validada en nuestro medio. Se confirma como relacionados correcta y precoz de trastorno bipolar para realizar un tratamiento adecuado que mejore la calidad de vida de los pacientes.

Validez de la versión venezolana del cuestionario de trastornos del estado de ánimo (MDQ) para detectar al trastorno bipolar tipo II en pacientes con depresión mayor / Validation of the spanish version of the mood disorder questionnaire to detect bipolar disorder type II in patients with major depression disorder

El Cuestionario de Trastornos del Estado de Ánimo (MDQ) ha sido validado en varios países para pesquisar al trastorno bipolar tipo II (TB II). Por esta razón los autores nos propusimos determinar la validez de criterio del MDQ -versión venezolana- en pacientes con el diagnóstico previo de trastorno depresivo mayor, episodio único o recurrente. Mediante un estudio realizado en dos etapas, fueron evaluados 199 pacientes provenientes de la Consulta Externa de Psiquiatría del Hospital Vargas de Caracas, Venezuela. Inicialmente fueron sometidos a una evaluación diagnóstica guiada por la Entrevista Clínica Estructurada para los Trastornos del Eje I del DSM-IV (SCID-I) y, posteriormente, se les pidió que contestaran el MDQ con un punto de corte 7/13. El protocolo fue aprobado por el comité de ética de la institución. La mayoría de los pacientes pertenecían al sexo femenino (78,4%). La edad media de las mujeres fue de 43,94 años (DE = 12,06) y la de los hombres fue de 43,60 años (DE = 14,19). La frecuencia de falsos unipolares fue de 28,1% (23,6% trastorno bipolar tipo I y 4,5 por ciento TB II). Al asociar los resultados obtenidos mediante la SCID-I y el MDQ, se encontró una sensibilidad de 100% (95% IC: 0,66-1,00) y una especificidad de 61,1% (95% IC: 0,53-0,68) para el diagnóstico de TB II. Sobre la base de los índices de validez obtenidos, los autores concluimos que el MDQ, con un punto de corte 7/13, es un instrumento válido para detectar al TB II en una consulta de psiquiatría general venezolana.

The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is an inventory used to detect bipolar disorder type II (BD II) and it has been validated in several countries, other than Venezuela. For this reason, the authors tried to determine the criterion validity of the Venezuelan version of the MDQ in Venezuelan patients. The study was carried out in two stages at the Psychiatric Department of the Hospital Vargas of Caracas, Venezuela, which is a general teaching hospital. A group of 199 adult outpatients, who had been previously diagnosed as suffering from major depression disorder -single episode or recurrent- were evaluated. Initially, they were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV for Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Afterwards, they were asked to answer the MDQ using a cut-off point 7/13. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Hospital Vargas of Caracas. A total of 78.4% of the subjects were female. The mean age was 43.60 years for males (SD = 14.19) and 43.94 years for females (SD = 12.06). The frequency of false unipolar patients was 28.1% (23.6% bipolar disorder type I and 4.5% BD II). While comparing the results of the SCID-I and the MDQ, a sensibility of 100.0% (95% CI: 0.66-1.00) and a specificity of 61.1% (95% CI: 0.53-0.68) were found for the diagnosis of BD II. According to our results, the MDQ with a cut-off point 7/13 is a valid instrument to detect the bipolar disorder type II in Venezuelan depressed outpatients.