Redundancy of Pharmacologic Ingredients in Over-the-Counter Nasal Sprays.

Objective: To evaluate and determine the prevalence of ingredients in over-the-counter (OTC) nasal sprays. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Retail pharmacies. Methods: An inventory of brand-name and generic OTC nasal sprays was recorded at five national pharmacy outlets in August 2023. Data regarding the active ingredients were collected on commercial websites, MedlinePlus and drugs.com, and frequency statistics were calculated. Results: Five pharmacies were visited, at which 12 different brand names of nasal sprays were identified at multiple pharmacies. Nine brand names were associated with multiple formulations, accounting for 49 different products. The active ingredients included in our analysis were oxymetazoline, phenylephrine, fluticasone, triamcinolone, budesonide, azelastine, cromolyn sodium, and mometasone. Nasal decongestants had the greatest number of brand name formulations compared to intranasal steroids and antihistamine sprays which had limited choices. Products that included oxymetazoline were the most widely marketed drug (51 unique products) followed sodium chloride (40 unique products). Conclusion: These findings suggest that there are widespread redundancies in the OTC nasal spray market. Clinician should be aware of the redundancy in OTC formulations and encourage patients to read the labels in order to make informed decisions regarding their use of OTC medications.

Association between prescription drugs and all-cause mortality risk in the UK population.

Although most drugs currently approved are meant to treat specific diseases or symptoms, it has been hypothesized that some might bear a beneficial effect on lifespan in healthy older individuals, outside of their specific disease indication. Such drugs include, among others, metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors and rapamycin. Since 2006, the UK biobank has recorded prescription medication and mortality data for over 500'000 participants, aged between 40 and 70 years old. In this work, we examined the impact of the top 406 prescribed medications on overall mortality rates within the general population of the UK. As expected, most drugs were linked to a shorter lifespan, likely due to the life-limiting nature of the diseases they are prescribed to treat. Importantly, a few drugs were associated with increased lifespans, including notably Sildenafil, Atorvastatin, Naproxen and Estradiol. These retrospective results warrant further investigation in randomized controlled trials.

Preventive drug treatments for adults with chronic migraine: a systematic review with economic modelling.

Background: Chronic migraine is a disabling condition, affecting 2-4% of adults globally. With the introduction of expensive calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, it is timely to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive drugs for chronic migraine. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of medications used for chronic migraine through systematic reviews and economic modelling. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials of drug treatments for efficacy with > 100 participants with chronic migraine per arm; for adverse events > 100 participants with episodic or chronic migraine per arm. Previous economic analyses of preventive drugs for chronic migraine. Data sources: Eight databases. Reviews methods: Systematic reviews, network meta-analysis and economic modelling. Outcomes: Monthly headache days, monthly migraine days, headache-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness. Results: We found 51 individual articles, reporting 11 randomised controlled trials, testing 6 drugs (topiramate, Botox, eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab), versus placebo, on 7352 adults with chronic migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, Botox and topiramate reduced headache/migraine days by 2.0-2.5, just under two, or by less than 1.5 days per month, respectively. In the network meta-analysis, eptinezumab 300 mg and fremanezumab monthly ranked in first place in both monthly headache day and monthly migraine day analyses. The calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies were consistently the best choices for headache/migraine days and headache-related quality of life. Topiramate was very unlikely to be the best choice for headache/migraine days and headache-related quality of life when compared to calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies or Botox. We found no trials of the commonly used drugs, such as propranolol or amitriptyline, to include in the analysis. The adverse events review included 40 randomised controlled trials with 25,891 participants; 3 additional drugs, amitriptyline, atogepant and rimegepant, were included. There were very few serious adverse events - none of which were linked to the use of these medications. Adverse events were common. Most people using some calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies reported injection site issues; and people using topiramate or amitriptyline had nervous system or gastrointestinal issues. The cost-effectiveness review identified 16 studies evaluating chronic migraine medications in adults. The newer, injected drugs are more costly than the oral preventatives, but they were cost-effective. Our economic model showed that topiramate was the least costly option and had the fewest quality-adjusted life-year gains, whereas eptinezumab 300 mg was more costly but generated the most quality-adjusted life-year gains. The cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier showed that topiramate was the most cost-effective medication if the decision maker is willing to pay up to £50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Our consensus workshop brought together people with chronic migraine and headache experts. Consensus was reached on the top three recommendations for future research on medications to prevent chronic migraine: (1) calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and Botox versus calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, (2) candesartan versus placebo and (3) flunarizine versus placebo. Limitations: Topiramate was the only oral drug for which we were able to include data. We did not find sufficient quality evidence to support the use of other oral drugs. Conclusions: We did not find evidence that the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies are more clinically and cost-effective when compared to topiramate or Botox. We identified directions for future research these drugs might take. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021265990, CRD42021265993 and CRD42021265995. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR132803) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 63. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Chronic migraine is a disabling condition that can destroy work and family life. Treatments include cheap tablets (e.g. amitriptyline, propranolol and topiramate), Botox and expensive new drugs (the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies). It is not known which of these drugs is the best choice. We wanted to find out which of these drugs works best. We wanted to know if they reduced the number of headache/migraine days and improved headache-related quality of life, how many side effects people experienced, and if they provided good value for the National Health Service. We first looked for research comparing these drugs to placebo (fake) drugs, and to each other. We then worked out which provide best value for money. Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies reduced headache/migraine days by 2.0­2.5 days per month; Botox reduced headache/migraine days per month by around 1.9; and topiramate reduced headache/migraine days by 1.1­1.5 days per month. Many people taking topiramate or amitriptyline have nervous system and/or stomach/bowel side effects. Some people using calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies reported side effects associated with injections. Some calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and Botox provide worthwhile benefits on headache-related quality of life. We were not able to identify any studies of sufficient quality to assess the effectiveness of other oral drugs. The best value drug was topiramate which gave better health outcomes at a lower cost than the placebos. After sharing the results with a panel of people with chronic migraine and headache experts, we identified a need for new studies comparing commonly used cheap oral drugs with placebo, Botox and calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies.

Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Impacts of Implementation of e-Pharmacy in India and its Potential Impact on Cost, Quality, and Access to Medicines: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: e-Pharmacy can potentially solve problems related to the quality of services and products, cost, and access to medicines in low- and middle-income countries. This review aims to understand the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of e-pharmacy in India. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed (1) to understand the facilitators and barriers to the use of e-pharmacy in India and (2) to estimate the potential for e-pharmacy in India for improving access to medication, improving the quality of services and medicines, and decreasing costs of medications. METHODS: All published and gray literature from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2021, relating to e-pharmacy, was searched from MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google using a systematic search strategy. RESULTS: In total, 1464 titles and abstracts were screened, of which 47 full-texts were included in the review. e-Pharmacy can potentially improve access to medications for remote areas, and old and debilitated individuals. e-Pharmacies can enable lean supply chain management, lower cost, and allow easy tracking of dispensed medicines. There is potential for integration of e-pharmacy services into the national program of Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Pariyojana. However, the country is not adequately regulated to prevent the growth of illicit e-pharmacies. Lack of global accreditation and internet coverage, digital literacy, and transnational access are other challenges. CONCLUSIONS: E-pharmacy has the potential to improve universal health coverage in India by improving access to medicines and lowering the overall cost of health care. However, future growth will need specific regulations and accreditation mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Forum; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6R9YQ.

Digital Interventions for Managing Medication and Health Care Service Delivery in West Africa: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: As a result of the recent advancements in technology, the incorporation of digital interventions into the health care system has gained a lot of attention and adoption globally. However, these interventions have not been fully adopted, thereby limiting their impact on health care delivery in West Africa. OBJECTIVE: This review primarily aims at evaluating the current digital interventions for medication and health care delivery in West Africa. Its secondary aim is to assess the impacts of digital interventions in managing medication and health care service delivery with the intent of providing vital recommendations that would contribute to an excellent adoption of digital intervention tools in the health care space in West Africa. METHODS: In line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), a comprehensive search through various databases yielded 529 results. After a rigorous screening, 29 articles that provided information on 3 broad digital health intervention tools were found eligible for this review. RESULTS: Out of 29 studies, 16 (55%) studies examined phone-based interventions, 9 (31%) studies focused on tele- and e-based interventions, and 4 (14%) studies evaluated digital interventions. These interventions were used for diverse purposes, some of which are monitoring adverse drug reactions, general health, sexual and reproductive health, and training of health care practitioners. The phone-based intervention appears to be the most known and impactful of all the interventions, followed by tele- and e-based, while digital interventions were scarcely used. CONCLUSIONS: Digital interventions have had a considerable level of impact on medication and health care delivery across West Africa. However, the overall impact is limited. Therefore, strategies must be developed to address the challenges limiting the use of digital intervention tools so that these tools can be fully incorporated into the health care space in West Africa.

A review on drug repurposing applicable to obesity.

Obesity is a major public health concern and burden on individuals and healthcare systems. Due to the challenges and limitations of lifestyle adjustments, it is advisable to consider pharmacological treatment for people affected by obesity. However, the side effects and limited efficacy of available drugs make the obesity drug market far from sufficient. Drug repurposing involves identifying new applications for existing drugs and offers some advantages over traditional drug development approaches including lower costs and shorter development timelines. This review aims to provide an overview of drug repurposing for anti-obesity medications, including the rationale for repurposing, the challenges and approaches, and the potential drugs that are being investigated for repurposing. Through advanced computational techniques, researchers can unlock the potential of repurposed drugs to tackle the global obesity epidemic. Further research, clinical trials, and collaborative efforts are essential to fully explore and leverage the potential of drug repurposing in the fight against obesity.

Factors associated with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment success during the pregnancy and postpartum periods: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are a crucial intervention for pregnant and postpartum individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, there is paucity of data on the factors associated with MOUD treatment success in this population. This scoping review aimed to evaluate factors associated with MOUD success during the pregnancy and postpartum period. METHODS: We completed a structured search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases. Eligible studies included a metric of success in outpatient treatment in the pregnancy and postpartum period and were conducted in the United States after the Food and Drug Administration's approval of buprenorphine in 2002. Reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. The primary outcome was treatment success (i.e., treatment adherence, abstinence from illicit opioids, or retention in care) during pregnancy and up to 12 months postpartum. RESULTS: Data from 15 studies were included. Medications included methadone, naltrexone and buprenorphine (mono or combination therapy). High daily dose of buprenorphine as mono or combination therapy, early initiation and longer duration of MOUD were associated with treatment success. Legal involvement, homelessness, and rural residency were negatively associated with treatment success. There were no differences in outcomes of individuals receiving telemedicine versus in-person care. CONCLUSION: We identified several factors associated with MOUD treatment success among individuals with OUD during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. These factors may help guide future research and inform the development and adaptation of interventions tailored to better meet the needs of this key population.

Association between risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias and angiotensin receptor â ¡ blockers treatment for individuals with hypertension in high-volume claims data.

BACKGROUND: Findings regarding the protective effect of Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) against Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) and cognitive decline have been inconclusive. METHODS: Individuals with hypertension who do not have any prior ADRD diagnosis were included in this retrospective cohort study from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart. We identified antihypertensive medication (AHM) drug classes and subclassified ARBs by blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. We compared baseline characteristics and used the Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curve and adjusted Cox proportional hazards (PH) model for survival analyses. FINDINGS: From 6,390,826 individuals with hypertension, there were 1,839,176 ARB users, 3,366,841 non-ARB AHM users, and 1,184,809 AHM non-users. The unadjusted KM curve showed that ARB users had lower cumulative hazard than other AHM users or AHM non-users (P < 0.0001). In Cox PH analysis, ARB users showed a 20% lower adjusted hazard of developing ADRD compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) users and a 29% and 18% reduced hazard when compared to non-ARB/ACEI AHM users and AHM non-users (all P < 0.0001). Consumption of BBB-crossing ARBs was linked to a lower hazard of ADRD development than non-BBB-crossing ARBs, undetermined ARBs, and non-consumption of AHMs by 11%, 25%, and 31% (all P < 0.0001). INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that ARBs are superior to ACEIs, non-ARB/ACEI AHMs, or non-use of AHMs in reducing the hazard of ADRD among patients with hypertension. Also, BBB-permeability in ARBs was associated with lower ADRD incidence. There is no cure for AD, ADRD, or vascular dementia; hence, these findings are significant in preventing those disorders in an inexpensive, convenient, and safe way. Limitations in claims data should be considered when interpreting our findings. FUNDING: This research was supported by the National Institute on Aging grants (R01AG084236, R01AG083039, RF1AG072799, R56AG074604).

Impact of Polypharmacy on Symptoms and Health Outcomes in Older Adults With and Without Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.

BACKGROUND: There is a critical gap in understanding the symptom experience and health outcomes of older adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias (ADRD) and polypharmacy (PPY). The primary aim of the study was to compare the number of symptoms experienced over time in older adults with and without ADRD by polypharmacy status. The secondary aim was to examine the trajectory of physical function and health outcomes over time in each group. METHODS: This study utilized longitudinal data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2016-2019. The sample was separated into four groups (N = 2,052): neither ADRD or PPY (n = 1,048), PPY only (n = 761), ADRD only (n = 116), and both ADRD and PPY(n = 127). RESULTS: The overall sample was predominately female (57.9%), White (70.9%), aged 84 or younger (75%), married (46%), and had some college or a college degree (50%). Participants with both ADRD and PPY experienced more symptoms on average, had higher odds of falls, hospitalizations, and mortality than all other groups. Older adults with both ADRD and PPY had lower physical function, needed more assistance with activities of daily living and higher assistive device utilization compared to the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that older adults with both ADRD and PPY experience more symptoms, negative health outcomes and physical function decline that can negatively impact their quality of life. Further research is needed to identify strategies for reducing PPY in people with ADRD.

Prevalence of masked and white-coat hypertension among individuals with diabetes: insights from web-based home blood pressure monitoring in the Brazilian population.

The association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and masked hypertension (MH) in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is established, but its relationship with home BP monitoring (HBPM) remains uncertain. This web-based database study compared BP phenotypes in individuals using (n = 51,194; 6.05% with DM) and not using (n = 55,320; 0.63% with DM) antihypertensive medications (AH) undergoing HBPM. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed similar MH and white-coat hypertension (WCH) prevalence in individuals with or without DM, irrespective of AH use. However, among AH non-users, DM was associated with a higher likelihood of normotension (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.09-1.66; p = 0.006) and a lower likelihood of sustained hypertension (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.99; p = 0.039) compared to individuals without DM. These findings suggest that while DM does not significantly impact MH and WCH in HBPM, it may influence normotension and sustained hypertension rates in AH non-users. Likelihood of diabetes mellitus according to blood pressure phenotypes. AH - antihypertensive medications; CH - controlled hypertension; MH - masked hypertension; MUCH - masked uncontrolled hypertension; NT - normotension; SH - sustained hypertension; SUCH - sustained uncontrolled hypertension; WCH - white-coat hypertension; WUCH - white-coat uncontrolled hypertension.

Optimising antidiabetic medication management for type 2 diabetes and renal dysfunction in Can Tho City, Vietnam.

Introduction: The research aimed to delineate and investigate the utilisation of antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes patients with kidney failure at a hospital in Can Tho City, Vietnam. Material and methods: The research analysed the use of antidiabetic drugs at various time points, determined the drug interaction rate, and evaluated the appropriate use of drugs and the relationship with the achievement of target blood glucose and HbA1c levels. A two-tailed Student's t-test was employed to compare continuous variables, an ANOVA test was used to assess multiple values, and an χ2 test was utilised to evaluate categorical variables. Results: Insulin monotherapy was the predominant regimen for treating type 2 diabetes in patients with impaired kidney function. Metformin was the most prescribed oral medication. Approximately 85.78% of patients received safe and appropriate diabetes treatment. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship between achieving target blood glucose and HbA1c after 3 months and factors such as safe drug use and minimal drug interactions (p < 0.05). Patients with chronic kidney disease demonstrated better blood glucose control compared to those with acute kidney disease. Conclusions: The most common drug used for type 2 diabetes patients with impaired kidney function was insulin monotherapy, with usage increasing with the severity of chronic kidney disease. The chronic kidney disease group exhibited a higher rate of achieving target blood glucose and HbA1c compared to the acute kidney disease group. Rational, safe, and interaction-free drug use significantly contributed to better blood sugar control compared to less prudent medication choices.

Patterns of pain medication usage and self-reported pain in older Irish adults with osteoarthritis: A latent class analysis of data from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify and describe links between pain medication use and self-reported pain among people aged ≥ 50 years with osteoarthritis (OA) in an Irish population, and to examine the relationships between pain, medication usage and socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of wave 1 cross-sectional data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) was undertaken of 1042 people with self-reported doctor-diagnosed OA. We examined use of medications typically included in OA clinical guidelines, including non-opioid analgesics (e.g. paracetamol), topical and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids and nutraceuticals. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify underlying clinical subgroups based on medication usage patterns, and self-reported pain severity. Multinomial logistic regression was used to explore sociodemographic and clinical characteristic links to latent class membership. RESULTS: A total of 358 (34.4%) of the 1042 people in this analysis were taking pain medications including oral NSAIDs (17.5%), analgesics (11.4%) and opioids (8.7%). Nutraceutical (glucosamine/chondroitin) use was reported by 8.6% and topical NSAID use reported by 1.4%. Three latent classes were identified: (1) Low medication use/no pain (n = 382, 37%), (2) low medication use/moderate pain (n = 523, 50%) and (3) moderate medication use/high pain (n = 137, 13%). Poorer self-rated health and greater sleep disturbance were associated with classes 2 and 3; depressive symptoms and female gender were associated with class 2, and retirement associated with class 3. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst pain medication use varied with pain severity, different medication types reported broadly aligned with OA guidelines. The two subgroups exhibiting higher pain levels demonstrated poorer self-rated health and greater sleep disturbance.

Association of Coprescribing of Gabapentinoid and Other Psychoactive Medications With Altered Mental Status and Falls in Adults Receiving Dialysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Prescribing psychoactive medications for patients with kidney disease is common, but for patients receiving dialysis, some medications may be inappropriate. We evaluated the association of coprescribing gabapentinoids and other psychoactive potentially inappropriate medications (PPIMs) (e.g., sedatives, opioids) with altered mental status (AMS) and falls, and whether the associations are modified by frailty. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: & Participants: Adults receiving dialysis represented in the United States Renal Data System who had an active gabapentinoid prescription and no other PPIM prescriptions in the prior 6 months. EXPOSURE: PPIM coprescribing, or the presence of overlapping prescriptions of a gabapentinoid and ≥1 additional PPIM. OUTCOMES: Acute care visits for AMS and injurious falls. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Prentice-Williams-Petersen Gap Time models estimated the association between PPIM coprescribing and each outcome, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and frailty (assessed by a validated frailty index (FI)). Each model tested for interaction between PPIM coprescribing and frailty. RESULTS: Overall, PPIM coprescribing was associated with increased hazard of AMS (HR: 1.66 [95% CI 1.44, 1.92]) and falls (HR: 1.55 [95% CI 1.36, 1.77]). Frailty significantly modified the effect of PPIM coprescribing on the hazard of AMS (interaction p=0.01), but not falls. Among individuals with low frailty (FI=0.15), the hazard ratio for AMS with PPIM co-prescribing was 2.14 (95% CI: 1.69, 2.71); while for individuals with severe frailty (FI=0.34), the hazard ratio for AMS with PPIM coprescribing was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.42, 1.89). Individuals with PPIM coprescribing and severe frailty (FI =0.34) had the highest hazard of AMS [HR 4.04 (95% CI: 3.20, 5.10)] and falls [HR 2.77 (95% CI: 2.27, 3.38)] compared to non-frail individuals without PPIM coprescribing. LIMITATIONS: Outcome ascertainment bias; residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to gabapentinoid prescriptions alone, PPIM coprescribing was associated with an increased risk of AMS and falls. Clinicians should consider these risks when coprescribing PPIMs to patients receiving dialysis.

Buprenorphine use among non-hospital residential programs.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of buprenorphine within non-hospital residential programs. We hypothesize that programs offering long-term treatment will be less likely to accept or prescribe buprenorphine, but those that accept public insurance will demonstrate relative increased likelihood of buprenorphine availability. METHOD: This study analyzed data from the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey. The analytic sample (n=3654) included a subset of facilities that reported providing only substance use treatment, including three non-mutually exclusive service types: detox, short-term, and long-term. A logistic regression examined the association between buprenorphine availability and residential service type, holding constant characteristics associated with the outcome of interest. We then tested an interaction between public insurance and long-term service type on the outcome of interest. RESULTS: While long-term service type was associated with reduced odds of buprenorphine availability (OR=.288, p <.05), programs that both offered long-term residential programs and accepted public health insurance had 3.5 higher odds of accepting or prescribing buprenorphine (OR=4.586, p<.01) compared to long-term programs without public insurance. IMPLICATIONS: Patients who require treatment of longer duration may face barriers to buprenorphine availability; however, public insurance acceptance may increase odds of availability of buprenorphine among long-term programs.

Limited acceptance of buprenorphine in recovery residences in South Florida: A secret shopper survey.

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is a first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), essential for reducing opioid overdose mortality and improving treatment retention. Despite federal policies that mandate the acceptance of buprenorphine in recovery residences, individuals in South Florida taking this medication often face significant barriers to admission. This study uses a secret shopper survey to examine whether federal policies regarding prescribed buprenorphine use are being violated in South Florida recovery residences. METHODS: We selected recovery residences in South Florida due to the region's high opioid overdose death rate and its prominence as a recovery hub. From a list of 141 Florida Association of Recovery Residences (FARR)-certified residences in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade, we randomly surveyed 100 programs across all treatment levels (I-IV) using a standardized script. The primary outcome was whether residences accepted individuals taking buprenorphine, classified into three categories: (1) unconditional acceptance, where any person taking buprenorphine was accepted; (2) denial, where admission was refused for all individuals taking buprenorphine; and (3) conditional acceptance, where admission was granted under specific conditions. Secondary outcomes included requirements for conditional acceptance, such as dose limits or tapering policies. RESULTS: The distribution of the 100 surveyed recovery residences was comparable to the 141 FARR-certified facilities: 67 % were in Palm Beach, 31 % in Broward, and 2 % in Miami-Dade. Most residences (55 %) were level II certified, followed by 26 % level IV, 14 % level I, and 5 % level III. Sixteen percent of residences permitted admission of individuals taking any buprenorphine dose, 31 % had conditional policies, and 53 % prohibited buprenorphine. The maximum acceptance across all counties and levels was 20 %. No significant differences were observed by county (p = 0.61) or facility level (p = 0.29). Of 31 residences with conditional policies, 25.8 % (n = 8) required a mandatory taper, 38.7 % (n = 12) allowed a maximum 8 mg daily dosage, 12.9 % (n = 4) had a maximum 12 mg daily dosage, 6.5 % (n = 2) had a maximum 16 mg daily dosage, 6.5 % (n = 2) required a provider letter, and 9.7 % (n = 3) did not provide further information. CONCLUSIONS: Access to FARR-certified recovery residences is severely limited for individuals in South Florida taking buprenorphine. Urgent action is needed to improve access to evidence-based OUD treatments, address complexities influencing recovery residence policy and practice, and ensure appropriate allocation of public funds like State Opioid Response dollars.

Schizophrenia and antipsychotic medications present distinct and shared gut microbial composition: A meta-analysis.

There are some conflicting results regarding alterations of gut microbial composition in schizophrenia (SZ), even a few meta-analysis studies have addressed this field. Ignoring of antipsychotic medication effects may cause the large heterogeneity and impact on study results. This study is a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate composition of gut microbiota in patients with SZ, to elucidate the impact of antipsychotic use and reveal distinct and shared gut bacteria in SZ and antipsychotic medications. We re-analyzed the publicly available 16S rRNA-gene amplicon datasets by a standardized pipeline in QIIME2, used the natural log of response ratios as an effect index to directly and quantitatively compare composition of gut microbiota by random-effects meta-analysis with resampling tests in Metawin, ultimately to evaluate distinct abundance of gut bacteria. A total of 19 studies with 1968 participants (1067 patients with SZ and 901 healthy controls (HCs)) were included in this meta-analysis. The alterations of alpha diversity indices occurred in SZ on antipsychotics but not in drug-naïve or -free patients, while variation of beta diversity metrics appeared in SZ regardless of antipsychotic use. After antipsychotic treatment, reversed Simpson index, decreased observed species index and significant difference of Bray-Curtis distance were observed in patients. Especially, risperidone treatment increased the Shannon and Simpson indices. Noteworthy, three differed genera, including Lactobacillus, Roseburia and Dialister, were identified in both states of antipsychotic use. This meta-analysis is to provide a novel insight that SZ and antipsychotic medications present distinct and shared gut microbial composition.

Epidemiology and real-world management of childhood epilepsy in Japan: A descriptive study using a health claim database.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this epidemiological study was to assess the prevalence, comorbidities, and real-world management of childhood epilepsy to provide insights for enhancing epilepsy management and medical resource planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study encompassed insured individuals aged 0-17 years as of December 2018 who were registered at any point in 2018, for at least part of the year, in a Japanese health claims database spanning January-December 2018. Epilepsy was defined as a diagnosis of epilepsy based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes, and a claimed management fee for epilepsy or an anti-seizure medication (ASM) prescription for longer than 4 weeks. The prevalence of epilepsy, patient characteristics, including comorbidities, and management status, such as prescription of ASMs, were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 1528,905 registered children, 9279 were identified as having epilepsy. The prevalence of epilepsy was the lowest at 1.97 per 1000 population (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.80-2.15) in the 0-2-year age group and increased with age to 9.34 per 1000 population (95 % CI 8.98-9.72) in the 15-17-year age group, with a significantly higher prevalence in boys than in girls in the ≥12-year age group. ASMs were prescribed to 88.3 %-91.9 % of the patients. Moreover, 27 (0.29 %) patients underwent epilepsy surgery. The frequency of claiming intravenous ASMs and long-term electroencephalogram fees increased with a decrease in age. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that young children receive more medical resources than adolescents and that epilepsy surgery is underutilized. Further investigations will help improve the management of and develop measures against epilepsy.

Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: Problem-solving courts (PSCs) provide alternatives to prosecution and incarceration for drug-related crimes and offer integrated support for people who have lost custody of children due to drug use. Methadone and buprenorphine are lifesaving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) but are underused by PSC clients. Even when PSCs lack a court-level prohibition against MOUD, court staff still make individualized decisions about whether a court client can use MOUD. Therefore, we sought to identify factors involved in such individualized PSC court decisions about clients' use of MOUD. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups between Summer and Fall 2022 with a convenience sample of 54 PSC staff members from 33 courts across four states. Data were analyzed using iterative categorization. RESULTS: Interviewees indicated that their courts had eliminated blanket prohibitions against MOUD due to federal and state policy funding requirements, widespread dissemination of voluntary best practice standards, fear of lawsuits, and MOUD education targeting courts. Courts allowed MOUD if the court client accessed it through a treatment provider with whom the court collaborates. Some courts only allowed court clients to access MOUD from non-partnering treatment providers after a court-led "vetting" process of the proposed MOUD provider. MOUD provider characteristics considered during the vetting process included the provider's willingness to communicate with the court, frequent drug testing, adjustments of medication or dosage in response to aberrant results, offering of counseling, and acceptance of Medicaid or sliding scale payments. PSC staff were least comfortable with court clients using methadone treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The presence (or lack of) a PSC-MOUD partnership is a key factor involved in court staff decisions when a court client desires MOUD. Therefore, increasing the number of partnerships between PSCs and MOUD providers could lead to higher rates of MOUD utilization. It is unclear whether court-led vetting processes for non-partnering MOUD treatment providers are necessary or appropriate, and such vetting processes could reduce treatment choice or access in communities with few MOUD providers.