[JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis: ruxolitinib and momelotinib].

Myelofibrosis should be diagnosed according to the WHO classification (2022, 5th Ed.) and International Consensus Conference 2022 criteria. Testing for driver mutations in the three genes JAK2, CALR, and MPL is recommended to ensure a definitive diagnosis. Ruxolitinib is the only JAK inhibitor currently approved in Japan, but momelotinib is under regulatory review. The MOMENTUM study showed similar spleen volume reduction at 24 weeks and MFSAF-TSS reduction as the COMFORT study of ruxolitinib. Momelotinib acts on ACVR1 and, therefore, improves anemia through suppression of hepcidin. Anemia and/or transfusion dependency are known to be associated with overall survival duration. Consequently, supportive care measures such as ESA and danazol in lieu of transfusion should be considered in addition to JAK inhibitor selection. Mean survival after discontinuation of JAK inhibitors is 11 to 14 months. Pacritinib (not approved in Japan) is suitable for MF patients with thrombocytopenia. JAK inhibitor selection and supportive care by ESA or danazol in lieu of transfusion should be considered. Many classes of drugs other than JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis are under investigation.

Momelotinib in myelofibrosis and beyond: a comprehensive review of therapeutic insights in hematologic malignancies.

Myelofibrosis (MF), a complex hematological malignancy, presents a diverse array of symptoms, including anemia, constitutional symptoms, bone marrow insufficiency, and splenomegaly. The latter, often necessitating blood transfusions, poses an essential obstacle to MF management. While conventional approaches predominantly involve the use of JAK inhibitors, the potential for exacerbating anemia introduces complexity to the treatment. Nonetheless, Momelotinib stands out as a promising pharmaceutical compound with the potential to revolutionize the field. Momelotinib is an ACVR1 antagonist and a dual inhibitor of the JAK1 and JAK2 enzymes. By targeting MF's hematological and fibrotic aspects, Momelotinib influences iron metabolism by regulating hepcidin. This results in reduced hepcidin expression and increased iron availability, ultimately leading to improved anemia and reduced dependency on blood transfusion. This study aims to provide a concise overview of the pathogenesis of MF and elucidate the mechanism of action of Momelotinib. Subsequently, our review offers a practical summary encompassing the effects of Momelotinib in monotherapy, combined comparative drug therapy, and its associated side effects. Additionally, we explore the application of Momelotinib in other cancer types and investigate predictors for treatment success. Furthermore, we examine the utilization of Momelotinib in patients with liver and kidney failure.

Momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: an efficacy/safety analysis in the Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 randomized SIMPLIFY-1 trial.

Momelotinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 and activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor, improved symptoms, splenomegaly, and anemia in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). This sub-analysis of SIMPLIFY-1 evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Japanese patients with JAK inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve MF. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive momelotinib 200 mg once daily or ruxolitinib 20 mg twice daily (or modified based on label) for 24 weeks, after which patients could receive open-label momelotinib. The primary endpoint was splenic response rate (SRR; ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at 24 weeks; main secondary endpoints were total symptom score (TSS) response (≥ 50% reduction) and transfusion independence (TI) rates. Fifteen Japanese patients (momelotinib, n = 6; ruxolitinib, n = 9) were enrolled; all completed treatment. At Week 24, SRR was 50.0% with momelotinib and 44.4% with ruxolitinib. TSS response rates were 33.3% and 0%, and TI rates were 83.3% and 44.4%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 83.3% with momelotinib and 88.9% with ruxolitinib. Grade 3/4 TRAE rates were 0% and 55.6%, with specific events being anemia (55.6%) and vertigo (11.1%) with ruxolitinib. Momelotinib was well tolerated, improved spleen and symptom responses, and reduced transfusion requirements in Japanese patients with JAKi-naïve MF.

Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2.

INTRODUCTION: Some Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib do not address and may worsen anemia in patients with myelofibrosis. In these cases, the JAK inhibitor may be continued at a reduced dose in an effort to maintain splenic and symptom control, with supportive therapy and/or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions added to manage anemia. This post hoc descriptive analysis of the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-2 trial evaluated the relative benefits of this approach versus switching to the JAK1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib in patients for whom anemia management is a key consideration. METHODS: SIMPLIFY-2 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase 3 trial of momelotinib versus best available therapy (BAT; 88.5% continued ruxolitinib) in JAK inhibitor-experienced patients with myelofibrosis (n = 156). Patient subgroups (n = 105 each) were defined by either baseline (1) hemoglobin (Hb) of < 100 g/L or (2) non-transfusion independence (not meeting the criteria of no transfusions and no Hb of < 80 g/L for the previous 12 weeks); outcomes have been summarized descriptively. RESULTS: In both subgroups of interest, week 24 transfusion independence rates were higher with momelotinib versus BAT/ruxolitinib: baseline Hb of < 100 g/L, 22 (33.3%) versus 5 (12.8%); baseline non-transfusion independent, 25 (34.7%) versus 1 (3.0%). Mean Hb levels over time were also generally higher in both subgroups with momelotinib, despite median transfusion rates through week 24 with momelotinib being comparable to or lower than with BAT/ruxolitinib. Spleen and symptom response rates with momelotinib in these subgroups were comparable to the intent-to-treat population, while rates with BAT/ruxolitinib were lower. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe anemia and/or in need of RBC transfusions, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using anemia supportive therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02101268.

Patients with the rare blood cancer myelofibrosis often experience symptoms such as tiredness, an increase in the size of their spleens (an organ involved in filtering the blood), and anemia (too few red blood cells). One type of treatment for myelofibrosis, called a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, can help patients to feel better and reduce the size of their spleens, but some JAK inhibitors do not help with anemia and may make it worse. In those situations, patients may continue to take their JAK inhibitor but also receive another type of treatment, called an anemia supportive therapy, and may also receive red blood cell transfusions. This study compared 2 treatment approaches, continuing the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib and adding an anemia supportive therapy and/or transfusions versus switching to another treatment called momelotinib, in 2 groups of patients from a clinical trial: (1) patients with levels of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) at the start of the trial that indicated that they had anemia, and (2) patients who were already receiving red blood cell transfusions at the start of the trial. In both groups, more patients did not need red blood cell transfusions anymore at week 24 with momelotinib, and their hemoglobin levels on average became higher over time. More patients also had improvements in spleen size and symptoms with momelotinib. Overall, outcomes were improved by switching to momelotinib rather than continuing ruxolitinib and using supportive therapies and/or red blood cell transfusions to treat anemia.

Advances with janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms: an update of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The hallmark discovery of hyperactivation of the janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway was a sentinel moment in the history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). This finding paved the way for the development of JAK inhibitors, which now represent the foundation of myelofibrosis therapy. With four JAK inhibitors now approved for myelofibrosis, awareness of their clinical efficacy and safety data and recognition of their unique pharmacologic attributes are of critical importance. Additionally, ruxolitinib represents an integral part of the therapeutic arsenal for polycythemia vera. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a broad overview of the published literature supporting JAK inhibitor therapy for MPNs. Primarily focusing on myelofibrosis, each of the four available JAK inhibitors is reviewed in detail, including pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data. Failure of JAK inhibitors and future directions in JAK inhibitor therapy are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: JAK inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of MPNs and have dramatically improved patient outcomes. However, data informing selection between currently available JAK inhibitors is limited. These agents are not curative and eventually fail most patients with myelofibrosis. Combining JAK inhibitors with novel targeted agents appears to be the most promising path to further improve outcomes.

Momelotinib - a promising advancement in the management of myelofibrosis in adults with anemia.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of stem cells, with mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL genes. MF presents in primary and secondary forms, with common symptoms including splenomegaly, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Diagnostic criteria involve bone marrow examination and mutation studies. Current treatments are limited, with allogeneic stem cell transplant as the only curative option. Recent FDA approval of Momelotinib (MMB) offers new promise for MF patients with anemia. MMB, a JAK1/2 and ACVR1 inhibitor, effectively reduces spleen size, improves hemoglobin levels, and decreases transfusion dependency. The MOMENTUM trial compared MMB to danazol in JAK inhibitor-treated MF patients with anemia, showing MMB's superior symptom relief and transfusion independence rates. Additionally, the SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2 trials evaluated MMB in JAK inhibitor-naïve and experienced patients, respectively, confirming MMB's non-inferiority to ruxolitinib in spleen volume reduction and highlighting its benefits in transfusion requirements. MMB's unique dual inhibition mechanism addresses anemia by suppressing hepcidin production, thus enhancing erythropoiesis. These trials collectively suggest MMB as an effective treatment for MF, improving quality of life and offering a survival advantage for patients with anemia. Despite challenges, such as trial design limitations and adverse events, MMB represents a significant advancement in MF management, providing a new therapeutic option for a previously underserved patient population.

MoReLife - real-life data support the potential of momelotinib as a safe and effective treatment option for cytopenic myelofibrosis patients.

Recurrent problems of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) are cytopenias, debiliating disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly. Whereas the latter are usually addressed by the JAK1/2 inhibitors ruxolitinib and fedratinib, cytopenias often remain critical. Momelotinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of anemic MF patients, was shown to improve anemia via a direct inhibition of activin A receptor type I. In this German-wide, multicenter, retrospective analysis the safety and efficacy profile of momelotinib was evaluated in a real world setting within a cohort of 60 MF patients independent of pre-treatment. The median duration of treatment was 12 weeks. As a new, but manageable safety finding, creatinine increase (CTC°1-2) was detected in 10/60 patients (17%). Interestingly, not only hemoglobin levels increased in 84% of patients, but also platelet values (67%). In the cohort of transfusion-dependent individuals (n = 38), transfusion requirement improved in 15 patients (39%) with 8 reaching transfusion independency (21%). Transfusion independency was achieved within a median of 4 weeks (range 2-12). Spleen size decreased in 13/53 individuals (25%) with a median response time of 6 weeks. Thereof, 11 patients had been pre-treated with JAK inhibitor(s) (85%). Clinical improvement was detected in 24/51 symptomatic individuals (47%) with a median response time of 4 weeks. 5 patients stopped treatment due to side effects (8%), 6 patients due to a worsening of clinical symptoms (10%). Taken together, the MoReLife analysis identifies momelotinib as potent and safe therapeutic option also for heavily pre-treated cytopenic MF patients under real world conditions.

Transfusion-related cost offsets and time burden in patients with myelofibrosis on momelotinib vs. danazol from MOMENTUM.

Aim: To estimate projected US-based cost and time burden for patients with myelofibrosis and anemia treated with momelotinib compared with danazol. Methods: Cost and time burden were calculated based on the transfusion status of patients in the MOMENTUM trial and estimates extracted from previous studies. Results: Reductions in transfusion associated with momelotinib are projected to result in cost and time savings compared with danazol in transfusion-dependent and transfusion-independent/requiring patients with myelofibrosis, respectively: annual medical costs ($53,143 and $46,455 per person), outpatient transfusion costs ($42,021 and $8,370 per person) and annual time savings (173 and 35 h per person). Conclusion: Fewer transfusions with momelotinib are projected to result in cost and time savings in patients with myelofibrosis and anemia compared with danazol.

Estimated cost & time savings in patients with the blood cancer myelofibrosisMyelofibrosis is a rare blood cancer often associated with bone marrow damage, too few of some types of blood cells and symptoms including tiredness, night sweating, itching and feelings of fullness and pain because of increased spleen size. Patients with anemia (too few red blood cells) may require regular blood transfusions and this is one sign that myelofibrosis is getting worse. MOMENTUM was a Phase III clinical trial showing that the drug momelotinib was safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis who were previously treated with a type of drug called a JAK inhibitor. In particular, the trial showed that momelotinib reduced the need for transfusions compared with danazol, another drug typically used to treat patients with anemia. Based on this transfusion information from MOMENTUM and other publicly available information about estimated medical costs and patients' time spent in receiving transfusions, the analysis described here shows that a reduction in the number of transfusions with momelotinib compared with danazol is estimated to lead to cost savings as well as reduced patient time spent in transfusion-related travel, preparing and waiting for transfusions and receiving and recovering from transfusions.

Discovery of a potent and selective JAK1-targeting PROTAC degrader with anti-tumor activities.

Aberrant activation of the JAK-STAT pathway is evident in various human diseases including cancers. Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) provide an attractive strategy for developing novel JAK-targeting drugs. Herein, a series of CRBN-directed JAK-targeting PROTACs were designed and synthesized utilizing a JAK1/JAK2 dual inhibitor-momelotinib as the warhead. The most promising compound 10c exhibited both good enzymatic potency and cellular antiproliferative effects. Western blot analysis revealed that compound 10c effectively and selectively degraded JAK1 in a proteasome-dependent manner (DC50 = 214 nM). Moreover, PROTAC 10c significantly suppressed JAK1 and its key downstream signaling. Together, compound 10c may serve as a novel lead compound for antitumor drug discovery.

Momelotinib in myelofibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a hematologic disease characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. Recent years have seen the emergence of novel therapeutic agents, notably ruxolitinib and fedratinib, which target the Janus kinases (JAK) pathway. However, their myelosuppressive effect coupled with the persistence, and even worsening anemia remains a significant challenge, leading usually to treatment discontinuation. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on Momelotinib (MMB), a unique JAK inhibitor that has shown promise in MF treatment, particularly in improving anemia. MMB inhibits type 1 kinase activin A receptor or activin receptor-like kinase-2 (ACVR1/ALK2), with consequent rebalancing of the SMAD pathways and reduced transcription of hepcidin. Moreover, it seems that MMB could reduce the serum levels of several inflammatory cytokines responsible for anemia. Clinical trials have demonstrated MMB's efficacy in reducing spleen size, alleviating symptoms, and improving anemia, with a favorable safety profile compared to other JAK inhibitors, both in treatment-naïve and in pre-treated patients. EXPERT OPINION: Due to its mechanism of action, MMB represents a valuable therapeutic option in MF, addressing the clinical challenge of anemia and potentially improving outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies. Ongoing research explores MMB's potential in acute myeloid leukemia and combination therapies.

Momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patient subgroups by baseline hemoglobin levels in the SIMPLIFY-1 trial.

A key hallmark of myelofibrosis is anemia, which ranges from mild to severe based on hemoglobin levels. To more clearly define outcomes with the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib by anemia severity, we performed a descriptive post hoc exploratory analysis of the double-blind, randomized, phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1 study (NCT01969838; N = 432, JAK inhibitor naive, momelotinib vs. ruxolitinib); subgroups were defined by baseline hemoglobin: <10 (moderate/severe), ≥10 to <12 (mild), or ≥12 g/dL (nonanemic). Spleen and symptom results were generally consistent with those previously reported for the intent-to-treat population. In anemic subgroups, momelotinib was associated with higher rates of transfusion independence and reduced/stable transfusion intensity vs. ruxolitinib. No new or unexpected safety signals were identified. Overall, momelotinib provides spleen, symptom, and anemia benefits to JAK inhibitor-naive patients with myelofibrosis regardless of baseline hemoglobin level, and greater anemia-related benefits vs. ruxolitinib in patients with hemoglobin <12 g/dL.

Meaningful Symptomatic Change in Patients With Myelofibrosis From the SIMPLIFY Studies.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with myelofibrosis develop symptoms due to bone marrow fibrosis, systemic inflammation, and/or organomegaly. Alleviating symptoms improves overall quality of life. Clinical trials have historically defined symptom response as a reduction of at least 50% in Total Symptom Score at week 24 compared with baseline. Whether 50% constitutes a meaningful benefit has not been established. This study determined the meaningful change threshold (MCT) for 2 momelotinib phase III trials, SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2. METHODS: The absolute and percentage MCT was determined using anchor-based methods applied to the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form v2.0 and Patient Global Impression of Change. MCTs were applied retrospectively to determine responder rates. Generalized estimating equations estimated the treatment-related difference in likelihood of improvement. RESULTS: In SIMPLIFY-1, a Janus kinase inhibitor-naive population, the MCT was 8 points. In SIMPLIFY-2, a previously Janus kinase inhibitor-treated population, the MCT was 6 points. A 32% MCT was determined in both studies, showing that the historic 50% reduction threshold may be a conservative choice. In SIMPLIFY-1, a similar proportion of patients achieved responder status with 24 weeks of momelotinib or ruxolitinib therapy based on the absolute MCT (39% vs 41%, respectively). In SIMPLIFY-2, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with momelotinib achieved responder states compared with best available therapy based on absolute and percent change MCTs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that momelotinib provided clinically meaningful symptom benefit for patients with myelofibrosis and provides insight into the appropriateness of the symptom change threshold used in historical studies.

Changes in bone marrow fibrosis during momelotinib or ruxolitinib therapy do not correlate with efficacy outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis.

Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is a pathological feature of myelofibrosis, with higher grades associated with poor prognosis. Limited data exist on the association between outcomes and BMF changes. We present BMF data from Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-naive patients from SIMPLIFY-1 (NCT01969838), a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study of momelotinib vs ruxolitinib. Baseline and week 24 bone marrow biopsies were graded from 0 to 3 as per World Health Organization criteria. Other assessments included Total Symptom Score, spleen volume, transfusion independence status, and hemoglobin levels. Paired samples were available from 144 and 160 patients randomized to momelotinib and ruxolitinib. With momelotinib and ruxolitinib, transfusion independence was achieved by 87% and 44% of patients with BMF improvement of ≥1 grade and 76% and 56% of those with stable/worsening BMF; there was no association between BMF changes and transfusion independence for either arm (momelotinib, p = .350; ruxolitinib, p = .096). Regardless of BMF changes, hemoglobin levels also generally increased on momelotinib but decreased on ruxolitinib. In addition, no associations between BMF changes and spleen (momelotinib, p = .126; ruxolitinib, p = .407)/symptom (momelotinib, p = .617; ruxolitinib, p = .833) outcomes were noted, and no improvement in overall survival was observed with ≥1-grade BMF improvement (momelotinib, p = .395; ruxolitinib, p = .407). These data suggest that the anemia benefit of momelotinib is not linked to BMF changes, and question the use of BMF assessment as a surrogate marker for clinical benefit with JAK inhibitors.

Anemia-related response end points in myelofibrosis clinical trials: current trends and need for renewed consensus.

JAK inhibitors are the current standard of care in myelofibrosis, but many do not address and may worsen anemia; thus, anemia-related responses have traditionally been overlooked as efficacy end points in pivotal clinical trials, leading to a lack of consistency and analytic detail in their reporting. Here we apply our experiences in the phase III trials of momelotinib, a JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor and the first therapy indicated by the US FDA for myelofibrosis patients with anemia, to highlight how application of different criteria impacts the anemia-related benefits reported for any potential treatment in myelofibrosis. We advocate for a convention of a new expert consensus panel to bring consistency and transparency to the definition of anemia-related response in myelofibrosis.

What is this Perspective about? Anemia (too few healthy red blood cells) is common in patients with myelofibrosis. While it is becoming more common to measure the anemia benefits associated with potential treatments for myelofibrosis in clinical trials, different definitions of anemia benefit are available. This Perspective reviews these definitions, the differences between them, and why consistency and clarity in measuring anemia benefit matter. The definitions used in clinical trials of momelotinib, a treatment for patients with myelofibrosis and anemia, are also explained to show how the anemia benefit observed in these trials could have changed if different definitions were used. What does this Perspective show? Definitions of anemia benefit may include the number of red blood cell transfusions a patient receives, the amount of hemoglobin (a red blood cell protein) in their blood, or a combination thereof. Considerations such as timing, the types of patients included, and other factors are not consistent across definitions and not always clearly reported. Results when different definitions of anemia benefit were followed in the momelotinib clinical trials show that the amount of benefit observed with treatments changes depending on which definition is used. What conclusions can be drawn from this Perspective? More consistency and clarity in the definitions of anemia benefit in myelofibrosis clinical trials are needed, suggesting that a new panel of experts should come together to discuss this topic.

Treatment of anemia in myelofibrosis: focusing on novel therapeutic options.

INTRODUCTION: Myelofibrosis is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells, increased bone marrow fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, hepatosplenomegaly, abnormal cytokine production, and constitutional symptoms. These and many other factors contribute to the development of anemia in myelofibrosis patients. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes novel and promising treatments for anemia in myelofibrosis including transforming growth factor-ß inhibitors luspatercept and KER-050, JAK inhibitors momelotinib, pacritinib, and jaktinib, BET inhibitors pelabresib and ABBV-744, antifibrotic PRM-151, BCL2/BCL-XL inhibitor navitoclax, and telomerase inhibitor imetelstat. EXPERT OPINION: Standard approaches to treat myelofibrosis-related anemia have limited efficacy and are associated with toxicity. New drugs have shown positive results in myelofibrosis-associated anemia when used alone or in combination.

Novel Janus-kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in Myelofibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: JAK inhibitors (JAKis), used in the treatment of myelofibrosis, have entered standard treatment, providing significant improvements in spleen size and symptom burden. Although splenomegaly provides a reduction and some improvement in cytopenia, there is still a way to go. Novel JAKis are being investigated to overcome barriers to treatment access, such as therapeutic challenges, intolerance, and unresponsiveness. AREAS COVERED: This review includes the current status of JAKi treatment for myelofibrosis, mainly focusing on investigational JAKis; jaktinib, lestaurtinib, itacitinib, gandotinib, BMS-911543, ilginatinib, TQ05105, and flonoltinib maleate. MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov were screened to identify all completed or active studies on this topic. The outcomes of the preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and discussed for each drug. EXPERT OPINION: In patients with myelofibrosis, momelotinib was effective in treating anemia, whereas jaktinib was effective in both anemia and Total Symptom Score (TSS). More phase 3 studies are needed to provide more precise evidence. The increasing variety of JAKis will allow for more personalized treatment options for myelofibrosis in the future. The potential impact on disease progression, molecular responses, and the duration of this response will become important parameters for future evaluations of these drugs.

AXL-initiated paracrine activation of pSTAT3 enhances mesenchymal and vasculogenic supportive features of tumor-associated macrophages.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are integral to the development of complex tumor microenvironments (TMEs) and can execute disparate cellular programs in response to extracellular cues. However, upstream signaling processes underpinning this phenotypic plasticity remain to be elucidated. Here, we report that concordant AXL-STAT3 signaling in TAMs is triggered by lung cancer cells or cancer-associated fibroblasts in the cytokine milieu. This paracrine action drives TAM differentiation toward a tumor-promoting "M2-like" phenotype with upregulation of CD163 and putative mesenchymal markers, contributing to TAM heterogeneity and diverse cellular functions. One of the upregulated markers, CD44, mediated by AXL-IL-11-pSTAT3 signaling cascade, enhances macrophage ability to interact with endothelial cells and facilitate formation of primitive vascular networks. We also found that AXL-STAT3 inhibition can impede the recruitment of TAMs in a xenograft mouse model, thereby suppressing tumor growth. These findings suggest the potential application of AXL-STAT3-related markers to quantitatively assess metastatic potential and inform therapeutic strategies in lung cancer.

Current therapies for classic myeloproliferative neoplasms: A focus on pathophysiology and supportive care.

PURPOSE: This article concisely evaluates current therapies that have received regulatory approval for the treatment of classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Pertinent pathophysiology and supportive care are discussed. Emerging therapies are also briefly described. SUMMARY: MPNs are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by acquired abnormalities of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), resulting in the generation of transformed myeloid progenitor cells that overproduce mature and immature cells within the myeloid lineage. Mutations in JAK2 and other driver oncogenes are central to the genetic variability of these diseases. Cytoreductive therapies such as hydroxyurea, anagrelide, interferon, and therapeutic phlebotomy aim to lower the risk of thrombotic events without exposing patients to an increased risk of leukemic transformation. However, no comparisons can be made between these therapies, as reduction of thrombotic risk has not been used as an endpoint. On the other hand, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib (an investigational agent at the time of writing) directly target the constitutively activated JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway of HSCs in the bone marrow. Mutations of genes in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway provide a unifying understanding of MPNs, spur therapeutic innovations, and represent opportunities for pharmacists to optimize mitigation strategies for both disease-related and treatment-related adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Treatment options for MPNs span a wide range of disease mechanisms. The growth of targeted therapies holds promise for expanding the treatment arsenal for these rare, yet complex diseases and creates opportunities to optimize supportive care for affected patients.

Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by abnormal proliferation of myeloid cells and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to progressive bone marrow dysfunction. The introduction of ruxolitinib just over a decade ago marked a significant advancement in MF therapy, with JAK inhibitors now being the first-line treatment for reducing spleen size and managing symptoms. However, early JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib and fedratinib) are often associated with cytopenias, particularly thrombocytopenia and anemia, which limit their tolerability. To address these complications, pacritinib has been developed and recently approved for patients with thrombocytopenia, while momelotinib is in development for those with anemia. Although JAK inhibitors have significantly improved the quality of life of MF patients, they have not demonstrated the ability to reduce leukemic transformation and their impact on survival is debated. Numerous drugs are currently being developed and investigated in clinical trials, both as standalone therapy and in combination with JAK inhibitors, with promising results enhancing the benefits of JAK inhibitors. In the near future, MF treatment strategies will involve selecting the most suitable JAK inhibitor based on individual patient characteristics and prior therapy. Ongoing and future clinical trials are crucial for advancing the field and expanding therapeutic options for MF patients.

Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments.

Myelofibrosis (MF) presents an array of clinical manifestations and molecular profiles. The two distinct phenotypes- myeloproliferative and myelodepletive or cytopenic- are situated at the two poles of the disease spectrum and are largely defined by different degrees of cytopenias, splenomegaly, and distinct molecular profiles. The myeloproliferative phenotype is characterized by normal/higher peripheral blood counts or mildly decreased hemoglobin, progressive splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF, higher JAK2 V617F burden, fewer mutations, and superior overall survival (OS). The myelodepletive phenotype is usually associated with primary MF, ≥2 cytopenias, modest splenomegaly, lower JAK2 V617F burden, higher fibrosis, greater genomic complexity, and inferior OS. Cytopenias are associated with mutations in epigenetic regulators/splicing factors, clonal evolution, disease progression, and shorter OS. Clinical variables, in conjunction with the molecular profiles, inform integrated prognostication and disease management. Ruxolitinib/fedratinib and pacritinib/momelotinib may be more suitable to treat patients with the myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotypes, respectively. Appreciation of MF heterogeneity and two distinct phenotypes, the different clinical manifestations and molecular profiles associated with each phenotype alongside the growing treatment expertise, the development of non-myelosuppressive JAK inhibitors, and integrated prognostication are leading to a new era in patient management. Physicians can increasingly tailor personalized treatments that will address the unique unmet needs of MF patients, including those presenting with the myelodepletive phenotype, to elicit optimal outcomes and extended OS across the disease spectrum.