Characteristics of isatuximab-derived interference in serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, and an absence of sustained in vivo interference due to belantamab mafodotin and denosumab.

OBJECTIVES: Some therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, like daratumumab and elotuzumab, produce interfering monoclonal bands on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). Whether other common therapeutic antibodies also produce interference has not been systematically evaluated. DESIGN AND METHODS: SPEP/IFE from patients receiving isatuximab (48 patients), belantamab mafodotin (BM; 41), and denosumab (41) were retrospectively reviewed for therapeutic antibody interference. Cases exhibiting isatuximab interference were quantified and the maximum duration of isatuximab effect was evaluated. To characterize band position, neat human serum was spiked with BM or denosumab at supratherapeutic concentrations. Band migration patterns were compared on SPEP and IFE, with band position expressed relative to other constant protein fractions. RESULTS: Isatuximab-induced IFE interference was common (81.3 % of evaluated patients) with a maximum observed duration of 8 weeks. 10.4 % of isatuximab patients had IgG kappa monoclonal gammopathies that co-migrated with the drug; this subset could benefit from HYDRASHIFT 2/4 isatuximab testing. 8.3 % of IFE cases were negative for an isatuximab band but showed large, endogenous M-spikes migrating elsewhere. All patients in this group expired within 1 year of this finding. We hypothesize that an inability to detect isatuximab in this setting corresponds to a large residual myeloma burden that reduces isatuximab serum concentration. This observation may serve as a negative prognostic factor. Spiking studies demonstrated that BM and denosumab produce interference in vitro, but sustained interference was not observed in >40 treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic antibody interference in patients receiving isatuximab is common, and can persist for at least 8 weeks after administration. >10 % of patients receiving isatuximab may benefit from HYDRASHIFT testing post-therapy. In contrast, BM and denosumab fail to produce sustained interference in treated patients.

The course of COVID-19 in a multiple sclerosis: a case report.

The authors present the case of a prolonged course of COVID 19 disease in a 37-year-old patient with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies immunotherapy. This publication presents a clinical case of the course of COVID-19 disease in a multiple sclerosis patient receiving ublituximab therapy. The use of disease-modifying anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy was associated with a protracted wave-like course of COVID-19 with the addition of a bacterial infection. This publication illustrates the key mechanisms and approaches to the treatment of such a cohort of patients. The use of highly effective multiple sclerosis treatment methods may be associated with an increase in the incidence of COVID-19 and worsening of its course. Multiple sclerosis patients receiving anti-CD20 therapy are at particular risk of a wave-like course of COVID-19, caused by immunosuppression, creates a basis for bacterial and fungal coinfection.

Association between monoclonal antibody therapy, vaccination, and longer-term symptom resolution after acute COVID-19.

Effective therapies for reducing post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) symptoms are lacking. Evaluate the association between monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment or COVID-19 vaccination with symptom recovery in COVID-19 participants. The longitudinal survey-based cohort study was conducted from April 2021 to January 2022 across a multihospital Colorado health system. Adults ≥18 years with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were included. Primary exposures were mAb treatment and COVID-19 vaccination. The primary outcome was time to symptom resolution after SARS-CoV-2 positive test date. The secondary outcome was hospitalization within 28 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Analysis included 1612 participants, 539 mAb treated, and 486 with ≥2 vaccinations. Time to symptom resolution was similar between mAb treated versus untreated patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.90, 95% CI: 0.77-1.04). Time to symptom resolution was shorter for patients who received ≥2 vaccinations compared to those unvaccinated (aHR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.31-1.88). 28-day hospitalization risk was lower for patients receiving mAb therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.19-0.50) and ≥2 vaccinations (aOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20-0.55), compared with untreated or unvaccinated status. Analysis included 1612 participants, 539 mAb treated, and 486 with ≥2 vaccinations. Time to symptom resolution was similar between mAb treated versus untreated patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.90, 95% CI: 0.77-1.04). Time to symptom resolution was shorter for patients who received ≥2 vaccinations compared to those unvaccinated (aHR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.31-1.88). 28-day hospitalization risk was lower for patients receiving mAb therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.19-0.50) and ≥2 vaccinations (aOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20-0.55), compared with untreated or unvaccinated status. COVID-19 vaccination, but not mAb therapy, was associated with a shorter time to symptom resolution. Both were associated with lower 28-day hospitalization.

Immune-Related Adverse Event-Related Adrenal Insufficiency Mediates Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy in Cancer Treatment.

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with cancer; however, these agents may initiate immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies have demonstrated a robust correlation between disease prognosis and the occurrence of irAEs, specifically skin or endocrine irAEs. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between irAE-related adrenal insufficiency (AI) and ICI treatment efficacy. Patients and methods: Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal, respiratory, head and neck, urological, skin and gynecologic cancers treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody as monotherapy or combined therapy (combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy) were divided into irAE-A (patients with irAE-related AI), irAE-B (patients with other irAEs) and non-irAE groups. Immunotherapy efficacy was assessed based on the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Results: Of the 192 patients enrolled in our study, 17 developed irAE-related AI and 83 developed other irAEs. The DCR of the irAE-A and irAE-B groups were higher than that of the non-irAE group (P<0.05). Multiple extended Cox regression analyses showed that irAE status (irAE-A vs non-irAE, P=0.008; irAE-B vs non-irAE, P=0.020), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (P=0.045), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P=0.000), and treatment line (P=0.002) were independent predictors of PFS. Contrarily, irAE status (irAE-A vs non-irAE, P=0.009; irAE-B vs non-irAE, P=0.013), ECOG status (P=0.007), TNM stage (P=0.035), treatment line (P=0.001) and treatment modality (P=0.008) were independent predictors for OS. Conclusion: IrAE-related AI was significantly associated with ICI treatment efficacy in patients with cancer, which could be a potentially predictable marker. Due to the destruction of adrenal tissue by T cells with enhanced activity, AI reflects enhanced T cell activity to some extent.

Epstein-Barr virus gp42 antibodies reveal sites of vulnerability for receptor binding and fusion to B cells.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes infectious mononucleosis and is associated with B cell lymphomas. EBV glycoprotein 42 (gp42) binds HLA class II and activates membrane fusion with B cells. We isolated gp42-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), A10 and 4C12, which use distinct mechanisms to neutralize virus infection. mAb A10 was more potent than the only known neutralizing gp42 mAb, F-2-1, in neutralizing EBV infection and blocking binding to HLA class II. mAb 4C12 was similar to mAb A10 in inhibiting glycoprotein-mediated B cell fusion but did not block receptor binding, and it was less effective in neutralizing infection. Crystallographic structures of gH/gL/gp42/A10 and gp42/4C12 complexes revealed two distinct sites of vulnerability on gp42 for receptor binding and B cell fusion. Passive transfer of mAb A10 into humanized mice conferred nearly 100% protection from viremia and EBV lymphomas after EBV challenge. These findings identify vulnerable sites on EBV that may facilitate therapeutics and vaccines.

Biosimilar in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Breast cancer (BC) has been identified as a major public health cancer as it topped the list of most prevalent cancers among women in the last three years. Rigorous research has been conducted to improve the prognosis of cancer therapies since the time of inception. Recent advancements in cancer therapy have introduced monoclonal biosimilars as a promising treatment alternative. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), produced through cloning, have demonstrated effectiveness in targeting diverse antigens. Biosimilar, considered complex entities compared to small-molecule drugs, pose challenges in replication due to their biological nature. The manufacturing process involves rigorous comparability testing to ensure similarity in quality, safety, and efficacy with the reference product. Trastuzumab biosimilars, such as CT-P6, Ontruzant®, ABP 980, and PF-05280014, have shown efficacy in treating HER2-positive metastatic BCs, presenting a viable alternative to the reference product. The implications of monoclonal biosimilars extend beyond trastuzumab, with bevacizumab emerging as another significant biosimilar for BC treatment. The shift toward biosimilar aims to enhance accessibility to biologics by reducing costs. Health economic analyses indicate potential cost savings, contributing to the overall cost-effectiveness of biosimilar adoption. While concerns about switching between reference products and biosimilars exist, evidence suggests a lower risk of immunogenicity-related side effects with mAbs like trastuzumab. Monoclonal biosimilars present a promising avenue in BC therapy, demonstrating efficacy, safety, and potential cost savings. The integration of biosimilars into cancer treatment strategies offers a means to improve accessibility to effective care while addressing economic considerations in healthcare.

Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies locally-applied into the middle ear of guinea pigs.

Countless therapeutic antibodies are currently available for the treatment of a broad range of diseases. Some target molecules of therapeutic antibodies are involved in the pathogenesis of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), suggesting that SNHL may be a novel target for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy. When considering mAb therapy for SNHL, understanding of the pharmacokinetics of mAbs after local application into the middle ear is crucial. To reveal the fundamental characteristics of mAb pharmacokinetics following local application into the middle ear of guinea pigs, we performed pharmacokinetic analyses of mouse monoclonal antibodies to FLAG-tag (FLAG-mAbs), which have no specific binding sites in the middle and inner ear. FLAG-mAbs were rapidly transferred from the middle ear to the cochlear fluid, indicating high permeability of the round window membrane to mAbs. FLAG-mAbs were eliminated from the cochlear fluid 3 h after application, similar to small molecules. Whole-body autoradiography and quantitative assessments of cerebrospinal fluid and serum demonstrated that the biodistribution of FLAG-mAbs was limited to the middle and inner ear. Altogether, the pharmacokinetics of mAbs are similar to those of small molecules when locally applied into the middle ear, suggesting the necessity of drug delivery systems for appropriate mAb delivery to the cochlear fluid after local application into the middle ear.

Cancer drugs with high repositioning potential for Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recent full FDA approval of lecanemab, there is currently no disease modifying therapy (DMT) that can efficiently slow down the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population. This statement emphasizes the need to identify novel DMTs in the shortest time possible to prevent a global epidemic of AD cases as the world population experiences an increase in lifespan. AREAS COVERED: Here, we review several classes of anti-cancer drugs that have been or are being investigated in Phase II/III clinical trials for AD, including immunomodulatory drugs, RXR agonists, sex hormone therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. EXPERT OPINION: Given the overall course of brain pathologies during the progression of AD, we express a great enthusiasm for the repositioning of anti-cancer drugs as possible AD DMTs. We anticipate an increasing number of combinatorial therapy strategies to tackle AD symptoms and their underlying pathologies. However, we strongly encourage improvements in clinical trial study designs to better assess target engagement and possible efficacy over sufficient periods of drug exposure.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy of Breastfeeding Patient Infected with SARS-CoV-2: A Case Report.

Introduction: Although safety data demonstrated the efficacy and effectiveness of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination for all individuals over 6 months of age, including pregnant and breastfeeding individuals, optimal treatment courses for symptomatic pregnant and lactating individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 remain to be defined. Case Description: A coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-vaccinated breastfeeding woman received anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody treatment casirivimab-imdevimab 5 days after diagnosis of a symptomatic breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results and Conclusions: The patient did not present with obvious defects in innate or adaptive cellular subsets, but compared with controls had minimal maternal antibody response to recommended pregnancy vaccinations including SARS-CoV-2 and tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (TDaP). The outcome of the monoclonal antibody infusion treatment was favorable as it transiently increased SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in plasma and human milk compartments.

COVID-19 Treatments: Then and Now.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has evolved over the past 3+ years, and strategies to prevent illness and treat infection have changed over time. As COVID-19 transitions from a pandemic to an endemic infection, widespread nonpharmaceutical interventions such as mask mandates and governmental policies requiring social distancing have given way to more selective strategies for risk mitigation. Monoclonal antibody therapies used for disease prevention and treatment lost utility owing to the emergence of resistant viral variants. Oral antiviral medications have become the mainstay of treatment in nonhospitalized individuals, whereas systemic corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy in those requiring supplemental oxygen. Emerging literature also supports the use of additional immune-modulating therapies in select admitted patients. Importantly, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted both unprecedented research and development of medical interventions while also drawing attention to significant pitfalls in the global response. This review provides a comprehensive update in prevention and management of COVID-19.

Understanding mechanisms of virulence in MRSA: implications for antivirulence treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a widespread pathogen, often causing recurrent and deadly infections in the hospital and community. Many S. aureus virulence factors have been suggested as potential targets for antivirulence therapy to decrease the threat of diminishing antibiotic availability. Antivirulence methods hold promise due to their adjunctive and prophylactic potential and decreased risk for selective pressure. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the dominant virulence mechanisms exerted by MRSA and antivirulence therapeutics that are currently undergoing testing in clinical or preclinical stages. We also discuss the advantages and downsides of several investigational antivirulence approaches, including the targeting of bacterial transporters, host-directed therapy, and quorum-sensing inhibitors. For this review, a systematic search of literature on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant search terms was performed in April and May 2023. EXPERT OPINION: Vaccine and antibody strategies have failed in clinical trials and could benefit from more basic science-informed approaches. Antivirulence-targeting approaches need to be set up better to meet the requirements of drug development, rather than only providing limited results to provide 'proof-of-principle' translational value of pathogenesis research. Nevertheless, there is great potential of such strategies and potential particular promise for novel probiotic approaches.

Complement system in Anti-CD20 mAb therapy for cancer: A mini-review.

The complement system is an important part of innate immunity. Through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), it plays an important role in the clearance of invading pathogens but also cancerous host cells. Therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), for example, rituximab and ofatumumab, is a well-established treatment for lymphoid malignancies, and CDC is one of the main mechanisms underlying their anti-cancer activity. However, there are still some issues with the clinical application of anti-CD20 antibodies. On the one hand, anti-CD20 can cause some clinical side effects; on the other hand, anti-CD20 has low potency in some patients, and increasing the dosage does not enhance its effectiveness in these patients. Previous studies have reported that a gain-of-function in a certain complement component can boost the cytolytic activity of anti-CD20 mAbs. Through reviewing the literature on complement system control and anti-CD20 mAbs, this article aims to provide a thorough understanding of the potential of targeting complement components in lymphoma therapy.

The effectiveness of the anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy infliximab in neuro-Behçet's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of infliximab for the treatment of refractory central neuro-Behçet's disease. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the research question was designed using the 'Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes' (PICO) model and the search methodology was developed according to the PRISMA statement. The study was registered on PROSPERO. Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published in English between January 2000 and January 2020. Data were analysed using Meta-Essentials software, version 10.12. Treatment effect size was determined by a random effects model. Interstudy heterogeneity was explored using I2 statistics. Cumulative meta-analysis was conducted to assess the temporal trend for accumulating evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies, comprising 64 patients (mean age, 38 .21 years and mean disease duration, 84.76 months) were included. Effect-size analysis showed that 93.7% of the treated patients in the analysis were responders to infliximab therapy (95% confidence interval 0.88, 0.993). There was no significant inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Cumulative analysis showed accumulating evidence favoring increasing effectiveness over the last 20 years. CONCLUSION: Infliximab showed considerable therapeutic effectiveness in the treatment of refractory neuro-Behçet's disease.

Effectiveness of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalization and Mortality in a Statewide Population.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibody (MAB) treatments for COVID-19 received Emergency Use Authorization in the United States. METHODS: We used surveillance data from Rhode Island to conduct a retrospective, statewide cohort study to estimate the effectiveness of MABs for preventing hospitalization and death during periods when Alpha and Delta variants were predominant. RESULTS: From 1/17/2021-10/26/2021, 285 long-term congregate care (LTCC) residents and 3,113 non-congregate patients met our eligibility criteria and received MAB; they were matched to 285 and 6,226 controls, respectively. Among LTCC residents, 8.8% (25/285) of patients who received MAB were hospitalized or died compared to 25.3% (72/285) of those who did not receive MAB (adjusted difference=16.7%, 95% confidence interval CI=11.0-22.3%). Among non-congregate patients, 4.5% (140/3,113) of patients who received MAB were hospitalized or died compared to 11.8% (737/6,226) of those who did not receive MAB (adjusted difference=7.2%, 95% CI=6.0-8.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of MABs led to an absolute reduction in hospitalization or death during periods when Alpha and Delta variants were predominant.

Relationship Between the Response to Antibody Therapy and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with Severe Asthma.

Purpose: Asthma is associated with a high prevalence of psychopathological disorders, especially depressive disorders or anxiety. In patients with uncontrolled severe asthma, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-therapy positively influenced control of mental disorders. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of antibody therapy on the burden of these mental diseases depending on responder status. Patients and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma (n = 82) prior to mAb-therapy ("baseline") (omalizumab, dupilumab, benralizumab or mepolizumab). Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) were detected at baseline using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as general sociodemographic data and lung function parameters. At 6-month (±3 month) follow-up, the burden of psychopathological symptoms under mAb-therapy was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-2 (GAD-2). Response status was classified using the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS), assessing exacerbations, oral corticosteroid usage and asthma control test (ACT) score. Predictors for non-response to mAb-therapy were identified using linear regression analysis. Results: Patients with severe asthma suffered from symptoms of MDD/GAD more often compared to the general population, with a higher prevalence among mAb therapy non-responders. mAb-responders exhibited a declining burden of MDD, better quality of life (QoL), less exacerbations, better lung function and better disease control compared to non-responders. A history of symptoms of depression was identified as a predictor for non-response to mAb-therapy. Conclusion: Asthma symptoms and psychological problems are linked and more prevalent in our cohort of severe asthma patients than in the general population. Patients with signs of MDD/GAD before mAb-therapy show less mAb therapy response suggesting a negative impact of prior psychological problems on treatment response. In some patients, the score on MDD/GAD was caused by severe asthma - here symptoms decreased after effective treatment.

Internalization of Angiotensin-(1-12) in Adult Retinal Pigment Epithelial-19 Cells.

Purpose: Angiotensin-(1-12) [Ang-(1-12)] serves as a primary substrate to generate angiotensin II (Ang II) by angiotensin-converting enzyme and/or chymase suggests it may be an unrecognized source of Ang II-mediated microvascular complication in hypertension-mediated retinopathy. We investigated Ang-(1-12) expression and internalization in adult retinal pigment epithelial-19 (ARPE-19) cultured cells. We performed the internalization of Ang-(1-12) in ARPE-19 cells in the presence of a highly specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) developed against the C-terminal end of the Ang-(1-12) sequence. Methods: All experiments were performed in confluent ARPE-19 cells (passage 28-35). We employed high-performance liquid chromatography to purify radiolabeled, 125I-Ang-(1-12) and immuno-neutralization with Ang-(1-12) mAb to demonstrate Ang-(1-12)'s internalization in ARPE-19 cells. Internalization was also demonstrated by immunofluorescence (IF) method. Results: These procedures revealed internalization of an intact 125I-Ang-(1-12) in ARPE-19 cells. A significant reduction (∼53%, P < 0.0001) in 125I-Ang-(1-12) internalization was detected in APRE-19 cells in the presence of the mAb. IF staining experiments further confirms internalization of Ang-(1-12) into the cells from the extracellular culture medium. No endogenous expression was detected in the ARPE-19 cells. An increased intensity of IF staining was detected in cells exposed to 1.0 µM Ang-(1-12) compared with 0.1 µM. Furthermore, we found hydrolysis of Ang-(1-12) into Ang II by ARPE-19 cells' plasma membranes. Conclusions: Intact Ang-(1-12) peptide is internalized from the extracellular spaces in ARPE-19 cells and metabolized into Ang II. The finding that a selective mAb blocks cellular internalization of Ang-(1-12) suggests alternate therapeutic approaches to prevent/reduce the RPE cells Ang II burden.

Targeting interleukin 4 and interleukin 13: a novel therapeutic approach in bullous pemphigoid.

Aim: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an organ-specific autoimmune bullous disease characterized by autoantibodies that target the cellular adhesion molecules BP180 and BP230. Both immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgE are involved in the induction of subepidermal blisters. Specifically, IgE autoantibodies are presumed to be responsible for the pruritic and erythematous features of BP. Histologically, eosinophil infiltration is a prominent feature in BP. Eosinophils and IgE are mostly associated with the Th2 immune response. Th2 cytokines, particularly interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, are presumed to contribute to the pathology of BP. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of IL-4/13 in the pathogenesis of BP and the potential of using IL-4/13 antagonists for treatment.Methods: After searching in PubMed and Web of Science databases using 'bullous pemphigoid', 'interleukin-4/13', and 'dupilumab' as keywords, studies related was compiled and examined.Results: Overall, IgE, eosinophils, IL-4, and IL-13 may interact with each other in the pathogenesis of BP; these potential interactions provide clues concerning targets for molecular treatment.Conclusion: Anti-IL-4/13 treatment has been experimentally used in patients with BP, with satisfactory outcomes and few side effects. However, before this novel therapy can be approved for regular usage, further studies are needed concerning the long-term safety and systemic usage of IL-4/13 monoclonal antibody treatment in BP.KEY MESSAGESBP is an autoimmune skin disease with Th2-mediated autoimmune response involvement.As typical Th2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13 may contribute to the pathogenesis of BP in multiple ways, such as promoting Th2 cell polarization, driving the immunoglobulin class switching, recruiting eosinophils and basophils, and inducing pruritus.As a promising therapeutic approach for BP, IL-4/13 antagonists have shown satisfactory outcomes in preliminary clinical studies.

Recent Advances in Monoclonal Antibody-Based Approaches in the Management of Bacterial Sepsis.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by an uncontrolled inflammatory response to an infectious agent and its antigens. Immune cell activation against the antigens causes severe distress that mediates a strong inflammatory response in vital organs. Sepsis is responsible for a high rate of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients. Monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutic strategies are now being explored as a viable therapy option for severe sepsis and septic shock. Monoclonal antibodies may provide benefits through two major strategies: (a) monoclonal antibodies targeting the pathogen and its components, and (b) mAbs targeting inflammatory signaling may directly suppress the production of inflammatory mediators. The major focus of mAb therapies has been bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide), although other surface antigens are also being investigated for mAb therapy. Several promising candidates for mAbs are undergoing clinical trials at present. Despite several failures and the investigation of novel targets, mAb therapy provides a glimmer of hope for the treatment of severe bacterial sepsis and septic shock. In this review, mAb candidates, their efficacy against controlling infection, with special emphasis on potential roadblocks, and prospects are discussed.

Nanoparticles (NPs)-mediated systemic mRNA delivery to reverse trastuzumab resistance for effective breast cancer therapy.

Monoclonal antibody-based therapy has achieved great success and is now one of the most crucial therapeutic modalities for cancer therapy. The first monoclonal antibody authorized for treating human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is trastuzumab. However, resistance to trastuzumab therapy is frequently encountered and thus significantly restricts the therapeutic outcomes. To address this issue, tumor microenvironment (TME) pH-responsive nanoparticles (NPs) were herein developed for systemic mRNA delivery to reverse the trastuzumab resistance of breast cancer (BCa). This nanoplatform is comprised of a methoxyl-poly (ethylene glycol)-b-poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) copolymer with a TME pH-liable linker (Meo-PEG-Dlink m -PLGA) and an amphiphilic cationic lipid that can complex PTEN mRNA via electrostatic interaction. When the long-circulating mRNA-loaded NPs build up in the tumor after being delivered intravenously, they could be efficiently internalized by tumor cells due to the TME pH-triggered PEG detachment from the NP surface. With the intracellular mRNA release to up-regulate PTEN expression, the constantly activated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway could be blocked in the trastuzumab-resistant BCa cells, thereby resulting in the reversal of trastuzumab resistance and effectively suppress the development of BCa.

Emerging monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment landscape for advanced-stage, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has shifted dramatically over a short period of time, with new therapeutic agents available for clinical use. However, despite these recent advances in the field, mUC continues to be a disease with significant morbidity and mortality and remains generally incurable. While platinum-based therapy remains the backbone of therapy, many patients are ineligible for chemotherapy or have failed initial chemotherapy treatment. In post-platinum treated patients, immunotherapy and antibody drug conjugates have provided incremental advances, but agents with better therapeutic index guided by precision medicine are needed. AREAS COVERED: This article covers the available monoclonal antibody therapies in mUC excluding immunotherapy and antibody drug conjugates. Included are a review of data utilizing monoclonal antibodies targeting VEG-F, HER-2, FGFR, and KIR-2 in the setting of mUC. A literature search from 6/2022- 9/2022 was performed utilizing PubMed with key terms including urothelial carcinoma, monoclonal antibody, VEG-F, HER-2, FGFR. EXPERT OPINION: Often used in combination with immunotherapy or other therapeutic agents, monoclonal antibody therapies have exhibited efficacy in mUC in early trials. Upcoming clinical trials will further explore their full clinical utility in treating mUC patients.