Organizational citizenship behaviour as a protective factor against the occurrence of adverse nursing-sensitive outcomes: A multilevel investigation.

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the association between organizational citizenship behaviour enacted by nurses and the occurrence of adverse nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: Managing psychosocial factors (i.e., aspects concerning the work environment) is key to ensure patient safety, to prevent exacerbation of case complexity and to cope with critical shortages in human and financial resources. METHODS: Self-report measures of nurses' organizational citizenship behaviour were combined with objective data on the incidence of adverse nursing-sensitive outcomes (i.e., pressure ulcers and restraint use) collected through patients' medical records. Participants were 11,345 patients and 1346 nurses across 52 teams working in 14 Italian hospitals. Data were analysed using multilevel binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: A negative relationship between nurses' organizational citizenship behaviour and restraint use was identified, with an odds ratio of 0.11. Thus, for a one-unit higher organizational citizenship behaviour score, the odds of using restraints shrink to about one eighth of the previous level. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention strategies to foster the implementation of organizational citizenship behaviour among nurses may inhibit the occurrence of critical outcomes affecting patients' health and well-being (i.e., using restraint devices). IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: In health care organizations, shaping a psychosocial environment encouraging organizational citizenship behaviour can mitigate the occurrence of adverse nursing-sensitive outcomes such as restraint use on patients.

The impact of first wave of COVID-19 on the nursing-sensitive and rehabilitation outcomes of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a single centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the care of hip fracture patients remains a clinical priority. To date, there is limited empirical knowledge about the impact of pandemic on the care of patients surgically treated for hip fracture, affected or not by COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the nursing-sensitive and rehabilitation outcomes of frail patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in an Italian Orthopaedic Research Institute. All patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted with fragility hip fractures between 1st March and 30th June in 2019 (group PP: pre-pandemic) and in the same period in 2020 (group P: pandemic), were compared. In the P group, COVID-19 positive patients were excluded due to the presence of a specific treatment pathway. Data on patient demographics and baseline characteristics, and peri-operative care factors were obtained from the Institute's computer-based patient-record system. The primary outcome was the incidence of any stage hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs). The secondary outcome was time to first static verticalization and to first ambulation. RESULTS: Three-hundred and sixty patients were included in the study, which comprised 108 patients in PP group and 252 patients in P group. Overall PUs incidence was significantly higher in the P-group (21.8%) than in the PP-group (10.2%) (p = 0.009). Specifically, the incidence of sacral PUs was significantly lower in P-group (38.1%) vs PP-group (91%) (p = 0.004); on the contrary, the incidence of PUs localized to the heels or other body sites were significantly higher in P-group (30.9% and 30.9%, respectively) vs PP-group (0% and 9%, respectively) (p = 0.004). No significant between groups differences were found for all the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In the pandemic period, nursing and rehabilitation care provided to patients with fragility hip fracture maintained high standards comparable to the pre-pandemic period. The increase in PUs incidence in the pandemic period was probably due to the older age of the patients admitted to hospital. The qualitative evaluation of the care administered and the emotional impact of the pandemic on the patients are very interesting topic which would deserve further investigation.

Evaluating the effects of polices on nursing care as promoted by the Veneto region: the research protocol and its implications for public health.

Study design: Multi-centre mixed-method study design organised into several phases. Background: The Veneto region has recently defined a set of policies on nursing care by determining the needed amount of daily care in minutes and by initiating a systematic measurement of nursing outcomes; also, with a more recent policy, missed nursing care (MNC) has been established as a process measure of interest. To measure the effect of these policies, a research protocol - aimed at evaluating several end points - has been designed, involving a large target population and hospital units. The aim of this manuscript is to briefly present the research protocol and to discuss the public health implications of its expected end-points. Methods: The endpoints of the protocol are: (a) to describe the frequency of MNC as perceived by nurses; (b) to identify contributing factors; (c) to identify practices adopted in low-occurrence MNC units and to assess the effectiveness of implementing them in units with higher levels of MNC; (d) to explore the relationship between the amount of nursing care provided, MNC, and patient outcomes; and (e) to validate a tool that measures MNC as perceived by patients/caregivers. A total of 3,460 nurses, 5,000 patient/day and 160 nursing coordinators of the medical and surgical units of public hospitals in the Veneto Region will be included. Conclusions: Measuring the association between the amount of nursing care and patient outcomes, as well as evaluating the role of MNC as perceived by nurses and patients in hindering or increasing the risk of some patient outcomes can provide a body of evidence capable of further informing policies in the field, both at the national and at the international level. Moreover, emerging good practices capable of preventing or minimising MNC, sharing and implementing them in other units where high levels of missed care are reported and evaluating their effectiveness, can also inform public health policies.

What nursing sensitive outcomes have been studied to-date among patients cared for in intensive care units? Findings from a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have considered mortality and adverse effects as outcomes sensitive to nursing practice, it seems that other outcomes of nursing care in intensive care units have been explored less commonly. OBJECTIVES: To describe the state-of-science in research in the field of nursing sensitive outcomes in intensive care units and to synthesize outcomes that have been documented to date as being influenced by nursing care. DESIGN: A scoping review study based on the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, further refined by the Levac and Joanna Briggs Institute was performed in 2019. DATA SOURCES: The Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched. In addition, the reference list of included articles was screened. REVIEW METHODS: Two researchers independently identified publications on the basis of the following criteria: (a) articles that reported nursing sensitive outcomes on critically-ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit, (b) as primary and secondary studies, (c) written in English, and (d) without any time frame limitation. RESULTS: Of the 4,231 records, 112 fully met the inclusion criteria and were included. Publications were mainly authored in the US and Canada (n = 44, 39.2%), and the majority (n = 62, 55.3%) had an observational design. A total of 233 nursing sensitive outcomes emerged, categorized in 35 outcomes, with, on average, two per study included. The most often measured outcomes were pressure ulcers (20 studies) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (19 studies); the less studied outcomes were quality of life, secretion clearance, patient-ventilator dysynchrony, and post-extubation dysphagia. When categorizing outcomes, the ones concerning safety (n = 77, 33.1%) were represented the most, followed by those concerning the clinical (n = 72, 30.9%), functional (n = 70, 30.0%), and perceptual (n = 14, 6.0%) domains. The interdependent outcomes linked to multi-professional interventions (e.g., ventilator-associated pneumonias) were the most frequently studied nursing sensitive outcomes (n = 20, 57.1%), while independent outcomes resulting from autonomous interventions performed by nurses were less often studied (n = 8, 22.9%). CONCLUSIONS: From a clinical point of view, a large heterogeneity of outcomes influenced by nursing care emerged. However, identified outcomes have been studied with different approaches and metrics, so that future efforts will need to establish homogeneous conceptual and operative definitions. Moreover, increasing efforts in establishing perceptual outcomes, or those close to the fundamentals of nursing care, are suggested in order to better depict the contribution of critical care nurses in the field.

The association between nurse staffing levels and paediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes in tertiary hospitals.

AIM: This study aimed to explore the association between paediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes and nurse staffing levels. BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have reported an association between low nursing-sensitive outcomes and high nurse staffing levels in adult populations, there are few studies on paediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes. METHODS: This study used electronic Health insurance review and assessment data for all children under 18 years old admitted at 46 tertiary hospitals in Korea between 2013 and 2014. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine relationships among nurse staffing levels and 11 paediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes. RESULTS: Nurse staffing levels had a clear relationship with the occurrence of lower respiratory tract infection and gastrointestinal infection. Five paediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes (pneumonia, sepsis, arrest / shock / respiratory failure, wound infection and postoperative cardiopulmonary complication) showed weak relationships with nurse staffing levels. Pressure ulcers and failure to rescue had the lowest incidences in hospitals with the lowest nurse staffing levels. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated evidence for the relationships of nurse staffing levels with seven paediatric nursing-sensitive outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: For quality paediatric nursing care, nurse staffing improvement is required. The study results could be useful evidence for appropriateness of nursing staffing in paediatric facilities.

Oncology Nursing Minimum Data Set (ONMDS): can we hypothesize a set of prevalent Nursing Sensitive Outcomes (NSO) in cancer patients?

BACKGROUND: The nursing minimum data set (NMDS) was created in 1977 in the United States to collect uniform standardised data that could be comparable among different nursing areas or patients. So far, in the literature, an NMDS in an oncology setting has not yet been described. Considering an oncology nursing minimum data set (ONMDS), which data could be chosen to define this tool regarding cancer patient care? MATERIAL AND METHODS: At the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), 20 experienced oncology nurses representing surgical, medical, and critical areas participated in a nursing record working group. All nurses followed an educational course on NMDS, and they shared clinical experiences to find which data common among different areas could be useful to care. To identify these data, nurses considered three issues: what is nursing care for nurses in the IEO? What is the nurses' responsibility in the IEO? What is the organisational nursing model in the IEO? Nurses in the IEO are autonomous in decision making and recognised by patients and by a multi-professional team; the organisational nursing model is primary nursing with patient-centred care. Nursing data must therefore show the quality and results of this care. With this in mind, the working group decided to orient the ONMDS toward nursing-sensitive outcomes (NSOs), meeting also with psychologists, physiotherapists, and dieticians. Nurses analysed Oncology Nursing Society outcomes, and through focus groups, experiential meetings, role playing, and case studies, they integrated them with other NSOs. RESULTS: The ONMDS is composed of 49 NSOs recognised as the most common and frequent oncologic outcomes regardless of the treatment that the patient undergoes. These outcomes were clustered into 15 categories. The categories are: gastrointestinal outcomes, genitourinary outcomes, respiratory outcomes, skin outcomes, fluid and electrolyte balance outcomes, neurological outcomes, security, functional status, vascular access outcomes, nutritional status, pain, psychosocial discomfort, activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities daily living (IADL), and self-care outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to identify an ONMDS based on NSOs allow us to develop an tool that can standardise language, assessment, and intervention, but overall could be used to measure nursing care. To evaluate these potentialities, the ONMDS was introduced into nursing records, and it was tested with a pre-post research study.