Passive Manipulation for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Contractures.

PURPOSE: We investigated closed passive manipulation as an alternative to surgery for certain proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint extension contractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with PIP joint extension contractures treated with passive manipulation at our institution between 2015 and 2019. The included patients were a minimum of 12 weeks from their initial injury/surgery (median 179 days; interquartile range: 130-228 days), had plateaued with therapy, and underwent a 1-time passive manipulation. All included fingers had congruent PIP joints and no indwelling hardware that could have had direct adhesions. Most (80%) patients had a direct injury to the finger ray(s) that led to the contractures. Most (75%) patients had the manipulation performed under local anesthesia in the office. Available measures of passive range of motion (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM) immediately, within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks after the manipulation were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients and 46 digits met the criteria. The median PIP joint PROM improved from 50° to 90° immediately following the manipulation. The median PROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks following manipulation were 80°, 85°, and 85°, respectively. The median AROM immediately after the manipulation improved from 40° to 90°, and the median AROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks were 70°, 50°, and 60°, respectively. None of the patients experienced worsening of PIP joint range of motion. One patient who had 4 fingers manipulated had a 45° distal interphalangeal joint extension lag for one of the fingers after the manipulation. Eight fingers underwent later flexor tenolysis or reconstruction to improve AROM after the gains in PROM via manipulation were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Passive manipulation is an alternative to surgical release for select PIP joint extension contractures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Clinical reasoning of ultrasound imaging-guided manual passive manipulation for adhesion prevention in a patient with total knee arthroplasty: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with total knee arthroplasty occasionally develop postoperative abnormalities such as posttraumatic knee stiffness and arthrofibrosis, which may affect activities of daily living. However, there are no clear assessment methods or interventions for knee stiffness. Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging enables real-time evaluation of mobility and flexibility of tissues. The purpose of this case report was to describe the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging for evaluating the optimal location and methods of passive manipulation. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was an 82-year-old woman who had undergone total knee arthroplasty. She was unable to climb stairs due to limited knee flexion. Based on the results of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging assessment, we hypothesized that the knee flexion limitation was caused by decreased sliding movement of the suprapatellar pouch. Hence, we performed passive manipulation on the tissue with decreased sliding under musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance. OUTCOMES: The patient's knee flexion angle increased from 90° to 110° within 1 week of intervention, and her gait speed improved from 16.48 to 13.2 s per 10 m. Furthermore, after the intervention, she was able to climb 10 steps using a handrail. DISCUSSION: Ultrasound imaging is important because it allows the examination of tissues with mobility changes such as in arthrofibrosis. Our work highlights the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging for identifying the target region for therapy and for providing guidance during passive manipulation.

Addition of blood flow restriction to passive mobilization reduces the rate of muscle wasting in elderly patients in the intensive care unit: a within-patient randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the addition of blood flow restriction to passive mobilization in patients in the intensive care unit. DESIGN:: The study was a within-patient randomized trial. SETTING:: Two intensive care units in Belém, from September to October 2017. SUBJECTS:: In total, 34 coma patients admitted to the intensive care unit sector, and 20 patients fulfilled the study requirements. INTERVENTIONS:: All participants received the passive mobilization protocol for lower limbs, and blood flow restriction was added only for one side in a concurrent fashion. Intervention lasted the entire patient's hospitalization time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT:: Thigh muscle thickness and circumference. RESULTS:: In total, 34 subjects were enrolled in the study: 11 were excluded for exclusion criteria, 3 for death, and 20 completed the intervention (17 men and 3 women; mean age: 66 ± 4.3 years). Despite both groups presented atrophy, the atrophy rate was lower in blood flow restriction limb in relation to the control limb (-2.1 vs. -2.8 mm, respectively, in muscle thickness; P = 0.001). In addition, the blood flow restriction limb also had a smaller reduction in the thigh circumference than the control limb (-2.5 vs. -3.6 cm, respectively; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION:: The use of blood flow restriction did not present adverse effects and seems to be a valid strategy to reduce the magnitude of the rate of muscle wasting that occurs in intensive care unit patients.