Assessing the Impact of PRESERFLO MicroShunt on Intraocular Pressure in Porcine Eyes Ex Vivo Using Infusion Pump System.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PFM) in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) ex vivo in porcine eyes using an infusion pump system and to simulate various IOP conditions, In this study, porcine eyes received increasing flows between 2 and 20 µL/min. IOP measurements were taken under conditions with and without the PFM [PFM (+) and PFM (-), respectively]. In the PFM (-) group, IOP increased from 7.4 mmHg to 46.3 mmHg as the flow rate increased from 2 µL/min to 20 µL/min. The rate of IOP reduction (%ΔIOP) rose with increasing flow rates, although the absolute IOP values achieved with the PFM insertion also increased. The correlation between IOPs in the PFM (-) conditions and the %ΔIOP was modeled as %ΔIOP = 22.4 Ln [PFM(-) IOP] - 41.7. According to this equation, IOP reduction by PFM insertion is 0% at IOPs of 6.4 mmHg or lower. IOP reductions of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% were observed when the pre-insertion IOPs were 10.1, 15.7, 24.6, and 38.4 mmHg, respectively. Achievable post-insertion IOP levels of ≤21 mmHg, ≤18 mmHg, ≤15 mmHg, and ≤12 mmHg corresponded to the initial IOPs of 33 mmHg, 26 mmHg, 20 mmHg, and 14.8 mmHg, respectively. In conclusion, the PFM effectively reduced IOP within a specific range of IOP values in an ex vivo experimental system. In clinical situations, the PFM is unlikely to be effective at low IOP levels. At higher levels, the PFM reduces IOP, but it may be insufficient to achieve the target IOP.

The use of intraluminal PRESERFLO stenting in avoiding early postoperative hypotony.

PURPOSE: Postoperative hypotony following PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PMS) implantation is a frequent cause of complications such as choroidal detachment and hypotony maculopathy. This study aims at evaluating the impact of intraluminal stenting of the PMS during the early postoperative period. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 97 patients who underwent PMS implantation with intraoperative placement of a Nylon 10-0 suture as intraluminal stent (PStent) and compared the outcomes to those of an existing database of the traditional MicroShunt implantation technique (PTrad, n = 120). The primary outcome measure was the intraocular pressure (IOP) at one week postoperatively. As a secondary outcome measure, adverse hypotony, defined as an IOP ≤ 5 mmHg with significant choroidal effusion and/or anterior chamber shallowing or the presence of macular folds was also assessed. Additionally, the time to stent removal and the IOP one week after stent removal were reported. RESULTS: Preoperative median IOP was 25.0 (20.5-30.3) mmHg in PStent and 25.0 (19.3-32.0) mmHg in PTrad (p = 0.62). One week after surgery, the median IOP dropped to 10.0 (8.0-13.0) mmHg in PStent and 7.0 (5.0-9.0) in PTrad (p < 0.01). At one month, the IOP was 12.0 (10.0-14.0) mmHg in PStent and 10.0 (8.0-11.0) mmHg in PTrad (p < 0.01). After 3 months, both groups showed similar median IOP levels of 11.0 (8.0-13.5) mmHg and 10.0 (9.75-13.0) mmHg in PStent and PTrad, respectively (p = 0.66). The presence of adverse hypotony was significantly lower in PStent compared to PTrad (6.2% vs 15.8%, p < 0.05). In PStent the stent was removed after 30.0 (21.0-42.5) days. One week after stent removal the mean IOP drop was 6.1 ± 0.5 mmHg (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In the early follow-up period, intraluminal stenting of the PMS appears to be safe and effective in controlling the IOP while reducing early postoperative hypotony. Surgical success is not compromised by stent placement. Based on our data, it is recommended to remove the suture two to six weeks after surgery for most patients with uncomplicated postoperative clinical findings.

Ab Interno Intraluminal Stent Insertion for Prolonged Hypotony After PreserFlo MicroShunt Implantation.

This study aimed to present an effective and minimally invasive method for treating prolonged hypotony after PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) implantation, which can cause serious complications. A 79-year-old man with primary open-angle glaucoma of the right eye underwent ab interno intraluminal stent insertion for prolonged hypotony after PMS implantation. After making two corneal incisions at the 5 and 8 o'clock positions in the right eye, a viscoelastic material was injected into the anterior chamber. A 10-0 nylon suture was inserted into the anterior chamber through a corneal incision in the 5 o'clock position. Next, the 10-0 nylon suture was grasped and inserted into the PMS lumen as a stent with forceps, following which it was cut approximately 1 mm from the tip of the PMS using micro-iris scissors. Finally, the viscoelastic material in the anterior chamber was washed with a balanced salt solution, and self-closure of the two corneal incisions was confirmed. After ab interno intraluminal stent insertion, hypotony improved and stabilized at approximately 10 mmHg. The shallow anterior chamber, choroidal detachment, and hypotonic maculopathy improved rapidly. This novel technique demonstrated effectiveness and minimal invasiveness in treating prolonged hypotony after PMS implantation.

Intermediate-term impact on corneal endothelial cells and efficacy of Preserflo MicroShunt implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma - a prospective study over two years.

INTRODUCTION: Preserflo MicroShunt is a novel microinvasive bleb forming device for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. The intermediate- and long-term success and the impact of this procedure on corneal endothelial cell density remain to be investigated. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 62 eyes of 55 glaucoma patients (mean age ± SD: 67.0 ± 15.0 years) receiving a Preserflo MicroShunt were included. Corneal endothelial cell density, intraocular pressure and best corrected visual acuity were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively. Success rates, bleb revision rates and complications were analysed. Complete success was defined as an intraocular pressure reduction of ≥ 20% and achieving a target pressure of ≤ 18, ≤ 15 or ≤ 12 mmHg without antiglaucoma medication. Qualified success indicated that the criteria were reached with or without medication. RESULTS: Corneal endothelial cells showed no significant decline over 24 months (p > 0.05). Intraocular pressure showed a substantial reduction postoperatively (p < 0.001), decreasing from 29.6 ± 8,3 mmHg to 13.0 ± 4.3 mmHg after 24 months (p < 0.001). Complete and qualified success with a target pressure ≤ 15 mmHg was achieved in 52.9% and 54.6% of cases after 24 months, respectively. Best corrected visual acuity did not change after 24 months. CONCLUSION: Preserflo MicroShunt had no negative side effects on corneal endothelial cells and showed favourable success rates after 2 years in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Changes in Ocular Biometry Following PreserFlo MicroShunt Implantation and Trabeculectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background This study aimed to evaluate postoperative changes in ocular biometry following initial PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation and trabeculectomy. Methodology This prospective, observational study analyzed 27 cases of PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation and 29 cases of trabeculectomy performed by a single surgeon. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal curvature, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and axial length were assessed at baseline and postoperatively at one day, one week, two weeks, one month, two months, three months, and six months. Patients requiring additional surgery and those with missing data were excluded. Consecutive data were compared with the baseline values using multiple comparisons. Results In both groups, intraocular pressure was significantly decreased from baseline at all postoperative time points (all p < 0.01). Visual acuity decreased in both groups at one day and one week postoperatively. Corneal curvature remained unchanged in both groups throughout the six-month follow-up. Central corneal thickness increased at one day and one week postoperatively in the PreserFlo group, but not in the trabeculectomy group. Anterior chamber depth exhibited a significant decrease at one week postoperatively in both groups. Axial length significantly decreased postoperatively until three months in the PreserFlo group and at all postoperative time points in the trabeculectomy group. Conclusions Ocular biometry following PreserFlo and trabeculectomy had a similar tendency postoperatively.

Bleb vessel density as a predictive factor for surgical revisions after Preserflo Microshunt implantation.

PURPOSE: Bleb failure is a common complication after glaucoma filtration surgery. Different bleb classification schemes incorporating filtration bleb vascularization have been proposed, but the reported correlation with intraocular pressure (IOP) has been variable, possibly because of subjective vascularization grading. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate bleb vascularization after Preserflo Microshunt (PM) implantation using anterior segment OCT-angiography (AS-OCTA) as a biomarker for bleb failure. METHODS: Twenty-three eyes of twenty-three patients underwent PM implantation. Up to 12 months after surgery PM scleral passage-centred AS-OCTA measurements (PLEX Elite 9000) for bleb-vessel density (BVD) determination were performed and IOP as well as necessity for surgical revisions (needling and open revision) were documented. After multi-step image analysis (region of interest definition, artefact removal, binarization, BVD calculation), the predictive value of early postoperative BVD for surgical revisions was assessed using logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: Baseline IOP (23.57 ± 7.75 mmHg) decreased significantly to 8.30 ± 2.12, 9.17 ± 2.33 and 11.70 ± 4.40 mmHg after 1, 2 and 4 week(s), and 13.48 ± 5.83, 11.87 ± 4.49, 12.30 ± 6.65, 11.87 ± 3.11 and 13.05 ± 4.12 mmHg after 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 month(s), respectively (p < 0.001). Nine patients (39%) needed surgical revisions after a median time of 2 months. Bleb vessel densities at 2 and 4 weeks were significantly associated with future surgical revisions upon logistic regression analysis (2 W/4 W likelihood-ratio test p-value: 0.0244/0.0098; 2 W/4 W area under the receiver operating characteristics curve: 0.796/0.909). CONCLUSION: Filtration bleb vessel density can be determined using AS-OCTA in the early postoperative period and is predictive for bleb failure after PM implantation.

Evaluation of ocular surface following PreserFlo Microshunt implantation: Functional outcomes and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PreserFlo Microshunt on the ocular surface, focusing on both objective and subjective parameters. METHODS: Prospective-observational study on 48 eyes undergoing PreserFlo Microshunt implantation, standalone or combined with phacoemulsification. At baseline, 1-month, 6-months and 12-months post-operative follow-ups, we performed Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Schirmer's test (ST), Tear-film break-up time (TBUT), fluoresceine staining (FS), tear osmolarity and minimum corneal epithelial thickness (Epi-ThkMIN. ) measurements. RESULTS: OSDI score improved from 37.43 ± 17.49 at baseline, to 24.13 ± 12.55 at 1-month (p = 0.003) and to 12.89 ± 8.54 and 13.09 ± 10.22 at 6-months and 12-months (p < 0.0001). TBUT and ST, in a similar way, non-significantly increased at 1-month, but then improved at 6-months and 12-months (p < 0.05 for both). Tear osmolarity significantly decreased from 308.2 ± 7.3 mOsm/L at baseline, to 303.3 ± 8.2 mOsm/L, 295.6.2 ± 7.0 mOsm/L and 297.6 ± 6.8 mOsm/L at 1-month, 6-months and 12-months (p < 0.05 for all). Epi-ThkMIN was stable when comparing baseline (44.9 ± 5.7 µm) and 1-month (p = 0.28), and successively increased in 6-months (47.8 ± 5.5 µm, p = 0.02) and 12-months (48.0 ± 3.6 µm, p = 0.01). In subgroup analysis, OSDI score and tear osmolarity were significantly higher at 1-month in combined group compared to standalone group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively), but reaching comparable values in successive follow-ups. Further, Oxford scale grades for FS were significantly improved when comparing baseline-6-months and baseline-12-months. CONCLUSION: PreserFlo implantation improved ocular surface subjective symptoms, increased TBUT and ST, and reduced FS, highlighting the potential benefits of this surgical intervention. Moreover, we reported significant improvements of tear osmolarity and corneal epithelium.

Exploring the Pressure Characteristics of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in In Vitro Studies and Effects of Sclera on Device Performance.

This study aims to investigate the pressure characteristics of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt, a microinvasive glaucoma device, using an in vitro setup. Additionally, the study explores the impact of the scleral tissue surrounding the device on its pressure and lumen area. Ten PRESERFLO MicroShunts were subjected to an in vitro experimental setup. A constant flow of physiological saline was maintained at 2 µL/min using an infusion syringe pump. The PRESERFLO was connected to a pressure transducer via a 23 G needle. Pressure characteristics were measured under three different conditions: without sclera [sclera (-)], passing through sclera at a 90° angle (sclera 90°), and passing through sclera at a 30° angle (sclera 30°). The lumen area of the device was measured using microscopic observation. We observed peak and trough pressures in this experimental setting; the peak pressure (6.76 mmHg) was significantly higher than the trough pressure of 4.74 mmHg (p = 0.0020) in the sclera (-) condition. Compared to sclera (-), the peak pressures were significantly higher in the sclera 90° (7.81 mmHg, p = 0.0020) and the sclera 30° (7.96 mmHg, p = 0.0039) conditions. Additionally, compared to sclera (-), the trough pressure was significantly higher in the sclera 90° (6.25 mmHg, p = 0.0039) and the sclera 30° (5.76 mmHg, p = 0.037) conditions. The lumen area was significantly smaller in the sclera 90° condition (3515 µm2) than the sclera (-) condition (3927 µm2, p = 0.0078). The study found that when the distal end of PRESERFLO MicroShunt was free and in air, it exhibited both peak and trough pressures. The presence of scleral tissue surrounding the PRESERFLO MicroShunt affects its lumen area and pressure characteristics. Understanding these effects can provide valuable insights into the device's performance.

Single versus Double PreserFlo MicroShunt Implantation in Glaucoma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe and evaluate double PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation as a modified micro-invasive glaucoma surgery technique and to retrospectively compare the outcomes in a cohort of glaucoma patients with single or double implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of 57 glaucoma patients who consecutively underwent PreserFlo implantation was performed. Medical records were examined for patients' demographics, glaucoma type, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication, complications, and re-interventions. Two groups with single (n = 29) or double (n = 28) implantation were formed, and the outcomes were compared. In cases of two-stage double implantation (n = 17), the courses of the initial and the second implantations were compared. RESULTS: Mean preoperative IOP was significantly higher in the double compared to the single implantation group (29.4 ± 10.0 mm Hg; 21.7 ± 8.2 mm Hg; p = 0.003). Postoperatively, IOP was significantly lower in the double implantation group at various time-points (day 1, week 1, months 3 and 6; all p < 0.021). In the subgroup with two-stage procedures, mean preoperative IOP was 24.5 ± 8.5 mm Hg and 29.8 ± 10.1 mm Hg, respectively (p = 0.128). While immediately postoperatively, mean IOP lowering was clinically significant and similar following both procedures, the longer sustainable effect was observed after the second procedure (month 12: 25.5 ± 7.5 mm Hg; 12.4 ± 4.8 mm Hg; p = 0.001). No serious complications were observed. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Double PreserFlo implantation appears safe and efficient for lowering IOP in glaucoma patients. Our preliminary findings suggest that double is superior to single implantation in terms of IOP lowering and the need for additional topical medication. Patients with insufficient IOP lowering following single implantation may benefit from a second implantation. Further research is warranted to evaluate double implantation as a first-line, one-stage procedure.

Comparison of Bleb Morphology following PRESERFLO® MicroShunt and Trabeculectomy Using Anterior Segment OCT.

Trabeculectomy has traditionally been upheld as the gold standard in glaucoma surgery, but recent advancements, including the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt, have introduced less invasive techniques to mitigate complications and reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). The examination of bleb morphology post-filtering surgery is critical for modulating wound healing and ensuring long-term success. While previous evaluations of PRESERFLO-generated blebs have relied on data from trabeculectomy blebs, the differing surgical techniques used in PRESERFLO and trabeculectomy surgeries suggest potential variations in bleb morphologies. This study conducted a comparative analysis of blebs resulting from PRESERFLO and trabeculectomy procedures. Retrospective descriptive assessments using the Jenaer Bleb Grading System were performed, along with quantitative evaluation using eight-dimensional parameters utilizing anterior segment OCT. We included 93 eyes (57 following PRESERFLO, 36 following trabeculectomy). In the descriptive assessment, PRESERFLO-generated blebs exhibited fewer conjunctival cysts (3.5% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.007) and cavernous changes (10.5% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.021) compared to trabeculectomy. Quantitatively, overall bleb dimensions were comparable (maximal bleb height, width, and length, p > 0.05 for all). However, PRESERFLO blebs displayed a shallower (0.52 ± 0.24 vs. 0.67 ± 0.3 mm, p = 0.017) yet longer (4.12 ± 1.54 vs. 3.23 ± 1.64 mm, p = 0.024) episcleral lake. A thicker bleb wall (1.52 ± 0.46 vs. 1.10 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001) along with more posteriorly positioned blebs (distance to limbus = 6.16 ± 1.36 vs. 4.87 ± 1.34 mm, p < 0.001) were observed following PRESERFLO. This study illuminates the nuanced morphological differences between PRESERFLO and trabeculectomy blebs. Understanding these distinctions is vital, empowering clinicians to make informed postoperative decisions and avoid misinterpretation of bleb morphology.