"Extra-anatomical Pedicle Rerouting" An alternative technique to obtain new recipient vessels for microsurgical reconstruction in unfavorable clinical situations.

BACKGROUND: Lack of adequate recipient vessels in certain anatomically unfavorable locations or in complex clinical situations is still a limitation to successful microsurgical transfer. To address such complex cases, advanced microsurgical techniques should be applied. In this paper, the authors describe their experience with the Extra-anatomical Pedicle Rerouting (EPR) technique, an alternative approach that was used in selected cases throughout the body to obtain healthy recipient vessels for microsurgical reconstruction in unfavorable clinical situations where suitable recipient vessels were difficult to find. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with defects of variable etiology (oncological resection, trauma, previous surgeries) located in the trunk or upper and lower extremities received EPR free flap reconstruction at our Institution. Operative data, postoperative course, and complications were recorded. Clinical and photographic follow-ups were also documented. RESULTS: A total of 15 flaps (6 antero-lateral thigh (ALT), 6 latissimus dorsi/thoracodorsal artery perforator flap (LD/TDAP), 3 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP)) were transferred adopting the EPR technique for oncological (11) and post-traumatic (4) defects. According to the different clinical scenarios, the rerouted vessels were the thoraco-acromial, posterior circumflex humeral, thoracodorsal, deep inferior epigastric, lateral circumflex femoral, anterior tibial, and medial sural pedicles. Mean length of the rerouted vascular conduits was 6.53 cm. Mean operative time was 420 minutes. No major complications were registered. Minor wound dehiscence was observed and managed conservatively in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The EPR technique proved to be useful in a reliable and reproducible manner in different regions of the body as an alternative solution to obtain healthy recipient vessels in anatomically and surgically unfavorable clinical situations.

Lingual Artery as the Recipient Vessel of Choice in Patients Requiring a Second or Third Free Flap in Recurrent Oral Cancers and Vessel-Depleted Neck: A 5-Year Experience in a Single Institute.

Introduction Reconstruction with free flaps becomes a challenge in recurrent cases having previously treated necks, in patients who have received prior radiation therapy or chemotherapy or both, and where the patient has already undergone free flap reconstruction in a prior surgery. Depleted cervical recipient vessels can increase the complexity of reconstruction in achieving successful free flap prefusion and thereby increasing flap thrombosis and eventually failure. Materials and Methods Over a period of 5 years from January 2018 to February 2023, we encountered a total of 22 cases of recurrent or second primary oral cancer with bilateral necks operated, postadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, and requiring a second or third free flap reconstruction. In most of the cases we resorted to the lingual artery as the recipient artery of choice. Results No flap loss was reported. No cases were reexplored either for hematoma or for congestion. All patients recovered uneventfully. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, there has been no paper yet that focuses on the lingual artery to be the recipient vessel of choice in recurrent oral cancers. We find the lingual artery to be a reliable and safe option and advocate its usage as recipient vessel of choice in recurrent oral cancers requiring more than one free flap reconstruction.

Creating a context for recipient vessel selection in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In autologous tissue breast reconstruction, recipient vessels are important for artery perfusion and venous drainage to ensure free flap survival. There are insufficient clinical outcomes to select efficient recipient vessels in bi-pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. METHODS: We presented a retrospective observational series of 108 patients regarding the diameter, anastomosis time, and re-anastomosis rate in internal mammary (IM), circumflex scapular (CS), thoracodorsal (TD), thoracoacromial (TA), lateral thoracic (LT), and internal mammary perforator (IMP) vessels of bi-pedicled DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. The outcomes were the vessel re-anastomosis rate, flap failure rate, vessel anastomosis time, and complications. Data were gleaned from the chi-square test, Fisher's test, and analysis of variance using Scheffe's test as a post hoc analysis. The level of significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the diameters of the artery, first vein, and second vein across the recipient vessels (p > 0.05). However, the anastomosis time was longer in IM and TA than in CS, TD, and LT (p < 0.001). Also, there were no significant differences for re-anastomosis, flap necrosis, and fat necrosis among different recipient vessels (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the altered mastectomy incisions, this study provides complete anatomical vascular properties and suggests that altering recipient vessel selection for bi-pedicled DIEP flaps can shorten anastomosis time and better conceal scars.

Microsurgical phalloplasty: Anatomical study evaluating the use of the external pudendal vessels as recipients.

The inferior epigastric artery (IEA) is commonly used as a recipient vessel in microsurgical phalloplasty but its use can be associated with abdominal parietal complications (hernia, bulging). To preclude such complications and avoid involvement of the femoral artery, we assessed an external pudendal artery (EPA) as a recipient vessel. We studied the disposition of the external pudendal system and its general anatomy. Then we compared the external diameter of the EPA to that of the first branches of the femoral artery. The most important point was to determine the location of the EPA through a reference line to facilitate a surgical approach. We then illustrated this preliminary study with a clinical case to check the reliability of the identified landmarks. Ten adult cadavers were dissected. The arteries of interest were part of a system consisting of either a common trunk or a duplicated system. The branches of the pudendal system arose from either the femoral artery or the deep femoral artery. On a horizontal reference line passing through the two pubic tubercles, we observed that 83% of EPAs arose between the reference line and 3 cm below it, at the level of a vertical axis centered on the femoral artery. The EPA could be suitable as recipient vessel in phalloplasty owing to its location, size, and ease of dissection. Using it instead of the IEA precludes abdominal parietal complications and reduces scarring in the recipient area.

Results of contralateral anastomosis of microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Despite various solutions to the issue of ipsilateral vessel-depleted neck in microvascular head and neck reconstruction, concrete data on its safety and implementation are scarce. This paper focuses on the feasibility and success rates of contralateral anastomosis in free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study at a tertiary referral center includes all patients who underwent free flap reconstruction of the head and neck with contralateral anastomosis between January 1st, 2007 and February 28th, 2021. Primary objectives were frequency, success, and flap-associated complication rates. Secondary objectives were recipient vessels and flap type. RESULTS: Of 318 patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction, anastomosis was performed on the contralateral side of the neck in 32 patients (10.0%). Recipient vessels involved mainly the superior thyroid artery (74.2%; n = 23) and the facial vein (51.1%; n = 23). Thirty patients (93.8%) received a radial forearm free flap. Flap-associated complications occurred in 12.5% of included cases (n = 4): one partial flap necrosis (3.1%), one anastomotic insufficiency (3.1%), one venous thrombosis of the microvascular pedicle (3.1%), and one wound dehiscence (3.1%). All of these complications were resolved without complete flap loss. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that contralateral anastomosis is a successful and safe option in microvascular head and neck reconstruction, especially using a radial forearm free flap. Thus, anastomosing to the contralateral side of the neck can be advocated as a valuable option in the ipsilateral vessel-depleted neck.

The Recipient Vessel Hemodynamic Features Affect the Occurrence of Cerebral Edema in Moyamoya Disease After Surgical Revascularization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Objective: In moyamoya disease (MMD) with direct or combined revascularization, the initially hemodynamic recipient features are likely one of the main causes of acute hemodynamic disruption. Previous studies have explored the relationship between recipient diameter or flow velocity and postoperative complications, but there are still no optimal selection criteria with multiple potential recipient vessels. Cerebral edema is one of the most common radiological manifestations in the acute postoperative period. This study assessed the hemodynamic characteristics of cortex vessels related to postoperative cerebral edema. Methods: All patients who had undergone direct or combined revascularization with preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) between 2019 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion in this study. The application of DSA was performed and regular radiological examinations were employed after surgery. DSA was analyzed with the hemodynamic features within chosen recipient vessels. Cerebral edema was identified as a low-density image on CT or high signaling in the MRI T2 phase. The recipient hemodynamic characteristics and demographic presentation, as well as clinical data, were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Results: A total of 103 patients underwent direct or combined revascularization with preoperative DSA. The mean age of this enrolled cohort was 44.31 ± 10.386 years, in which bilaterally involved MMD accounted for the main part. The preliminary correlation analysis found preoperative disease period (p = 0.078), recipients observed in angiography (p = 0.002), and surgery on the left (p = 0.097) may be associated with cerebral edema. The following regression analysis confirmed low occurrence of cerebral edema was accompanied by recipients observed in angiography (p = 0.003). After subdividing by flow direction and hemodynamic sources, the incidence rate of anterograde direction, anterior sources, and posterior sources were significantly lower than undetected recipients. Conclusions: Cerebral edema is a common radiological manifestation in MMDs after surgery. In this study, the observation in angiography reliably identifies a variety of physiological or pathological recipient detection, flow direction, and hemodynamic sources in patients with MMD after revascularization, which indicates the selection strategy of potential recipients and highlights the importance of recipient observability in DSA. Meanwhile, vascular conditions determined by recipient hemodynamics meditate the occurrence of postoperative cerebral edema.

The lateral thoracic vessels: A novel recipient site for breast reconstruction with DIEP flap.

BACKGROUND: Adequate selection of recipient vessel to minimize recipient site morbidity is essential for a successful breast reconstruction. The authors explored the clinical use of the lateral thoracic vessels as recipient vessels in the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: This study included 63 patients with breast cancer. The age of patients ranged from 26 to 67 years (43.23 ± 8.63). All patients received an immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the lateral thoracic vessels as recipient vessels in the authors' department from 2014 May to 2018 September. The flap blood supply, complications, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The patients were followed up for 6 to 29 months with satisfactory results. All the flaps had stable blood supply except for two cases, which had an event of partial skin necrosis and were repaired by debridement. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral thoracic vessels are not only easy to explore but also have reliable blood supply, which present a safe and reliable choice for immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Transverse cervical vascular pedicle: It's extended use as 'second-line' recipient vessels in thoracic and upper arm reconstructions in addition to head-and-neck reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: Selection of recipient vessels is one of the key factors for a successful microvascular reconstruction. Non-availability of primary recipient vessels in the vicinity necessitates surgeon to approach a remote second-line vascular access. Transverse cervical vessels (TCV) have been described as second-line vascular access for head-and-neck reconstructions. Due to its location, their use can be extended to the proximal chest and upper arm reconstructions. AIM: The aim of the study is to analyse the reliability of TCV as second-line recipient vessels for the upper arm and chest reconstructions in addition to the head-and-neck reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 2010-2017, 14 TCV were explored as the choice of second-line recipient pedicle for specific indications. Clinical experience with different reconstructions discussed. RESULTS: Out of 14 transverse cervical arteries, 13 were of adequate size for anastomosis. About 12 successful reconstructions were performed involving the head and neck (7), proximal thorax (3) and upper arm (2) for indications such as scarring from different aetiology (8), previous free flaps (2) and sacrificed vessels (2). In one case, the arterial anastomosis was shifted to superior thyroid artery. All the chest and upper arm reconstructions needed a realignment of the pedicle without any kink. Transverse cervical vein (TCv) could be used only 5/14 times either alone or along with external jugular vein (EJV). In other cases, EJV alone was used. All the 12 flaps survived without any vascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Transverse cervical vessels are reliable second-line recipient vessels in the head and neck; in addition, they are of use in the upper arm and proximal chest defects.

Osteocutaneous free transfer of vascularized fibula in cervico-thoracic spinal reconstruction with filling of an esophageal fistula: A case report.

The case under review is a 60-year-old patient with a vertebral plasmocytoma treated by cervico-thoracic fusion 2 years previously. He presented a thoracic spinal septic non-union complicated by esophagospinal fistula. We performed vascularized fibula transplant with cutaneous pad to fill the esophageal fistula. Control CT at day 5 confirmed vascular anastomosis permeability and bone transplant position. Osseointegration was achieved at 18 months postoperatively. The patient was alive 3 years after the last procedure (5 years after tumorectomy). A systematic review of the literature on spinal reconstruction by vascularized fibula transplant showed the diversity of surgical techniques available. In view of the multiplicity of possible organ and soft tissue defects involving the spine, reminders are provided of the different approaches and recipient vessels in this type of reconstruction depending on location.

Studying the blood pressures of antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels: Do they really work as recipient vessels?

BACKGROUND: The proximal ends of internal mammary (IM) vessels are now the most common recipient vessels for breast reconstruction. On the other hand, bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are often needed according to the territory and the volume required for reconstruction. The usefulness of retrograde IM vessels as second recipients has recently been reported, but there are very few quantitative studies on the hydrodynamics of the retrograde IM vessels. Because the flow is dependent on the pressure differential, the blood pressures of the antegrade IM artery (AIMA), antegrade IM vein (AIMV), retrograde IM artery (RIMA), retrograde IM vein (RIMV), and recirculated intraflap vein (FV) were investigated to solve this question and to confirm the reliability and usefulness of the retrograde IM vessels. METHODS: Ten free flap breast reconstructions were included in this study. The IM vessels were exposed, and the pressures were measured. After recirculation, the FV pressures were measured when the flap was not ischemic or congestive. Systemic blood pressure was also recorded during the whole measurement period. RESULTS: The AIMA and RIMA pressures were 70.4 ± 8.2 mmHg and 54.0 ± 8.6 mmHg (p = 0.000003), respectively, while the systemic pressure was 65.1 ± 10.0 mmHg. The AIMV pressure was always smaller than the RIMV pressure; the mean AIMV pressure was 5.3 ± 1.6 mmHg. In addition, the FV pressure was greater (p = 0.03) than the RIMV pressure (17.7 ± 9.9 mmHg), while the RIMV pressure was 8.7 ± 2.0 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Both the RIMA and RIMV are useful and reliable as second recipients for bipedicled free flap transfers. This is a great benefit because it would provide two recipients in one surgical site and would be especially useful in thin patients or patients with previous abdominal scars requiring double pedicled DIEP flaps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study, Level IV.

Computed tomography angiographic study of internal mammary perforators and their use as recipient vessels for free tissue transfer in breast reconstruction.

CONTEXT: The internal mammary artery perforator vessels (IMPV) as a recipient in free flap breast reconstruction offer advantages over the more commonly used thoracodorsal vessels and the internal mammary vessels (IMV). AIMS: This study was designed to assess the anatomical consistency of the IMPV and the suitability of these vessels for use as recipients in free flap breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from ten randomly selected female patients who did not have any chest wall or breast pathology but had undergone a computed tomography angiography (CTA) for unrelated diagnostic reasons from April 2013 to October 2013 were analysed. Retrospective data of seven patients who had undergone mastectomy for breast cancer and had been primarily reconstructed with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap transfer using the IMPV as recipient vessels were studied. RESULTS: The CTA findings showed that the internal mammary perforator was consistently present in all cases bilaterally. In all cases, the dominant perforator arose from the upper four intercostal spaces (ICS) with the majority (55%) arising from the 2nd ICS. The mean distance of the perforators from the sternal border at the level of pectoralis muscle surface on the right side was 1.86 cm (range: 0.9-2.5 cm) with a mode value of 1.9 cm. On the left side, a mean of 1.77 cm (range: 1.5-2.1 cm) and a mode value of 1.7 cm were observed. Mean perforator artery diameters on the right and left sides were 2.2 mm and 2.4 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Though the internal mammary perforators are anatomically consistent, their use as recipients in free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction eventually rests on multiple variables.

Recipient Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Objective: Recipient vessel caliber may be the single most important variable for flow to free tissue transfer. We performed cadaveric dissection of the external carotid artery and its branches to analyze average diameter in order to determine an algorithm for recipient vessel selection in head and neck reconstruction. Methods: The external carotid artery and branches were exposed on 3 lightly embalmed male human cadavers, aged 82 to 85 years. Each vessel was dissected, and luminal diameters were recorded with calipers. Results: The proximal ECA had the greatest average diameter (4 ± 0.6 mm) and potential flow; followed by distal ECA (2.85 ± 0.4 mm) facial (2.0 ± 0.6 mm), lingual (1.65 ± 0.6 mm), superior thyroid (1 ± 0.3  mm), and superficial temporal (0.85 ± 0.4 mm). There was a trend towards size variation between sides of the same cadaver. Conclusion: The external carotid artery has the greatest internal diameter and potential blood flow. It should be considered, when feasible, especially for defects of the upper third of the head. For defects of the lower third, the facial artery and the lingual artery should be utilized before the smaller diameter superior thyroid artery. Vessel selection is more challenging in the setting of radiation therapy, complex trauma, and prior neck surgery. In these settings, it is useful to have knowledge of the vascular anatomy and an objective algorithm for recipient vessel selection.

Usability of the internal mammary recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the internal mammary vessels are, for many surgeons, the recipient vessels of choice in microvascular breast reconstruction, there continues to be some debate regarding their use. The reliability of these vessels, particularly the vein, has been called into question, with high rates of conversion to alternative vessels being reported. This study investigates the true usability rate of the internal mammary vessels in a large series of consecutive patients without preselection. METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent microvascular breast reconstruction at the University Health Network between September 2007 and December 2013 was conducted, and the conversion rate to alternative vessels was determined. RESULTS: A total of 759 microvascular breast reconstructions were performed in 515 patients. The internal mammary vessels were explored in all cases and found to be suitable for anastomosis in 756 of 759 reconstructions. Conversion to the thoracodorsal vessels was required in three reconstructions (0.4%) due to unusable internal mammary arteries. There was no significant increase in unusable vessels with timing or laterality of reconstruction or other factors such as smoking, vascular co-morbidities and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Total flap failure occurred in four reconstructions (0.5%), whereas partial flap loss occurred in five (0.6%). CONCLUSION: The internal mammary vessels can be safely and reliably used in almost all patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction with low rates of microvascular complications.

Choice of recipient vessels for nasal ala reconstruction using a free auricular flap.

Starting in 2010, we experienced seven cases of full-thickness nasal ala defects reconstructed with free auricular flaps. We modified previous methods using retrograde free auricular flaps by including both retrograde and antegrade superficial temporal vessels to enhance the venous drainage of the flap. Based on our experience and the findings of previous reports, we developed an algorithm to insert free auricular flaps for use in nasal ala reconstruction, and to select the recipient vessels. Eight free auricular flaps were transferred in seven cases. In all cases, one artery anastomosis and two venous anastomoses were performed. The facial artery was used as the recipient artery at the nasolabial fold in five cases, and the proximal stump of the superficial temporal artery was used as the recipient vessel via a vein graft in two cases. The facial vein at the nasolabial fold was used in six cases, and the facial vein at the mandible via a vein graft was used in one case. In all cases, the angular vein at the medial canthus was available and used as the second recipient vein. The key to success with free auricular flap transfer for nasal ala reconstruction is to select the proper recipient vessel. We believe that our algorithm and procedure will increase the rate of successful operations.

Flap reconstruction of the knee: A review of current concepts and a proposed algorithm.

A literature search focusing on flap knee reconstruction revealed much controversy regarding the optimal management of around the knee defects. Muscle flaps are the preferred option, mainly in infected wounds. Perforator flaps have recently been introduced in knee coverage with significant advantages due to low donor morbidity and long pedicles with wide arc of rotation. In the case of free flap the choice of recipient vessels is the key point to the reconstruction. Taking the published experience into account, a reconstructive algorithm is proposed according to the size and location of the wound, the presence of infection and/or 3-dimensional defect.

A decision-making algorithm for recipient vein selection in bipedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap autologous breast reconstruction.

The bipedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap allows reliable transfer of the entire lower abdominal flap in patients who have a small pannus or require a large volume breast reconstruction. Selection of recipient vessels for the second pedicle can however, be challenging. We describe our experience with a consecutive series of twenty three bipedicle DIEP flaps with particular focus on selection of the recipient veins. We demonstrate that with judicious selection the internal mammary system can be reliably used as recipients for both pedicles with low complication rates.

The use of the serratus anterior muscle vascular pedicle as recipient site in DIEP flap transfer for breast reconstruction.

Currently, the choice for recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction is made between axillary and internal mammary regions. The authors report their experience with anastomosis to a new, unconventional, axillary recipient vessel, the serratus anterior muscle vascular pedicle. Among 340 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions performed between 2004 and 2013, 11 were successfully revascularised to the serratus anterior (SA) pedicle: In three cases, complications led to a salvage procedure, while in eight cases, anastomosis to this recipient site was electively planned. The pedicle was constantly present, with calibre always comparable to that of flap's pedicle. At the mean 24-month follow-up, no recipient site complications were observed. The SA muscle pedicle resulted as a reliable choice in salvage procedures and a suitable option for recipient vessel selection in elective cases.

Free flaps for head and neck cancer reconstruction: Does the use of both large cervical vessels as recipient vessels and the employment of end-to-side technique enhance flap survival?

This study specifically investigates whether the use of both large cervical vessels (the external carotid artery and the internal jugular vein) as recipient vessels with end-to-side anastomosis enhance free flap survival in head and neck cancer reconstruction, when compared with the use of other standard smaller neck recipient vessels and end-to-end anastomosis. A total of 84 consecutive patients were included and were divided into two groups (42 in each group) according to the recipient vessels. The overall vessel thrombosis rate was 6% (five of 84 cases) and the overall flap loss rate was 2.4% (two of 84 cases) yielding a flap salvage rate of 60%. Vessel thrombosis occurred in three cases of the smaller vessels group and in two cases of the large cervical vessels group. This was not statistically significant.

La présente étude évalue si l'utilisation des deux vaisseaux cervicaux (l'artère carotide externe et la veine jugulaire interne) comme vaisseaux récepteurs avec une anastomose termino-latérale améliore la survie des lambeaux libres en cas de reconstruction de la tête et du cou par suite d'un cancer, par rapport au recours habituel à d'autres vaisseaux récepteurs du cou, plus petits, et à une anastomose termino-terminale. Au total, 84 patients consécutifs ont participé à l'étude et ont été divisés en deux groupes (42 par groupe), selon les vaisseaux récepteurs. Le taux global de thrombose des vaisseaux s'est élevé à 6 % (cinq cas sur 84), et celui de perte des lambeaux, à 2,4 % (deux cas sur 84), laissant place à un taux de sauvegarde des lambeaux de 60 %. Une thrombose des vaisseaux s'est produite dans trois cas au sein du groupe de patients chez qui on avait utilisé les petits vaisseaux, et dans deux cas au sein de celui chez qui ont avait recouru aux gros vaisseaux. Ces résultats n'étaient pas statistiquement significatifs.