Integration of network pharmacology, metabolomics and lipidomics for clarifying the role of sphingolipid metabolism in the treatment of liver cancer by regorafenib.

AIMS: Regorafenib, an FDA-approved drug for advanced primary liver cancer (PLC), could provide survival benefits for patients. However, markers for its therapeutic sensitivity are lacking. This study seeks to identify sensitive targets of regorafenib in PLC from the perspective of small molecular metabolites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initiated with network pharmacology (NP) to map regorafenib's target landscape and metabolic regulatory network in liver cancer. Subsequently, regorafenib's impact on hepatoma cells was evaluated by flow cytometry, western blotting (WB) and cell viability assay. Advanced metabolomics and lipidomics were employed to elucidate regorafenib's metabolic reprogramming effects in liver cancer. Metabolic enzyme expression was assessed by WB, immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence assays. Ultimately, mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was utilized to investigate the potential causality of sphingolipid metabolism in hepatic cancer. KEY FINDINGS: Regorafenib was observed to inhibit hepatoma cell proliferation and cell cycle progression at G0/G1 phase, resulting in significant alterations in sphingolipid levels. It promoted the significant accumulation of 16:0 dihydroceramide (16:0 dhCer) by upregulating ceramide synthase 6 (CERS6) expression and inhibiting dihydroceramide desaturase 1 (DEGS1) activity. The MR analysis revealed that DEGS1 was a risk factor for the development and progression of liver cancer, while cumulative 16:0 dhCer was a protective factor. SIGNIFICANCE: Sphingolipids, particularly dhCer and regulatory enzymes, may be potential sensitive markers of regorafenib in the treatment of liver cancer, providing new insights for enhancing the treated efficacy of regorafenib in liver cancer.

Regorafenib enhances M1/M2 macrophage polarization by inhibiting the secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

AIMS: Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of various metastatic/advanced cancers. Although clinical trials have reported the efficacy of regorafenib in multiple cancer types, its immunomodulatory activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear. MAIN METHODS: This study investigated the effects of regorafenib on tumorigenesis by using two mouse models of HNSCC. The distribution of immune cells in tumor tissues was assessed through flow cytometry, RNA sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence staining. KEY FINDINGS: Regorafenib exhibited significant antitumor activity in our HNSCC mouse models. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte isolation and RNA sequencing revealed that regorafenib can activate immune functions. Moreover, regorafenib-treated tumor-conditioned medium regulated macrophage proliferation ex vivo. Our data suggests that regorafenib modulates immune function by regulating both tumor and immune cells. Specifically, regorafenib induced the polarization of macrophages toward the proinflammatory M1 phenotype by suppressing the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), a macrophage regulator. In addition, regorafenib suppressed the secretion of PAI-1 from ex vivo human HNSCC organoids. SIGNIFICANCE: Regorafenib enhances M1/M2 macrophage polarization and suppresses PAI-1 secretion from cancer cells, leading to a shift from M2 to M1 macrophages in the HNSCC tumor microenvironment.

Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Regorafenib Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-formulation, and 2-cycle crossover trial conducted in 48 healthy Chinese volunteers, under fasting and fed conditions. The participants received oral doses of the test formulation (regorafenib) and reference formulation (40 mg) during each study period. Blood samples were collected before and up to 144 hours after the formulations were administered to determine changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters and adverse reactions, which were then used to evaluate bioequivalence and safety. The geometric mean ratios of maximum blood concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity for regorafenib were as follows: 94.7%, 91.4%, and 91.7%, respectively, under fasting conditions; and 94.6%, 97.7%, and 98.8%, respectively, under fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios were within the 80%-125% equivalence interval for both the fasting and fed tests. Ingesting high-fat and high-calorie foods increases exposure to regorafenib, leading to slower rates of absorption. The safety profiles of the 2 preparations were similar.

TRIM21 induces selective autophagic degradation of c-Myc and sensitizes regorafenib therapy in colorectal cancer.

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutation is associated with malignant tumor transformation and drug resistance. However, the development of clinically effective targeted therapies for KRAS-mutant cancer has proven to be a formidable challenge. Here, we report that tripartite motif-containing protein 21 (TRIM21) functions as a target of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC), contributing to regorafenib therapy resistance. Mechanistically, TRIM21 directly interacts with and ubiquitinates v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (c-Myc) at lysine 148 (K148) via K63-linkage, enabling c-Myc to be targeted to the autophagy machinery for degradation, ultimately resulting in the downregulation of enolase 2 expression and inhibition of glycolysis. However, mutant KRAS (KRAS/MT)-driven mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling leads to the phosphorylation of TRIM21 (p-TRIM21) at Threonine 396 (T396) by ERK2, disrupting the interaction between TRIM21 and c-Myc and thereby preventing c-Myc from targeting autophagy for degradation. This enhances glycolysis and contributes to regorafenib resistance. Clinically, high p-TRIM21 (T396) is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Targeting TRIM21 to disrupt KRAS/MT-driven phosphorylation using the antidepressant vilazodone shows potential for enhancing the efficacy of regorafenib in treating KRAS-mutant CRC in preclinical models. These findings are instrumental for KRAS-mutant CRC treatment aiming at activating TRIM21-mediated selective autophagic degradation of c-Myc.

Pan-Canadian consensus recommendations for GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumours that originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal. GISTs are mainly driven by gain-of-function mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for localized tumours and all currently approved medical GIST treatments are based on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent discoveries in the molecular and clinical features of GISTs have greatly impacted GIST management. Due to the provincially rather than nationally administered Canadian healthcare system, there have been inconsistencies in the treatment of GISTs across the country. Therefore, guidance on the latest knowledge, clinical management and treatment of GIST is needed to standardize the approach to GIST management nationwide. To establish pan-Canadian guidance, provide up-to-date data and harmonize the clinical practice of GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada; a panel of 20 physicians with extensive clinical experience in GIST management reviewed relevant literature. This included radiologists, pathologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons and medical oncologists across Canada. The structured literature focused on seven key domains: molecular profiling, radiological techniques/reporting, targeted localized therapy, intricacies of systemic treatments, emerging tests, multidisciplinary care and patient advocacy. This literature review, along with clinical expertise and opinion, was used to develop this concise and clinically relevant consensus paper to harmonize the knowledge and clinical practice on GIST management across Canada. The content presented here will help guide healthcare providers, especially in Canada, in terms of approaching and managing GIST.

Successful desensitization in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer presenting with regorafenib-mediated fix drug eruption.

INTRODUCTION: Regorafenib is an oral protein kinase inhinitor approved fot the treatment of metastatic colorecral cancer. We present a first successful case of desensitization in regorafenib-related fix-drug eruption in the literature. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old female patient was diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. The patient received regorafenib treatment for malignancy recurrence. The patient was admitted to adult allergy clinic with developing recurrent fix drug eruption in the second cycle, on the 10th day of regorafenib treatment. The patient was given the third cycle of regorafenib treatment with a 6-day desensitization protocol, the first day of which consisted of 6 steps and and the third cycle was successfully completed. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Regorafenib-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reactions occur less frequently and and regorafenib hypersensitivity reactions are difficult to manage and experience is limited. This is the first successful desensitization protocol developed by us for regorafenib-related fix drug eruption and more cases are needed to be reported to confirm the desensitization protocol. DISCUSSION: There is only one successful regorafenib desensitization protocol for severe delayed hypersensivity reaction in the literature, but there is no protocol developed for mild type delayed hypersensivity reaction. The management of fix-drug eruption primarily involves discontinuation and avoidance of the offending drug but our patient had a mild delayed-type reaction and there was no alternative to regarofenib treatment. We developed the rapid 6-step desensitization protocol (Day 1). According to this protocol, the patient was able to continue regorafenib treatment successfully.

Association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib.

BACKGROUND: The impact of sidedness on survival of later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between sidedness and survival among chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) or regorafenib or both. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 or regorafenib between 2015 and 2020 was retrospectively collected. Patients were stratified into TAS-102 first and regorafenib first, then subdivided into TAS-102 followed by regorafenib (T-R) and regorafenib followed by TAS-102 (R-T) groups. The oncologic outcomes were presented with time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After matching, 376 TAS-102 patients and 376 regorafenib patients were included for outcomes comparison. TTF had insignificant differences while OS was significantly different between TAS-102 and regorafenib groups. Median TTF and OS were 1.9 months versus 2.0 months (P = .701) and 9.1 months versus 7.0 months (P = .008) in TAS-102 and regorafenib, respectively. The OS benefits were consistent regardless primary tumor location. Subgroup analysis with 174 T-R patients and 174 R-T patients was investigated for treatment sequences. TTF and OS had significant differences in both groups. Median TTF and OS were 8.5 months versus 6.3 months (P = .001) and 14.4 months versus 12.6 months (P = .035) in T-R and R-T groups, respectively. The TTF and OS benefits were persisted regardless primary tumor location. CONCLUSION: TAS-102 first provided a better survival benefit in chemotherapy refractory patients with mCRC across all sidedness. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate our conclusions.

Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 (FGF2) Activates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): An Autocrine Mechanism Contributing to Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Resistance.

We showed previously that the autocrine activation of the FGFR-mediated pathway in GIST lacking secondary KIT mutations was a result of the inhibition of KIT signaling. We show here that the FGF2/FGFR pathway regulates VEGF-A/VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST cells. Indeed, recombinant FGF2 increased the production of VEGF-A by IM-naive and resistant GIST cells. VEGF-A production was also increased in KIT-inhibited GIST, whereas the neutralization of FGF2 by anti-FGF2 mAb attenuated VEGFR signaling. Of note, BGJ 398, pan FGFR inhibitor, effectively and time-dependently inhibited VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, thereby revealing the regulatory role of the FGFR pathway in VEGFR signaling for this particular GIST cell line. This also resulted in significant synergy between BGJ 398 and VEGFR inhibitors (i.e., sunitinib and regorafenib) by enhancing their pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative activities. The high potency of the combined use of VEGFR and FGFR inhibitors in IM-resistant GISTs was revealed by the impressive synergy scores observed for regorafenib or sunitinib and BGJ 398. Moreover, FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1/2 were co-localized in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, and the direct interaction between the aforementioned RTKs was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. In contrast, IM-resistant GIST 430 cells expressed lower basal levels of FGF2 and VEGF-A. Despite the increased expression VEGFR1 and FGFR1/2 in GIST 430 cells, these RTKs were not co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated. Moreover, no synergy between FGFR and VEGFR inhibitors was observed for the IM-resistant GIST 430 cell line. Collectively, the dual targeting of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs is not limited to the synergistic anti-angiogenic treatment effects. The dual inhibition of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs potentiates the proapoptotic and anti-proliferative activities of the corresponding RTKi. Mechanistically, the FGF2-induced activation of the FGFR pathway turns on VEGFR signaling via the overproduction of VEGF-A, induces the interaction between FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1, and thereby renders cancer cells highly sensitive to the dual inhibition of the aforementioned RTKs. Thus, our data uncovers the novel mechanism of the cross-talk between the aforementioned RTKs in IM-resistant GISTs lacking secondary KIT mutations and suggests that the dual blockade of FGFR and VEGFR signaling might be an effective treatment strategy for patients with GIST-acquired IM resistance via KIT-independent mechanisms.

Schisandrin C prevents Regorafenib-Induced cardiotoxicity by recovering EPHA2 expression in cardiomyocytes.

Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal, and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. However, regorafenib-induced cardiotoxicity increases the risk of mortality. Despite reports that regorafenib can cause mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiomyocytes, the molecular mechanism of regorafenib-induced cardiotoxicity is much less known and there is an urgent need for intervention strategies. Here, we treated mice with vehicle or 200 mg/kg regorafenib daily for 42 days by gavage or treated cardiomyocyte lines with 8, 16 or 32 µM regorafenib, and we found that regorafenib could cause apoptosis, mitochondrial injury and DNA damage in cardiomyocytes. Mechanistically, regorafenib can reduce the expression of EPHA2, which inhibits AKT signaling, leading to cardiomyocyte apoptosis and cardiotoxicity. In addition, we showed that recovering EPHA2 expression via plasmid-induced overexpression of EPHA2 or schisandrin C, a natural product, could prevent regorafenib-induced cardiotoxicity. These findings demonstrated that regorafenib causes cardiomyocyte apoptosis and cardiac injury by reducing the expression of EPHA2 and schisandrin C could prevent regorafenib-induced cardiotoxicity by recovering EPHA2 expression, which provides a potential management strategy for regorafenib-induced cardiotoxicity and will benefit the safe application of regorafenib in clinic.

Regorafenib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors versus regorafenib monotherapy as a late-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Background: Few data are available on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with late-line regorafenib monotherapy or combined with other therapies. This study thus aimed to examine regorafenib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with regorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced CRC. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced CRC who experienced recurrence and progression after standard first- and second-line treatments treatment from November 2018 to December 2021. The patients received regorafenib plus ICIs or regorafenib monotherapy. Treatment response was evaluated based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed via multivariate analysis. Results: The combined group and the monotherapy group included 30 and 43 patients, respectively. The median OS (13.7 vs. 10.1 months; P=0.10) and PFS (4 vs. 3.6 months; P=0.32) were not significantly different between the two groups. In males, the median OS was significantly longer in the combined group compared with the monotherapy group (not reached vs. 8.03 months; P=0.02), but the median PFS showed no significant difference (7.23 vs. 3.90 months; P=0.16). There was no significant difference in OS (P=0.71) or PFS (P=0.89) in females. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 1 [vs. 0; hazard ratio (HR) =3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61-6.10; P<0.001] was independently associated with PFS. ECOG PS 1 (vs. 0; HR =3.63, 95% CI: 1.54-8.56; P=0.003) and combined therapy (vs. monotherapy; HR =0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.99; P=0.048) were associated with OS. Conclusions: Regorafenib combined with ICIs led to numerically longer PFS and significantly prolonged OS in patients with mCRC compared to regorafenib monotherapy, especially in male patients.

Underlying mechanisms and management strategies for regorafenib-induced toxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 85% of liver cancer cases and is the third leading cause of cancer death. Regorafenib is a multi-target inhibitor that dramatically prolongs progression-free survival in HCC patients who have failed sorafenib therapy. However, one of the primary factors limiting regorafenib's clinical utilization is toxicity. Using Clinical Trials.gov and PubMed, we gathered clinical data on regorafenib and conducted a extensive analysis of the medication's adverse reactions and mechanisms. Next, we suggested suitable management techniques to improve regorafenib's effectiveness. AREAS COVERED: We have reviewed the mechanisms by which regorafenib-induced toxicity occurs and general management strategies through clinical trials of regorafenib. Furthermore, by examining the literature on regorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibition, we summarized the mechanics of the onset of regorafenib toxicity and mechanism-based intervention strategies by reviewing the literature related to regorafenib and other tyrosine kinase inhibition. EXPERT OPINION: One of the primary factors restricting regorafenib's clinical utilization and combination therapy is its toxicity reactions. To optimize regorafenib treatment regimens, it is especially important to further understand the specific toxicity mechanisms of regorafenib as a multi-kinase inhibitor.

Small HBV surface antigen drives regorafenib resistance in HCC via KIAA1429-dependent m6A modification of CCR9.

A substantial body of literature, including our own, points to a connection between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the development of drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly against sorafenib. However, the influence of HBV on resistance to regorafenib, another therapeutic agent, has been less studied. In this study, we used the GEO database (GSE87630) and clinical samples to demonstrate that C-C motif chemokine receptor 9 (CCR9) was highly expressed in HBV-related HCC and predicted poor overall survival. Its overexpression correlated with HBsAg-positive HCC patients. Both univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis elucidated CCR9 was an independent risk factor for poor overall survival in HCC patients. Our in vitro findings further revealed that HBV structural proteins, small HBV surface antigen (SHBs), triggered an upregulation of CCR9. Functional assays showed that SHBs enhanced HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, increased ABCB1 and ABCC1 expression, and promoted regorafenib resistance via CCR9. Intriguingly, overexpression of HBV plasmid and an AAV-HBV mouse model both exhibited a significant elevation in global N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels. Further investigations revealed that SHBs elevated these m6A levels, upregulated CCR9 and stabilized CCR9 mRNA through KIAA1429-mediated m6A modification, with sites 1373 and 1496 on CCR9 mRNA being critical for modification. In conclusion, SHBs promoted HCC progression and regorafenib resistance via KIAA1429-mediated m6A modification of CCR9. Our findings suggested that CCR9 could be a potential prognostic biomarker and a valuable molecular therapeutic target of regorafenib resistance in HBV-related HCC.

Real-world dosing patterns of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: the RE-SEARCH study.

PURPOSE: To describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction. RESULTS: Most patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Regorafenib-related erythrocytosis in metastatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report.

Introduction: Regorafenib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of various tumor types, including metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), as a third-line systemic therapy. Erythrocytosis, which is characterized by an increase in erythrocyte count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels, has been described as a side effect of some antiangiogenic TKIs but has never been associated with regorafenib administration. Case presentation: An extra-GIST was diagnosed in a 58-year-old woman after she underwent surgery to remove a pelvic mass. Three years later, systemic therapy with imatinib was started due to pelvic disease recurrence. However, after six months, due to disease progression, we prescribed sunitinib, which the patient received for four years. Regorafenib was initiated in June 2019, and after six months, we noted an increase in the erythrocytes' count and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Given that the patient had clinical benefit and hematocrit was within normal range, we only monitored the blood cell count and continued to give regorafenib at the same dose. The drug was then stopped for over six weeks due to hospitalization for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and Hb levels returned to normal. Therefore, we decided to restart regorafenib at a lower dose. However, Hb levels rose again in conjunction with increased hematocrit, resulting in the need for multiple phlebotomies. We attempted to restart regorafenib every other day, but it was unsuccessful, so we stopped it permanently in May 2023, and all values returned to normal. Conclusion: Regorafenib may cause secondary erythrocytosis that could not be dose-related, as this case report suggests. Secondary erythrocytosis might be a marker of TKI efficacy, given the patient's prolonged clinical benefit during regorafenib treatment (48 months). In patients receiving regorafenib, monitoring blood count as well as any symptoms associated with erythrocytosis may be suggested.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 pharmacotherapies for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA and China.

Background: Several studies have systematically assessed the efficacy and safety of progressive or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, the discernible limitations of efficacy and the elevated costs of interventions instigate an investigation into the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate cost-effectivenesses of 11 pharmacotherapeutic interventions for recurrent GBM from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United States (US) and China. Design: A model-based pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Methods: A partitioned survival model was employed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 11 distinct drug-based treatments. The clinical efficacy and safety data were obtained from a network meta-analysis, while the medical expenditure and health utility were primarily derived from published literature. One-way sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to scrutinize the impact of potential uncertainties to ensure the robustness of the model. The primary endpoint was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: Among the therapeutic interventions evaluated, lomustine emerged as the cheapest option, with costs amounting to $78,998 in the United States and $30,231 in China, respectively. Regorafenib displayed the highest quality-adjusted life years at 0.475 in the United States and 0.465 in China. The one-way sensitivity analyses underscored that drug price was a key factor influencing cost-effectiveness. Both scenario and PSA consistently demonstrated that, considering the willingness-to-pay thresholds, lomustine was a cost-effective treatment with probability of more than 94%. Conclusion: In comparison to the alternative antitumor agents, lomustine was likely to be a cost-effective option for relapsed GBM patients from the perspective of healthcare payers in both the United States and China.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE Combined with Camrelizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Untreatable Progression After TACE Combined with Sorafenib Therapy: A Case Control Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib (hereafter, TACE-regorafenib) or camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with untreatable progression after TACE and sorafenib therapy. METHODS: The medical records of patients with HCC who received TACE-regorafenib or TACE-camrelizumab between September 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, with 41 and 35 patients in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups, respectively. The objective response rates in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups were 9.8% and 8.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.859). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the two groups (61.0% vs 68.6%, P = 0.838). The median OS was 11 months in the TACE-regorafenib group and 10 months in the TACE-camrelizumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.348). The TACE-regorafenib group had a median PFS of 7 months, which was significantly longer than that of the TACE-camrelizumab group (4 months, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P = 0.544). CONCLUSIONS: TACE-regorafenib was safe, well-tolerated, and showed promising efficacy in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC, whereas TACE-camrelizumab demonstrated similar survival benefits.

Real-world dosing of regorafenib and outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis using US claims data.

BACKGROUND: The randomized, dose-optimization, open-label ReDOS study in US patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) showed that, compared with a standard dosing approach, initiating regorafenib at 80 mg/day and escalating to 160 mg/day depending on tolerability increased the proportion of patients reaching their third treatment cycle and reduced the incidence of adverse events without compromising efficacy. Subsequently, the ReDOS dose-escalation strategy was included as an alternative regorafenib dosing option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines. A retrospective analysis was conducted using a US claims database to assess whether inclusion of this dose-escalation strategy in NCCN Guidelines has influenced the use of flexible dosing in routine US clinical practice, and to describe clinical outcomes pre- and post-inclusion in NCCN Guidelines. METHODS: Patients with CRC in the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database initiating regorafenib for the first time between January 2016 and June 2020 were stratified based on whether they initiated regorafenib pre- or post-inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, and in two groups: flexible dosing (< 160 mg/day; < 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle) and standard dosing (160 mg/day; ≥ 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who initiated their third treatment cycle and the mean number of treatment cycles per group. RESULTS: 703 patients initiated regorafenib during the study period, of whom 310 (44%) initiated before and 393 (56%) initiated after inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines. After inclusion in the guidelines, the proportion of patients who received flexible dosing increased from 21% (n = 66/310) to 45% (n = 178/393), the proportion who received standard dosing decreased from 79% (n = 244/310) to 55% (n = 215/393), the proportion who initiated their third treatment cycle increased from 36% (n = 113/310) to 46% (n = 179/393), and the mean (standard deviation) number of treatment cycles increased from 2.6 (2.9) to 3.2 (3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Following inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, real-world data suggest that US clinicians have markedly increased use of flexible dosing in clinical practice, potentially maximizing clinical benefits and safety outcomes for patients with metastatic CRC receiving regorafenib.

Exploratory Study Identifies Matrix Metalloproteinase-14 and -9 as Potential Biomarkers of Regorafenib Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

In identifying biomarkers for anticancer drugs, the lack of objectivity in selecting candidate factors makes interpretation difficult. We performed preclinical analysis and a translational validation study to identify candidate biomarkers for regorafenib efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Using in silico COMPARE analysis with a human cancer cell line panel, JFCR39, we selected candidate biomarkers whose expression correlates with regorafenib sensitivity. We validated predictive values in mCRC patients receiving regorafenib (discovery, n = 53) and FTD/TPI (control, n = 16). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL), before the second cycle (2nd), and at progressive disease (PD), and biomarker levels were measured using ELISA. Our analysis showed that high matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-14 expression was associated with a high sensitivity to regorafenib. In the discovery cohort, high MMP-14 levels at BL and PD were correlated with tumor shrinkage and longer progression-free survival (PFS). A subsequent analysis of other related factors further indicated that the patients with decreased MMP-9 levels at the 2nd had higher disease control rates, tumor shrinkage, longer PFS, and overall survival than those with increased changes. These findings were not observed in the control cohort. Our study suggests MMP-14 and MMP-9 may serve as prognostic markers for regorafenib and provide insights into novel combination therapies with anti-MMP-9 agents or FTD/TPI.

Regorafenib enhances the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma through MAPK signaling pathway suppression.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising and innovative approach for treating tumors. The synergistic effect of PDT and chemotherapy can enhance the anti-tumor efficacy by leveraging their complementing benefits. In this study, we created lipid vesicles to deliver a photosensitizer (chlorin e6, Ce6) and Regorafenib into tumors for the purpose of examining the effectiveness and mechanism of Lipo-Ce6@Rego-PDT (LCR-P) on Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both in vitro and in vivo. We found that the cytotoxicity on HCC caused by LCR-P was significantly stronger than that caused by Lipo-Ce6-PDT (LC-P). Cellular ROS production in the LCR-P group was approximately higher than that in the LC-P group, and Regorafenib significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of JNK, ERK, and P38 of Lipo-Ce6-PDT group in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, Regorafenib significantly downregulated the expression of Bcl-2 and upregulated the expression of Bax and cleaved caspase-3 of LC-P group in vitro and in vivo. Compared with LC-P, LCR-P significantly increased cell apoptosis rate. The body weight and HE staining of normal organs primarily indicated the safety of this combined strategy. These results indicate that the combination of Regorafenib and Lipo-Ce6 can significantly enhance the anti-tumor efficiency of PDT for HCC and exhibits good biosafety.

Third-line treatment and beyond in metastatic colorectal cancer: What do we have and what can we expect?

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer worldwide and the second cause of cancer-related death. Treatment advances and precision oncological medicine for these tumours have been stalled in comparison to those for other common tumours such as lung and breast cancer. However, the recent publication of the SUNLIGHT trial results with the trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102)-bevacizumab combination and the irruption of new molecular targets with guided treatments have opened new possibilities in third-line metastatic colorectal cancer management. Anti-EGFR rechallenge, anti-HER2 targeted therapies or the promising results of Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC), are some of the available options that may modify what is presumably third-line colorectal treatment. Hereby, we present the evidence of the different treatment options in third-line colorectal cancer and beyond, as well as the possibilities of sequencing them.