RESUMO
Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) is a method for predicting the physical and biological properties of small molecules; it is in use in industry and public services. However, as any scientific method, it is challenged by more and more requests, especially considering its possible role in assessing the safety of new chemicals. To answer the question whether QSAR, by exploiting available knowledge, can build new knowledge, the chapter reviews QSAR methods in search of a QSAR epistemology. QSAR stands on tree pillars, i.e., biological data, chemical knowledge, and modeling algorithms. Usually the biological data, resulting from good experimental practice, are taken as a true picture of the world; chemical knowledge has scientific bases; so if a QSAR model is not working, blame modeling. The role of modeling in developing scientific theories, and in producing knowledge, is so analyzed. QSAR is a mature technology and is part of a large body of in silico methods and other computational methods. The active debate about the acceptability of the QSAR models, about the way to communicate them, and the explanation to provide accompanies the development of today QSAR models. An example about predicting possible endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDC) shows the many faces of modern QSAR methods.
