Effectiveness of a two-tiered trauma team activation system at a level I trauma center.

PURPOSE: Many trauma patients who are transported to our level I trauma center have minor injuries that do not require full trauma team activation (FTTA). Thus, we implemented a two-tiered TTA system categorizing patients into red and yellow code alerts, indicating FTTA and Limited TTA (LTTA) requirements, respectively. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this triage tool by evaluating its diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), undertriage and overtriage) and comparing injury severity between the two groups. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a Level I trauma center. Characteristics compared between the red and yellow code groups included demographics, injury severity, treatments, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Calculating the diagnostic parameters was based on Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the need for life-saving surgery or procedures. RESULTS: Significant differences in injury severity indicators were observed between the two groups. Patients in the red code group had a higher ISS and New Injury Severity Score (NISS), a lower Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and probability of survival. They had a longer hospital LOS, a higher Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rate and required more emergency operations. The Sensitivity of the triage tool was 85.2%, specificity was 55.6%, PPV was 74.2%, NPV was 71.5%, undertriage was 14.7%, and overtriage was 25.7%. CONCLUSION: The two-tiered TTA system effectively distinguish between patients with major trauma who need FTTA and patients with minor trauma who can be managed by LTTA.

Characteristics of undertriaged older patients in the emergency department: Retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Older patients are more likely to be undertriaged as they often suffer from multiple diseases and complain of non-specific symptoms. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the characteristics of undertriaged older patients in emergency departments. METHODS: This descriptive study retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the electronic medical records of older patients who visited the emergency department of a general hospital in Seoul between January and December 2019. RESULTS: Approximately 29 % (n = 4,823) of older patients who visited the emergency department during the study period were classified as Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) level 4 or 5, and approximately 8 % (n = 397) were undertriaged. Approximately 73 % (n = 288) of patients were hospitalized after visiting the emergency department. The undertriaged older patients exhibited nervous system symptoms such as dizziness and headache (28.8 %), cardiopulmonary symptoms such as chest discomfort, palpitations, and abdominal pain (28.4 %), head trauma (12.8 %), and respiratory symptoms such as cough and dyspnea (12.5 %). CONCLUSION: Triage nurses in emergency departments should carefully triage older patients as their chief complaints can be non-specific. In particular, when older patients visit the emergency department and exhibit symptoms such as dizziness, abnormal pain, chest discomfort, palpitations, and head trauma, they are more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit. Therefore, meticulous care for older patients showing these symptoms is essential.

Evaluation of Prehospital Undertriage in Relation to Trauma Team Activation-Results from a Prospective Study in 12 Level one German Trauma Centers.

Background/Objective: This prospective, multicenter observational cohort study was carried out in 12 trauma centers in Germany and Switzerland. Its purpose was to evaluate the rate of undertriage, as well as potential consequences, and relate these with different Trauma Team Activation Protocols (TTA-Protocols), as this has not been done before in Germany. Methods: Each trauma center collected the data during a three-month period between December 2019 and February 2021. All 12 participating hospitals are certified as supra-regional trauma centers. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of undertriaged patients. Those included in the study were all consecutive adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with acute trauma admitted to the emergency department of one of the participating hospitals by the prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) within 6 h after trauma. The data contained information on age, sex, trauma mechanism, pre- and in-hospital physiology, emergency interventions, emergency surgical interventions, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and death within 48 h. Trauma team activation (TTA) was initiated by the emergency medical services. This should follow the national guidelines for severe trauma using established field triage criteria. We used various denominators, such as ISS, and criteria for the appropriateness of TTA to evaluate the undertriage in four groups. Results: This study included a total of 3754 patients. The average injury severity score was 5.1 points, and 7.0% of cases (n = 261) presented with an injury severity score (ISS) of 16+. TTA was initiated for a total of 974 (26%) patients. In group 1, we evaluated how successful the actual practice in the EMS was in identifying patients with ISS 16+. The undertriage rate was 15.3%, but mortality was lower in the undertriage cohort compared to those with a TTA (5% vs. 10%). In group 2, we evaluated the actual practice of EMS in terms of identifying patients meeting the appropriateness of TTA criteria; this showed a higher undertriage rate of 35.9%, but as seen in group 1, the mortality was lower (5.9% vs. 3.3%). In group 3, we showed that, if the EMS were to strictly follow guideline criteria, the rate of undertriage would be even higher (26.2%) regarding ISS 16+. Using the appropriateness of TTA criteria to define the gold standard for TTA (group 4), 764 cases (20.4%) fulfilled at least one condition for retrospective definition of TTA requirement. Conclusions: Regarding ISS 16+, the rate of undertriage in actual practice was 15.3%, but those patients did not have a higher mortality.

Geriatric Population Triage: The Risk of Real-Life Over- and Under-Triage in an Overcrowded ED: 4- and 5-Level Triage Systems Compared: The CREONTE (Crowding and R E Organization National TriagE) Study.

Elderly patients, when they present to the emergency department (ED) or are admitted to the hospital, are at higher risk of adverse outcomes such as higher mortality and longer hospital stays. This is mainly due to their age and their increased fragility. In order to minimize this already increased risk, adequate triage is of foremost importance for fragile geriatric (>75 years old) patients who present to the ED. The admissions of elderly patients from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 were examined, taking into consideration the presence of two different triage systems, a 4-level (4LT) and a 5-level (5LT) triage system. This study analyzes the difference in wait times and under- (UT) and over-triage (OT) in geriatric and general populations with two different triage models. Another outcome of this study was the analysis of the impact of crowding and its variables on the triage system during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 423,257 ED presentations were included. An increase in admissions of geriatric, more fragile, and seriously ill individuals was observed, and a progressive increase in crowding was simultaneously detected. Geriatric patients, when presenting to the emergency department, are subject to the problems of UT and OT in both a 4LT system and a 5LT system. Several indicators and variables of crowding increased, with a net increase in throughput and output factors, notably the length of stay (LOS), exit block, boarding, and processing times. This in turn led to an increase in wait times and an increase in UT in the geriatric population. It has indeed been shown that an increase in crowding results in an increased risk of UT, and this is especially true for 4LT compared to 5LT systems. When observing the pandemic period, an increase in admissions of older and more serious patients was observed. However, in the pandemic period, a general reduction in waiting times was observed, as well as an increase in crowding indices and intrahospital mortality. This study demonstrates how introducing a 5LT system enables better flow and patient care in an ED. Avoiding UT of geriatric patients, however, remains a challenge in EDs.

Characteristics and demography of low energy fall injuries in patients > 60 years of age: a population-based analysis over a decade with focus on undertriage.

BACKGROUND: An increasing group of elderly patients is admitted after low energy falls. Several studies have shown that this patient group tends to be severely injured and is often undertriaged. METHODS: Patients > 60 years with low energy fall (< 1 m) as mechanism of injury were identified from the Stavanger University Hospital trauma registry. The study period was between 01.01.11 and 31.12.20. Patient and injury variables as well as clinical outcome were described. Undertriage was defined as patients with a major trauma, i.e., Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, without trauma team activation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, 388 patients > 60 years with low energy fall as mechanism of injury were identified. Median age was 78 years (IQR 68-86), and 53% were males. The location of major injury was head injury in 41% of the patients, lower extremities in 19%, and thoracic injuries in 10%. Thirty-day mortality was 13%. Fifty percent were discharged to home, 31% to nursing home, 9% in hospital mortality, and the remaining 10% were transferred to other hospitals or rehabilitation facilities. Ninety patients had major trauma, and the undertriage was 48% (95% confidence interval, 38 to 58%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged > 60 years with low energy falls are dominated by head injuries, and the 30-day mortality is 13%. Patients with major trauma are undertriaged in half the cases mandating increased awareness of this patient group.

A low proportion of undertriage validates the new West coast system for triage-Paediatric.

AIM: There is a lack of studies on paediatric triage systems. This study aimed to evaluate patient safety of the Gothenburg-developed paediatric triage system West Coast System for Triage-Paediatric (WEST-P). METHOD: This study was performed at the paediatric emergency department in Gothenburg, Sweden, October 2020 to April 2021. Included patients were double-triaged with the WEST-P, and the established Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System-Paediatrics (RETTS-p). We compared the level of urgency between both systems to identify potentially undertriaged patients. Also, we assessed the patient safety according to clinical assessment at presentation, and pre-defined criteria. RESULTS: This study included 2290 (23%) of triaged patients (44% girls, median age: 5.0 years) during the study period. A higher number of patients triaged to low urgency in WEST-P compared to RETTS-p (p < 0.0001) was observed, and 497 cases with low WEST-P and high RETTS-p urgencies identified. Of these, 29 had a clinical assessment indicating high urgency. After patient safety assessment, seven (0.4%) were determined undertriaged by the new triage system WEST-P. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate a low risk of undertriage in the new WEST-P. Thus, the WEST-P has a high degree of patient safety when used in a paediatric emergency department.

Delays in treatment and disposition attributable to undertriage of pediatric emergency medicine patients.

BACKGROUND: Triage, the initial assessment and sorting of patients in the Emergency Department (ED), determines priority of evaluation and treatment. Little is known about the impact of undertriage, the underestimation of disease severity at triage, on clinical care in pediatric ED patients. We evaluate the impact of undertriage on time to disposition and treatment decisions in pediatric ED patients. METHODS: This was a case control study of ED visits for patients <22 years of age, with an assigned Emergency Severity Index (ESI) score of 4 or 5, and associated hospital admission, nebulized treatment, supplemental oxygen, and/or intravenous (IV) line placement, between January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2022. Controls were sampled from a pool of patient visits with an ESI score of 3, matched by intervention, disposition, and date and hour of arrival. Primary outcome measures were time to order of intervention (nebulized treatment, oxygen administration, or IV placement) and time to disposition decision. A secondary outcome measure was return visits requiring admission or emergency intervention within 14 days of the index visit. Continuous variables (time to orders) were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test and dichotomous outcomes (return visits) were compared using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was performed with Python v3.10. RESULTS: The final analysis included 7245 undertriaged patients. Undertriaged patients had longer times to orders for nebulized treatments, (p < 0.001) IV placement, (p < 0.001) and admission (p < 0.001) when compared to controls. There were no significant differences in time to supplemental oxygen delivery and time to discharge compared to controls. Undertriaged patients were more likely to experience a return visit requiring admission or emergency intervention (OR 3.74, 95% CI 3.32,4.22). CONCLUSIONS: Undertriage in the pediatric ED is associated with delays in care and disposition decisions and increases likelihood of return visits.

Assessing Physiologic Reserve and Frailty in the Older Emergency Department Patient: Should the Paradigm Change?

Older patients are more vulnerable to acute illness or injury because of reduced physiologic reserve associated with aging. Therefore, their assessment in the emergency department (ED) should include not only vital signs and their baseline values but also changes that reflect physiologic reserve, such as mobility, mental status, and frailty. Combining aggregated vitals sign scores and frailty might improve risk stratification in the ED. Implementing these changes in ED assessment may require the introduction of senior-friendly processes to ensure ED treatment is appropriate to the older patients' immediate discomfort, personal goals, and likely prognosis.

The Trauma Activation Review Committee: Response to Undertriage During a Period of Rapid Growth at a Level II Trauma Center.

Trauma triage criteria are constantly being refined for improved identification of severely injured patients. When errors occur, they should be tracked, and triage criteria adjusted to minimize these events. Two time periods of trauma registry data at a single rural level II trauma center were retrospectively compared to evaluate demographics, injuries, and outcomes to identify triage errors. In 300 activated trauma patients during 2011, overtriage was 23% and undertriage was 3.7%. In 1035 activated trauma patients during 2019, overtriage was 20.5% and undertriage was 2.2%. Mortality decreased over time overall. In 2019, Trauma I patients were older, spent more time on the ventilator, and in the ICU (all P < .001). Trauma II patients were also older, had lower ISS, hospital days, and ventilator days (all P < .001). During rapid growth, evaluation of overtriage and undertriage can provide useful feedback for hospital staff to refine triage choices and improve patient outcomes.

Undertriage of Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) delineates trauma team activation (TTA) criteria to identify seriously injured trauma patients in the field. Patients are deemed to be severely undertriaged (SU), placing them at risk for adverse outcomes, when they do not meet TTA criteria but nonetheless sustain significant injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥25). OBJECTIVES: Delineate patient demographics, injuries, and outcomes after SU. PARTICIPANTS: Trauma patients presenting to our ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center with ISS ≥25 were included (11/2015-03/2022). Transfers and private vehicle transports were excluded. Patients were dichotomized and compared by trauma arrival level: TTA (Appropriately Triaged, AT) vs routine consults (SU). RESULTS: Study criteria were satisfied by 1653 patients: 1375 (83%) AT and 278 (17%) SU. Severely undertriaged patients were older than AT patients (47 vs 36 years, P < .001). Severely undertriaged occurred almost exclusively following blunt trauma (96% vs 71%, P < .001). Injury Severity Score was lower following SU than AT (29 vs 32, P < .001). The most common severe injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score [AIS] ≥3) among the SU group were in the Chest (n = 179, 64%). Severely undertriaged patients necessitated emergent intubation (n = 34, 12%), surgery (n = 59, 21%), and angioembolization (n = 22, 8%) at high rates. Severely undertriaged mortality was n = 40, 14%. CONCLUSION: Severely undertriaged occurred among a substantial proportion of ISS ≥25 patients, predominately following blunt trauma. Severe chest injuries were most likely to evade capture. Rates of intubation, emergent intervention, and in-hospital mortality were high after SU. Efforts should be made to identify such patients in the field as they may benefit from TTA.

Five Level Triage vs. Four Level Triage in a Quaternary Emergency Department: National Analysis on Waiting Time, Validity, and Crowding-The CREONTE (Crowding and RE-Organization National TriagE) Study Group.

Background and Objectives: Triage systems help provide the right care at the right time for patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs). Triage systems are generally used to subdivide patients into three to five categories according to the system used, and their performance must be carefully monitored to ensure the best care for patients. Materials and Methods: We examined ED accesses in the context of 4-level (4LT) and 5-level triage systems (5LT), implemented from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. This study assessed the effects of a 5LT on wait times and under-triage (UT) and over-triage (OT). We also examined how 5LT and 4LT systems reflected actual patient acuity by correlating triage codes with severity codes at discharge. Other outcomes included the impact of crowding indices and 5LT system function during the COVID-19 pandemic in the study populations. Results: We evaluated 423,257 ED presentations. Visits to the ED by more fragile and seriously ill individuals increased, with a progressive increase in crowding. The length of stay (LOS), exit block, boarding, and processing times increased, reflecting a net raise in throughput and output factors, with a consequent lengthening of wait times. The decreased UT trend was observed after implementing the 5LT system. Conversely, a slight rise in OT was reported, although this did not affect the medium-high-intensity care area. Conclusions: Introducing a 5LT improved ED performance and patient care.

All about the Benjamins: Efficacy of a modified triage protocol for trauma activation in geriatric patients.

BACKGROUND: The geriatric triage protocol at the study institution was modified from SBP <90 mmHg to SBP <110 mmHg and then to SBP <100 mmHg. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of adjusting geriatric triage protocols on patient outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was conducted on trauma patients 65 years or older. Three study periods with different geriatric specific trauma team activation (TTA) protocols (Group 1-SBP<90 mmHg; Group 2-SBP<110 mmHg; Group 3-SBP<100 mmHg) were compared. RESULTS: 2016 patients were included. There were no differences in mortality rates or need for trauma intervention (NFTI) rates among the three groups. The SBP <100 mmHg and SBP <110 mmHg groups had similar under-triage rates. The NFTI over-triage rate in the SBP <100 mmHg group was lower than the SBP <110 mmHg group. CONCLUSION: Using SBP <100 mmHg threshold for TTA criteria in geriatric trauma patients improves over-triage without leading to under-triage.

Association of In-Hospital Mortality and Trauma Team Activation: A 10-Year Study.

Background: Early trauma team activation (TTA) may improve clinical outcomes through early diagnosis and timely intervention by a dedicated multidisciplinary team. Controversy seems to exist about the effect of establishing trauma team systems in traumatic injury populations. Our aim was to identify factors that may be associated with clinical outcomes in trauma injury and to investigate the effect of trauma team activation. Method: This retrospective descriptive study included all traumatic patients from the Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital Trauma Database. All prehospital vital signs, management, injury type, injury mechanisms, hospitalization history, and clinical outcomes were analyzed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association between trauma team activation and clinical outcomes. Subgroups of TTA in minor injury and non-TTA in major injury were also analyzed. Result: In this study, a total of 11,946 patients were included, of which 10,831 (90.7%) patients were minor injury (ISS < 16), and 1115 (9.3%) patients were major injury (ISS ≥ 16). In the minor injury population, TTA had a higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, operation rate, re-operation rate, and prolonged total length of stay (LOS). In the major injury population, TTA had a higher mortality rate, prolonged total LOS, and prolonged ICU LOS. After adjusting for mechanism of injury and injury severity, there was no association between in-hospital mortality and TTA, compared with the non-TTA group. However, the TTA group had a higher risk of ICU admission, prolonged ICU LOS, and prolonged total LOS. The subgroup analysis showed trauma team activation had a higher risk of mortality in the 60- to 80-year-old population, major injury (ISS ≥ 16), consciousness clear population, and non-head injury group. Conclusions: We found there was no significant association between in-hospital mortality and TTA. However, in the TTA group, there was a higher risk of ICU admission, prolonged total, LOS, and prolonged ICU LOS. In the subgroup analysis, TTA had a higher risk of mortality in the 60- to 80-year-old population, major injury (ISS ≥ 16), consciousness clear population, and non-head injury group. Our results reflect TTA-criteria-selected patients with greater ISS and a high risk of mortality.

Utilization of trauma nurse screening procedure for triage of the injured patient.

PURPOSE: The treatment of trauma patients requires significant hospital resources. Numerous protocols exist to triage the injured patient and determine the level of care they may require. The purpose of this work is to describe an institutional trauma nurse screening procedure and to evaluate its effectiveness in triaging injured patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a large, tertiary trauma center from January to June 2021. Patients were assessed by trauma nurse clinicians (TNC) utilizing a standardized screening process to determine suitability for trauma activation. If the patient did not meet activation criteria, they were sent to the main Emergency Department for evaluation and treatment. Patients could be activated later by the emergency physician. The primary variables of interest were number of activations after initial "rule out," injury severity score (ISS) for patients who were activated, mechanism of injury, and disposition. RESULTS: A total of 1874 TNC screenings were performed. Of these, 1449 (77%) patients did not meet trauma activation criteria. Only 41 (2.8%) patients initially ruled out were later activated by the emergency physician and admitted for treatment of injuries. The average ISS of all activated patients was 9 ± 6. Thirty-six patients had an ISS ≤ 15, four between 16 and 25, and only one patient had an ISS > 25. Twenty-seven patients were admitted to the ward, five went to step-down units, and five required intensive care unit admission. Four patients required operative intervention for their injuries. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that nursing screening protocols can be safe, effective tools for triage of trauma patients.

Undertriage of Geriatric Trauma Patients in Florida.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly undertriage rates are estimated up to 55% in the United States. This study examined risk factors for undertriage among hospitalized trauma patients in a state with high volumes of geriatric trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of 62,557 patients admitted to Florida hospitals between 2016 and 2018 from the Agency for Healthcare Administration database. Severely injured trauma patients were defined by American College of Surgeons definitions and an International Classification of Disease Injury Severity Score <0.85. Undertriage was defined as definitive care of these severely injured patients at any Florida hospital other than a state-designated trauma center (TC). Univariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with inpatient mortality and undertriage. Multiple variable regression was used to estimate risk-adjusted odds of mortality after admission to either a designated or nondesignated TC. RESULTS: Undertriaged patients were more likely to have isolated traumatic brain injuries, lower International Classification of Disease Injury Severity Scores, multiple comorbidities, and older age. Trauma patients aged 65 and older were more than twice as likely to be undertriaged (34% versus 15.7%, P < 0.0001). Undertriaged patients of all ages were also more likely to suffer from pneumonia, urinary tract infection, arrhythmias, and sepsis. After risk adjustment, severely injured trauma patients admitted to non-TC were also more likely to be at risk for mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: Age and multiple comorbidities are significant predictors of mortality among undertriage of trauma patients. As a result, trauma triage guidelines should account for high-risk geriatric trauma patients who would benefit from definitive treatment at designated TCs.

Trauma triage criteria as predictors of severe injury - a Swedish multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate performance of trauma team activation (TTA) criteria is important in order to accurately triage trauma patients. The Swedish National Trauma Triage Criteria (SNTTC) consists of 29 criteria that trigger either a Trauma Alert, the highest level of TTA, or a Trauma Response. This study aimed to evaluate the SNTTC and its accuracy in predicting a severely injured patient in a multicenter setting. METHODS: A cohort study in Sweden involving six trauma receiving hospitals. Data was collected from the Swedish Trauma Registry. Some 626 patients were analyzed with regard to the specific criteria used to initiate the TTA, injury severity with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and emergency interventions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of the criteria were calculated, as well as undertriage and overtriage. RESULTS: All 29 criteria of SNTTC had a sensitivity > 80% for identifying a severely injured patient. The 16 Trauma Alert Criteria had a lower sensitivity of 62.6% but higher LR+ (3.5 vs all criteria 1.4), specificity (82.3 vs 39.1%) and PPV (55.4 vs 37.6%) and the highest accuracy (AUC 0.724). When using only the six physiological criteria, sensitivity (44.8%) and accuracy (AUC 0.690) decreased while LR+ (6.7), specificity (93.3%) and PPV (70.2%) improved. CONCLUSION: SNTTC is efficient in identifying severely injured patients. The current set of criteria exhibits the best sensitivity compared to other examined combinations and no additional criterion was found to improve the protocol enough to promote a change.

Prehospital triage of trauma patients before and after implementation of a regional triage guideline.

INTRODUCTION: Severely injured trauma patients have a considerable mortality rate. One way to reduce the mortality is to ensure optimal triage. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma has since 1986 made guidelines for the triage of trauma patients. These guidelines formed the basis, when the capital region of Denmark implemented a regional trauma triage guideline on February 15th 2016. It is uncertain how the implementation of the regional trauma triage guideline has influenced the triage of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in admission pattern of trauma patients in the entire region after the implementation of the regional trauma triage guideline. We hypothesized that there would be a reduction in the proportion of trauma patients admitted to the trauma center after the implementation of the regional trauma triage guideline. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study with one-year follow-up, we used a national patient registry in Denmark. We identified trauma patients three years before and three years after the implementation of a new regional trauma triage guideline. The primary outcome was the proportion of trauma patients triaged to the regional trauma center. Secondary outcomes were: 30-day and one-year mortality, overtriage, and undertriage. RESULTS: We found a significant reduction in the proportion of trauma patients triaged to the trauma center from 2115/5951 (35.5%) to 1970/5857 (33.6%), after the implementation of the regional trauma triage guideline, the difference being 1.9% (95% CI: 0.19 to 3.6%); P = 0.03. Further, a significant reduction of overtriage from 15.4% to 9.5% (difference 5.9% with 95% CI of 3.8 to 7.9%) was found. No significant changes in undertriage, 30-day or one-year mortality were found (1.07% vs 0.97%, 4.3% vs 4.5%, and 15.7% vs 16.6% respectively). CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in the proportion of trauma patients admitted to the trauma center was found after implementation of a new regional trauma triage guideline. A reduction was seen in overtriage, but no changes were found in undertriage and both short-term and long-term mortality remained unchanged.

The impact of delayed time to first CT head on functional outcomes after blunt head trauma with moderately depressed GCS.

PURPOSE: Recent work suggests patients with moderately depressed Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the Emergency Department (ED) who do not undergo immediate head CT (CTH) have delayed neurosurgical intervention and longer ED stay. The present study objective was to determine the impact of time to first CTH on functional neurologic outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients presenting to our Level I trauma center (11/2015-10/2019) with first ED GCS 9-12 were retrospectively identified and included. Transfers and those with extracranial AIS ≥ 3 were excluded. The study population was stratified into Immediate (≤ 1 h) and Delayed (1-6 h) CTH groups based on time from ED arrival to first CTH. Outcomes included functional outcomes at hospital discharge based on the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: After exclusions, 564 patients were included: 414 (73%) with Immediate CTH and 150 (27%) Delayed CTH. Both groups arrived with median GCS 11 and alcohol/drug intoxication did not differ (p > 0.05). AIS Head/Neck was comparable (3[3-4] vs. 3[3-3], p = 0.349). Time to ED disposition decision and ED exit were significantly shorter after Immediate CTH (2.8[1.5-5.3] vs. 5.2[3.6-7.5]h, p < 0.001 and 5.5[3.3-8.9] vs. 8.1[5.2-11.7]h, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes were slightly worse after Immediate CTH (mRS 2[1-4] vs. 2[1-3], p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis of patients requiring neurosurgical intervention demonstrated a greater proportion of moderately disabled patients with a lower proportion of severely disabled or dead patients after Immediate CTH as compared to Delayed CTH (51 vs. 20%, p = 0.063 and 35 vs. 60%, p = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate CTH shortened time to disposition decision out of the ED and ED exit. Patients requiring neurosurgical intervention after Immediate CTH had improved functional outcomes when compared to those undergoing Delayed CTH. These differences did not reach statistical significance in this single-center study and, therefore, a large, multicenter study is the next step in demonstrating the potential functional outcomes benefit of Immediate CTH after blunt head trauma.

Factors associated with undertriage in patients classified by the need to visit a hospital by telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital telephone triage stratifies patients into five categories, "need immediate hospital visit by ambulance," "need to visit a hospital within 1 hour," "need to visit a hospital within 6 hours," "need to visit a hospital within 24 hours," and "do not need a hospital visit" in Japan. However, studies on whether present and past histories cause undertriage are limited in patients triaged as need an early hospital visit. We investigated factors associated with undertriage by comparing patient assessed to be appropriately triaged with those assessed undertriaged. METHODS: We included all patients classified by telephone triage as need to visit a hospital within 1 h and 6 h who used a single after-hours house call (AHHC) medical service in Tokyo, Japan, between November 1, 2019, and November 31, 2020. After home consultation, AHHC doctors classified patients as grade 1 (treatable with over-the-counter medications), 2 (requires hospital or clinic visit), or 3 (requires ambulance transportation). Patients classified as grade 2 and 3 were defined as appropriately triaged and undertriaged, respectively. RESULTS: We identified 10,742 eligible patients triaged as need to visit a hospital within 1 h and 6 h, including 10,479 (97.6%) appropriately triaged and 263 (2.4%) undertriaged patients. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed patients aged 16-64, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.40 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.71-3.36], 8.57 [95% CI 4.83-15.2], and 14.9 [95% CI 9.65-23.0], respectively; reference patients aged < 15 years); those with diabetes mellitus (2.31 [95% CI 1.25-4.26]); those with dementia (2.32 [95% CI 1.05-5.10]); and those with a history of cerebral infarction (1.98 [95% CI 1.01-3.87]) as more likely to be undertriaged. CONCLUSIONS: We found that older adults and patients with diabetes mellitus, dementia, or a history of cerebral infarction were at risk of undertriage in patients triaged as need to visit a hospital within 1 h and 6 h, but further studies are needed to validate these findings.

Undertriage of patients requiring direct admission to intensive care from the emergency department for medical conditions: impact on prognosis and associated factors. / Infratriaje en urgencias de pacientes que precisan ingreso directo en cuidados intensivos por enfermedades médicas: impacto en el pronóstico y factores asociados.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether undertriage affects the outcome for patients requiring direct admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the emergency department due to a medical condition. To identify factors associated with undertriage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients treated in 2018 for medical emergencies requiring direct admission to the ICU from the emergency department. The cases were classified in 2 groups according to the assigned triage level. Underestimation was defined as a triage level of III or more. Independent variables were demographic and epidemiologic data and indicators of severity recorded in the emergency department. The main outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, prolonged ICU stay, and prolonged hospital stay. RESULTS: We included 470 patients with a median age of 68 years (first-third quartile range, 57-78 years); 61.1% were men, and 151 (32.1%) were undertriaged. Factors directly related to undertriage according to odds ratios (ORs) were age (OR = 1.017; 95% CI, 1.003-1.032), Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 0 or 1 (OR = 1.761; 95% CI, 1.038-2.988), ratio of oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen greater than 300 (OR = 2.447; 95% CI, 1.418-4.223), a diagnosis of infection (OR = 5.003, 95% CI 2.727-9.188) whether respiratory (OR = 3.993, 95% CI 1.919-8.310) or other (OR = 1.980, 95% CI, 1.036-3.785) versus a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Factors inversely related to undertriage were admission during the afternoon (OR = 0.512, 95% CI, 0.306-0.856) and ambulance transfer (OR = 0.373; 95% CI, 0.232-0.600). Ninety patients (19.1%) died within 30 days. Undertriage was not related to 30-day mortality or the other outcomes analyzed. CONCLUSION: Undertriage was not associated with a worse outcome in patients requiring direct admission to the ICU for a medical emergency. The factors we found to be associated with undertriage, such as patient age and time of day admitted, merit special attention given that these factors should not be affecting the triage process.

OBJETIVO: Determinar si el infratriaje tiene impacto pronóstico en pacientes que requieren ingreso desde urgencias en cuidados intensivos por enfermedad médica e identificar factores asociados. METODO: Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes atendidos durante 2018 por enfermedades médicas con ingreso directo en cuidados intensivos desde urgencias. Se clasificaron en dos grupos en función del nivel de triaje asignado y se consideró infratriaje un nivel de triaje III. Las variables independientes incluyeron datos demográficos, epidemiológicos e indicadores de gravedad en urgencias. Se registró la mortalidad a los 30 días (objetivo primario), así como la mortalidad hospitalaria, el ingreso prolongado en cuidados intensivos o el ingreso prolongado hospitalario (objetivos secundarios). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 470 pacientes [edad 68 años (rango 57-78), 61,1% hombres] de los que 151 (32,1%) formaban el grupo con infratriaje. Los factores relacionados con el infratriaje fueron la edad (OR = 1,017; IC 95% 1,003- 1,032), indicador qSOFA 0-1 (OR = 1,761; IC 95% 1,038-2,988), índice SpO2/FiO2 > 300 (OR = 2,447; IC 95% 1,418- 4,223) y el diagnóstico de infección (OR = 5,003; IC 95% 2,727-9,188), respiratorio (OR = 3,993; IC 95% 1,919-8,310) u otro (OR = 1,980; IC 95% 1,036-3,785) respecto al diagnóstico cardiovascular, mientras que la admisión en horario de tarde (OR = 0,512; IC 95% 0,306-0,856) o el traslado en ambulancia (OR = 0,373; IC 95% 0,232- 0,600) se relacionaron de forma inversa con el infratriaje. El evento mortalidad a 30 días tuvo lugar en 90 pacientes (19,1%). El infratriaje no se relacionó con la mortalidad a 30 días ni con el resto de los objetivos analizados. CONCLUSIONES: El infratriaje no se relacionó con un peor pronóstico en pacientes con ingreso directo en intensivos por enfermedad médica. Se han identificado factores relacionados con el infratriaje, como la edad o el horario de admisión que merecen una atención especial, ya que no deberían afectar el proceso de triaje.