Acute Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany-A Nationwide Study of 65,357 Hospitalized Cases: Variceal Hemorrhage in Germany.

Background: Acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH) is a frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in liver cirrhosis. Most cases require urgent endoscopic intervention due to potentially life-threatening courses. Different endoscopic hemostasis techniques can be used, in particular endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST), depending on the bleeding side (esophageal, fundal, and gastric) as well as radiological interventions (e.g., embolization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS]). This study aimed to investigate trends in incidence, treatment modalities, and outcome parameters, such as in-hospital mortality and adverse events in Germany. Methods: We evaluated the current epidemiological trends, therapeutic strategies, and in-hospital mortality of AVH in Germany based on the standardized hospital discharge data provided by the German Federal Statistical Office from 2010 to 2019. Results: A total of 65,357 AVH cases, predominately males (68.3%), were included in the analysis. The annual incidence rate (hospitalization cases per 100,000 persons) was 8.9. The in-hospital mortality was 18.6%. The most common underlying disease was alcohol-related liver cirrhosis (60.6%). The most common clinical complication was bleeding anemia (60.1%), whereas hypovolemic shock (12.8%) was the less frequent. In esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH), EVL was the most frequently performed endoscopic therapy, while in gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH), EST and fibrin glue injection were the most commonly performed therapies. EVL showed the lowest in-hospital mortality (12.3%) in EVH, while EST showed favorable results (14% in-hospital mortality) in GVH. Combination therapies overall showed a higher in-hospital mortality and were more frequent in GVH. The presence of hypovolemic shock, AKI, sepsis, artificial ventilation, ARDS, bleeding anemia, hepatic encephalopathy, and male sex was associated with a significantly worse outcome. Conclusion: Our study provides detailed insight into the incidence, patient-related risk factors, endoscopic treatment, and in-hospital mortality in a sizeable AVH collective in Germany. These data might help improve risk stratification and treatment strategies for AVH patients in the future.

Non-invasive fibrosis markers are useful in predicting the presence of varices in compensated cirrhosis and variceal bleeding in decompensated cirrhosis.

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of non-invasive fibrosis markers in predicting varices in compensated advanced chronic liver disease patients and variceal bleeding in decompensated cirrhotic patients. Between 1 July 2020-2021, 137 newly diagnosed cirrhosis patients (67 females/70 males; mean age: 53.35) were included in the study. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was made based on clinical, laboratory, imaging, and, if available, biopsy findings. Laboratory and clinical parameters, including lysyl oxidase-like protein 2 (LOXL2), were recorded for all patients. Commonly used noninvasive fibrosis scores were calculated, and endoscopies were performed to assess varices. All patients were followed up for 12 months, and variceal bleeding events were recorded. Parameters that could predict the presence of varices and variceal bleeding were identified using appropriate statistical methods. Out of the 137 cirrhotic patients, 55 were in the compensated stage and 82 were in the decompensated stage. Varices were detected in 36 (65%) of the compensated cirrhotic patients. It was found that a variceal score derived from spleen size and the ELF score could be used to predict varices (AUC: 0.83). Variceal bleeding developed in 26 (31%) of the patients with decompensated cirrhosis. It was determined that a scoring system derived from albumin, spleen size, LOXL2 level, and the Lok index could be used to predict variceal bleeding in this patient group (AUC: 0.845). This study demonstrates that, besides device-dependent examinations, non-invasive fibrosis scores and various serum parameters can predict varices and variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.

Prophylactic endotracheal intubation before endoscopic surgery reduces the rebleeding rate in acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding patients.

Objectives: Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB) is one of the main causes of cirrhosis-related deaths, and endoscopic therapy is the first-line treatment of choice. However, the efficacy of prophylactic endotracheal intubation (PEI) before endoscopy remains controversial. Methods: Data were collected from 119 patients who underwent endoscopic confirmation of an EVB. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to reduce bias between the two groups. The primary outcomes included rebleeding rates within 24 h and 6 weeks post-endoscopic surgery and 6-week mortality. Results: After endoscopic surgery, the rebleeding rate within 24 h in the PEI group was significantly lower than non-PEI group (1.2 % VS 12.6 %, P-value = 0.025). Although PEI did not reduce 6-week mortality, it significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding within 24 h (odds ratio [OR]: 0.89, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.97, P = 0.008) and within 6 weeks (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.90, P = 0.029). In multivariate regression analyses, maximum varices diameter >1.5 cm (OR: 1.23, 95 % CI: 1.09-1.37, P < 0.001) was independent risk factor for rebleeding within 24 h. Creatinine (HR: 1.01, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001) and international normalized ratio (HR: 2.99, 95 % CI: 1.99-4.65, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for rebleeding within 6 weeks. Conclusions: PEI before endoscopic surgery reduced the incidence of rebleeding within 24 h and 6 weeks after endoscopic surgery. However, PEI did not reduce the 6-week mortality rate after endoscopic surgery and might increase the length of hospital stay.

Computed tomography-based multi-organ radiomics nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics has been used in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and prediction of its associated complications. However, most current studies predict the risk of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) based on image features at a single level, which results in incomplete data. Few studies have explored the use of global multi-organ radiomics for non-invasive prediction of EVB secondary to cirrhosis. AIM: To develop a model based on clinical and multi-organ radiomic features to predict the risk of first-instance secondary EVB in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: In this study, 208 patients with cirrhosis were retrospectively evaluated and randomly split into training (n = 145) and validation (n = 63) cohorts. Three areas were chosen as regions of interest for extraction of multi-organ radiomic features: The whole liver, whole spleen, and lower esophagus-gastric fundus region. In the training cohort, radiomic score (Rad-score) was created by screening radiomic features using the inter-observer and intra-observer correlation coefficients and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Independent clinical risk factors were selected using multivariate logistic regression analyses. The radiomic features and clinical risk variables were combined to create a new radiomics-clinical model (RC model). The established models were validated using the validation cohort. RESULTS: The RC model yielded the best predictive performance and accurately predicted the EVB risk of patients with cirrhosis. Ascites, portal vein thrombosis, and plasma prothrombin time were identified as independent clinical risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the RC model, Rad-score (liver + spleen + esophagus), Rad-score (liver), Rad-score (spleen), Rad-score (esophagus), and clinical model in the training cohort were 0.951, 0.930, 0.801, 0.831, 0.864, and 0.727, respectively. The corresponding AUC values in the validation cohort were 0.930, 0.886, 0.763, 0.792, 0.857, and 0.692. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis, combined multi-organ radiomics and clinical model can be used to non-invasively predict the probability of the first secondary EVB.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus.

BACKGROUND: Whether hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) can improve the success rate of endoscopic hemostasis and overall survival (OS) from transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remains controversial. AIM: To compare the clinical outcomes between TIPS and standard treatment for such HCC patients. METHODS: This monocenter, retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed as HCC with PVTT and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were grouped by the treatment (TIPS or standard conservative treatment). The success rate of endoscopic hemostasis, OS, rebleeding rates, and main causes of death were analyzed. RESULTS: Between July 2015 and September 2021, a total of 77 patients (29 with TIPS and 48 with standard treatment) were included. The success rate of endoscopic hemostasis was 96.6% in the TIPS group and 95.8% in the standard treatment group. All the 29 patients in TIPS group successful underwent TIPS procedure and had a better OS compared with standard treatment within the first 160 days after treatment (68 days vs 43 days, P = 0.022), but shorter OS after 160 days (298 days vs 472 days, P = 0.022). Cheng's Classification of PVTT, total bilirubin and Child-Pugh class were independently negative associated with OS (all P < 0.05). The main causes of death were liver failure or hepatic encephalopathy (75.9%) in the TIPS group and rebleeding (68.8%) in the standard treatment. CONCLUSION: TIPS could reduce the risk of early death due to rebleeding and prolong short-term survival in HCC patients with PVTT and acute EGVB, which deserves further investigation.

Current approaches to the management of jejunal variceal bleeding at the site of hepaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Jejunal variceal bleeding at the site of hepaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy due to portal hypertension caused by extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is a life-threatening complication and is very difficult to treat. Pharmacotherapy, endoscopic methods, transcatheter embolization of veins supplying the jejunal afferent loop, portal venous stenting, and surgical procedures can be used for the treatment of jejunal variceal bleeding. Nevertheless, the optimal management strategy has not yet been established, which is due to the lack of randomized controlled trials involving a large cohort of patients necessary for their development.

Efficacy of novel endoscopic hemostatic agent for bleeding control and prevention: Results from a prospective, multicenter national registry.

Background and study aims Topical hemostatic agents emerged as a new treatment modality for gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PuraStat for control of active bleeding and for prevention of bleeding after different operative endoscopy procedures. Patients and methods A national, multicenter, observational registry was established to collect data from ten Italian centers from June 2021 to February 2023. Demographics, type of application (active gastrointestinal bleeding or prevention after endoscopic procedures, site, amount of gel used, completeness of coverage of the treated area), outcomes (rates of intraprocedural hemostasis and bleeding events during 30-day follow-up), and adverse events (AEs) were prospectively analyzed. Results Four hundred and one patients were treated for active gastrointestinal bleeding or as a preventive measure after different types of operative endoscopy procedures. Ninety-one treatments for active bleeding and 310 preventive applications were included. In 174 of 401 cases (43.4%), PuraStat was the primary treatment modality. Complete coverage was possible in 330 of 401 (82.3%) with difficulty in application in seven of 401 cases (1.7%). Hemostasis of active bleedings was achieved in 90 of 91 patients (98.9%). In 30-day follow-up 3.9% patients in whom PuraStat was used for prophylaxis had a bleeding event compared with 7.7% after hemostasis. No AEs related to the use of PuraStat were reported. Conclusions PuraStat is a safe and effective hemostat both for bleeding control and for bleeding prevention after different operative endoscopy procedures. Our results suggest that the possible applications for the use of PuraStat may be wider compared with current indications.

A targeted endoscopic band ligation technique for management of acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic band Ligation (EBL) standard therapy is traditionally performed with banding from the distal esophagus upwards. However, esophageal varices (EV) with stigma of recent bleeding are not consistently banded at the first attempt. We aimed to compare conventional banding in acute variceal bleeding (AVB) vs targeted banding of EV in patients with stigma of recent bleeding (white nipple sign). METHODS: This case-control study included patients treated in our hospital from December 2016 to September 2019 with endoscopic signs of recent variceal bleeding. The targeted technique involves deploying the first band at the recent bleeding stigmata and then completing the procedure with standard variceal banding technique. The conventional group included patients treated with standard EBL. RESULTS: We analyzed 92 patients, 54 (58.7%) in conventional technique and 38 (41.3%) in the targeted group. Active bleeding during endoscopy occurred in 11 (20.0%) of conventional and two (6.5%) of the targeted group (p=0.021). Although procedure time was longer in the conventional group (24.3 min SD 11.58) compared to the targeted group (21.52 min SD 8.73) this difference was not significant. One detached band episode was documented in targeted group and none in the conventional group (p=0.418). TIPS were not used during this study due to health system policy. There were no significant differences in mortality, rebleeding or transfusion requirements between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The targeted technique for EV with stigma of recent bleeding had a low band detachment incidence and fewer bleeding events during endoscopy, however, the limitations of the study should be considered.

Successful endoscopic treatment of superficial esophageal cancer in a patient with esophageal variceal bleeding: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of esophageal variceal bleeding and superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) is relatively rare in clinical practice. Moreover, there have been few reports of SEC overlying esophageal varices (EVs). Herein, we report our successful use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), esophageal solitary venous dilatation (ESVD), and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) to treat a 75-year-old man who was diagnosed with SEC coexisting with esophageal variceal bleeding. CASE SUMMARY: A 75-year-old man was admitted to the hospital due to black stool for 4 days. The patient had a history of liver cancer, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension. Endoscopic examination revealed esophageal and gastric varicose veins, as well as esophageal carcinoma in situ. We first treated esophageal variceal bleeding by ESVD and EIS. One week later, ESD treatment was done, and the complete resection of early esophageal cancer was successfully completed via endoscopy. There were no postoperative complications, such as bleeding, infection, or perforation. CONCLUSION: The sequential treatment of ESVD, EIS, and ESD is an effective method for treating EVs with early esophageal cancer.

Clinical and Biochemical Differences in Patients Having Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding on NSAIDs, Oral Anticoagulants, and Antiplatelet Therapy.

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for major resource allocation and increasing incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the severity of non-variceal bleeding in patients at risk of bleeding through the use of NSAIDs, oral anticoagulants, and antiplatelet therapy. Material and Method: The study included 296 patients admitted in the Gastroenterology Department of the Municipal County Emergency University Hospital, Timisoara, between 01.01.2018 and 01.04.2020, and diagnosed via gastroscopy with non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. The patients were divided among four groups based on their use of different drugs known to induce UGIB, i.e., aspirin and clopidogrel, NOACs, NSAIDs, and anti-vitamin K drugs, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed based on ANOVA one-way tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables with pairwise comparisons based on Bonferroni adjusted significance tests. Results: The results showed several parameters having statistical significance among the different groups of patients. Patients on NOACs had statistically significant lower hemoglobin levels, lower hematocrit values, lower erythrocytes, lower RDW and higher fibrinogen levels compared to patients on VKA. Discussion: Surprisingly, the results from our study suggest that the use of NOACs was associated with a higher risk of bleeding when compared to VKA, which differs from the existing literature. Conclusions: One of the important factors causing upper non-variceal bleeding can be iatrogenic, either due to antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants, to which NSAID treatment is additionally associated for various reasons. In our study, the use of NOACs seemed to have a more severe bleeding spectrum with higher morbidity compared to VKA.

Applications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems in the Management of Esophageal Varices.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal varices, dilated submucosal veins in the lower esophagus, are commonly associated with portal hypertension, particularly due to liver cirrhosis. The high morbidity and mortality linked to variceal hemorrhage underscore the need for accurate diagnosis and effective management. The traditional method of assessing esophageal varices is esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which, despite its diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities, presents limitations such as interobserver variability and invasiveness. This review aims to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing the management of esophageal varices, focusing on its applications in diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment optimization. METHODS: This systematic review focuses on the capabilities of AI algorithms to analyze clinical scores, laboratory data, endoscopic images, and imaging modalities like CT scans. RESULTS: AI-based systems, particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, have demonstrated the ability to improve risk stratification and diagnosis of esophageal varices, analyzing vast amounts of data, identifying patterns, and providing individualized recommendations. However, despite these advancements, clinical scores based on laboratory data still show low specificity for esophageal varices, often requiring confirmatory endoscopic or imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS: AI integration in managing esophageal varices offers significant potential for advancing diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment strategies. While promising, AI systems should complement rather than replace traditional methods, ensuring comprehensive patient evaluation. Further research is needed to refine these technologies and validate their efficacy in clinical practice.

Effect of sarcopenia on liver cirrhosis with complicating oesophageal and gastric varices after endoscopic therapy.

Several investigators have reported that sarcopenia is common in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, few studies have probed the association between sarcopenia and liver cirrhosis complicated with oesophageal and gastric variceal bleeding (LC-EGVB). We aimed to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on rebleeding after endoscopic therapy in patients with LC-EGVB. Computed tomography (CT) radiographs from the third lumbar vertebra were selected to analyse body composition, including skeletal muscle tissue, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue using SliceOmatic software. Sarcopenia was defined using validated cutoff values for patients with liver cirrhosis: 44.77 cm2/m2 for men and 32.50 cm2/m2 for women. A total of 187 patients with LC-EGVB and 309 controls were included in this study. The rate of sarcopenia in controls (17.4 %) was significantly lower than that in patients with LC-EGVB (41.2 %). Patients with LC-EGVB exhibiting sarcopenia showed a high prevalence of portal vein thrombosis and rebleeding rate at 1 year. The rate of sarcopenia in the rebleeding group was significantly higher than that in the non-rebleeding group. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for rebleeding within 1 year in patients with LC-EGVB. Patients with LC-EGVB displayed a high prevalence of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was observed to be an independent risk factor for rebleeding within 1 year.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential diagnostic markers for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

The aim of the present study is to explore the potential prediction value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or peripheral blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB). We have enrolled 80 rebleeding patients with EVB and 113 EVB patients without rebleeding in the present study. The lymphocyte, platelet counts, the PLR, and the NLR of the candidates were calculated, and receiver-operating characteristic curve was drawn to examine whether NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing rebleeding patients from the EVB patients. We observed that NLR and PLR were all significantly increased in rebleeding patients with EVB compared with the non-rebleeding patients (p < 0.01); moreover, the area under the curve of NLR and PLR was 0.7037 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6281-0.7792) and 0.7468 (95% CI, 0.6793-0.8144), respectively, suggesting that NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing non-rebleeding patients from the rebleeding patients. We reported that NLR and PLR were significantly increased in the peripheral blood of patient with esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, suggesting that NLR and PLR may be potential early diagnostic and prognostic markers for the rebleeding among patients with EVB.

Road to recompensation: Baveno VII criteria and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver cirrhosis.

Liver cirrhosis has long been considered a point of no return, with limited hope for recovery. However, recent advancements, particularly the Baveno VII criteria and the utilization of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), have illuminated the concept of hepatic recompensation. In this editorial we comment on the article by Gao et al published in the recent issue. This editorial provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of understanding cirrhosis, the criteria for recompensation, and the efficacy of TIPS in achieving recompensation. We discuss key findings from recent studies, including the promising outcomes observed in patients who achieved recompensation post-TIPS insertion. While further research is needed to validate these findings and elucidate the mech-anisms underlying recompensation, the insights presented here offer renewed hope for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and highlight the potential of TIPS as a therapeutic option in their management.

The effect of shortening vasoactive drug durations alongside endoscopic therapy in esophageal variceal bleeding: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The recommended duration of vasoactive drugs in esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) spans 2-5 days. Prior meta-analyses of randomized trials include only a few studies that compared short vs. long vasoactive drug durations approximating this time range, including older management techniques, and only assessed variceal rebleeding at 5 days. We identified several additional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing rebleeding at various durations, with updated management of EVB. Methods: We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effect of shortening the vasoactive drug duration by 48-72 h. The primary outcome was rebleeding within 5 days. Secondary outcomes included rebleeding, mortality due to rebleeding, and all-cause mortality within 4-6 weeks (extended period) with subgroup analysis by vasoactive drug and type of endoscopic therapy. Length of stay, blood transfusion requirements and terlipressin-related adverse events were additional secondary outcomes. Results: Our comprehensive search strategy and screening process yielded 14 RCTs with 1060 patients (75.1% male): 7 trials used terlipressin, 4 octreotide, and 3 somatostatin. Shortened durations combined with band ligation led to similar rebleeding, with a trend towards less rebleeding when populations with more severe liver disease were excluded. There was greater rebleeding and mortality over an extended period when shorter durations were combined with sclerotherapy. Longer durations were associated with a longer hospital stay and, for terlipressin, more adverse events. Conclusions: Shorter vasoactive drug durations combined with band ligation in selected populations appear safe. Higher powered RCTs are needed, involving patients with different degrees of severity of EVB and liver disease.

Efficacy of endoscopic therapy combined with partial splenic embolization versus Hassab's operation for patients with liver cirrhosis with esophageal variceal bleeding and hypersplenism: a multicenter cohort study based on propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis comparison between endoscopic therapy + partial splenic embolization (PSE) and Hassab's operation is unclear in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to compare the outcome of endoscopic therapy + PSE (EP) with a combination of splenectomy + pericardial devascularization procedure, known as Hassab's operation (SH) for esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis with hypersplenism. METHODS: We enrolled 328 patients, including 125 and 203 patients who underwent EP and SH, respectively. Each group consisted of 110 patients after propensity score matching (PSM). Subsequently, we recorded and analyzed bleeding episodes and mortality in 6 months and 1, 2, and 5 years after therapies. RESULTS: The median follow-up time in the EP and SH groups was 53 and 64 months, respectively. Bleeding incidence 6 months after therapies in the EP group was lower than that in the SH group (1.8% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.010). Additionally, complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different (0% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.008). However, the bleeding rate between the two groups was not significantly different at 1, 2, and 5 years after therapies (7.3% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.157; 10.9% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.205; 30.6% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.801), as well as mortality rate (4.5% vs 7.3%, P = 0.571). CONCLUSION: Compared with SH therapy, the bleeding rate 6 months after EP therapy was lower, but the long-term bleeding rate was similar.

Transjugular mesenteric-caval shunt for portal vein cavernous transformation with recurrent variceal bleeding: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the transjugular mesenteric-caval shunt (TMCS) as a treatment for the cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV) and recurrent variceal bleeding. METHODS: This retrospective case series was conducted with approval from the institutional review board. It involved seven patients diagnosed with CTPV and recurrent variceal bleeding who underwent the TMCS procedure. We analyzed the rate of procedural complications, incidents of rebleeding, stent stenosis, hepatic encephalopathy, and overall survival to assess treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The TMCS was successfully performed in all seven patients without any life-threatening complications. Postoperatively, one patient developed a lung infection and pleural effusion, which resolved with appropriate treatment. Additionally, two patients experienced an increase in total bilirubin levels, but there was no further deterioration in liver function. The median portal pressure gradient significantly decreased from a preoperative value of 27 mmHg (range 20-36 mmHg) to a postoperative value of 6 mmHg (range 4-11 mmHg). A notable improvement was observed in one cirrhotic patient, with liver function progressing from Child-Pugh class B (score 9) to class A (score 6). Over a median follow-up period of 14 months (range 7-18 months), none of the patients encountered rebleeding, stent stenosis, hepatic encephalopathy, or mortality. CONCLUSION: The TMCS appears to be a viable and effective alternative for managing CTPV with recurrent variceal bleeding. Its long-term outcome requires further evaluation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: TMCS provides a promising treatment for patients with life-threatening CTPV complications when occluded portal vein cannot be recanalized and portal vein recanalization TIPS is not an option. KEY POINTS: Performing TIPS in patients with portal vein cavernoma is complex due to the requirement for recanalization of the occluded portal vein. Creating a mesenteric-caval shunt through a transjugular approach is a feasible technique. Establishing a TMCS provides a means to manage life-threatening complications arising from portal vein cavernoma.

Impact of peptic ulcer bleeding on the in-hospital outcomes of cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: Peptic ulcer is the most common source of non-variceal bleeding. However, it remains controversial whether the outcomes of cirrhotic patients with peptic ulcer bleeding differ from those with variceal bleeding. METHODS: Cirrhotic patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) who underwent endoscopy and had an identifiable source of bleeding were retrospectively screened from an international multicenter cohort. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the impact of peptic ulcer bleeding on in-hospital death and 5-day failure to control bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed by matching age, gender, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score between the peptic ulcer bleeding and variceal bleeding groups. RESULTS: Overall, 1535 patients were included, of whom 73 (4.7%) had peptic ulcer bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that peptic ulcer bleeding was not independently associated with in-hospital death (OR = 2.169, p = 0.126) or 5-day failure to control bleeding (OR = 1.230, p = 0.680). PSM analyses demonstrated that both in-hospital mortality (9.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.376) and rate of 5-day failure to control bleeding (6.9% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.787) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of peptic ulcer bleeding on the in-hospital outcomes of cirrhotic patients is similar to that of variceal bleeding.

In this international multicenter study, we included 1535 patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) and divided them into peptic ulcer bleeding and variceal bleeding groups. We found that only a minority of AGIB episodes in cirrhotic patients was attributed to peptic ulcer. Additionally, after adjusting for the severity of liver dysfunction, the in-hospital mortality and the rate of 5-day failure to control bleeding should be similar between cirrhotic patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and those with variceal bleeding.

Severe Hyponatremia Associated With Terlipressin Use in Esophageal Variceal Bleeding.

Terlipressin is an analogue of vasopressin that is indicated as first-line therapy for variceal hemorrhage and hepatorenal syndrome. Hyponatremia is an uncommon complication of terlipressin because it has less effect on vasopressin V2 receptors located in the kidneys. Profound hyponatremia related to terlipressin use is a rare complication that needs to be aware of. We described a 35-year-old previously healthy man, who was admitted for esophageal variceal bleeding that was attributed to hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis. He had a normal baseline sodium level (Na 139 mmol/L) and developed severe hyponatremia 119 mmol/L (euvolemic, hypo-osmolar) at 72 hours of terlipressin therapy. After holding the medication, the hyponatremia corrected rapidly to 135 mmol/L within 24 hrs. Terlipressin was given again as therapy for overcorrection of hyponatremia and the sodium level decreased before being stabilized without neurological consequences. Severe hyponatremia is an uncommon complication of terlipressin therapy; however, our case emphasizes the importance of sodium monitoring during terlipressin therapy in all patients to prevent this complication, and more importantly, to avoid rapid correction that could happen after holding it.

Gastric variceal obstruction improves the efficacy of endoscopic management of esophageal variceal bleeding in GOV type I.

Background and study aims Limited data exist regarding endoscopic obstruction of type I gastroesophageal (GOV I) in managing bleeding from esophageal varices. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to access the efficacy of blocking gastric varices in management of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV1. Patients and methods Cirrhotic patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices and having GOV I gastric varices in four centers were screened. All included patients were followed up for 180 days, or until death. Results A total of 93 cirrhotic patients with GOV I and bleeding esophageal varices were included. Among them, 58 patients underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) for gastric varices in addition to treatment for esophageal varices (EV), while the remaining 35 patients received treatment for EV only. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the cumulative 180-day rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the ECI plus EV treatment group (7.9%) compared with the EV treatment group (30.7%) ( P = 0.0031). The cumulative incidence of 180-day mortality was 1.9% in the ECI plus EV treatment group and 23.9% in the EV treatment group ( P = 0.0010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that concomitant ECI treatment was an independent protective factor against 180-day rebleeding and overall mortality. Conclusions In conclusion, obstruction of gastric varices in addition to endoscopic treatment for bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV 1 proved superior to endoscopic treatment alone for esophageal variceal bleeding.