Comparison of Video Laryngoscope (VL) and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (I-LMA) for Endotracheal Intubation in a Manikin with Restricted Neck Motion.

Introduction: Intubating patients undergoing manual in-line stabilization (MILS) can make airway management more challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of intubation with video-laryngoscope (VL) and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (I-LMA) in manikin with restricted neck motion using MILS. Methods: In this comparative study, emergency medicine residents and paramedics were randomly allocated to two crossover sets. Then the intubation outcomes (success rate, time to successful intubation, and cervical spine movement) were compared between intubation with VL and I-LMA in a manikin model with restricted cervical spine mobility, achieved through MILS. Results: 64 participants with a mean age of 28.86 ± 4.03 (range: 24-47) years and a mean duration of intubation experience of 3.63 ± 1.35 years were studied (43.75% male, 81.3% emergency medicine resident). The intubation success rate was 62 out of 64 (96.88%) in the VL method and 52 out of 64 (81.25%) in the I-LMA method (p = 0.008). The mean time to successful intubation was 33.03±16.94 seconds in the VL method and 55.03±17.34 seconds in the I-LMA method (p < 0.001). The mean cervical range of motion (CROM) in flexion-extension was 4.38±1.82 degrees in the VL method and 4.13±3.20 degrees in the I-LMA method (p = 0.158). The mean CROM in rotation was 4.27±2.62 degrees in the VL method and 4.65±2.47 degrees in the I-LMA method (p= 0.258) and the mean CROM in lateral bending was 5.35±4.45 degrees in the VL method and 7.71±6.14 degrees in the I-LMA method (p = 0.010). Conclusion: In a manikin model with restricted cervical spine mobility, the utilization of VL significantly improved intubation success rates, reduced time to successful intubation, and limited CROM.

Machine Learning Predictions and Identifying Key Predictors for Safer Intubation: A Study on Video Laryngoscopy Views.

This study develops a predictive model for video laryngoscopic views using advanced machine learning techniques, aiming to enhance airway management's efficiency and safety. A total of 212 participants were involved, with 169 in the training set and 43 in the test set. We assessed outcomes using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and considered factors like the modified Mallampati classification, thyromental height and distance, sternomental distance, mouth opening distance, and neck circumference. A range of machine learning algorithms was employed for data analysis, including Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Regression, Ridge Regression, and Lasso Regression. The models' performance was evaluated on the test set, with Root Mean Squared Error values ranging from 20.4 to 21.9. SHapley Additive exPlanations value analysis revealed that age is a consistent and significant predictor of POGO score across all models, highlighting its critical role in the predictive accuracy of these techniques.

A Comparative Study Between Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Simulated Cervical Fracture Injury: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study.

Purpose Video laryngoscopes were being used more often in cases of potentially difficult airways. The Karl Storz video stylet offered clear advantages over conventional laryngoscopes for patients with cervical spine fractures. This study aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with the new Karl Storz video stylet in patients with simulated cervical fracture injuries. Material and methods The study, approved by the Board of Studies and the Ethical Committee of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital in Aligarh, involved 50 patients undergoing operative procedures under general anaesthesia. It was a prospective randomised controlled study on patients aged 20-60, weighing 30-80 kg, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grades I and II, admitted for elective operative procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups for intubation using different devices: the control group (N = 25) was intubated with the C-MAC (Mac blade) video laryngoscope (CM), and the study group (N = 25) was intubated with the Karl Storz video stylet (VS). The anaesthetic procedure involved a detailed pre-anesthetic check-up for all patients, including a medical history review, physical examination, and necessary tests based on age. Standard monitoring and pre-medication were administered uniformly. Anesthesia was induced and intubation was attempted using appropriate devices, following manual stabilisation of the neck. Parameters such as intubation attempts, time taken, failures, hemodynamic changes, and complications were recorded throughout the procedure. If intubation was unsuccessful, alternative measures were taken, and the operative procedure proceeded. Results The intubation success rates were compared between the two groups, CM and VS. In the CM group, all 25 patients (100%) were successfully intubated on the first attempt, while in the VS group, 23 patients (92%) were successfully intubated on the first attempt, and two patients (8%) required two attempts. The difference in the distribution of the number of attempts between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.4915). The mean intubation time in the CM group was 27.24 ± 2.16 seconds, while in the VS group, the mean intubation time was significantly longer at 30.84 ± 6.81 seconds, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0105). Adjustment manoeuvres were required in only 4% of patients in the CM group compared to 0% in the VS group, although this difference was not statistically significant. The occurrence of blood on the device during intubation was recorded, and the distribution of patients with blood on the device among the two groups did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.617). Conclusion This study compared the effectiveness of two intubation devices. The C-MAC video laryngoscope showed a significantly higher rate of first-attempt successful intubations and required fewer attempts compared to the Karl Storz video stylet. The C-MAC also had shorter intubation times compared to the Karl Storz device. However, the Karl Storz video stylet demonstrated comparable performance to the C-MAC video laryngoscope in clinical settings, with both devices having similar safety profiles and minimal complications.

The i-view® Video Laryngoscope Compared With the Macintosh Laryngoscope Does Not Enhance the Endotracheal Intubation Skills of Dental Students.

Background A disposable i-view® video laryngoscope (Intersurgical Limited, Berkshire, United Kingdom) is yet to be used to educate medical and dental students, who must learn endotracheal intubation skills. Additionally, the advantage of the i-view® use for the purpose, compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, is unknown. We aimed to first determine whether the i-view® video laryngoscope enhances endotracheal intubation skills among dental students compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Methodology A prospective, observational, simulation study was conducted among 67 dental students in their sixth clinical year of education. Intubation skills were evaluated on a computer-assisted simulator with a standardized manikin. Each student was asked to intubate using the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and the i-view® video laryngoscope in the trachea of the simulator's manikin. We collected objective data, including the retroflection angle of the manikin, the maxillary incisor contact pressure, time from picking up the laryngoscope to ventilation, intubation success, and intubation delay. Each student was further asked to grade their subjective evaluation concerning the visual field, Cormack and Lehane classification, operability, stability, needed force for intubation, and easiness during intubation. Results Enrolled dental students quoted that the i-view® video laryngoscope demonstrated better visual field, Cormack and Lehane classification, operability, and stability than the Macintosh laryngoscope. However, they felt intubation easiness could have been better using Macintosh than i-view®. Intubation time, failure rate, and delay rate did not differ between the two laryngoscopes. Nevertheless, the maxillary incisor contact pressure (median interquartile range (IQR)) during the intubation increased in the i-view® intubation compared with Macintosh (32 (24 to 41) vs. 25 (18 to 35) N, p = 0.010). Conclusions We first demonstrated that the i-view® video laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope does not enhance the endotracheal intubation skills of dental students. However, the possible repeated use as an educational simulator training tool may add some advantages to the experience of video laryngoscope in both medical and dental students.

Comparison of AirAngel® vs. Storz® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh® laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation training: prospective randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: For both normal and difficult airway management, VL is thought to be more effective. However, VL seems far from being offered as a standard option in both healthcare delivery and educational activities in low-income countries, considering its high costs. Therefore, three-dimensional(3D)printed VLs may be considered an alternative to conventional VLs in low-income countries and other places with limited resources. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of AirAngel 3D-printed VL (3D-PVL) with those of commercially available Storz® VL (SVL) and conventional Macintosh® laryngoscope (MCL) in normal and difficult airway scenarios in the hands of inexperienced users. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized crossover manikin study that included 126 senior medical students with no experience in intubation. The effectiveness of all three laryngoscopy devices in the hands of inexperienced users was evaluated in terms of intubation time, glottic visualization, ease of use, endotracheal tube placement, and intubation success rate. Between 2020 and 2022, 126 last year medical students participated in the study. RESULTS: MCL resulted in significantly longer intubation times than 3D-PVL and SVL in the difficult airway scenario, with no significant difference between 3DPVL and SVL (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.016; Bonferroni correction MCL: 28.54 s; SVL: 26.68 s; 3DPVL: 26.64 s). Both SVL and 3D-PVL resulted in significantly better Cormack - Lehane grades in both normal and difficult airway scenarios, and thus provided better glottic viewing than MCL, with no significant difference between 3D-PVL and SVL (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.016; Bonferroni correction, MCL: 1.73; SVL: 1.29; 3DPVL: 1.25). The SVL was the easiest device to use for normal airway scenarios (1: very easy, 5: very difficult), while the MCL was the most difficult (MCL: 2.64; 3DPVL: 1.98; SVL: 1.49). Conversely, no significant difference was found between 3DPVL and other devices in terms of ease of use in difficult airway scenarios and in terms of accurate placement of the endotracheal tube and successful intubation attempts. CONCLUSION: 3D-PVL is a good educational and possible clinical alternative to conventional VL, particularly in places with limited resources, due to its low cost.

A new video laryngoscope combined with flexible laryngeal mask insertion: A prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The video laryngoscope (VLS) has been proven to be an effective insertion device for airway management. However, no laryngoscope has been specifically designed for the placement of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). We improved the current VLS and developed a novel VLS method. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an improved VLS for inserting a flexible laryngeal mask airway (F-LMA) compared with the standard blind method. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent F-LMA insertion under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the standard blind insertion technique (group B) or VLS -assisted insertion (group VL). First attempt success rates were recorded. Secondary outcomes included oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), fiberoptic view, insertion time, position adjustment, reinsertion rate, and postoperative airway morbidity. RESULTS: The first-attempt success rate was higher in group VL than that in group B (99% vs. 86%; p = 0.002). The OLP was significantly higher in the VLS-guided technique (26.4 ± 5.1 vs 23.8 ± 4.4 cmH2O, p = 0.002). The fiberoptic view was significantly better in the group VL (p < 0.001) and required less readjustment and reinsertion to establish an effective airway (p < 0.001). The insertion time was shorter in the group B than that in group VL (33.9 vs 41.3 s, p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stress responses and postoperative airway complications did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The new VLS-guided insertion technology has a high success rate, achieves greater OLP, and provides an ideal anatomical position with minimal adjustment, without increasing the risk of hemodynamic stress or adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300075866; https://www.chictr.org.cn).

A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscope and Video Laryngoscope in the Sellick and Trendelenburg Position with That Using Direct Laryngoscope in the Supine Sniffing Position: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Tracheal intubation in the Sellick and Trendelenburg position (ST position) can prevent pulmonary aspiration but increase the difficulty of tracheal intubation. We compared tracheal intubation using video and direct laryngoscopy in the ST position with direct laryngoscopy in the supine sniffing position to evaluate the overall intubation performance. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients were randomly assigned to three groups: direct laryngoscope in the supine sniffing position (control), direct laryngoscope in the ST position (ST direct), and video laryngoscope in the ST position (ST video). The primary outcome was the intubation time; secondary outcomes included the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation, intubation difficulty scale score, operator's subjective assessment of intubation difficulty, and modified Cormack-Lehane grades. Results: The median intubation times were greater in the ST direct (36.0 s) and video (34.5 s) than the control (28.0 s) groups. The first attempt success rate decreased in the ST direct (77.5%) but not the video (95.0%) group compared with the control group (100%). Conclusions: The challenges of tracheal intubation in the ST position, aimed at reducing the risk of pulmonary aspiration, can be mitigated by using a video laryngoscope, despite slightly longer intubation times.

Glottis Recognition Software Development Using Artificial Intelligence.

The use of video laryngoscopes has enhanced the visualization of the vocal cords, thereby improving the accessibility of tracheal intubation. Employing artificial intelligence (AI) to recognize images obtained through video laryngoscopy, particularly when marking the epiglottis and vocal cords, may elucidate anatomical structures and enhance anatomical comprehension of anatomy. This study investigates the ability of an AI model to accurately identify the glottis in video laryngoscope images captured from a manikin. Tracheal intubation was conducted on a manikin using a bronchoscope with recording capabilities, and image data of the glottis was gathered for creating an AI model. Data preprocessing and annotation of the vocal cords, epiglottis, and glottis were performed, and human annotation of the vocal cords, epiglottis, and glottis was carried out. Based on the AI's determinations, anatomical structures were color-coded for identification. The recognition accuracy of the epiglottis and vocal cords recognized by the AI model was 0.9516, which was over 95%. The AI successfully marked the glottis, epiglottis, and vocal cords during the tracheal intubation process. These markings significantly aided in the visual identification of the respective structures with an accuracy of more than 95%. The AI demonstrated the ability to recognize the epiglottis, vocal cords, and glottis using an image recognition model of a manikin.

[Airway management in neonates and infants : Recommendations according to the ESAIC/BJA guidelines]. / Atemwegssicherung bei Neugeborenen und Säuglingen : Handlungsempfehlung gemäß der BJA/ESAIC-Leitlinie.

Securing an airway enables the oxygenation and ventilation of the lungs and is a potentially life-saving medical procedure. Adverse and critical events are common during airway management, particularly in neonates and infants. The multifactorial reasons for this include patient-dependent, user-dependent and also external factors. The recently published joint ESAIC/BJA international guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants are summarized with a focus on the clinical application. The original publication of the guidelines focussed on naming formal recommendations based on systematically documented evidence, whereas this summary focusses particularly on the practicability of their implementation.

The Clinical Usability Evaluation of an Attachable Video Laryngoscope in the Simulated Tracheal Intubation Scenario: A Manikin Study.

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of an attachable video laryngoscope (AVL) by attaching a camera and a monitor to a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (CML). Normal and tongue edema airway scenarios were simulated using a manikin. Twenty physicians performed tracheal intubations using CML, AVL, Pentax Airwayscope® (AWS), and McGrath MAC® (MAC) in each scenario. Ten physicians who had clinical experience in using tracheal intubation were designated as the skilled group, and another ten physicians who were affiliated with other departments and had little clinical experience using tracheal intubation were designated as the unskilled group. The time required for intubation and the success rate were recorded. The degree of difficulty of use and glottic view assessment were scored by participants. All 20 participants successfully completed the study. There was no difference in tracheal intubation success rate and intubation time in the normal airway scenario in both skilled and unskilled groups. In the experienced group, AWS had the highest success rate (100%) in the tongue edema airway scenario, followed by AVL (60%), MAC (60%), and CML (10%) (p = 0.001). The time required to intubate using AWS was significantly shorter than that with AVL (10.2 s vs. 19.2 s) or MAC (10.2 s vs. 20.4 s, p = 0.007). The difficulty of using AVL was significantly lower than that of CML (7.8 vs. 2.8; p < 0.001). For the experienced group, AVL was interpreted as being inferior to AWS but better than MAC. Similarly, in the unskilled group, AVL had a similar success rate and tracheal intubation time as MAC in the tongue edema scenario, but this was not statistically significant. The difficulty of using AVL was significantly lower than that of CML (8.8 vs. 3.3; p < 0.001). AVL may be an alternative for VL.

The Production, Assessment, and Utility of 3D-Printed Video Laryngoscopes in Eastern India: A Low-Cost Alternative to Conventional Video Laryngoscopes.

Introduction Recognizing the limitations of traditional direct laryngoscopes, particularly in difficult airway situations, video laryngoscopy has emerged as a potentially safer and more effective alternative. This study evaluated the utility of two 3D-printed video laryngoscopes: a standard geometry video laryngoscope (SGVL), resembling the traditional Macintosh blade, and a hyper-angulated video laryngoscope (HAVL) with a more curved design. Their performance was compared to a standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope across various intubation parameters. By leveraging the cost-effectiveness of 3D printing with polylactic acid, the study aimed to assess the potential of this technology to improve airway management across diverse clinical settings and varying levels of physician expertise. Methods This prospective randomized crossover study compared the effectiveness of 3D-printed video laryngoscopes (VL) and a standard direct laryngoscope in intubation. After obtaining IRB approval, physicians from various specialties across multiple centers participated. Participants received training on SGVL, HAVL, and DL intubation using an instructional video and hands-on practice. The training was standardized for all participants. The primary outcome measures were time to successful intubation, number of attempts, and time to visualize vocal cords. Participants were randomized to use all three laryngoscopes on a manikin, with a maximum of two attempts per scope. A 30-minute break separated each laryngoscope evaluation. Successful intubation was defined as the single insertion of each laryngoscope and bougie, followed by endotracheal tube placement and confirmation of lung inflation. Results Ninety-eight doctors, mostly from the EM team (73.5%) and ICU team (23.4%). Teams consist of consultants, residents, and medical officers of the concerned departments. Forty-eight of the participants (49%) were novice operators (<25 intubations). Successful first-attempt intubation in those with <1 year of experience with intubation (n=33) was highest for SGVL (97%) compared to DL (82%) and HAVL (67%). Participants who learned intubation through self-directed learning exhibited a higher acceptance of VL and achieved 100% success on their first attempt. Among those who followed modules or workshops, 97% had successful first-attempt intubation with VL. The average time taken to visualize the vocal cords was lower in SGVL compared to DL (5.6 vs. 7.5 seconds) (p<0.001). The HAVL also had a lower average time compared to the DL (7.1 vs. 7.5 secs) (p<0.001). However, the time taken to intubate using DL (24.2 ±8.7 sec) was similar to SGVL (28.1 ±13 sec). Lastly, the intubation time using HAVL was the longest (49.6 ±35.5 sec). The time to intubate with DL and SGVL had Spearman's rho of 0.64 (p<0.001), and DL and HAVL had 0.59 (p<0.001). Conclusions The ease of use and its cost-effective nature make 3D-printed VLs beneficial in situations where traditional VLs may not be available, especially in simulation and training.

Comparison of the HugeMed video laryngoscope with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal tracheal intubation in children undergoing dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the HugeMed® videolaryngoscope with a direct Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation. METHODS: Eighty-eight children aged 4-10 years were randomly assigned to either the HugeMed® videolaryngoscope (HVL) or the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (MDL) group. Intubation difficulty, glottic view grade, time-to-intubation, number of tracheal intubation attempts, use of external laryngeal manipulation and Magill forceps, recovery time, pediatric-anesthesia-delirium-scale (PAEDS) scores, pain due to tracheal intubation, and laryngeal bleeding were evaluated. RESULTS: Easy tracheal intubation incidence was higher in the HVL group than that in the MDL group (p = 0.001). Glottic view was better in the HVL group as compared to the MDL group (p = 0.027). There was no difference between the groups in terms of time-to-tracheal intubation, number of tracheal intubation attempts, Magill forceps usage, pain, and bleeding due to tracheal intubation. The need for external laryngeal manipulation (p = 0.004) and PAEDS scores (p = 0.006) were higher in the MDL group than those in the HVL group. CONCLUSION: HugeMed® videolaryngoscope may provide easier tracheal intubation, create a better glottic view, and significantly reduce the need for additional manipulation compared to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, for nasotracheal intubation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrial.gov identifier is NCT05121597.

Comparison of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscope for bougie-aided naso-tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled study.

Background: Video laryngoscopes are commonly used along with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal intubation (NTI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes during bougie-aided NTI with respect to intubation time, success rate, and hemodynamic changes during the procedure. Methods: Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II adult patients, with Mallampati grade 1-4, requiring NTI, were enrolled after taking written informed consent. ASA III/IV, restricted mouth opening, and body mass index >30 were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly allocated to intubate with one of the three laryngoscopes (McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview) and the anesthesiologists were well experienced with all of them. The primary outcome was intubation time and secondary outcomes included first attempt success rate, external laryngeal manipulation, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, and hemodynamic responses. Results: The intubation time of McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview, was 86.87 ± 15.92, 82.87 ± 16.46, and 79.93 ± 14.53 (mean ± standard deviation) seconds, respectively, which is comparable with Truview being the shortest. CL grade 1 was obtained more in the Truview group (53.3%) compared to the other two groups, while CL grade 3 was obtained in 20% each in McCoy and Macintosh groups. Conclusions: McCoy, Macintosh, and Truview laryngoscopes were comparable in performance during bougie-aided NTI, with Truview having the shortest intubation time and better visualization.

A prospective randomized comparative trial of pediatric C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope with McCoy direct laryngoscope for intubation in children posted for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric airway management requires careful clinical evaluation and experienced execution due to anatomical, physiological, and developmental considerations. Video laryngoscopy in pediatric airways is a developing area of research, with recent data suggesting that video laryngoscopes are better than standard Macintosh blades. Specifically, there is a paucity of literature on the advantages of the C-MAC D-blade compared to the McCoy direct laryngoscope. METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 children aged 4-12 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to intubation using a C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade (Group 1) and a McCoy laryngoscope size 2 blade (Group 2). The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for ease of intubation was the primary outcome, while Cormack-Lehane grades, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, hemodynamic responses, and incidence of any airway complications were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. The median (IQR) Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was better but was statistically nonsignificant with C-MAC (0 [0-0] vs. 0 [0-2], p = .055). The glottic views were superior (CL grade I in 32/35 vs. 23/35, p = .002), and the time to best glottic view (6 s [5-7] vs. 8.0 s [6-10], p = .006) was lesser in the C-MAC D-blade group while the total duration of intubation was comparable (20 s [16-22] vs. 18 s [15-22], p = .374). All the patients could be successfully intubated on the first attempt. None of the patients had any complications. CONCLUSION: The C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D-blade provided faster and better glottic visualization but similar intubation difficulty compared to McCoy size 2 laryngoscope in children. The shorter time to achieve glottic view demonstrated with the C-MAC failed to translate into a shorter total duration of intubation when compared to the McCoy laryngoscope attributable to a pronounced curvature of the D-blade.

Comparative Evaluation of Linscope and King Vision Video Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction Indirect laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for learning the techniques of airway management. The incorporation of small, less expensive, and yet more reliable video cameras in laryngoscopes has given the process of laryngoscopy and intubation a big leap. The King Vision video laryngoscope (Medline Industries, USA) has demonstrated promise in several settings while the Linscope video laryngoscope (Centrum, Turkey) is a newly launched device and no literature is available to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of the Linscope video laryngoscope (VL) and King Vision video laryngoscope. Method This is a randomized controlled trial study. Seventy patients, after approval from the institute's ethical clearance, were divided into two groups. In Group A, patients were intubated with Linscope VL and in Group B patients were intubated with King Vision VL as per the protocol. The primary outcome measure was the duration of tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes were measured by the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and glottic view. Results Both Linscope VL and King Vision VL groups were comparable in terms of mean intubation time (20.34 s vs. 19.45 s). The endotracheal intubation with both devices was 100% successful at the first attempt. Both the devices provided a percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score of > 70% and a clear vision of the glottis. The POGO score obtained with King Vision VL was 83.57 ± 11.41% and with Linscope VL was 87.85 ± 10.31%. POGO score was greater with Linscope VL compared to King Vision VL, but the difference was not statistically significant (p-value>0.05). Conclusion King Vision demonstrated shorter intubation time and fewer optimization maneuvers. Both devices achieved a 100% success rate on the first attempt. While both devices are viable first-line options, King Vision's well-established efficacy in the literature suggests its preference over Linscope till extensive evidence is available in the future.

Airway management of postburn neck contracture in pediatric patient - A challenge for anesthesiologist!

Pediatric difficult airway management is more challenging for an anesthesiologist due to anatomical and physiological differences as compared to adults. Moreover, the familiarity with the use of difficult airway equipment in adults does not equate to proficiency for the same in children. So, here we are presenting the management of a unique case of a difficult airway due to postburn neck contracture in a 4-year-old child, which was managed successfully with the help of a video laryngoscope after the failure attempt with a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope.

Application of Video Laryngoscopy for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) has emerged as a preferred method of surfactant delivery. Pioneers of this technique have described the use of direct laryngoscopy (DL) for MIST. With the increasing application of video laryngoscopy (VL) for neonatal airway management, it is speculated that MIST techniques can be adapted for use with VL. OBJECTIVE: To compare procedural success, operator ease of use, and complication of MIST using VL vs. MIST using DL. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted at a tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit after obtaining ethical approval. We included neonates who received MIST between 1 October 2020 and 31 October 2022. Baseline demographic characteristics, along with procedural data, were collected. Primary outcome measures included the overall procedural success rate, the need for multiple attempts, and the total number of attempts. Secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of adverse events, the need for a second dose of surfactant, and the need for intubation within 7 days of the procedure. Means and SDs, independent t-tests, frequencies, and chi-square were used as appropriate. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 79 neonates included, 37 neonates received MIST via VL, while 42 received MIST via DL. The median gestational age was lower in the VL group at 29.0 weeks vs. 30.5 weeks (p = 0.011) in the DL group. The median birthweight in the VL group was 1260 g, IQR (1080, 1690), which was significantly lower than the DL group, which was 1575 g, IQR (1220, 2251), p = 0.028. Purpose-built catheter use was higher in the DL group. The overall procedural success was similar between groups. The need for multiple attempts was lower with VL in comparison to DL [4 (11%) vs. 13 (31%); p = 0.034)] at the univariate level but not significant at multivariate analysis (p = 0.131). Procedural complications, the need for a second dose of surfactant, the need for mechanical ventilation post-MIST, and operator ease of use were similar. User comments emphasized the value of VL in providing real-time visual information to confirm catheter placement and guide operators/trainees. CONCLUSION: Overall, in our cohort, despite VL being a more recently adapted technology used more in smaller, sicker, and more premature neonates, procedural success, complications, and operator ease of use for MIST using VL and DL were comparable. Our findings show the successful application of VL for MIST and suggest procedural advantages that might facilitate universal adoption.

Laryngopharyngeal Mucosal Injury Due to Nasogastric Tube Insertion during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients under cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are at high risk of aspirating gastric contents. Nasogastric tube insertion (NGTI) after tracheal intubation is usually performed blindly. This sometimes causes laryngopharyngeal mucosal injury (LPMI), leading to severe bleeding. This study clarified the incidence of LPMI due to blind NGTI during CPR. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 84 patients presenting with cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival, categorized them into a Smooth group (Smooth; blind NGTI was possible within 2 min), and Difficult group (blind NGTI was not possible), and consequently performed video laryngoscope-assisted NGTI. The laryngopharyngeal mucosal condition was recorded using video laryngoscope. Success rates and insertion time for the Smooth group were calculated. Insertion number and LPMI scores were compared between the groups. Each regression line of outcome measurements was obtained using simple regression analysis. We also analyzed the causes of the Difficult group, using recorded video laryngoscope-assisted videos. RESULTS: The success rate was 78.6% (66/84). NGTI time was 48.8 ± 4.0 s in the Smooth group. Insertion number and injury scores in the Smooth group were significantly lower than those in the Difficult group. The severity of LPMI increased with NGT insertion time and insertion number. CONCLUSIONS: Whenever blind NGTI is difficult, switching to other methods is essential to prevent unnecessary persistence.

Feasibility study of intubation in lateral position using Viva-sight double-lumen tube combined with video laryngoscope in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: Double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation in lateral decubitus position is rarely reported. We designed this study to evaluate the feasibility of VivaSight double-lumen tube (VDLT) intubation assisted by video laryngoscope in lateral decubitus patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy were assessed for eligibility between January 2022 and December, 2022. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into supine intubation group (group S) and lateral intubation group (group L) by a computer-generated table of random numbers. The prime objective was to observe whether the success rate of VDLT intubation in lateral position with the aid of video laryngoscope was not inferior to that in supine position. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were assessed, and 88 eligible patients were randomly divided into group L (n = 44) and group S (n = 44). The success rate of the first attempt intubation in the L group was 90.5%, lower than that of S group (97.7%), but there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups were intubated with VDLT for no more than 2 attempts. The mean intubation time was 91.98 ± 26.70 s in L group, and 81.39 ± 34.35 s in S group (p > 0.05). The incidence of the capsular malposition in the group L was 4.8%, less than 36.4% of group S (p < 0.001). After 24 h of follow-up, it showed a higher incidence of sore throat in group S, compared to that in group L (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the comprehensive success rate of intubation in lateral decubitus position with VDLT assisted by video laryngoscope is not inferior to that in supine position, with less risk of intraoperative tube malposition and postoperative sore throat. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trail Register (ChiCTR2200062989).

Complications and degree of difficulty of orotracheal intubation in the Intensive Care Unit before and after the establishment of an intubation protocol for critically ill patients: a prospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the degree of difficulty and complications related to tracheal intubation in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) before and after the introduction of an intubation protocol based on the Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults, published in 2018. METHODS: Prospective, observational study comparing all intubations performed in our ICU over 2 periods: pre-protocol (January 2015-January 2019) and post-protocol (February 2019-July 2022). The material used for intubation, the degree of difficulty, and intubation-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 661 patients were intubated - 437 in the pre-protocol period (96% by direct laryngoscopy) and 224 in the post-protocol period (53% with direct laryngoscopy, 46% with video laryngoscopy). We observed an improvement in laryngeal view in the post-protocol period compared to the pre-protocol period (Cormack-Lehane ≥ 2b in 7.6% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.001), and a decrease in the number of moderate-to-severely difficult intubations (6.7% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.001). The first-pass success rate was 92.8% in the post-protocol period compared to 90.2% pre-protocol (p = 0.508). We did not find significant differences in complications between the periods studied. CONCLUSIONS: Intubations performed in the post-protocol period were associated with improved laryngeal view and fewer cases of difficult intubation compared with the pre-protocol period.