CHIEF: A retrospective self-control study of children with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors comparing emicizumab to FVIII prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked bleeding disorder diagnosed by a deficiency in factor VIII (FVIII). For severe HA (SHA), prophylaxis clotting factor concentrates (CFC) has become the standard of care; however, it imparts a high treatment burden and typically results in an annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of 2-6. Emicizumab, a subcutaneously administered FVIII substitute, has become the de facto standard-of-care prophylaxis for children with SHA in many countries. Previous clinical trials of emicizumab have assessed ABR in patients greater than 12 years without inhibitors, and in children less than 12 years with inhibitors; however, there is little information published regarding the ABR of emicizumab compared to CFC in non-inhibitor SHA children. METHODS: Using a retrospective electronic medical record chart review, we conducted a self-control analysis of 15 patients less than 12 years of age during equivalent periods of CFC versus emicizumab prophylaxis. RESULTS: The mean ABR on CFC and emicizumab was 1.79 and 1.13 (p = .092), respectively, with a substantially decreased rate of joint bleeds (CFC 0.94; emicizumab 0.33; p = .001) and spontaneous bleeds (CFC 0.79; emicizumab 0.23; p = .008). No safety events were recorded for patients while administering emicizumab. The mean annual cost of CFC prophylaxis was $515,340 (SD $199,540), compared to $328,410 (SD $137,230) for emicizumab prophylaxis (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Emicizumab resulted in an improved ABR compared to CFC, especially for joint and spontaneous bleeds, had fewer administration complications, and was substantially less expensive compared to CFC prophylaxis; however, more research is necessary for a complete understanding of the effect of emicizumab on joint health and muscle bleeds.

Evaluating the benefits of emicizumab prophylaxis for haemophilia A with inhibitors: A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis in Thailand's upper-middle income setting.

BACKGROUND: In Thailand, an upper-middle-income country, managing haemophilia A (HA) with inhibitors poses significant challenges, often necessitating bypassing agents (BPAs) for bleeding control. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of emicizumab, a novel prophylactic agent, as an alternative to both episodic and prophylactic BPA treatments from a societal perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was employed to estimate the lifetime societal costs and outcomes of emicizumab prophylaxis for HA patients with inhibitors. Treatment efficacy, cost, and epidemiological data were obtained through a comprehensive literature review and incorporated into the model. A 5-year budget impact analysis complemented the cost-utility analysis, with a 3% annual discount rate applied to future costs and outcomes. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, emicizumab prophylaxis in HA patients aged 2 years and above demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness, yielding 18.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient over a lifetime and resulting in cost savings of 138 million Thai Baht (THB) compared to BPA prophylaxis. Compared to episodic BPA treatment, emicizumab yielded 30.5 QALYs and saved 25 million THB per patient. The 5-year budget impact was projected at 1775 million THB. CONCLUSIONS: Emicizumab offers a cost-saving approach for HA treatment with inhibitors in Thailand, promising significant health benefits and budgetary savings. This supports its potential inclusion in Thailand's National List of Essential Medicines to enhance haemophilia care access. HIGHLIGHTS: Managing haemophilia A (HA) with inhibitors in Thailand, an upper-middle-income country, faces challenges due to limited access to effective treatments or newer drugs for bleeding management. Emicizumab prophylaxis found to as a cost-effective and viable alternative to traditional treatments, effectively preventing bleeding in Thai HA patients over 2 years old with inhibitors. Demonstrating improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs, emicizumab prophylaxis outperforms episodic BPA treatments, positioning it as a superior treatment option for HA patients with inhibitors in Thailand.

Comprehensive Evaluation of Anti-Emicizumab Antibodies in Acquired Hemophilia A: A Detailed Case Study and Methodological Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and severe bleeding disorder characterized by autoantibodies inhibiting coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Current treatment of AHA involves bypassing agents, or FVIII replacement therapy, yet their efficacy is limited in cases of high inhibitor titers. Emicizumab, a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody, has shown promising hemostatic effectiveness in congenital hemophilia A (HA) patients and AHA, but a minority of patients developed anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), compromising its efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a comprehensive characterization of anti-emicizumab antibodies in a patient with AHA experiencing diminished emicizumab efficacy from week 10 of treatment. We developed a method for analysis of anti-emicizumab antibodies, distinguishing immunoglobulin subclasses and IgG subtype profiling. ADAs' neutralizing activity was evaluated using a modified clotting assay. RESULTS: The Luminex-based assay demonstrated the presence of anti-emicizumab antibodies, confirmed through competitive analysis. We detected anti-emicizumab IgG antibodies in the patient's plasma between week 16 and 29. IgG1 and IgG2 subclasses were identified. Longitudinal analysis showed IgG isotype antibodies against both emicizumab and FVIII. Anti-emicizumab antibodies exhibited non-inhibitory activity, confirmed by a modified Bethesda assay. Moreover, no accelerated clearance of emicizumab was observed in plasma samples from the patient. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first documented case of anti-emicizumab antibodies in AHA. Our study provides insights into ADA development against emicizumab, emphasizing the need for monitoring tools. The developed method enables comprehensive evaluation of ADAs, aiding in personalized treatment strategies. These findings contribute to understanding emicizumab's immunogenicity profile in AHA, facilitating its optimized clinical use.

Real-world effectiveness of eptacog beta in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors: A multi-institutional case series.

INTRODUCTION: The management of bleeding events (BEs) in haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) patients with inhibitors necessitates the use of bypassing agents. The recombinant factor VIIa bypassing agent eptacog beta has demonstrated efficacy at treating BEs and managing perioperative bleeding in adults in phase three clinical studies. AIM: To provide real-world descriptions of eptacog beta use for BE treatment in patients on emicizumab or eptacog beta prophylaxis. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 14 patients who received eptacog beta at seven haemophilia treatment centres, with HA (n = 11) or HB (n = 3) and inhibitors or anaphylaxis to factor replacement. RESULTS: Twenty-four spontaneous and traumatic BEs are described (muscle hematomas, joint hemarthroses, port site, and epistaxis) involving 11 subjects. Eptacog beta was effective for acute bleed treatment as both first-line therapy and for treatment of BEs refractory to eptacog alfa in 23/24 events. When eptacog beta was used for prophylaxis, 2/3 patients reported a decreased frequency of breakthrough BEs compared with prophylactic eptacog alfa and one patient experienced a similar frequency of breakthrough BEs compared with prophylactic activated prothrombin complex concentrate. Eptacog beta provided effective bleed control for three subjects who underwent minor surgical procedures. Treatment with eptacog beta was estimated to be 46%-72% more cost-effective than eptacog alfa. No safety concerns or adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, eptacog beta was safe, effective, and economical as first-line therapy, treatment of refractory BEs, management of perioperative bleeding, or prophylaxis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors.

[Acquired haemophilia: Update in 2024]. / Hémophilie acquise : quoi de neuf en 2024 ?

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disorder due to autoantibodies against factor VIII, with a high mortality risk. It should be suspected in subjects with abnormal bleedings, especially subcutaneous bleed associated with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). AHA is often idiopathic but is associated with autoimmune diseases, malignancies, pregnancy and postpartum period or drugs. Treatment is based on haemostatic agents as by-passants agents such as factor VIIa and activated prothrombine concentrate complex or recombinant porcine factor VIII for severe bleeding. Eradication of inhibitor should be established as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed with steroid alone often associated with cytotoxic agents or rituximab, depending on FVIII activity and inhibitor titer. The purpose of this review is to summarize the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment of AHA and discuss current recommendations.

Emicizumab and unmet needs of patients with hemophilia a who are managed with replacement therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia A is managed with coagulation clotting factor VIII (FVIII) therapy that poses significant challenges, such as a high treatment burden, immunogenicity, inconsistent hemostatic cover, poor treatment outcomes, and musculoskeletal progression despite adequate prophylactic treatment. Various non-factor therapies, such as several natural anticoagulant inhibitors and factor FVIII mimetics, have been developed to address these unmet needs. However, the role of emicizumab in addressing these unmet needs remains underexplored. AREAS COVERED: This review delves into the evolution of hemophilia A replacement clotting therapy from plasma-derived products to recombinant products and, more recently, nonfactor therapies. It underscores the unmet needs of replacement therapy and explores the nonfactor therapies developed to address them. The review then comprehensively summarizes the clinical trial and real-world experience data, demonstrating how emicizumab tackles these unsatisfied demands. EXPERT OPINION: Replacement clotting factor therapies as the standard of care has exposed several needs that have yet to be addressed. However, data from numerous emicizumab clinical trials and real-world experience offer a promising outlook, suggesting that it may effectively address many unmet needs. As hemophilia treatment goals continue to evolve, the role of currently developed nonfactor therapies in hemophilia management is yet to be fully defined.

Emicizumab in Children with Severe Hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of emicizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A (HA). Emicizumab is a novel therapeutic drug which is the first and only non-factor replacement agent licensed for use in people with HA. METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 1 mo to 12 y with severe HA and frequent / life threatening bleeding events, with or without coagulation protein factor VIII inhibitors were enrolled (n = 18) in this observational pre-post study. Patients were switched from therapy involving on-demand or prophylactic factor VIII/bypassing agents/immune tolerance induction to emicizumab prophylaxis and followed up for 52 wk. RESULTS: One year before initiating emicizumab, a total of 229 bleeding events occurred among the enrolled children. After emicizumab prophylaxis, 5 patients had one episode of bleeding event each with a mean bleeding duration of 1.2 d in one year. The mean annualized bleeding rate significantly reduced from 12.7 ± 8.61 events pre-emicizumab prophylaxis to 0.28 ± 0.46 events post-emicizumab prophylaxis (p < 0.001). Out of the total cohort (n = 18), 72.2% of patients (n = 13) had no bleeding events (95% Confidence interval: 46.4-89.3) while on emicizumab. The mean annualized joint bleeding rate reduced from 9.72 ± 7.44 to 0.17 ± 0.38 (p < 0.001). The target joint resolution was 100% and no adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Emicizumab was found to be effective and safe as a prophylactic agent for the treatment of severe HA with and without factor VIII inhibitors. Emicizumab prophylaxis can optimize treatment outcomes and promote a better quality of life in children with severe HA.

[Hemophilia: is a revolution in treatment options taking place?] / Hämophilie ­ Revolution der Therapiemöglichkeiten?

Prophylactic replacement therapy for hemophilia A (hereditary factor VIII deficiency) is a success story of the production of coagulation factor concentrates from donor plasma. Recombinant factor concentrates, which are also produced with modified gene constructs for coagulation factor VIII in order to improve pharmacological properties, have since proven their worth. This successful development over many years of factor concentrates for the successful treatment of hemophilia patients has now been followed by the innovation of a factor VIII mimetic in the form of a monoclonal antibody, which was developed in Japan already some years back. Emicizumab is a humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody for therapeutic use in hemophilia A. With this therapeutic agent, the treatment of the hereditary coagulation defect is based, for the first time, on a completely new active principle. The specific antibody simulates the properties of coagulation factor VIII as a cofactor for the formation of the tenase complex with the coagulation factors IX and X. As a result under steady state conditions almost normal thrombin and thus fibrin formation can be achieved.

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Egyptian Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia A: Single Center Cross Sectional Study.

Purpose: Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked hereditary bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII activity. Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that replaces the function of activated FVIII and prevents bleeds in patients with hemophilia A. Emicizumab is expected to reduce the risk of severe bleeds in those patients with their subsequent complications. However, data about its safety and efficacy in patients with hemophilia A is limited. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of Emicizumab prophylaxis in Egyptian pediatric patients with HA. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 88 HA patient who received prophylaxis with Emicizumab. Breakthrough bleeding episodes as well as annualized bleeding rate(ABR) were reported for all patients before and after Emicizumab prophylaxis. All adverse events during prophylaxis were reported to evaluate the safety of Emicizumab. Results: Joint bleeds were present in 94 % of the patients. 58% of them had one target joint, 36.4% had more than one target joint while 5.6% had no target joints. 17% of patients were positive for FVIII inhibitors. The median annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) was reduced remarkably after Emicizumab prophylaxis (36 before versus zero after Emicizumab. Also, the median ABR was 48 before Emicizumab versus zero after Emicizumab. Eight patients developed mild breakthrough bleeding episodes. The most common adverse events were local reaction at the injection sites, headache, arthralgia, fever and diarrhea. Conclusion: Emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower rate of bleeding events in patients with HA with and without inhibitors. The majority of patients had zero bleeds with Emicizumab prophylaxis.

Emicizumab as first-line therapy in acquired hemophilia A.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease resulting from the development of autoantibodies directed against endogenous factor (F)VIII, leading to bleeding manifestations that can be life-threatening. The current standard hemostatic treatment involves the use of bypassing agents that circumvent FVIII (recombinant activated FVII, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant porcine FVIII) that must be administered intravenously and possess a short half-life. These limitations and the risk of potentially fatal bleeding complications justify the early initiation of immunosuppressive treatment (IST) aimed at promptly eradicating the autoantibodies. IST is not without side effects, sometimes severe and possibly fatal, especially in persons with AHA who are generally older and have multiple comorbidities. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the action of FVIII, has emerged as an effective hemostatic therapy among persons with congenital hemophilia, whether complicated by the presence of anti-FVIII antibodies or not. Numerous arguments from recent clinical experiences suggest positioning emicizumab as a first-line treatment for AHA. This strategy has the potential to reduce bleeding complications and, importantly, the side effects associated with IST, which can be delayed and tailored to each patient.

[Novel treatment strategies for acquired hemophilia A].

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a bleeding disorder caused by autoantibody (inhibitor) production targeting blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). It is characterized by sudden onset, and often causes extensive and severe bleeding in soft tissue. Acquired hemophilia A is diagnosed when coagulation tests show normal PT, prolonged APTT, decreased FVIII activity, normal VWF activity, and positive FVIII inhibitor. Hemostatic therapy mainly consists of bypass therapy, which activates the extrinsic coagulation pathway, bypassing the need for FVIII or factor IX. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that substitutes for FVIII function, can be used to prevent bleeding. Immunosuppressive therapy is necessary to suppress or eradicate inhibitors. The majority of patients go into remission with treatment, but some die from bleeding symptoms or infections associated with immunosuppressive therapy.

Reduced doses of emicizumab achieve good efficacy: Results from a national-wide multicentre real-world study in China.

INTRODUCTION: Reduced doses of emicizumab improve the affordability among patients in developing countries. However, the relationship between variant dose selection and efficacy in the real world of China is still unclear. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of emicizumab especially in those on reduced dose regimens in a real-world setting. METHODS: We carried out a multicentre study from 28 hospitals between June 2019 and June 2023 in China and retrospectively analysed the characteristics including demographics, diagnosis, treatment, bleeding episodes, and surgical procedures. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with haemophilia A, including 42 with inhibitors, were followed for a median duration of 16.0 (IQR: 9.0-30.0) months. Median age at emicizumab initiation was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-4.0) years. Median (IQR) consumption for loading and maintenance was 12.0 (8.0-12.0) and 4.2 (3.0-6.0) mg/kg/4 weeks, respectively. While on emicizumab, 67 (52.8%) patients had no bleeds, whereas 60 (47.2%) patients had any bleeds, including 26 with treated bleeds. Compared to previous treatments, patients on emicizumab had significantly decreased annualized bleeding rate, annualized joint bleeding rate, target joints and intracerebral haemorrhage. Different dosages had similar efficacy except the proportion of patients with treated spontaneous bleeds and target joints. Adverse events were reported in 12 (9.4%) patients. Postoperative excessive bleeding occurred following two of nine procedures. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study describing patients with HA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis on variant dose regimens in China. We confirmed that nonstandard dose is efficacious and can be considered where full-dose emicizumab is ill affordable.

Emicizumab as a Promising Form of Therapy for Type A Hemophilia - A Review of Current Knowledge from Clinical Trials.

Hemophilia is a plasma bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency of certain blood clotting factors. The most common forms of this disease, i.e., type A and type B, affect approximately 400,000 people worldwide. Without appropriate treatment ensuring the proper coagulation cascade, this disease may lead to serious disability. Minimizing patient discomfort is possible via replacement therapy, consisting of the substitution of a missing coagulation factor via intravenous administration. Frequent medication and the risk related to factor inhibitors are significant disadvantages, necessitating the improvement of current therapies or the development of novel ones. This review examines the humanized bispecific antibody Emicizumab which ensures hemostasis by mimicking the action of the coagulation factor VIII, a deficiency of which causes type A hemophilia. The paper outlines the topic and then summarizes available clinical trials on Emicizumab in type A hemophilia. Several interventional clinical trials have found Emicizumab to be effective in decreasing bleeding episodes and raising patient satisfaction among various hemophilia A populations. Current Emicizumab-related trials are forecast to be completed between 2024 and 2030, and in addition to congenital hemophilia A, the trials cover acquired hemophilia A and patients playing sports. Providing a more comprehensive understanding of Emicizumab may revolutionize the management of hemophilia type A and improve quality of life. Conclusively, Emicizumab is a gentler therapy owing to subcutaneous delivery and fewer injections, which reduces injection-site reactions and makes therapy less burdensome, ultimately decreasing hospital visits and indirect costs.

Inhibitor eradication and treatment for acquired hemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare hemorrhagic autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In approximately half of the cases AHA does not recognize any cause (idiopathic form), while in the other cases it may be triggered by autoimmune disorders, cancers, drugs, infections, or pregnancy. Besides treating the underlying disorder, specific AHA treatment includes management of bleeding, if necessary, and inhibitor eradication. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review summarizes the main epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic characteristics of AHA. In particular, it is focused on the current therapeutic options for the inhibitor eradication, also showing the latest findings on the innovative therapies. A literature search strategy was performed, without temporal limits, through Medline and PubMed electronic databases. EXPERT OPINION: Various first-line and second-line immunosuppressive agents are currently available for the management of AHA. Among the latter, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been the object of intense research during the last years from investigators as innovative promising eradicating therapy for AHA. Preliminary data from the studies support the use of this drug as a first-line option for newly diagnosed AHA cases.

Expert Opinions on the Management of Hemophilia A in India: The Role of Emicizumab.

Hemophilia A (HA) is a genetic disorder of hemostasis associated with a deficiency or reduced activity of clotting factor VIII (FVIII). This disorder remains unacceptably underdiagnosed in India. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of HA can substantially prevent morbidity and mortality. Currently, HA is managed with regular replacement therapy using standard or extended half-life FVIII concentrates or non-factor drug products. The challenges associated with FVIII concentrates include plateauing of drug effect, issues with its administration and adherence to treatment, breakthrough bleeds, and the development of inhibiting antibodies against administered clotting factors. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody, launched in India in April 2019, for managing patients with HA. To investigate the role of emicizumab in Indian patients with HA, opinions were sought from 13 eminent hematologists and experts from India on the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, perioperative bleeds, and intracranial hemorrhage; resolving target joints; and reducing the rate of hospitalizations and fatality associated with HA in children and adults, with or without inhibitors. The benefits of emicizumab over traditional FVIII concentrates include the subcutaneous route of delivery, less frequent dosing, and a lack of inhibitor development, in addition to providing sustained hemostasis without in-depth monitoring. It is a safe and effective management option for all HA patients, especially for patients with certain archetypes, such as those with inhibitors, those with high annualized bleed rates, those living far away from hemophilia care centers, pediatric patients and infants with intravenous access challenges, and those with a history of life-threatening bleeding events.

Emicizumab is efficacious in people with hemophilia A with comorbidities aged ≥50 years: analysis of 4 phase III trials.

Background: The treatment of older people with hemophilia A (HA) can be complicated by comorbidities. Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of emicizumab in people with HA aged ≥50 years with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors or HIV and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Methods: The HAVEN 1 (NCT02622321), HAVEN 3 (NCT02847637), HAVEN 4 (NCT03020160), and STASEY (NCT03191799) studies enrolled adults/adolescents with severe HA. Participants were categorized as having a comorbidity if they had any CV risk factors (including history of CV disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, prior stroke, or obesity), HIV, and/or HCV infection. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared by age (<50 vs ≥50 years). Results: Of 504 participants at data cutoff, 408 were aged <50 years and 96 were aged ≥50 years. In people with HA aged <50 years, 26.7% had ≥1 CV risk factor and 29.4% had HIV and/or HCV infection. In people with HA aged ≥50 years, 72.9% had ≥1 CV risk factor and 74.0% had HIV and/or HCV infection. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rate for treated bleeds was 1.29 (0.07-6.06) for people with HA aged <50 years and 1.82 (0.19-6.93) for people with HA aged ≥50 years. No significant differences in annualized bleed rates were observed for those with comorbidities compared with those without. Safety outcomes were similar regardless of age. Conclusion: This pooled analysis suggests that emicizumab efficacy and safety in people with HA aged ≥50 years with CV and HIV/HCV comorbidities were consistent with those in people with HA aged <50 years enrolled in the HAVEN 1, 3, and 4 and STASEY studies.

Navigating the challenges: a case report on managing a complicated postpartum course in type 3 von Willebrand disease with alloantibodies.

Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 3 is characterized by a complete deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF), resulting in a severe bleeding phenotype. Treatment often requires administration of VWF concentrates/factor (F)VIII. However, the development of alloantibodies is a rare complication, resulting in ineffective recovery and allergic reactions. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking FVIII function, has emerged as a potential alternative, with promising results reported in several case reports. Key Clinical Question: Description of multiple approaches to control highly severe postpartum hemorrhage in type 3 VWD with alloantibodies, including off-label use of emicizumab. Clinical Approach: Here we present a 28-year-old patient with type 3 VWD and alloantibodies, known to have arthropathy of the right elbow. Previous immune tolerance induction was unsuccessful. Despite receiving negative pregnancy advice during preconception counseling, the patient became pregnant. Delivery was induced at 38 4/7 weeks with prostaglandin, and recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) was administered every 2 hours. Despite administration of rFVIIa, bleeding persisted, requiring manual placental removal and insertion of a Bakri balloon. Since bleeding persisted, plasma-derived VWF was administered with an initial excellent recovery and successful embolization of the uterine artery. Twelve days postpartum, she developed endometritis and recurrent vaginal bleeding treated with antibiotics, rFVIIa every 2 hours, and multiple erythrocyte transfusions. Plasma-derived VWF was administered but was complicated by anaphylaxis and no recovery. Due to persistent vaginal bleeding, reembolization of uterine arteries was performed and off-label emicizumab was initiated. Twenty-nine days postpartum, she developed septic shock requiring an abdominal hysterectomy, again complicated by severe bleeding necessitating direct intraabdominal packing after rFVIIa. A computed tomography scan 9 days postsurgery revealed thrombosis in the left iliac vein and asymptomatic pulmonary embolisms. rFVIIa was stopped and prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin was started. The patient was discharged 2 months after delivery on low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin, emicizumab, and antibiotics for an intra-abdominal abscess. During 2.5 years of emicizumab prophylaxis, she has had no rebleeding in her arthropathic right elbow. Conclusion: The current case emphasizes the postpartum clinical challenges of patients with type 3 VWD and alloantibodies. It underscores the potential role of emicizumab in maintaining hemostatic control.

Emicizumab is well tolerated and effective in people with congenital hemophilia A regardless of age, severity of disease, or inhibitor status: a scoping review.

Background: With the treatment landscape continually evolving, it is vital that the hemophilia community have an overview of all published data for approved therapies, such as emicizumab, to support shared decision making. Objectives: To bring together the clinical and real-world data for emicizumab use in people with congenital hemophilia A, regardless of age, disease severity, or factor VIII inhibitor status. Key focus areas were safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This scoping review used citation databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and manual searches of abstract books. Publications reporting original data for emicizumab in people with hemophilia A, published in English after December 2014, and reporting select endpoints were included. This narrative synthesis focused on zero bleeds, treated annualized bleeding rate (ABR), adverse events, and QoL measures. Results: Overall, 97 publications were included (cut-off: August 9, 2022). Treated ABR remained low (calculated mean and median treated ABRs ranged between 0.7-1.3 and 0.0-1.4, respectively), and the median percentage of people with zero treated bleeds was 66.7%. The proportion of people experiencing treatment-related adverse events ranged from 0.0% to 60.0%; most were injection-site reactions. Across 37 publications reporting on safety and enrolling >2300 individuals, 11 thrombotic events and 4 thrombotic microangiopathies were reported. Data from well-established tools show QoL benefits with emicizumab. Conclusion: This scoping review consolidates the global published experience for emicizumab in people with hemophilia A and supports the fact that emicizumab has an acceptable safety profile, is effective and efficacious in bleed prevention, and is associated with improvements in QoL.

Multicenter evaluation of the hemostatic activity of emicizumab in patients with severe hemophilia A.

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab has been approved for the prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A with or without inhibitors. However, spontaneous and trauma-induced breakthrough bleeds have been reported in patients on emicizumab prophylaxis, and no laboratory assay has been validated to evaluate the hemostatic activity of emicizumab. OBJECTIVES: The thrombin generation assay (TGA) could be a surrogate marker of the hemostatic efficacy of emicizumab. The correlation between TGA and the methods used to measure emicizumab blood concentration was evaluated in this study. METHODS: TGA was modified by the use of a trigger reagent combining a very low concentration of tissue factor and activated factor (F)XI. Emicizumab quantification was performed by 3 methods: the modified 1-step FVIII assay and 2 methods based on liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS). RESULTS: Using tissue factor/activated FXI-triggered TGA and platelet-poor plasma, a relationship was observed between the area under the thrombin generation curve (endogenous thrombin potential [ETP]) and the clinical response of patients to emicizumab. The ultrastructure of fibrin clots was consistent with ETP results and showed that emicizumab had a hemostatic activity equivalent to 20 to 30 IU/dL of FVIII. Finally, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses showed no correlation between ETP and LC-MS nor with modified 1-stage FVIII assay, but a statistically significant correlation between the LC-MS methods and the time-to-peak results of the TGA. CONCLUSION: Using a modified TGA, this study showed that patients who experienced breakthrough bleeds while on emicizumab had a lower thrombin-generating capacity compared with others with good clinical response to emicizumab.