Haploidentical Versus Mismatched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: HLA Factors and Donor Age Considerations.

HLA-mismatched unrelated donors and haploidentical related donors are suitable stem cell sources for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) when patients lack HLA-matched donors. Clinical outcome after mismatched HCT is influenced by HLA factors including the similarity of peptide-binding motifs (PBMs) between the patient and unrelated donor, and of the HLA-B leader in unrelated and haploidentical donors. Whether these factors can aid in the selection between mismatched unrelated and haploidentical donors is not known. To address this question, we investigated outcomes between the two donor types defined by matching for the PBM and leader peptide. We compared PBM-matched (n = 614) and mismatched (n = 958) MMUDs with calcineurin-inhibitor-based prophylaxis to four haploidentical groups that received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis. The haploidentical groups were B-leader matched/DRB1-mismatched (n = 722), B-leader matched/DRB1-matched (n = 154), B-leader mismatched/DRB1-mismatched (n = 493), and B-leader mismatched/DRB1-matched (n = 63). Multivariate analysis showed that the B-leader matched/DRB1-mismatched haploidentical group had the best overall survival (OS) compared to the PBM-matched MMUD, while other haploidentical groups had comparable OS. The PBM-mismatched MMUD showed the poorest outcomes, similar to the B-leader mismatched/DRB1-matched haploidentical group. Among non-HLA factors, donor age was the most significant predictor of OS. These results suggest that a B-leader matched/DRB1 mismatched haploidentical donor might be the preferred choice among donors of similar age. If such a donor is not available, the youngest donor from either PBM-matched unrelated or other haploidentical groups could be a beneficial choice. These findings need validation with both donor groups receiving PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.

Future directions in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) have improved over time. Graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which were important complications in major human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-disparity stem cell transplantation, have significantly decreased. These improvements have led to an exponential increase in the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation, as well as in the number of publications evaluating haplo-SCT outcomes. Many studies focused on factors important in donor selection, novel conditioning regimens or GVHD prophylaxis, the impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA), as well as strategies to prevent disease relapse post-transplant. DSA represents an important limitation and multimodality desensitization protocols, including plasma exchange, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin and donor buffy coat infusion, can contribute to the successful engraftment in patients with high DSA levels and is currently the standard therapy for highly allosensitized individuals. With regards to donor selection, younger donors are preferred due to lower risk of complications and better transplant outcomes. Moreover, recent studies also showed that younger haploidentical donors may be a better choice than older-matched unrelated donors. Improvement of disease relapse remains a top priority, and several studies have demonstrated that higher natural killer (NK) cell numbers early post-transplant are associated with improved outcomes. Prospective studies have started to assess the role of NK cell administration in decreasing post-transplant relapse. These studies suggest that the incorporation of other cell products post-transplant, including the administration of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, should be explored in the future.

Mismatched related donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation compared to other donor types for Ph+ chronic myeloid leukaemia: A retrospective analysis from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains an option for tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) and high-risk patients with advanced disease phases. In this European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry-based study of 1686 CML patients undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019, outcomes were evaluated according to donor type, particularly focusing on mismatched related donors (MMRDs). Median age at allo-HCT was 46 years (IQR 36-55). Disease status was CP1 in 43%, second CP (CP2) or later in 27%, accelerated phase in 12% and blast crisis in 18%. Donor type was matched related (MRD) in 39.2%, MMRD in 8.1%, matched unrelated (MUD) in 40.2%, and mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 12.6%. In 4 years, overall survival (OS) for MRD, MMRD, MUD and MMUD was 61%, 56%, 63% and 59% (p = 0.21); relapse-free survival (RFS) was 48%, 42%, 52% and 46% (p = 0.03); cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 33%, 37%, 27% and 30% (p = 0.07); non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 19%, 21%, 21% and 24% (p = 0.21); and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16%, 18%, 22% and 15% (p = 0.05) respectively. On multivariate analysis, MMRD use associated with longer engraftment times and higher risk of graft failure compared to MRD or MUD. There was no statistical evidence that MMRD use associated with different OS, RFS and incidence of GvHD compared to other donor types.

Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia-Single-Centre Experience.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening type of aplastic anemia for which allogeneic stem cell transplantation or immunosuppressive therapy are the principal treatment modalities. Only about 25-30% of patients have a matched sibling donor, and finding an unrelated donor in ethnic minorities is a challenge. The use of related haploidentical donor transplants in severe aplastic anemia is uncommon. We would like to report our experience with the first four patients who underwent haploidentical transplants for severe aplastic anemia. This is a retrospective study. We collected data from our transplant database of all haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplants for SAA from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021. The transplant protocol used was the Hopkins' protocol. There were three patients who underwent haploidentical transplants as primary therapy for SAA. A fourth patient received a haploidentical transplant after immunosuppressive therapy failure. The median age of the patients at transplant was 24 y (range 20-29). All patients were engrafted. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of 21 days (range 17-22). Any active infections resolved with the recovery of blood counts. The median hospitalization time was 27 days (range 22-41). Only one patient had grade 2 acute GVHD involving the skin. There was no chronic GVHD. All patients had complete lymphoid and myeloid donor chimerism on day 60. Based on our experience and the emerging literature, haplo-identical transplantation should be considered for select young patients with SAA who have low chances of responding to immunosuppressive therapy.

Graft CD8 T-cell-based risk system predicts survival in antithymocyte globulin-based myeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Objective: This study investigated the cellular composition of peripheral blood grafts for anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based myeloablative haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Methods: Clinical characteristics were retrospectively evaluated in a training cohort with ATG-based myeloablative haplo-HSCT between January 2016 and February 2020 and confirmed in a validation cohort between March 2020 and June 2021. Results: A higher dose of graft CD8+ T cells (≥ 0.85 × 108 kg-1) was significantly improved overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.750; P = 0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR, 1.751; P < 0.001) in the training cohort, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Higher doses of mononuclear cells (MNCs) demonstrated better OS (HR, 1.517; P = 0.038) and DFS (HR, 1.532; P = 0.027). Older patient age (> 46 years), older donor age (≥ 50 years) and a higher refined disease risk index (rDRI) were also related to OS. A graft CD8+ T-cell risk system based on graft CD8+ T-cell dose, donor age and rDRI was constructed using a nomogram model after LASSO Cox regression analysis. It showed acceptable discrimination, with a C-index of 0.62 and 0.63, respectively. Graft CD8+ T-cell dose was negatively correlated with donor age (P < 0.001) and positively correlated with a higher lymphocyte percentage in the peripheral blood before mobilisation (P < 0.001). Conclusion: A higher CD8+ T-cell dose in peripheral blood-derived grafts improves patients' survival with ATG-based myeloablative haplo-HSCT. Younger donors with higher lymphocyte percentages improved patients' survival with an intermediate rDRI risk.

Outcomes with HLA-matched unrelated donor versus haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We investigated the outcomes after adult haploidentical (haplo) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in a single-center study (n = 452) including 276 MUD and 176 haplo transplants. Myeloablative (37%) and reduced-intensity conditioning (63%) were performed. Graft sources included peripheral blood (50%) and bone marrow (50%). GVHD prophylaxis included tacrolimus/methotrexate (53%) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based (47%). In MUD versus haplo HCT recipients, a similar incidence of neutrophil engraftment (18 vs 17 days, p = 0.895), grade II-IV acute GVHD (51% vs 50%, p = 0.773), relapse (26% vs 23%, p = 0.578), non-relapse mortality (22% vs 23%, p = 0.817), 1-year disease-free survival (62% vs 63%. p = 0.921), and 1-year overall survival (73% vs 74%, p = 0.744) were observed. Earlier platelet engraftment (22 vs 27 days, p < 0.001) and higher chronic GVHD (45% vs 35%, p = 0.040) were noted in MUD as compared to haplo HCT. Allogeneic transplantation should be done promptly whenever indicated, utilizing either matched unrelated or haploidentical donors.

Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post- Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from an Unrelated or Mismatched Related Donor: A Comparative Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT (CMWP-EBMT).

Outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) using an unrelated donor (UD) or a mismatched related donor (MMRD) remain unknown. We report a retrospective comparison of PTCy-based allo-HCT from a UD, non-PTCy allo-HCT from a UD, and PTCy allo-HCT from an MMRD. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with CML undergoing first allo-HCT between 2012 and 2019 from a UD with either PTCy or non-PTCy graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis or from an MMRD using PTCy. The primary endpoint was GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). A total of 1341 patients were included (82% in the non-PTCy UD cohort). With a median follow-up of 34.9 months, the 3-year GRFS was 43% in the non-PTCy cohort, 37% in the PTCy-UD cohort, and 39% PTCy-MMRD cohort (P = .15). Multivariable analyses revealed no significant differences among the 3 cohorts in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, RI, and nonrelapse mortality. Factors independently associated with worse OS in the overall cohort were Karnofsky Performance Status <90 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 2.45; P < .001), older age (HR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.38; P < .001), and disease stage (compared to chronic phase [CP] 1): blast phase (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.60 to 3.16; P < .001), accelerated phase (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.54; P = .03), and CP >2 (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.17; P = .005). These results suggest that allo-HCT in patients with CML using either a UD or an MMRD with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis are feasible transplantation, platforms and that the disease stage at allo-HCT remains a major prognostic factor, highlighting the importance of closely monitoring CML patients and proposing transplantation when indicated when still in CP1.

Comparison of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes Between Matched Sibling Donors and Alternative Donors in Patients Over 50 Years of Age with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 8/8 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and Unrelated Cord Blood Provide Better Leukemia-Free Survival Compared with Matched Sibling Donors During Nonremission Status.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other post-transplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and nonremission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were nonremission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = .005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P < .001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P = .794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .146) compared to the MSD group in nonremission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas nonrelapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and nonremission status. Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during nonremission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor, an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) is considered the leading candidate. However, in recent decades, the alternative donor pool has been extended to HLA-haploidentical donors, especially with the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Comparative data for haploidentical and MUD allo-HCT in patients with MDS are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed 697 adult patients with MDS who underwent HLA-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with PTCy (n = 136), MUD bone marrow transplantation (MUD-BMT) (n = 465), or MUD peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MUD-PBSCT) (n = 96) as their first allo-HCT between 2014 and 2020 using Japanese registry data. Multivariable analyses demonstrated faster neutrophil engraftment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 2.90; P < .001) and platelet engraftment (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.72 to 3.10; P < 0001) in the MUD-PBSCT cohort compared with the haplo-PBSCT cohort. MUD-BMT was associated with a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD than haplo-PBSCT (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.29; P = .048). Among patients without in vivo T cell depletion using antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (haplo-PBSCT, n = 136; MUD-BMT, n = 446; MUD-PBSCT, n = 65), MUD-PBSCT recipients experienced faster hematopoietic recovery, MUD-BMT recipients (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.32; P = .042) or MUD-PBSCT recipients (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.18; P = .03) had a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD, and MUD-PBSCT recipients developed chronic GVHD more frequently than haplo-PBSCT recipients (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.89; P = .034). There were no significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, relapse, or nonrelapse mortality in the haplo-PBSCT cohort versus the MUD-BMT or MUD-PBSCT cohorts. In conclusion, despite differences in the incidences of hematopoietic engraftment and GVHD depending on graft type and ATG use in MUD transplant recipients, major transplantation outcomes were comparable between recipients of haplo-PBSCT using PTCy and recipients of MUD-BMT or MUD-PBSCT.

Comparison of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adult Patients with Aplastic Anemia.

Aplastic anemia patients who are refractory to immunosuppressive therapy or with very low neutrophil counts require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has been a treatment option when an HLA-matched donor is not available, and HSCT from a related haploidentical donor using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (PTCy-haplo) recently became another important approach. We aimed to compare the outcomes of PTCy-haplo and UCBT in adult patients with aplastic anemia to identify more effective and safer approaches for alternative donor transplantation. Data in a nationwide registry were analyzed retrospectively to assess the outcomes of aplastic anemia patients age ≥16 years who underwent PTCy-haplo or UCBT as their first HSCT between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) after HSCT. Secondary endpoints included 1-year failure-free survival (FFS), neutrophil and platelet engraftment, and acute and chronic GVHD. Eighty-three patients who underwent PTCy-haplo (n = 24) or UCBT (n = 59) were eligible. The 1-year OS rate was 78.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.7% to 90.5%) in the PTCy-haplo group and 77.5% (95% CI, 64.5% to 86.3%; P = .895) in the UCBT group. The 1-year FFS rate was 78.7% (95% CI, 56.1% to 90.6%) in the PTCy-haplo group and 62.2% (95% CI, 48.5% to 73.3%; P = .212) in the UCBT group. Among patients age <40 years, the PTCy-haplo group had a significantly higher FFS rate (92.9% [95% CI, 59.1% to 99.0%]) vs 63.9% [95% CI, 43.2% to 78.7%]; P = .047). Neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment rates were significantly higher in the PTCy-haplo group compared with the UCBT group: 95.8% (95% CI, 73.9% to 99.4%) vs 78.0% (95% CI, 65.1% to 86.6%, P < .001) and 83.3% (95% CI, 61.5% to 93.4%) vs 72.9% (95% CI, 59.6% to 82.4%; P = .025). No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD between the 2 groups. Aplastic anemia patients achieved significantly higher neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates with PTCy-haplo than with UCBT. OS and the incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar between the 2 groups. In patients age <40 years, the FFS rate was higher in the PTCy-haplo group. PTCy-haplo is promising for alternative donor transplantation in adult patients with aplastic anemia.

Unrelated or haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in second complete remission for acute myeloid leukemia-Improved outcomes over time: A European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party study.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only cure for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2). Patients lacking a matched sibling donor (MSD) receive transplants from matched unrelated donors (MUDs), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs), haploidentical (haplo) donors, or cord blood. METHODS: This is a retrospective, registry-based European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study that investigates changes in patient- and transplant-related characteristics and posttransplant outcomes over time. RESULTS: We identified 3955 adult patients (46.7% female; median age, 52 years [range, 18-78 years]) with AML in CR2 first transplanted between 2005 and 2019 from a MUD 10/10 (61.4%), MMUD 9/10 (21.9%), or haplo donor (16.7%) and followed for 3.7 years. A total of 725 patients were transplanted between 2005 and 2009, 1600 between 2010 and 2014, and 1630 between 2015 and 2019. Over the three time periods, there was a significant increase in patient age (from 48.7 to 53.5 years; p < .001), use of a haplo donor (from 4.6% to 26.4%; p < .001), and use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (from 0.4% to 29%; p < .001). There was a significant decrease in total body irradiation and in vivo T-cell depletion. In multivariate analysis, transplants performed more recently had better outcomes. Leukemia-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; p = .002) and overall survival (HR, 0.73; p < .001) increased over time. Similarly, nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.64; p < .001) decreased over time. We also observed better graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) rates (acute GVHD II-IV: HR, 0.78; p = .03; GVHD-free, relapse-free survival: HR, 0.69; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Even in the absence of an MSD, outcomes of allo-HCT in CR2 for AML have significantly improved over time, with most favorable outcomes achieved with a MUD.

Successful treatment of DOCK8 deficiency by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative donors.

Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive inborn error of immunity (IEI) characterized by eczematous dermatitis, elevated serum IgE, and recurrent infections, comprising a seemingly hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES). DOCK8 deficiency is only curable with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the outcome of HCT from alternative donors is not fully understood. Here, we describe the cases of two Japanese patients with DOCK8 deficiency who were successfully treated by allogeneic HCT from alternative donors. Patient 1 underwent cord blood transplantation at the age of 16 years, and Patient 2 underwent haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide at the age of 22 years. Each patient received a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen. Their clinical manifestations, including refractory molluscum contagiosum, promptly improved post-HCT. They achieved successful engraftment and immune reconstitution without serious complications. Alternative donor sources such as cord blood and haploidentical donors can be options for allogeneic HCT for DOCK8 deficiency.

Haploidentical transplants deliver equal outcomes to matched sibling transplants: a propensity score-matched analysis.

The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies is heavily dependent on the availability of suitable donors. Haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MSD) are two important donor options providing faster and easier sources of stem cells, however, due to confounding factors present in most retrospective studies, the validity of comparing outcomes between these two donor types remains uncertain. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial (trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR-OCH-12002490; registered 22 February 2012; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=7061 ) to compare outcomes of HID versus MSD peripheral blood stem cell-derived transplants in patients with hematologic malignancies between 2015 and 2022. All HID-receiving patients had antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between the two cohorts. A total of 1060 patients were initially reviewed and then 663 patients were ultimately included in the analysis after propensity score matching. The overall survival, relapse-free survival, non-relapse mortality rate and cumulative incidence of relapse were similar between HID and MSD cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission may have better overall survival with an HID transplant. The present demonstrated that haploidentical transplants can provide outcomes comparable to conventional MSD transplants, and HID should be recommended as one of the optimal donor choices for patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission.

Impact of Donor Age in Haploidentical-Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Matched Unrelated Donor Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared to HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with PTCy prophylaxis in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Given prognostic implications of donor age, we investigated the differences in outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n = 775) undergoing RIC-HCT with a younger MUD (age <35 years; n = 84) versus a younger haploidentical donor (age <35 years; n = 302) versus an older haploidentical donor (age ≥35 years; n = 389). The older MUD group was excluded from the analysis because of small numbers. The younger haploidentical donor group (median age, 59.5 years) was somewhat younger than the younger MUD group (median age, 66.8 years) and the older haploidentical donor group (median age, 64.7 years). More patients in the MUD group received peripheral blood grafts (82%) compared to the haploidentical donor groups (55% to 56%). In multivariate analysis, compared to the younger MUD group, the younger haploidentical donor group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 3.12; P = .005) and the older haploidentical donor group (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.71; P < .001) had a significantly inferior OS, and the younger haploidentical donor group (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.39 to 9.93; P = .009) and older haploidentical donor group (HR, 6.91; 95% CI, 2.75 to 17.39; P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of nonrelapse mortality. The older haploidentical group had a significantly higher risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.80; P = .001) and grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.09 to 6.71; P = .03). There were no significant differences across the groups in the incidence of chronic GVHD or relapse. Among adult AML patients in CR undergoing RIC-HCT with PTCy prophylaxis, a young MUD may be preferred over a young haploidentical donor.

Haploidentical versus Double-Cord Blood Stem Cells as a Second Transplantation for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

There are limited data on second stem cell transplantation (SCT2) outcomes with alternative donors for relapsed AML after the first stem cell transplantation (SCT1). We analyzed the outcomes of 52 adult AML patients who received SCT2 from haploidentical donors (HIT, N = 32) and double-cord blood (dCBT, N = 20) between 2008 and 2021. The HIT group received T-cell-replete peripheral blood stem cells after reduced-toxicity conditioning with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), while the dCBT group received myeloablative conditioning. For a median follow-up of 64.9 months, the HIT group, compared to the dCBT group, had earlier engraftment, superior 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) with similar relapse. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HIT was significantly associated with better OS, DFS, and lower NRM than dCBT. Both longer remission duration after SCT1 and complete remission at SCT2 were significantly associated with a lower relapse rate. In addition, bone marrow WT1 measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity was significantly associated with inferior OS and higher relapse. This study suggests that T-cell-replete HIT with ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis may be preferred over dCBT as SCT2 for relapsed AML and that WT1-MRD negativity may be warranted for better SCT2 outcomes.

HLA Factors versus Non-HLA Factors for Haploidentical Donor Selection.

When multiple haploidentical donors are available for transplantation, those of younger generations are generally selected over those of older generations. However, it is unclear who is the optimal donor when selecting candidates from within a generation, such as father versus mother, son versus daughter, or brother versus sister. Although traditionally male donors are favored over female donors, particularly for male recipients, and significant associations of individual HLA mis(matches) on outcomes are being increasingly recognized, the hierarchy of factors for donor selection is indeterminate. To assess whether HLA factors take precedence over non-HLA factors and to isolate the influence of specific characteristics on outcomes, we analyzed 412 patients stratified by donor relationship: child donor (son [n = 202] versus daughter [n = 96]), parent (father [n = 28] versus mother [n = 29]), and sibling (noninherited maternal [NIMA; n = 29] versus paternal [NIPA; n = 28] mismatched). Among siblings, NIMA mismatch was associated with a lower risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD); B-leader mismatch was associated with high nonrelapse mortality (NRM), poor progression-free survival, and a trend toward poor overall survival (OS), whereas A-mismatch was associated with lower aGVHD. Among parent donors, the relationship did not impact any outcome; B-leader mismatch was associated with higher NRM and a trend toward poor OS, whereas A-mismatch was associated with lower NRM and improved progression-free survival and OS. Among child donors, no individual HLA mismatch was predictive of any outcome, and daughter donors were not associated with any adverse outcomes in multivariate analyses. Our data suggest that certain HLA factors may be more significant in some cases and should be given priority over simply selecting a donor based on relationship/sex.

Alternative Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Aplastic Anemia: A Retrospective Report From the BMF-WG of Hunan Province, China.

Although the possibility of first-line hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from alternative donors in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients has been suggested recently, transplantation strategies are still being investigated. We established a novel post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based HCT protocol for patients with SAA in prior studies. We explores the effectiveness and safety of this HCT approach either as first-line or as salvage treatment in SAA patients. Outcomes of 71 consecutive young patients, who received HCT from unrelated or haploidentical donors, were retrospectively analyzed. According to their treatment before transplantation, the patients were classified into treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. The R/R patients were designated as such when a patient did not respond to previous immunosuppressive therapy or relapsed. We administered an antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-free, total body irradiation (TBI)-free conditioning regimen comprising cyclophosphamide, busulfan, and fludarabine, all in an intravenous formula. We used a thorough post-transplantation prophylaxis regimen for GVHD, including post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and short-term methotrexate and long-term cyclosporine A. The median age of the cohort was 16 (95% confidence interval, 12-20) years at transplantation. Most patients (61 of 71) received HCT from haploidentical donors, and the others received HCT from unrelated donors. TN patients (n = 38) were younger and had a shorter time-to-transplant and lower HCT-specific comorbidity index than patients with R/R diseases (n = 33). The frequencies of graft failure, grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and moderate-severe chronic GVHD were similar, at 5.3% versus 6.5% (P = .057), 8.3% versus 0% (P = .109), and 5.7% versus 0% (P = .199) between R/R and TN patients. With a median 42-month follow-up, the frequencies of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were higher in the TN group than in the R/R group (100% versus 84.8% [P = .013] and 86.8% versus 75.8% [P = .255], respectively). All patients who achieved successful engraftment showed full donor chimerism. Four patients, all in the R/R group, suffered from donor-type aplasia; of these, 2 died, 1 was salvaged with another transplantation, and the final one was still receiving transfusion at the last follow-up. Currently, 93.9% (62 of 66) of the patients are alive more than 12 months after transplantation; of these 93.5% (58 of 62) no longer receive immunosuppression, including 91.7% (33 of 34) of the TN group and 89.3% (25 of 28) in the R/R group. This novel TBI-free and ATG-free HCT protocol using a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen followed by modified PTCy achieved promising engraftment, minimal GVHD risk, and encouraging OS and EFS. Our study suggests that unrelated or haploidentical HCT with PTCy can be used as a first-line treatment for young patients with SAA. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed to explore possibilities for older patients and patients with a poor performance status.

Haploidentical Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Lymphomas.

When using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for lymphoma patients, it is currently unknown whether a matched unrelated donor (MUD) or a haploidentical related donor is preferable if both are available. In this study we wanted to test whether using a haploidentical donor has the same results of a MUD. A total of 2140 adults (34% Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, 66% European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry) aged ≥18 years who received their first haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) or MUD-HCT (8/8 match at HLA-loci A, B, C, and DRB1) for lymphoma using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The majority of both MUD and haploidentical HCTs received reduced intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (74% and 77%, respectively) and used a peripheral blood stem cell graft (91% and 60%, respectively) and a 3-drug GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy + calcineurin inhibitor + MMF in 54% and 90%, respectively). Haploidentical HCT has less favorable results versus MUD cohort in terms of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR= = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.27; P < .001), progression-free survival (HR=1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.79; P = .008), nonrelapse mortality (HR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.21-3.07; P = .006), platelet engraftment (HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; P < .001), acute grade 2-4 GVHD incidence (HR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.28-2.14; P < .001), and chronic GVHD (HR = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.30-2.48, P < .001). No significant differences were observed in terms of relapse and neutrophil engraftment. Adjusting for propensity score yielded similar results. Whenever MUD is available in a timely manner, it should be preferred over a haploidentical donor when using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for patients with lymphoma.

Effect of CD34+ Cell Dose on the Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

The impact of infused CD34+ cell dose on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) using standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis remains controversial. Information on this subject is scarce for alloHSCT using high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We aimed to assess the effect of CD34+ cell dose in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts on the outcome of alloHSCT using PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. To do so, we conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 221 consecutive adult patients who underwent PTCy alloHSCT from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs; n = 22), HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs; n = 83), mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs; n = 73), and haploidentical donors (n = 43). Based on the binary partitioning method, 5 × 106/kg was used as the optimal cutoff for CD34+ cell dose. According to our institutional protocol, the maximum CD34+ cell dose was capped at 8 × 106/kg. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups based on CD34+ cell dose: high dose (>5 to 8 × 106/kg) and low dose (≤5 × 106/kg). Patients receiving high-dose CD34+-containing grafts had significantly shorter median times to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment compared to those who received low-dose CD34+ (19 days versus 21 days [P = .002] and 16 days versus 22 days [P = .04], respectively). There were no differences between the high-dose and low-dose groups in the cumulative incidence of day +100 acute GVHD (grade II-IV: 25% versus 23% [P = .7]; grade III-IV: 5% versus 4% [P = .4], respectively) or 2-year chronic GVHD (moderate/severe GVHD: 9% versus 6%; P = .5). There was no impact of CD34+ cell dose on survival outcomes with the use of MSDs, MUDs, or MMUDs. Recipients of haploidentical alloHSCT using low-dose CD34+ cells had significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 6.01; P = .004) and relapse-free survival (HR, 4.57; P = .004). In recipients of PBSC PTCy alloHSCT, infused CD34+ cell doses >5 to 8 × 106/kg were associated with faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment, independent of donor type. Our study suggests an impact of CD34+ cell dose on survival outcomes only with haploidentical donors, for whom the administration of a CD34+ cell dose ≤5 × 106/kg significantly decreased survival outcomes.

Haploidentical donor stem cell transplantation had a lower incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome compared with HLA-matched sibling donor transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies: Benefit from ATG?

Background: Haploidentical donor stem cell transplantation (HID-SCT) based on antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis had achieved a similar incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor stem cell transplantation (MSD-SCT). However, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), which serves as pulmonary cGVHD, was rarely compared between HID and MSD transplantation. Methods: One thousand four hundred five patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent allogeneic SCT were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on donor type, we divided the patients into three groups: HID, MSD, and match unrelated donor (MUD) groups. The cumulative incidences and risk factors of BOS were analyzed. Results: The 5-year cumulative incidence of BOS was 7.2% in the whole population. HID transplantation had a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of BOS than MSD transplantation (4.1% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001) and a similar incidence with MUD transplantation (4.1% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.224). The 5-year cumulative incidence of BOS was lower in the ATG group than that in the non-ATG group in both the whole and MSD populations (4.6% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001, and 4.1% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.042, respectively). The 5-year incidence of BOS in mixed grafts [peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) plus bone marrow] group was also lower than that in the PBSC group (4.2% vs. 9.1, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that HID, ATG, and mixed grafts were protective factors for BOS [odds ratio (OR) 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6, p < 0.001; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.7, p = 0.001; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8, p = 0.013], and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and cGVHD were independent risk factors for BOS (OR 2.1, 95% 1.1-4.3, p = 0.035; OR 10.1, 95% CI 4.0-25.0, p < 0.001). Conclusions: HID transplantation had a lower incidence of BOS than MSD transplantation, which might be associated with ATG and mixed grafts.