Comparative safety analysis of lacosamide and perampanel in epilepsy management: insights from FAERS database.

Background: Epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition requiring effective management with minimal adverse effects. Lacosamide (LCM) and Perampanel (PER), two promising treatments, have distinct profiles that merit comparative analysis to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: This study utilizes a pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from Q1 2009 to Q3 2023. Employing disproportionality and Bayesian analyses, we assessed and compared the AE signals associated with LCM and PER to elucidate their safety profiles in epilepsy treatment. Results: The analysis included 12,576 AE reports for LCM and 2,703 for PER, highlighting a higher incidence of psychiatric disorders, including aggression with LCM, and a notable association of PER with psychiatric disorders such as psychotic disorders and dizziness. LCM showed a relatively safe profile during pregnancy, whereas PER's data suggested caution due to reported cases of suicidal ideation and attempts. Conclusion: This comprehensive evaluation underscores the importance of understanding the distinct AE profiles of LCM and PER in clinical practice, providing valuable insights for personalized epilepsy management. Future research with rigorous prospective designs is recommended to validate these findings and explore the mechanisms underlying the reported adverse events.

Intravenous lacosamide for acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill children.

OBJECTIVE: Acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus are common neurological emergencies in critically ill children. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children with acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus. METHODS: This retrospective study included children who received intravenous lacosamide for acute repetitive seizures or convulsive status epilepticus from October 2017 to September 2022 and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary medical center. Children who were newly started on intravenous lacosamide were included and divided into two groups: (a) previously healthy, and (b) history of epilepsy and receiving antiseizure medications. Efficacy was defined as the cessation of seizures within 72 h of administering lacosamide. Adverse effects were defined using predefined criteria, and most were evaluated during the first 7 days. RESULTS: Sixty-seven children were enrolled, including 25 (37.3%) girls and 42 (62.7%) boys with a mean age of 7.20 ± 5.66 years. Among them, 30 (44.8%) had acute repetitive seizures, and 37 (55.2%) had convulsive status epilepticus. The seizure types were focal onset (n = 34, 50.7%), generalized onset (n = 27, 40.3%), and mixed type (n = 6, 9.0%). In the previously healthy group, 9 patients had acute repetitive seizures and 23 had convulsive status epilepticus, and the rates of seizure cessation when lacosamide was used as the first to fourth choice of antiseizure medication were 100.0%, 85.7%, 40.0%, and 50.0%, respectively, compared to 73.7%, 54.5%, 100.0%, and 0.0% in the patients with epilepsy (21 had acute repetitive seizures and 14 had convulsive status epilepticus). Sixteen (23.9%) patients developed bradycardia and 1 (1.5%) patient developed a rash. SIGNIFICANCE: The early use of intravenous lacosamide was effective with acceptable side effects in treating acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill children, including young infants and children less than 4 years old and those with different etiologies. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus are common neurological emergencies in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), traditional intravenous antiseizure medications (ASMs) include phenytoin, valproic acid, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital. In this study, we categorized patients based on their epilepsy history and different etiologies. We observed that early use of lacosamide, even in young infants, demonstrated good efficacy and safety.

CYP2C19 genotype and sodium channel blockers in lacosamide-treated children with epilepsy: two major determinants of trough lacosamide concentration or clinical response.

Background: The widespread clinical use of lacosamide (LCM) has revealed significant individual differences in clinical response, with various reported influencing factors. However, it remains unclear how genetic factors related to the disposition and clinical response of LCM, as well as drug-drug interactions (DDIs), exert their influence on pediatric patients with epilepsy. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of genetic variations and DDIs on plasma LCM concentrations and clinical response. Design: Patients with epilepsy treated with LCM from June 2021 to March 2023 in the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included in the analysis. Methods: The demographic information and laboratory examination data were obtained from the hospital information system. For the pharmacogenetic study, the left-over blood specimens, collected for routine plasma LCM concentration monitoring, were used to perform genotyping analysis for the selected 26 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 14 genes. The trough concentration/daily dose (C 0/D) ratio and efficacy outcomes were compared. Results: Patients achieved 90.1% and 68.9% responder rates in LCM mono- and add-on therapy, respectively. The genetic variant in the CYP2C19 *2 (rs4244285) was associated with a better responsive treatment outcome (odds ratio: 1.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-3.15; p = 0.031). In monotherapy, 36% of patients were CYP2C19 normal metabolizers (NMs), 49% were intermediate metabolizers (IMs), and 15% were poor metabolizers (PMs) carrying CYP2C19 *2 or *3. Of note, the C 0/D ratios of IMs and PMs were 9.1% and 39.6% higher than those of NMs, respectively. Similar results were in the add-on therapy group, and we also observed a substantial decrease in the C 0/D ratio when patients were concomitant with sodium channel blockers (SCBs). Conclusion: This study was the first to confirm that CYP2C19 *2 or *3 variants impact the disposition and treatment response of LCM in children with epilepsy. Moreover, concomitant with SCBs, particularly oxcarbazepine, also decreased plasma LCM concentration.

CYP2C19 genotype and sodium channel blockers in lacosamide-treated children with epilepsy: two major determinants of plasma lacosamide concentration or treatment efficacy This study examined the impact of genetic factors and drug combinations on the effectiveness and plasma concentrations of lacosamide, an antiseizure medication, in patients under 18. Analyzing blood samples from 316 patients at the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, researchers discovered that genetic variations in the CYP2C19 (i.e. *2 and *3), along with metabolic capacity, and co-medication with sodium channel blockers, all influence plasma lacosamide concentration. Understanding these genetic influences could inform personalized dosing strategies, improving the medication's management for pediatric epilepsy patients.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive Lacosamide therapy for focal seizures in young children aged ≥1 month to ≤4 years: A real-world study.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide therapy against focal seizures in young children (1 month - 4 years). METHODS: This non-randomized, open-label, and self-controlled real-world study included 105 children (1 month-4 years) with focal seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide therapy at Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. RESULTS: (1) The 50% response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up were 58.1%, 61.0%, 57.1%, and 56.2%, while the seizure-free rates were 27.6%, 34.3%, 32.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. The 50% response rate of the first addition of lacosamide for focal seizures was much higher than the second and later added treatment at 3 months (p = 0.038). After 1 year of follow-up, these children showed an improvement in neurodevelopmental levels (p < 0.05). (2) Lacosamide retention rate was 72.7% (64/88) after 1 year of follow-up. Lack of efficacy and serious adverse events were independent risk factors for the lacosamide retention rate. (3) During adjunctive lacosamide therapy, 13 (12.4%) patients reported adverse events and five (4.7%) patients withdrew due to adverse events, including vomiting drowsiness, ataxia (0.94%), neck itching with eczema (0.94%), irritability (1.88%), and gastrointestinal discomfort (0.94%). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive lacosamide therapy was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in young Chinese children with focal seizures in this study.

Switching carbamazepine to lacosamide improves gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase levels.

Carbamazepine (CBZ) use has been limited by multiple adverse reactions. Lacosamide (LCM) is a functional amino acid anti-seizure medication (ASM), approved for focal seizure patients more than 4 years old. It is non-inferior in terms of efficacy to controlled release CBZ and was proven to have better tolerability. This study examines the effect of abruptly changing CBZ to LCM in epilepsy patients with elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). Consenting adult patients aged 18 years old and above, with controlled focal seizure disorder for more than 2 years, who were consistently taking CBZ and who had elevated GGT were included in this study. Out of 1526 patients screened, only 12 satisfied the inclusion criteria. After abruptly changing CBZ to LCM, the GGT level significantly dropped from a median of 141.5 to 63.5 IU/L (z = 3.06, p = 0.0005). Moreover, there was significantly lower proportion of patients with abnormal GGT levels after the switch in medications was done (100% vs. 66.7%, McNemar χ2 = 8, p = 0.008). Moderate to high levels of GGT in patients with focal epilepsy can be decreased by changing CBZ to LCM. Moreover, abruptly changing CBZ to LCM without cross-titration may be safe and effective in preventing seizure incidence within a 1-month period. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Although carbamazepine (CBZ) is the standard drug for focal seizures, its numerous side effects, especially in the liver, limits its use in a lot of patients with epilepsy. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which is elevated in liver disease of whatever cause including intake of CBZ, is associated with increased mortality. In this study, we found that abruptly changing CBZ to Lacosamide (LCM) can significantly decrease the GGT level in 1 month without apparent increase in seizure recurrence and side effects. Therefore, we conclude that high levels of GGT may be decreased by abruptly changing CBZ to LCM.

Intravenous push lacosamide: Successful implementation and patient outcomes across a health system.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Intravenous administration of the antiseizure medication lacosamide can be delayed given operational challenges related to short beyond-use-dating and controlled substance requirements. The purpose of this study was to describe the steps required to successfully transition from intravenous piggyback administration to intravenous push administration and demonstrate that workflow changes improved time to administration without compromising patient safety. METHODS: This multicenter study had 2 components; the first portion was a prospective description of the implementation and operationalization process, while the second was a retrospective cohort analysis comparing patients who received intravenous piggyback and intravenous push lacosamide. After the transition, the default administration route for adult patients for lacosamide doses of 400 mg or less was intravenous push. While the primary objective was to describe the implementation process, secondary objectives included comparison of time to administration and safety, using a composite and incidence of PR prolongation. RESULTS: Success in implementation and operationalization across a large health system was achieved by following a 6-month timeline. A total of 102 patients were included in the cohort study, with 869 individual administrations analyzed (519 intravenous piggyback and 350 intravenous push). Time from verification to administration was significantly decreased when comparing intravenous piggyback (median, 159 minutes) to intravenous push (median, 88 minutes) administrations (P = 0.008). No significant difference was found in the safety composite or PR prolongation. CONCLUSION: Transitioning intravenous lacosamide administration from piggyback to push administration is feasible and decreases time from verification to administration without increased incidence of adverse effects.

Cardiac adverse events associated with lacosamide: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.

Lacosamide was the first approved third-generation antiepileptic drug. However, real-world data regarding its adverse cardiac reactions in large samples still need to be completed. We evaluated the cardiac safety profile of lacosamide using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We performed disproportionality analysis computing reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a quantitative metric to assess the signal of lacosamide-related cardiac adverse events (AEs) from 2013 Q1 to 2022 Q4. The signal was considered significant when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ROR exceeded 1, and ≥ 5 AEs were reported. Serious and nonserious cases were compared by statistical analysis, and signals were further prioritized using a rating scale. A total of 812 cardiac AEs associated with lacosamide were identified, and 92 signals were detected, of which 17 AEs were significantly associated signals. The median time-to-onset (TTO) for moderate priority signals was 10 days, whereas for weak priority signals, it was 54 days. Notably, all cardiac AEs exhibited an early failing pattern, indicating the risk gradually decreasing. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the FAERS database and prioritization of cardiac AE signals, our research enhances the awareness among healthcare professionals regarding cardiac AEs associated with lacosamide.

Arbidol, an antiviral drug, identified as a sodium channel blocker with anticonvulsant activity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sodium channel blockers (SCBs) have traditionally been utilized as anti-seizure medications by primarily targeting the inactivation process. In a drug discovery project aiming at finding potential anticonvulsants, we have identified arbidol, originally an antiviral drug, as a potent SCB. In order to evaluate its anticonvulsant potential, we have thoroughly examined its biophysical properties as well as its effects on animal seizure models. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Patch clamp recording was used to investigate the electrophysiological properties of arbidol, as well as the binding and unbinding kinetics of arbidol, carbamazepine and lacosamide. Furthermore, we evaluated the anticonvulsant effects of arbidol using three different seizure models in male mice. KEY RESULTS: Arbidol effectively suppressed neuronal epileptiform activity by blocking sodium channels. Arbidol demonstrated a distinct mode of action by interacting with both the fast and slow inactivation of Nav1.2 channels compared with carbamazepine and lacosamide. A kinetic study suggested that the binding and unbinding rates might be associated with the specific characteristics of these three drugs. Arbidol targeted the classical binding site of local anaesthetics, effectively inhibited the gain-of-function effects of Nav1.2 epileptic mutations and exhibited varying degrees of anticonvulsant effects in the maximal electroshock model and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol model but had no effect in the pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Arbidol shows promising potential as an anticonvulsant agent, providing a unique mode of action that sets it apart from existing SCBs.

Case Report: Lacosamide unmasking SCN5A-associated Brugada syndrome in a young female with epilepsy.

Background: Lacosamide is frequently used as a mono- or adjunctive therapy for the treatment of adults with epilepsy. Although lacosamide is known to act on both neuronal and cardiac sodium channels, potentially leading to cardiac arrhythmias, including Brugada syndrome (BrS), its adverse effects in individuals with genetic susceptibility are less understood. Case: We report a 33-year-old female with underlying epilepsy who presented to the emergency department with a four-day history of seizure clusters, and was initially treated with lacosamide therapy. During the intravenous lacosamide infusion, the patient developed sudden cardiac arrest caused by ventricular arrhythmias necessitating resuscitation. Of note, the patient had a family history of sudden cardiac death. Workup including routine laboratory results, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram, and coronary angiogram was non-specific. However, a characteristic type 1 Brugada ECG pattern was identified by ajmaline provocation testing; thus, confirming the diagnosis of BrS. Subsequently, the genotypic diagnosis was confirmed by Sanger sequencing, which revealed a heterozygous mutation (c.2893C>T, p.Arg965Cys) in the SCN5A gene. Eventually, the patient underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and was discharged with full neurological recovery. Conclusion: This case highlights a rare but lethal adverse event associated with lacosamide treatment in patients with genetic susceptibility. Further research is warranted to investigate the interactions between lacosamide and SCN5A variants.

Clinical Experience With Lacosamide as an Adjunct Treatment for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) currently approved for the treatment of focal seizures in children aged greater than one month. There are limited data on its efficacy in the neonatal age group. We describe our experience with LCM as an adjunct ASM for the treatment of neonatal seizures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review over a five-year period (2018 to 2022) was conducted at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital to identify neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-proven seizures who were treated with LCM. Data were collected on electroclinical seizure characteristics, underlying etiology, ASMs, treatment response, and any adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 15 neonates with EEG-confirmed seizures who were treated with LCM were included. Ten neonates achieved seizure cessation after LCM was added to their ASM regimen consisting of phenobarbital, levetiracetam, or both. No new treatment-related adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: LCM is effective as an adjunct treatment for neonatal seizures. Randomized controlled studies are needed to establish its effectiveness and adequate dosing regimen in this population.

An update on pharmacotherapy for trigeminal neuralgia.

INTRODUCTION: Trigeminal neuralgia is a rare condition that can be effectively treated by carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine but these older drugs are associated with dose-dependent and potentially treatment-limiting adverse effects. Third-generation anticonvulsants, new calcitonin gene-related peptide blockers for migraine, and older drugs such as ketamine and cannabinoids may be promising adjuvants or monotherapeutic options. AREAS COVERED: The new drugs, their presumed mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy are discussed herein. There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence in support of these drugs for trigeminal neuralgia. New migraine agents are considered as well although migraines and trigeminal neuralgia are distinct, albeit similar, conditions. No new drugs have been released to market in recent years with the specific indication of trigeminal neuralgia. EXPERT OPINION: In real-world clinical practice, about half of trigeminal neuralgia patients take more than one agent for prevention and combination therapy may be the optimal approach. Combination therapy might allow for lower doses of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine, thus reducing the number and severity of potential adverse events but the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions must be considered. Drug therapy for trigeminal neuralgia involves acute or abortive treatments, often administered in hospital versus long-term preventive therapy, usually involving oral agents.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a relatively rare condition that usually affects one side of the face below the eye around the cheekbone. The cause of trigeminal neuralgia is sometimes a damaged nerve or a nerve that has lost part of its outer protective sheath (myelin). However, trigeminal neuralgia may have other neurological causes as well. Pain can be triggered by touch, pressure, or chewing and it tends to occur in very painful brief attacks followed by pauses with little or no pain. There are two types of drug treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: drugs to stop an ongoing attack (which are often administered in an emergency room or hospital intravenously) and drugs that are taken orally over the long term to reduce or prevent attacks.The two most effective drugs for trigeminal neuralgia are carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, which are actually drugs to prevent seizures. They are effective in reducing the pain intensity and number of attacks of trigeminal neuralgia but they have side effects. In fact, these side effects can be so severe that people stop taking the drugs.Many new drugs have come to market recently that may work for trigeminal neuralgia, although none was specifically developed for this use. The newest generation of anti-seizure medications including eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, levetiracetam, and retigabine, may be just as effective as the older carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine drugs with fewer side effects. Clinical studies are needed to test them in trigeminal neuralgia patients but their mechanisms of action suggest that they might work well.There are some new drugs developed for migraine headache that inhibit a substance in the body called CGRP. Migraine headaches and trigeminal neuralgia have some of the same symptoms but they are different conditions but both involve too much CGRP.Other new drugs include lasmiditan, pimozide (used for Tourette syndrome), tizanidine (muscle relaxant), lamotrigine and vixotrigine (anti-seizure drugs) may also be beneficial. It may be that people with trigeminal neuralgia will have to take combination therapy, the use of two or more drugs with different mechanisms of action. Older drugs like ketamine and cannabinoids are also being considered as possible add-on agents for therapy for trigeminal neuralgia.

Effect of locosamide as an add-on therapy in the management of dissociative disorders.

The role of lacosamide (LCM) as add on treatment modality in dissociative disorders (DD) is of interest. It was a randomized control trial in which 300 patients diagnosed with dissociative disorders having treatment for the dissociative disorders were included. They were divided into two groups. Group one consisted of intervention group in which LCM was also administered along with conventional psychiatric medication for different dissociative disorders. Group two consisted of control group where the patients of dissociative disorders were found to have conventional medication. There was analysis of improvements in recovery of symptoms and quality of life. There was statistically significant increase in excellent, very good, good and fair quality of life and decrease in poor and satisfactory quality of life in intervention group after drug intervention. It was observed that symptoms of the patients improved in 50.67% cases in intervention group and 10.67% cases in control group. There was greater improvement in recovery of symptoms and quality of life in patients of DD in which LCM was administered as add on medication.

A case of lacosamide and mirtazapine self-poisoning.

Lacosamide is a relatively new antiepileptic drug that exerts its anticonvulsant effect by selectively inactivating sodium channels. Since its launch, it has been used widely for the treatment of intractable epilepsy, but there are scant data on the toxic or lethal blood concentrations. Here, we report a case of drug poisoning following simultaneous high-dose self-administration of lacosamide and mirtazapine. We developed and validated an approach that uses liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry to determine the concentrations of lacosamide and mirtazapine in cadaveric blood, urine and liver. Calibration curves showed good linearity (r2 > 0.995), and our method enabled repeatable and accurate quantification, with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation not exceeding 10.9 % and 12.8 %, respectively, for each target drug. We used the method to measure the drug concentrations in the blood of a dead victim and found a lacosamide concentration of 91.9 µg/mL and a mirtazapine concentration of 12.0 µg/mL. The blood mirtazapine concentration was in the lethal range, and that of lacosamide was about 10 times the therapeutic range. The synergistically central nervous system depressive and cardiotoxic effects of these drugs may have contributed to the cause of death. We concluded that the cause of death in this case was lacosamide and mirtazapine poisoning.

Effectiveness and safety of Lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy under four years: Results from a prospective cohort study in China.

BACKGROUND: Lacosamide (LCM) has shown promising efficacy and safety outcomes in clinical trials. However, the evidence is limited among pediatric patients especially under four years in real-world. The study investigated the treatment outcomes and safety of LCM in patients under four years based on the data of the epilepsy registry of Children in China. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among patients under 4 years who newly received LCM as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. The treatment outcomes were measured by retention rate of LCM, 50 % response rates and seizure-free rates during follow-up. The retention rate of LCM was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival model. Adverse events were reported as a percentage of all participants. RESULTS: Of 109 participants (mean follow-up: 18.6 months), 59 received LCM as monotherapy and 50 as adjunctive therapy. Sixty patients had focal epilepsy, 44 had generalized epilepsy and 5 had combined generalized and focal epilepsy. 70 % of patients in the monotherapy group and 41 % in the adjunctive therapy group remained on LCM treatment without additional treatments for at least one year. In patients with monotherapy, 50 % response rate and seizure-free rate were 75 % and 56 % at 12 months, respectively. In adjunctive therapy group, these rates were 51 % and 36 %, respectively. Lower baseline seizure frequency in both treatment groups (monotherapy: p < 0.001; adjunctive therapy: p = 0.02) and younger age groups within the monotherapy group (P = 0.04) correlated with a higher LCM retention rate. Adverse events were reported by 15 patients (13.8 %), with somnolence being the most common (7 of 15 patients). CONCLUSION: With a comprehensive information and high-quality of data, the study demonstrates the effective treatment outcome and safety of LCM. The study adds reliable evidence to exiting real-word evidence of LCM in the specific age group of patients with epilepsy to fill the evidence gap.

Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on Safety and Electroencephalographic Response to Lacosamide for Neonatal Seizures.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in older children. However, minimal data are available for neonates. We aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with lacosamide use and explore the electroencephalographic seizure response to lacosamide in neonates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven pediatric hospitals from January 2009 to February 2020. For safety outcomes, neonates were followed for ≤30 days from index date. Electroencephalographic response of lacosamide was evaluated based on electroencephalographic reports for ≤3 days. RESULTS: Among 47 neonates, 98% received the first lacosamide dose in the intensive care units. During the median follow-up of 12 days, 19% of neonates died, and the crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-days (95% confidence interval) of the adverse events by diagnostic categories ranged from 2.8 (0.3, 10.2) for blood or lymphatic system disorders and nervous system disorders to 10.5 (4.2, 21.6) for cardiac disorders. Electroencephalographic seizures were observed in 31 of 34 patients with available electroencephalographic data on the index date. There was seizure improvement in 29% of neonates on day 1 and also in 29% of neonates on day 2. On day 3, there was no change in 50% of neonates and unknown change in 50% of neonates. CONCLUSIONS: The results are reassuring regarding the safety of lacosamide in neonates. Although some neonates had fewer seizures after lacosamide administration, the lack of a comparator arm and reliance on qualitative statements in electroencephalographic reports limit the preliminary efficacy results.

The effect of lacosamide on calcitonin gene-related peptide serum level in episodic migraine patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Migraine affects 11-15% of people worldwide, and the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is released during the migraine attack, producing pulsating pain of migraine. Also, lacosamide reacts with collapsin-response mediator protein 2, preventing its phosphorylation and leading to the inhibition of CGRP release in the trigeminal system. OBJECTIVE: The primary outcome was the difference in the serum level of CGRP-LI after three months of treatment with either lacosamide and ibuprofen or ibuprofen alone in episodic migraine patients. The secondary outcomes were assessing safety and efficacy of lacosamide in episodic migraine patients. METHODS: We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial on episodic migraine patients aged 10-55 years diagnosed according to (ICHD-3) in Kafr El-Sheikh University Hospital, Egypt. We assessed serum levels of CGRP-LI before and three months after treatment in our two groups, the lacosamide, and the control groups. We also assessed the side effects of treatment in each group, the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the migraine monthly days (MMD) frequency and the percentage of patients who achieved pain freedom within 2 h in ≥ 4 of 5 attacks in each group. RESULTS: 200 episodic migraine patients completed the study. There was a statistically significantly higher reduction in the serum CGRP-LI level in the lacosamide group compared with the control group. In addition, lacosamide was well tolerated by patients. Also, the lacosamide group had statistically significant higher percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the migraine monthly days (MMD) frequency and pain freedom within two hours in ≥ 4 of 5 attacks with P-values 0.002, 0.02 respectively. CONCLUSION: The daily use of lacosamide 50 mg Bid for three months in episodic migraine patients was associated with a significant reduction in serum CGRP-LI, better clinical outcomes regarding frequency and duration of migraine attacks, and was well tolerated by patients. These results were derived from an open-label pilot study that needed to be thoroughly investigated by a large-scale, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. TRIAL REGISTRATION:  We registered our trial on ClinicalTrials.gov, named after "The Lacosamide's Effect on Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide in Migraine Patients," and with a clinical trial number (NCT05632133)-August 8, 2023.

Lacosamide extended-release capsules are bioequivalent to lacosamide immediate-release tablets: Pharmacokinetic observations and simulations.

OBJECTIVES: Assess the bioequivalence of lacosamide extended-release (XR) capsules and immediate-release (IR) tablets and answer real-world clinical questions regarding the use of lacosamide XR. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, oral comparative bioavailability study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two lacosamide formulations. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive lacosamide XR capsules (400 mg once-daily) or IR tablets (200 mg twice-daily) in 1 of 2 sequences over 7-day periods. Primary outcome was the area under the lacosamide concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady-state (AUC0-τ,ss). Secondary outcomes were maximum (Cmax,ss) and minimum concentrations at steady-state (Cmin,ss). Bioequivalence was established when 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square means ratios (GLSMs) were between 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) and other safety outcomes were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic simulations, including adherent and partially adherent dosing scenarios with XR and IR formulations, modeled the clinical use of lacosamide XR. RESULTS: Thirty-five healthy adult males were enrolled in the bioequivalence study. After 7 days of study drug, mean AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss, and Cmin,ss values were similar between XR and IR formulations; all 90% CIs for GLSMs were between 80% and 125%. AEs were mild and no serious AEs or other clinically significant safety findings were observed. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that partial adherence affected formulations similarly; and the best strategy for switching formulations was to take the morning lacosamide IR dose followed by the evening lacosamide XR dose, as this resulted in the most consistent lacosamide plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily lacosamide XR capsules were bioequivalent to twice-daily lacosamide IR tablets. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated lacosamide XR and IR formulations were similarly affected by partial adherence, though once-daily dosing with lacosamide XR may offer clinical advantages, and formulations can be easily switched. These results support the use of lacosamide XR capsules as a once-daily alternative to lacosamide IR tablets.

The efficacy and safety of novel antiepileptic drugs in treatment of epilepsy of patients with brain tumors.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in treating epilepsy in patients with brain tumors (BTRE). Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023, with English language restriction. Results: In this meta-analysis, 18 clinical trials involving 755 BTRE patients were included to assess the efficacy and safety of novel AEDs in BTRE treatment. At the last follow-up, a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was experienced by 72% of patients (random-effects model, 95% CI = 0.64-0.78) using novel AEDs. At the last follow-up, seizure freedom was experienced by 34% of patients (random-effects model, 95% CI = 0.28-0.41) using novel AEDs. The pooled incidence of AEs was found to be 19% (95% CI: 13%-26%), with a withdrawal rate due to adverse effects of only 3%. Comparable efficacy and incidence of adverse effects were observed between lacosamide and perampanel. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that novel antiepileptic drugs are deemed effective for seizure control in brain tumor patients, particularly when used as adjunctive therapy. Although lacosamide and perampanel received more focus in studies, no significant difference was observed in the efficacy and adverse reactions of these two drugs in seizure control. Further randomized controlled trials are deemed necessary to validate our findings.