Unusual left colon displacement and clockwise torsion in a 10-month-old Arab filly: A case report.

In this case report, we present an unusual clockwise torsion of left colon around mesenteric root in a 10-month-old Arab filly, highlighting the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach and successful surgical intervention. A 10-month-old Arab filly weighing approximately 250 kg was referred with signs of acute abdominal pain. The history revealed anorexia, restlessness and severe abdominal pain that had begun the previous day. The local practitioner had previously administered flunixin meglumine, an analgesic, but it proved ineffective in relieving the pain. Upon physical examination, the filly exhibited sweating, a body temperature of 38.5°C, tachycardia (65 beats per minute) and tachypnea (25 breaths per minute). Due to the severity of the colic and the lack of response to the conservative treatments, surgical intervention was deemed necessary. An exploratory midline celiotomy was performed to evaluate the abdominal organs. During the examination, no obvious primary lesions were identified in the evaluated organs. However, a restriction in exteriorizing the left colon's length was observed. Further examination revealed an unusual clockwise torsion of the left colon that displaced in left to the right side around the mesenteric root; thereby, pelvic flexure was located in the normal anatomical position with a short length. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of clockwise torsion and an atypical displacement of the left colon in horses. The surgical correction of the displacement was successfully performed. The filly showed improvement post-surgery and did not exhibit any complications during the recovery period.

Single-cell transcriptomics reveals stage- and side-specificity of gene modules in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: An understanding of mechanisms underlying colorectal cancer (CRC) development and progression is yet to be fully elucidated. This study aims to employ network theoretic approaches to analyse single cell transcriptomic data from CRC to better characterize its progression and sided-ness. METHODS: We utilized a recently published single-cell RNA sequencing data (GEO-GSE178341) and parsed the cell X gene data by stage and side (right and left colon). Using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), we identified gene modules with varying preservation levels (weak or strong) of network topology between early (pT1) and late stages (pT234), and between right and left colons. Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) was used to assess the similarity or dissimilarity in gene connectivity. RESULTS: Equalizing cell counts across different stages, we detected 13 modules for the early stage, two of which were non-preserved in late stages. Both non-preserved modules displayed distinct gene connectivity patterns between the early and late stages, characterized by low ρ values. One module predominately dealt with myeloid cells, with genes mostly enriched for cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction potentiallystimulating myeloid cells to participate in angiogenesis. The second module, representing a subset of epithelial cells, was mainly enriched for carbohydrate digestion and absorption, influencing the gut microenvironment through the breakdown of carbohydrates. In the comparison of left vs. right colons, two of 12 modules identified in the right colon were non-preserved in the left colon. One captured a small fraction of epithelial cells and was enriched for transcriptional misregulation in cancer, potentially impacting communication between epithelial cells and the tumor microenvironment. The other predominantly contained B cells with a crucial role in maintaining human gastrointestinal health and was enriched for B-cell receptor signalling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: We identified modules with topological and functional differences specific to cell types between the early and late stages, and between the right and left colons. This study enhances the understanding of roles played by different cell types at different stages and sides, providing valuable insights for future studies focused on the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

Our Experience With Left Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery and the Impact of Preoperative Sarcopenia on Complication Rates.

BACKGROUND: Evidence about the importance of sarcopenia in patients operated on for gastrointestinal cancers and that it may have both early and long-term impacts is expanding. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia on the outcomes of the patients we operated on for left colon and rectum cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the electronic records of 38 patients operated on for left colon and rectal cancer between 2010 and 2020, and demographic variables, clinical stages, laboratory tests, body mass index (BMI), psoas muscle index (PMI), pathological stages, and Dindo Clavien complication scores were interpreted. We also assigned our patients into two groups according to their preoperative PMI values. We compared the first group of 12 patients with preoperative sarcopenia with the second group of 26 patients without preoperative sarcopenia. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients who underwent curative surgery for left colon and rectal cancer, 20 were female and 18 were male. The median age of the group was 59.9 years. The most common tumour localization was in the rectosigmoid region in 17 patients, and the tumour in 6 patients was in the left colon. Therapy had been initiated with neoadjuvant treatment in 19 patients. At the preoperative evaluation, sarcopenia was present in 12 patients. Thirty-four patients underwent robot-assisted surgery. Postoperative pathologies were reported as stage 3 in 15 patients. Complications were reported in 17 patients, and nine were minor (Dindo-Clavien score < 3), but in eight patients, they were moderate to severe (Dindo-Clavien score ≥ 3). When the first group, 12 patients with preoperative sarcopenia, and the second group, 26 patients without preoperative sarcopenia, were compared, the patients with sarcopenia were found to be older (p=0.001), and male patients were in the majority (p=0.017). The postoperative follow-up of 12 patients with preoperative sarcopenia revealed that 7 (58.8%) had complications. Complications were observed in 10 (38.4%) patients in the second group. When the two groups were compared, the risk of developing complications was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group (p=0.016). Only one patient in the first group had moderate to severe complications, but seven patients without sarcopenia had moderate to severe complications. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that many patients we have operated on for left colon and rectal cancer have preoperative sarcopenia for which we should care. The sarcopenia rate was higher in males and elderly patients, and the risk of overall postoperative complications increased significantly in patients with preoperative sarcopenia. In consequence, the results of our study provide evidence that preoperative sarcopenia status is an important parameter to determine the risk status of the patient, and patients with preoperative sarcopenia should be monitored more closely. Thus, we may be able to diagnose and intervene early in the complications.

Differences Between Right and Left Colon Cancer in Beira Interior.

Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in Portugal and worldwide, with a high mortality rate, especially in more advanced stages. In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in the distinction between right colorectal carcinoma (RCC) and left colorectal carcinoma (LCC) due to the different presentation, treatment, and prognosis. Studies show that RCC and LCC have different clinical and biological characteristics, being considered two distinct entities. Material and methods This cross-sectional, descriptive, and comparative retrospective study included data collection at the three hospitals of Beira Interior - Centro Hospitalar Cova de Beira, Hospital Amato Lusitano, and Hospital Sousa Martins - over a 6-year period. Results The proportion of RCC cases was higher. The proportion of women was higher in the RCC group compared to the LCC (46.2%, 121/262 vs. 39%, 76/195). Anemia was statistically higher in the RCC group (p <0.01). On the other hand, intestinal occlusion tends to appear in patients with LCC (p <0.001). The most frequent surgery was elective. The proportion of emergency surgery was higher in the LCC group (LCC vs RCC: 27.2% vs 18.3%; p = 0.03). Discussion and conclusion In both the RCC and LCC groups, the male sex is the most frequently observed in Beira Interior and in Portugal, opposite from the world population, in which the female sex predominates in patients with RCC. The RCC presents alterations in bowel habits more often (p> 0.05). On the other hand, anemia is more common in RCC and intestinal occlusion in LCC, following the current literature. Conducting targeted studies and optimizing the screening and treatment processes are key to reducing mortality associated with CRC.

Laparoscopic and robotic intracorporeal resection and end-to-end anastomosis in left colectomy: a prospective cohort study - stage 2a IDEAL framework for evaluating surgical innovation.

PURPOSE: To analyze the safety and feasibility of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in upper rectum, sigmoid, and left colon surgery, via both laparoscopic and robotic approaches. The secondary aim was to assess possible short-term differences between laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study according to IDEAL framework exploration and assessment stage (Development, stage 2a), evaluating and comparing the laparoscopic approach and the robotic approach in left colon, sigmoid, and upper rectum surgery with intracorporeal resection and end-to-end anastomosis. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and postoperative variables of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery are described and compared according to the surgical technique used. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and March 2022, seventy-nine patients were consecutively included in the study, 41 operated via laparoscopy (laparoscopic left colectomy: LLC) and 38 by robotic surgery (robotic left colectomy: RLC). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic variables. In surgical variables, the median surgical times differed significantly: 198 min (SD 48 min) for LLC vs. 246 min (SD 72 min) for RLC (p = 0.01, 95% CI: - 75.2 to - 20.5)). The only significant difference regarding postoperative complications was a higher degree of relevant morbidity in the LLC (Clavien-Dindo > II (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.03) and Comprehensive Complication Index (IQR 22 vs. IQR 0, p = 0.03). The pathological results were similar in both approaches. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and robotic intracorporeal resection and anastomosis are feasible and safe, and obtain similar surgical, postoperative, and pathological results than described in literature. However, morbidity seems to be higher in LLC group with fewer relevant postoperative complications. The results of this study enable us to proceed to stage 2b of the IDEAL framework. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The study is registered in Clinical trials with the registration code NCT0445693.

Is serum thymidine kinase 1 a prognostic biomarker in primary tumor location of colorectal carcinomas?

AIM: To assess whether serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1p), CEA and CA19.9 can be used as prognostic biomarkers in the primary tumor location (PTL) of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Additional clinical factors of TNM stage, pathological grade, age and sex were also included. METHODS: STK1p was determined by an ECL-dot-blot assay, and CEA/CA19.9 was determined by an automatic electrochemiluminescence analyzer in a retrospective presurgery of right-colon carcinoma (R-CC, n = 90), left-colon carcinoma (L-CC, n = 128) and rectal carcinoma (RC, n = 270). Prognostic factors were evaluated by COX and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The multivariate-COX and OS in relation to the prognostic factors of PTL in CRC were different and complex. An elevated STK1p value was significantly associated with poor OS in RC (P = 0.002) and L-CC (P = 0.037) but not in R-CC (P > 0.05). Elevated CEA (P≈.000) and CA19.9 (P≈.000) were significantly associated with poor OS in RC but not in L-CC and R-CC. Multivariate-COX showed that STK1p (P = 0.02, HR = 1.779, 95%CI 1.30-7.582), CEA (P = 0.001, HR = 2.052, 95%CI 1.320-3.189), CA19.9 (P≈.000, HR = 2.574, 95%CI 1.592-4.162) and TNM-stage (P≈.000, HR = 2.368, 95%CI 1.518-3.694) were independent prognostic factors in RC, while TNM-stage was an independent prognostic factor only in R-CC (P = 0.011, HR = 3.139, 95% CI 1.30-7.582) and L-CC (P≈.000, HR = 4.168, 95%CI 1.980-8.852). Moreover, elevated STK1p was significantly more sensitive (P < .001) for predicting mortality than CEA and CA19.9. No correlation was found between STK1p, CEA or AFP. CONCLUSION: Combining TNM stage and suitable biomarkers, STK1p provides further reliable information on the survival of PTL of CRC.

Bilious Emesis and Failure to Pass Meconium in the Nursery: A Case Study.

We present a case of an infant born to a mother with COVID-19, who at 24 hours of life was treated with a glycerin suppository for failure to pass meconium and went on to develop bilious emesis and abdominal distention as feeding continued over the next several hours. After a barium enema identified the distal obstruction, the pediatric surgical team used rectal irrigation to remove a large meconium plug, which mimicked the appearance of the descending colon on plain film, in a case of small left colon syndrome. Although intestinal obstruction in the newborn is rare, it is imperative that it is promptly diagnosed and treated appropriately to avoid negative outcomes; which, even in perhaps the mildest form of functional distal obstruction, meconium plug syndrome, can lead to an impressive clinical illness with risk of intestinal perforation and subsequent meconium peritonitis if the obstruction is not relieved.

Short- and long-term outcomes of subtotal/total colectomy in the management of obstructive left colon cancer.

PURPOSE: Surgical management of obstructive left colon cancer (OLCC) is still a matter of debate. The classic Hartmann procedure (HP) has a disadvantage that requires a second major operation. Subtotal colectomy/total abdominal colectomy (STC/TC) with ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis is proposed as an alternative procedure to avoid stoma and anastomotic leakage. However, doubts about morbidity and functional outcome and lack of long-term outcomes have made surgeons hesitate to perform this procedure. Therefore, this trial was designed to provide data for morbidity, functional outcomes, and long-term outcomes of STC/TC. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of OLCC that were treated by STC/TC between January 2000 and November 2020 at a single tertiary referral center. Perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes of STC/TC were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-five descending colon cancer (45.5%) and 30 sigmoid colon cancer cases (54.5%) were enrolled in this study. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients. The majority complication was postoperative ileus (10 of 12). Anastomotic leakage and perioperative mortality were not observed. At 6 to 12 weeks after the surgery, the median frequency of defecation was twice per day (interquartile range, 1-3 times per day). Eight patients (14.5%) required medication during this period, but only 3 of 8 patients required medication after 1 year. The 3-year disease-free survival was 72.7% and 3-year overall survival was 86.7%. CONCLUSION: The risk of anastomotic leakage is low after STC/TC. Functional and long-term outcomes are also acceptable. Therefore, STC/TC for OLCC is a safe, 1-stage procedure that does not require diverting stoma.

Laparoscopic Welti's Maneuver: A Single-Center Experience.

Purpose: Left hemicolectomy is the standard surgical operation for a variety of colonic diseases, both benign and malignant. When colonic resection is extended, relocation of the small bowel loops can be difficult. Several techniques have been described to reposition the small intestine. Welti's technique consists in the passage of the entire small bowel to the left side of the abdomen, below the descending colon that is positioned on the right side. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 23 patients who underwent extended left hemicolectomy and reconstruction according to the Welti's technique at our hospital. We assessed the recovery of intestinal function and the length of hospital stay; in the mid-term follow-up we searched for episodes of acute or chronic intestinal obstruction. Results: Median operative time was 215 minutes; median resumption of gas and stool emission were, respectively, 3 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-6) and 4 days (IQR: 2-9) after surgery. Median hospital stay was 8 (IQR: 5-37) day. After a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR: 3-132) we did not observe any episode of acute or chronic bowel obstruction. Conclusions: Welti's technique is safe and does not cause a delay in resumption of bowel functions or a delayed hospital discharge; it is a useful technique that the colorectal surgeon can use when needed.

A novel knotless hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis using V-loc barbed suture vs. stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic left colonic surgery: A propensity scoring match analysis.

Background: Laparoscopic colectomy is widely practiced for colon cancer, but many variations exist for anastomosis after laparoscopic colon cancer radical resection. Method: We retrospectively analyzed 226 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection for left colon cancer with knotless hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis (KHEA) technique with barbed V-loc™ suture material and compared perioperative outcomes, safety, and efficacy to those undergoing stapled anastomosis from 2010 to 2021. Results: After the 1:2 propensity score matching, 123 participants with similar preoperative characteristics (age, body mass index, TNM stage, and tumor location) were enrolled in the study: 41 in the KHEA and 82 in the stapler group. Statistically significant differences were found in time to accomplish the anastomosis (mean 7.9 vs. 11.9 min, p < 0.001) and hospital costs (mean 46,569.71 vs. 50,915.35 CNY, p < 0.05) that differed between the KHEA and stapler group, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found in the mean delay to bowel function recovery (2.6 vs. 2.7 days, p = 0.466), duration of hospital stay (8.6 vs. 7.9 days, p = 0.407), or rate of postoperative complications (14.6% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.563). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 11 patients: 5 (12.2%) vs. 6 (7.3%) (p > 0.05) in the KHEA and stapler group, respectively. Conclusion: KHEA is feasible and safe for anastomosis after laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. The KHEA technique could reduce operation time and hospital costs with complication rates comparable to stapling.

Conversion Strategy in Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Unresectable Liver-Limited Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients frequently develop liver metastases. Different treatment strategies are available according to the timing of appearance, the burden of metastatic disease, and the performance status of the patient. Systemic treatment (ST) represents the cornerstone of metastatic disease management. However, in select cases, combined ST and surgical resection can lead to remarkable survival outcomes. In the present multicentric cohort study, we explored the efficacy of a conversion strategy in a selected population of left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type CRC patients with liver-limited metastatic disease. Methods: The primary endpoint was to compare survival outcomes of patients undergoing ST not leading to surgery, liver resection after conversion ST, and hepatic resection with perioperative ST. Furthermore, we explored survival outcomes depending on whether the case was discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Results: Between 2012 and 2020, data from 690 patients respecting the inclusion criteria were collected. Among these, 272 patients were deemed eligible for the analysis. The conversion rate was 24.1% of cases. Fifty-six (20.6%) patients undergoing surgical resection after induction treatment (i.e., ultimately resectable) had a significant survival advantage compared to those receiving systemic treatment not leading to surgery (176 pts, 64.7%) (5-year OS 60.8% and 11.7%, respectively, Log Rank test p < 0.001; HR = 0.273; 95% CI: 0.16−0.46; p < 0.001; 5-year PFS 22.2% and 6.3%, respectively, Log Rank test p < 0.001; HR = 0.447; 95% CI: 0.32−0.63; p < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between ultimately resectable patients and those who had liver resection with perioperative systemic treatment (potentially resectable­40 pts) (5-year OS 71.1%, Log Rank test p = 0.311. HR = 0.671; 95% CI: 0.31−1.46; p = 0.314; 5-year PFS 25.7%, Log Rank test p = 0.305. HR = 0.782; 95% CI: 0.49−1.25; p = 0.306). Conclusions: In our selected population of left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer patients with liver-limited disease, a conversion strategy was confirmed to provide a survival benefit. Patients not deemed surgical candidates at the time of diagnosis and patients judged resectable with perioperative systemic treatment have similar survival outcomes.

The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery (LCA) preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE).

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has the advantages of less postoperative pain, fast bowel function recovery, reduced hospital stay and better cosmetic effects. In our centre, anterior resection of rectal cancer with preservation of the left colonic artery (LCA) was performed using NOSES. The feasibility, safety and short-term clinical efficacy of the technique were discussed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer with left colonic artery preservation and natural orifice specimen extraction in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital from September 2018 to December 2019. General information about the patients, perioperative data and short-term postoperative results were analysed. RESULTS: All operations were completed smoothly, with an average operation duration of 304.36 ± 45.04 min, intraoperative bleeding of 76.31 ± 61.12 ml, first time off bed of 14.42 ± 3.56 h, first time to anus exhaust of 15.26 ± 8.92 h, first time to liquid diet of 2.94 ± 1.12 days, and average postoperative stay of 10.21 ± 3.13 days. Two patients developed temporary intestinal obstruction, and one patient developed pulmonary infection. All of them recovered well after active supportive treatment and were successfully discharged. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic NOSES for rectal cancer with left colon artery preservation is safe and feasible, with satisfactory short-term results, and is worthy of further clinical investigation.

Minimal invasive surgery for left colectomy adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic: laparoscopic intracorporeal resection and anastomosis, a 'don't touch the bowel' technique.

AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced surgeons to adapt their standard procedures. The modifications introduced are designed to favour minimally invasive surgery. The positive results obtained with intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in the right colon and rectum prompt us to adapt these procedures to the left colon. We describe a 'don't touch the bowel' technique and outline the benefits to patients of the use of less surgically aggressive techniques and also to surgeons in terms of the lower emission of aerosols that might transmit the COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This was an observational study of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in left colectomy. We describe the technical details of intracorporeal resection, end-to-end stapled anastomosis and extraction of the specimen through mini-laparotomy in the ideal location. RESULTS: We present preliminary results of 17 patients with left-sided colonic pathologies, 15 neoplasia and two diverticular disease, who underwent four left hemicolectomies, six sigmoidectomies and seven high anterior resections. Median operating time was 186 min (range 120-280). No patient required conversion to extracorporeal laparoscopy or open surgery. Median hospital stay was 4.7 days (range 3-12 days). There was one case of anastomotic leak managed with conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Intracorporeal resection and end-to-end anastomosis with the possibility of extraction of the specimen by a mini-laparotomy in the ideal location may present benefits and also adapts well to the conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Future comparative studies are needed to demonstrate these benefits with respect to extracorporeal anastomosis.

Pre-, Peri-, and Postoperative Intravenous Ropivacaine versus that of Lidocaine for Analgesia after Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery of Left Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSES: Pre-, peri-, and postoperative intravenous lidocaine are reported effective in the management of postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery but until the time, that of ropivacaine is not tested for the same. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-, peri-, and postoperative intravenous ropivacaine against that of lidocaine on the postoperative pain, bowel function recoveries, and hospital stays in patients who underwent surgery of left colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data regarding total doses of fentanyl required, bowel function recoveries, surgical-related complications, and hospital stays of 367 patients who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery of left colon cancer were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients received pre-, peri-, and postoperative intravenous normal saline (NS cohort, n = 104), or that of lidocaine (LC cohort, n = 145), or that of ropivacaine (RC cohort, n = 118). RESULTS: Fewer dose of fentanyl was required in patients of RC cohort than those of NS (9 doses/patient vs. 11 doses/patient, p < .0001, q = 27.445) and LC (9 doses/patient vs. 10 doses/patient, p < .0001, q = 9.911) cohorts. Patients of the RC cohort had less time to first drink, first bowel movement, full diet, and hospital stay than those of NS and LC cohorts (p < .05 and q > 3.329 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-, peri-, and postoperative intravenous ropivacaine are safe and effective than that of normal saline or lidocaine in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery of left colon cancer.

Effect of primary colorectal cancer tumor location on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Although colorectal cancer bowel segment location has been shown to independently predict the outcomes in early stage disease, it has not been previously studied in the setting of pulmonary metastases. We sought to determine whether colorectal cancer location affects survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. METHODS: Patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer at a single institution from 2011 to 2018 were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall survival and disease-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to determine differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were evaluated. The median follow-up, survival time, and 5-year survival rate were 36.8 months, 75.8 months, and 57%, respectively, and 122 patients (63%) had experienced disease recurrence at any location. On univariable analysis, age, primary tumor location, pulmonary nodule size, ≥3 pulmonary nodules, and intrathoracic nodal disease were associated with overall survival. On multivariable analysis, patients with left-sided tumors experienced a survival benefit (hazard ratio, 0.31; P = .036). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median survival time of 90 months (95% confidence interval, 82 months to not reached) compared with 55 months (95% confidence interval, 49 months to not reached) for patients with left-sided and rectal tumors, respectively, after metastasectomy (P = .078). Location was not associated with disease-free survival on Cox multivariable regression. CONCLUSIONS: We found that left-sided colorectal cancer is associated with prolonged survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. Future investigations are required to determine the validity of such findings, including the effect of location in the prognostication for patients who are candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Redefining the collateral system between the superior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric artery: a novel classification.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the arterial collateral vasculature between the superior mesenteric artery and the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) from a surgical perspective. METHOD: A total of 107 fresh adult cadavers (94 male) were studied with emphasis on the vascular anatomy of the left colon. Dissections were carried out mimicking the anterior resection technique. The vasculature of the left mesocolon and the collaterals between the superior mesenteric artery and the IMA with respect to their relationship to the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) were assessed and classified. Collaterals were classified into three different groups: marginal anastomoses (via the marginal = pericolic artery), intermediate mesocolic anastomoses (parallel to the marginal artery but neither adjacent to the IMV nor close to the duodenum) and central mesocolic anastomoses (next to the IMV at the level of the duodenojejunal junction and the lower border of the pancreas). RESULTS: All patients had a marginal anastomosis. However, the marginal anastomosis, as the only anastomosis between the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries at the splenic flexure, was observed in 41 cases (38%). In addition to the marginal artery, intermediate mesocolic anastomoses were found in 49 (46%) and a central mesocolic anastomosis was observed in 17 (16%) of the 107 cases in the splenic flexure mesocolon. It is in this latter variant that collateral vessels can be compromised during ligation/transection of the IMV. CONCLUSION: This new classification can contribute to a precise mesocolic dissection technique and splenic flexure mobilization and help prevent ischaemic damage to the descending colon.

Current management of acute left colon diverticulitis: What have Italian surgeons learned after the IPOD study?

The acute left diverticulitis is a common problem encountered by surgeons in the acute setting. Some years ago, the Italian Prospective Observational Diverticulitis (IPOD) study showed several disputes in managing acute left colon diverticulitis in Italian surgical department. The aim of this study is to check the compliance of Italian surgeons with clinical evidence-based guidelines in non-university hospitals. A 21 multiple-choice questions survey was sent to the Italian Society of Hospital Surgeons (ACOI) mailing list members, from the 1st April 2019 to 6th June 2019. One hundred and seventy-four Italian general surgeons (the ACOI collaborative diverticulitis group) joined the project and answered to the survey. The response rate was 7% (174/2500 ACOI members). Despite current international guidelines about the management of acute diverticulitis, several controversies have emerged from the analysis of this survey in the clinical practice of Italian surgeons, resulting from their low compliance with evidence-based recommendations.

Colon sparing resection versus extended colectomy for left-sided obstructing colon cancer with caecal ischaemia or perforation: a nationwide study from the French Surgical Association.

AIM: It is not known whether patients with obstructive left colon cancer (OLCC) with caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation (defined as a blowout of the caecal wall related to colonic overdistension) should undergo a (sub)total colectomy (STC) or an ileo-caecal resection with double-barrelled ileo-colostomy. We aimed to compare the results of these two strategies. METHOD: From 2000 to 2015, 1220 patients with OLCC underwent surgery by clinicians who were members of the French Surgical Association. Of these cases, 201 (16%) were found to have caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation intra-operatively: 174 patients (87%) underwent a STC (extended colectomy group) and 27 (13%) an ileo-caecal resection with double-end stoma (colon-sparing group). Outcomes were compared retrospectively. RESULTS: In the extended colectomy group, 95 patients (55%) had primary anastomosis and 79 (45%) had a STC with an end ileostomy. In the colon-sparing group, 10 patients (37%) had simultaneous resection of their primary tumour with segmental colectomy and an anastomosis which was protected by a double-barrelled ileo-colostomy. The demographic data for the two groups were comparable. Median operative time was longer in the STC group (P = 0.0044). There was a decrease in postoperative mortality (7% vs 12%, P = 0.75) and overall morbidity (56% vs 67%, P = 0.37) including surgical (30% vs 40%, P = 0.29) and severe complications (17% vs 27%, P = 0.29) in the colon-sparing group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Cumulative morbidity included all surgical stages and the rate of permanent stoma was 66% and 37%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. Overall survival and disease-free survival were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The colon-sparing strategy may represent a valid and safe alternative to STC in OLCC patients with caecal ischaemia or diastatic perforation.

Plasma protein expression differs between colorectal cancer patients depending on primary tumor location.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) includes tumors in the right colon, left colon, and rectum, although they differ significantly from each other in aspects such as prognosis and treatment. Few previous mass spectrometry-based studies have analyzed differences in protein expression depending on the tumor location. In this study, we have used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to analyze plasma samples from 83 CRC patients to study if differences in plasma protein expression can be seen depending on primary tumor location (right colon, left colon, or rectum). Differences were studied between the groups both regardless of and according to tumor stage (II or III). Large differences in plasma protein expression were seen, and we found that plasma samples from patients with rectal cancer separated from samples from patients with colon cancer when analyzed by principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. Samples from patients with cancer in the right and left colon also tended to separate from each other. Pathway analysis discovered canonical pathways involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation to be enriched. This study will help to further define CRC as distinct entities depending on tumor location, as shown by the widespread differences in plasma protein profile and dysregulated pathways.

Left colon as a novel high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence of stage II colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether stage II colon and rectal cancer have the same risk factors for recurrence. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 990 patients who had undergone radical surgery for stage II colorectal cancer. Patients' pathological features and characteristics including age, sex, family history, body mass index, tumor diameter, gross type of tumor, infiltration degree (T3/T4), tumor grade, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, pathologic examination of lymph node number, and preoperative carcinoembryonic assay (CEA) level was compared between patients with and without recurrence. Finally, the prediction of the left and right colons was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean ages of the colon cancer and rectal cancer patients were 69.5 years and 66.4 years, respectively. In total, 508 (82.1%) and 285 (76.8%) patients were treated laparoscopically for colon cancer and rectal cancer, respectively, with median follow-up periods of 42.2 months and 41.8 months, respectively. Forty-four recurrences occurred in both the colon cancer (7.1%) and rectal cancer (11.9%) groups. The preoperative serum CEA level and T4 infiltration were significantly higher in recurrent colorectal cancer patients. The postoperative recurrence rate of left colon cancer (descending colon, sigmoid colon) was higher than that of right colon cancer (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon) (OR 2.191, 95% CI 1.091-4.400, P = 0.027). In COX survival factor analysis of colon cancer, the left colon is one of the independent risk factors (risk ratio 5.377, 95% CI 0.216-0.88, P = 0.02). In disease-free survival (DFS), the left colon has a relatively poor prognosis (P = 0.05). However, in the COX analysis and prognosis analysis of OS, no difference was found between the left colon and the right colon. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CEA and depth of infiltration (T4) are high-risk factors associated with recurrence and are prognostic factors in stage II colorectal cancer. Left colon is also a risk factor for postoperative recurrence of stage II colon cancer.